Chicago Hooligan
Footballguy
DIE COWBOYS DIE
Just call that the jekyll and hyde division. NYG, Phili, Dallas ... who knows what team steps onto the field with those three.Glad the Packers didn't play to this level in either Viking game. Pretty impressive bounce back from last week. Cowboys are as Jekyll and Hyde a team as you can find, I guess.
The thing is that going for 2 in that situation is probably the correct play, even if it's widely dismissed and could get a coach fired. However, I'm sure Aikman just wasn't thinking.How dumb is Troy Aikman.He can't understand why Dallas isn't going for 2 down by 17? WTF.
Congratulations on your big win.SHUTOUT MY ###!!111
Big disappointment considering how well they had played the last month or so.Congratulations on your big win.SHUTOUT MY ###!!111
It was a very stupid challenge. However you have to hang this on his replay guy up in the booth for telling him to challenge, every team has one and Green Bays should be fired.Stupid challenge McCarthy. It looked like Nelson got it in live, but on the replay it sure looked like the official spotted it correctly. Don't you have any faith in your offense to score from the 1 anyway? I'm guessing you're accounting for after you go shotgun and empty backfield on this next play and the sack that will result. Now you're going to be down a timeout and won't be able to challenge for the rest of the game.
Whenever I see a game the Packers have with this crew I cringe. They are horrible and absolutely LOVE to call penalties.@ TriplettI thought McCarthy had used them all up?
Well, Packer fans, I would congratulate you on a great game, but that would be wrong, so I'll just congratulate you on a much needed win.
It's pretty clear that this D is better without KampmanDom Capers showed up big time today and really earned his paycheck. Hope he keeps the D dialed up while this line of the Packers get figured out on the offense. Kampy was out today and the D looked fine with out him, as it will next year as I dont see him wanting to come back. They will get more athletes that fit the scheme and get better with time.
Was thinking the same thing.It's pretty clear that this D is better without KampmanDom Capers showed up big time today and really earned his paycheck. Hope he keeps the D dialed up while this line of the Packers get figured out on the offense. Kampy was out today and the D looked fine with out him, as it will next year as I dont see him wanting to come back. They will get more athletes that fit the scheme and get better with time.
Very...and the Dline held their own allowing the LBs to move free a bit more.Hawk and Barnett were causing some havoc at times in the backfield. IT was great to see Hawk playing fast and playing well for once.Kampman or no Kampman....it seems like Capers was more aggressive with the blitz packages today.
True, the D-line played quite well. That definitely helps.Very...and the Dline held their own allowing the LBs to move free a bit more.Hawk and Barnett were causing some havoc at times in the backfield. IT was great to see Hawk playing fast and playing well for once.Kampman or no Kampman....it seems like Capers was more aggressive with the blitz packages today.
I don't think it was every a problem with him being aggressive ... I think he steadily refused to blitz barnett or hawk and over blitzed from the secondary. This time he fired all of his linebackers in different scenarios and didn't blitz his corners more then a hand full of times.Very...and the Dline held their own allowing the LBs to move free a bit more.Hawk and Barnett were causing some havoc at times in the backfield. IT was great to see Hawk playing fast and playing well for once.Kampman or no Kampman....it seems like Capers was more aggressive with the blitz packages today.
Do you think they would start on the Vikings? Titans? Rams? Jaguars? Yeah, I don't think so either.I'm aware you have to adjust your game and take what the defense gives you, but we have 3 backs that would start on any team in the league.
Alright, slight exaggeration there. How about this: Talented wise, we have one of the deepest backfields in the league.Do you think they would start on the Vikings? Titans? Rams? Jaguars? Yeah, I don't think so either.I'm aware you have to adjust your game and take what the defense gives you, but we have 3 backs that would start on any team in the league.
or:Bengals, Carolina, Miami, BaltimoreDo you think they would start on the Vikings? Titans? Rams? Jaguars? Yeah, I don't think so either.I'm aware you have to adjust your game and take what the defense gives you, but we have 3 backs that would start on any team in the league.
I give props to GB and once again think Garrett is as an O coordinator. They abandoned the run for no reason (most of the game was a 10 pt game).. he did nothing to try and slow GB's pass rush that was all over Romo... draw plays, etc. I totally agree that running it 14 or whatever times is just silly with the talent DAL has at RB. Its not like they had no success running... MBIII looked good the first series--then he never got the ball again.Great rebound for GB after the loss to TB... D--especially the D line looked awesome.Alright, slight exaggeration there. How about this: Talented wise, we have one of the deepest backfields in the league.Do you think they would start on the Vikings? Titans? Rams? Jaguars? Yeah, I don't think so either.I'm aware you have to adjust your game and take what the defense gives you, but we have 3 backs that would start on any team in the league.
Kampman is a very good player but he has not taken to playing that position at all. You can run at him since he doesn't get a lot of push and doesn't hold the point all that well while standing and he doesn't get a whole lot of pressure either because he doesn't seem to get a lot of leverage. Also, I don't think anyone who has seen the packers play this year would say that about Chillar either since he has been very good when he has played.I'm satisfied with giving credit to Capers and the players who were out there rather than trying to spin Kampman's absence as a positive. Brandon Chillar was active but didn't play, and I don't think anyone will say putting him on the bench makes the team better.
Yes. Kampman has been a liability in that position all year. I would rather they use Kampman as a down lineman then outside. He has been really bad.So... you want Brad Jones to start instead? That's difficult for me to believe, even with Kampman not producing. But maybe he'll miss more time and we'll see more of Jones.
I would not yet go that far.But he did not look lost in coverage...and it allows them to do more with Matthews around the line (which is why Kampman has been out in coverage more recently IMO).Kind of an interesting dynamic...Kampman is a beast...but as an OLB its been a big disappointment.I think youd see him rotated out much more in the coming weeks though.So... you want Brad Jones to start instead? That's difficult for me to believe, even with Kampman not producing. But maybe he'll miss more time and we'll see more of Jones.
I think I might rather have Jones out there than Poppinga.Actually I guess Poppinga would still be put out there ahead of Jones.
Hoping GB can work out a franchise tag and trade deal. No need to give him up for nothing.The sad thing is some NFL team is going to get a great deal on a player like Kampman. he is a very good player but just cannot play outside linebacker in a 3-4.
Ok, that's a little more reasonable. GB's pass rush has been terrible all season, while at times the run defense has been stellar. So I can see why the coaches decided not to just pound the ball. That said, when it wasn't working (but the game was still 3-0), why not start running it more? Long story short (too late), I'm with you 100%. [except for the part where you implied Barber, Jones and Choice would start ahead of AP ]Alright, slight exaggeration there. How about this: Talented wise, we have one of the deepest backfields in the league.Do you think they would start on the Vikings? Titans? Rams? Jaguars? Yeah, I don't think so either.I'm aware you have to adjust your game and take what the defense gives you, but we have 3 backs that would start on any team in the league.
Kampman looks lost out there much of the time.So... you want Brad Jones to start instead? That's difficult for me to believe, even with Kampman not producing. But maybe he'll miss more time and we'll see more of Jones.
How dare you sir! I never implied!Ok, that's a little more reasonable. [except for the part where you implied Barber, Jones and Choice would start ahead of AP ]Alright, slight exaggeration there. How about this: Talented wise, we have one of the deepest backfields in the league.Do you think they would start on the Vikings? Titans? Rams? Jaguars? Yeah, I don't think so either.I'm aware you have to adjust your game and take what the defense gives you, but we have 3 backs that would start on any team in the league.