That's a shame. Won't be many folks there to watch them what with the game being in Seattle and all.A lot of passing downs coming up this weekend in Det
It actually is exactly the same. Big plays took his average 5 tackle (7.5 points) to a 20 point week, since no LB is averaging 20 points per week in any league I am in and his ONLY other start was a 30+ point game I would say in games in which he starts he has produced at a VERY high level and if it takes 15 tackles or 2 sacks, I could care less, he is averaging 25+ points per start. Do I think he keeps that production? Probably not, I am not getting all crazy and comparing him to PW yet, but I also can't ignore the actual facts.it's actually not the same, but I'm open to more analogies if you want to try another one.How can you say "but what if" about sacks? That is like saying if you take away all those "lucky" long touchdown runs by Chris Johnson, he is average.
he's been better than fletcher this year hasn't he?Hate to bring this up again but what is his value in keeper league? How do I not find room to keep this guy regardless of Tatupu contract..IDo I consider keeping him over Dansby/T.Cole in a tackle-heavy league? I have Rudd, Fletcher, and Dansby penciled now at LB (Start 3)
Fletcher is a proven stud. There's a post on why he's not putting up big numbers lately and it has more to do with WASH facing the less rushing attempts(way below avg) but Fletcher is still leading the team in tackles. Again Im talking about after this year with Tatupu coming back next year with many years left on his contract??he's been better than fletcher this year hasn't he?Hate to bring this up again but what is his value in keeper league? How do I not find room to keep this guy regardless of Tatupu contract..IDo I consider keeping him over Dansby/T.Cole in a tackle-heavy league? I have Rudd, Fletcher, and Dansby penciled now at LB (Start 3)
I'm not so sure they will put Hawthorne or Curry on the bench. Who would you pull off the field?From IDP upgradesHawthorne continues to climb the ranks of fantasy linebackers with another huge game this week. He was credited with a team-high 8 solo tackles and an assist while also adding 2 interceptions and 3 passes defensed. In 3 starts at MLB this year, Hawthorne has posted 28 solo tackles, 5 assists, 2 sacks, 3 interceptions, a forced fumble, and 5 passes defensed. If he keeps this up, it looks Tatupu might have to fight for his starting job next year.I'm about to jump on Leroy Hill. His tackle numbers are great considering he is not playing ever snap and it appears he will be eventually as he is the fastest of the LB's.
I'm not a big believer in the rookie wall, but Curry hasn't been the same player over the past two weeks. He may still see some nickel snaps at backer or as a pass rusher, but after Mora's comments suggesting Hill would return to an every-down job soon and Hawthorne's strong play, the writing was on the wall for Curry.Wow Curry is the one bumped from the nickel.
He's the middle linebacker. The Seahawks like him so much that they may move to a 3-4 scheme in 2010 to put him on the field at the same time as Lofa:Seahawks.comSteelfan7 said:Is Hawthorne a ILB or OLB? Weekly FBG rankings have him as OLB, but NFL.com lists him as MLB.
Hmm. If they tender him a high offer or make him a multi year offer that may be what they do (3-4). Or they could rip him off and only give him 4 to 500K.He's the middle linebacker. The Seahawks like him so much that they may move to a 3-4 scheme in 2010 to put him on the field at the same time as Lofa:Seahawks.comSteelfan7 said:Is Hawthorne a ILB or OLB? Weekly FBG rankings have him as OLB, but NFL.com lists him as MLB.
the article doesn't say anthing concrete. it does say at the least the hawks would use some 3-4packages to get hawthorne on the field with lofa. i don't know about the personnel they have on the DL transitioning to a 3man line. many teams struggle or switch back when trying to implement a 3-4He's the middle linebacker. The Seahawks like him so much that they may move to a 3-4 scheme in 2010 to put him on the field at the same time as Lofa:Seahawks.comSteelfan7 said:Is Hawthorne a ILB or OLB? Weekly FBG rankings have him as OLB, but NFL.com lists him as MLB.
I would be surprised if they sign him to a long-term contract since they already have 3 LBs signed long-term. They likely could not afford to have so much money committed to the LB position.Hmm. If they tender him a high offer or make him a multi year offer that may be what they do (3-4). Or they could rip him off and only give him 4 to 500K.He's the middle linebacker. The Seahawks like him so much that they may move to a 3-4 scheme in 2010 to put him on the field at the same time as Lofa:Seahawks.comSteelfan7 said:Is Hawthorne a ILB or OLB? Weekly FBG rankings have him as OLB, but NFL.com lists him as MLB.
I totally agree AB, I was more thinking that if he tears it up the rest of this year, he could be very good trade bait for another team, if they keep him in Seattle, I doubt they change his contract, but just let him play out his current one and keep him as a great back-up/possible other starter if they do run some 34 next year.I would be surprised if they sign him to a long-term contract since they already have 3 LBs signed long-term. They likely could not afford to have so much money committed to the LB position.
He's gonna be an exclusive rights free agent, so if they want to keep him they have to make him an offer. And I was just talking about like a 2 year deal for 1.5-2 mil. He only makes $385k this year.I totally agree AB, I was more thinking that if he tears it up the rest of this year, he could be very good trade bait for another team, if they keep him in Seattle, I doubt they change his contract, but just let him play out his current one and keep him as a great back-up/possible other starter if they do run some 34 next year.I would be surprised if they sign him to a long-term contract since they already have 3 LBs signed long-term. They likely could not afford to have so much money committed to the LB position.
