I don't think so. Johnson played SLB a number of times in 2006 and did well. He'll draw a bunch of coverage responsibility on Todd Heap this week so he should still be a good LB3 play.
This HAS to hurt Landon Johnson's value to some degree, going from Weakside to Strongside in a 4-3? The question is, how much does it help Caleb Miller's value?
Apologies. Looks like I projected Johnson's solid on-field to play to the boxscore. Thought I had remembered him finishing more plays than the stats suggest, but there's a 2 ppg difference as seen below. It helps Miller's value a lot -- he'll go from only playing in the nickel to becoming the Bengals' second every down backer. I'm not sure it'll give him as much value as he had last year in the middle, but he'll be a good option -- should be around Johnson's 2006 stats depending on how well Brooks plays.Johnson as SLB in 2006
1 CIN KC 5 0 0 0 1 0 1 8
4 CIN NE 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 3
6 CIN TB 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 9.5
7 CIN CAR 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 4
8 CIN ATL 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 4.5
20 solos/12 assists >>> 5.8 avg ppg FBG scoring
Johnson when Jeanty played SLB
2 CIN CLE 2 2 0 0 0 1 2 9
3 CIN PIT 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 8.5
9 CIN BAL 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 8
10 CIN SD 7 2 0 1 0 0 0 10
11 CIN NO 8 4 0 0 0 0 1 11
12 CIN CLE 5 1 1 1 0 0 0 10.5
13 CIN BAL 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 4.5
14 CIN OAK 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 3.5
15 CIN IND 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 4.5
16 CIN DEN 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 8.5
17 CIN PIT 5 2 0 1 0 0 1 9
56 solos/22 assists >>> 7.9 avg ppg FBG scoring