I would say, there is no 100% sure thing in FF, the only sure thing is change. I haven't seen many highlights from this weeks game but if he is still calling the plays I am guessing he is going to be staying on the field almost every down the rest of the year.4 - Digit Shark said:I'm late to the party here.Is Hawthorne locked in as a starter for the rest of the year?I only ask because I don't know his entire story or the injury status of the other SEA LB's. I know he is playing great, but is he 100% sure to start the rest of the year, barring injury?Thanks
He was the backup MLB before Lofa got hurt. Nothing is 100%but DD Lewis is the listed backup. Curry could be moved there I suppose but unless he gets hurt I doubt they go there.Earlier one team source was quoted saying they may consider the 3-4 next year to get him on the field. I think he's safe.4 - Digit Shark said:I'm late to the party here.Is Hawthorne locked in as a starter for the rest of the year?I only ask because I don't know his entire story or the injury status of the other SEA LB's. I know he is playing great, but is he 100% sure to start the rest of the year, barring injury?Thanks
He's been the top fantasy :LB the last few weeks in most of my leagues. Nice to see Lofton doing better today but Barnett Aaron Kampman had a good game til he got hurt(took him to the locker room-knee-no word yet). He stuck with a couple TE's pretty well.another 2 solo tackles in the first 4 plays 2nd half...looking like a stud
You only start 2? Pick a game without good matchups for Lofton. Hawthorne has been more consistent than Curtis.RommelDAK said:Lord, I may have to start him at some point, but who do I bench? Willis or Lofton?At the very worst, I'm keeping him off of someone else's roster!Go, Horned Frogs!!!
This guy is a supreme Bad ###!!! Read this post when it was made about a month ago and since then I have won 6 straight games after starting 0-5. Thank you for the advise, whoever started the thread but great f*c*ing my friend.Actually, the guy I was tempted to bench this week was Willis, which would have been the right call--but benching Willis?! I won big, anyway.What I really need is to be able to start Hawthorne as a running back!
Looking good so far. Has there been a linebacker better than him since he took over as a starter?You have high hopes for him, but I wouldn't count on him being top 20.Either way, Hawthorne should be a top 10 scoring LB (easily) for the rest of the year.I picked him up and started him last week over Beason. He was projected by yahoo to score 3 points, he scored 20.
He must be fired up by his alma mater's undefeated season (so far)!Looking good so far. Has there been a linebacker better than him since he took over as a starter?You have high hopes for him, but I wouldn't count on him being top 20.Either way, Hawthorne should be a top 10 scoring LB (easily) for the rest of the year.I picked him up and started him last week over Beason. He was projected by yahoo to score 3 points, he scored 20.
I have to give props to bcr8f, I think he mentioned before me... by a little. But we both have been his biggest promoters by far.This guy is a supreme Bad ###!!! Read this post when it was made about a month ago and since then I have won 6 straight games after starting 0-5. Thank you for the advise, whoever started the thread but great f*c*ing my friend.Actually, the guy I was tempted to bench this week was Willis, which would have been the right call--but benching Willis?! I won big, anyway.What I really need is to be able to start Hawthorne as a running back!
with only 6 games left, i'll take my chances. its a terrible team. so he's going to be on the field - a lot. here's another question:Considering he is far and away the #1 scoring defensive player on a ppg basis... yes.In my main league -- in his 6 games played he has 49 points. Good for 8.166 per game.Is Hawthorne basically match-up resistant?
By way of comparison: Willis 6.75. Harrison/DHarris/Cushing 5.8. (DSharper 5.9 & JAllen 5.5).
And while I readily agree the more games he plays the more likely his stats get closer to the leagues baseline -- I dont see how you can pull him for any reason until he shows/proves he needs to be pulled.
From what I understood, Ruskell said they would look at using some 3-4 packages. Not that they would move to a full 3-4 defense.with only 6 games left, i'll take my chances. its a terrible team. so he's going to be on the field - a lot. here's another question:Considering he is far and away the #1 scoring defensive player on a ppg basis... yes.In my main league -- in his 6 games played he has 49 points. Good for 8.166 per game.Is Hawthorne basically match-up resistant?
By way of comparison: Willis 6.75. Harrison/DHarris/Cushing 5.8. (DSharper 5.9 & JAllen 5.5).
And while I readily agree the more games he plays the more likely his stats get closer to the leagues baseline -- I dont see how you can pull him for any reason until he shows/proves he needs to be pulled.
the seahawks said they will consider going to a 3-4 next year. how much of an impact would that have on his value next year? i'm thinking, if you are out of the race this year, he might be a good sell high guy.
The team actually said that or was it just one source?with only 6 games left, i'll take my chances. its a terrible team. so he's going to be on the field - a lot. here's another question:Considering he is far and away the #1 scoring defensive player on a ppg basis... yes.In my main league -- in his 6 games played he has 49 points. Good for 8.166 per game.Is Hawthorne basically match-up resistant?
By way of comparison: Willis 6.75. Harrison/DHarris/Cushing 5.8. (DSharper 5.9 & JAllen 5.5).
And while I readily agree the more games he plays the more likely his stats get closer to the leagues baseline -- I dont see how you can pull him for any reason until he shows/proves he needs to be pulled.
the seahawks said they will consider going to a 3-4 next year. how much of an impact would that have on his value next year? i'm thinking, if you are out of the race this year, he might be a good sell high guy.