ufshowboat
Footballguy
Best just went at 2.07 in my 14-team Classic draft.
That's where I took him in Dynasty. After my pick I was like but after reading this thread I'm pretty sure we've got a Gale Sayers on our hands here, folks.Best just went at 2.07 in my 14-team Classic draft.
:(I doubt you've spent hours going over Lions game film and analyzing their offensive line's play. I can see you were able to look up stats from last year which can be the result of many factors including having three different starting quarterbacks and an average at best running back. You're obviously an expert on the Lions offensive line though, so I concede.I'm basing it on me watching them play. But I guess if you want me to cite some objective experts, FO had their line last year rated at 29/22 run/pass. They gave up 43 sacks, which is ungood.if the point you're trying to make is that the Lions don't have an offensive line, I would like to know what you're basing that on. The yards per carry average of Kevin Smith, an average running back?
Thank you. Detroit's o-line isn't going to take over games and dominate, but they are going to cost us games either. An injury or two and our line could be a total disaster, but that is probably true for 2/3 of the league.Last year, the Lions did not have a left guard all year who could be considered average, their right guard (Peterman) was decent, but got hurt and missed several games. The right tackle spot was below average. This year, Rob Sims is playing left guard and while he is not a pro bowler, he has been a major upgrade in both pass protection and run blocking. Last year, Backus constantly had to slide towards the inside to block the player that the left guard whiffed on, which caused the right end he was supposed to be blocking to put pressure on the QB. I haven't seen much if any of this in preseason. Sims has made a huge difference. Peterman has been solid enough at right guard. Cherilus at right tackle has been a bit more consistent, but that position is the biggest question mark. Cherilus can definitely play, but he has to be more consistent and avoid mental lapses. While the line is not great by any stretch, it is not as bad as some people think. There is too much comparison to last year. This line is much better than last year's line. It isn't considered a good line, but it should be adequate enough so we don't have to avoid drafting Lions' skill players.
Best will make the OL better. He doesn't need as big a hole or for the hole to be opened as long as most other backs due to his speed and vision.I saw a stat posted elsewhere comparing the 4 top backs (Best, Matthews, Spiller and Gerhart) in this year's draft:Just for fun. 20+ yard runs-these are from 2007-2009RB A: 24 on 477 carriesRB B: 25 on 565 carriesRB C: 34 on 363 carriesRB D: 28 on 534 carriesBest is C. This stat is indicative of his big play ability. All he needs is one or two plays where he gets decent blocking and he'll run for 20+ yards.His college game translates very well into the NFL. If Best stays healthy, he will have a long and very productive career.Ilov80s said:Thank you. Detroit's o-line isn't going to take over games and dominate, but they are going to cost us games either. An injury or two and our line could be a total disaster, but that is probably true for 2/3 of the league.Anthony Borbely said:Last year, the Lions did not have a left guard all year who could be considered average, their right guard (Peterman) was decent, but got hurt and missed several games. The right tackle spot was below average. This year, Rob Sims is playing left guard and while he is not a pro bowler, he has been a major upgrade in both pass protection and run blocking. Last year, Backus constantly had to slide towards the inside to block the player that the left guard whiffed on, which caused the right end he was supposed to be blocking to put pressure on the QB. I haven't seen much if any of this in preseason. Sims has made a huge difference. Peterman has been solid enough at right guard. Cherilus at right tackle has been a bit more consistent, but that position is the biggest question mark. Cherilus can definitely play, but he has to be more consistent and avoid mental lapses. While the line is not great by any stretch, it is not as bad as some people think. There is too much comparison to last year. This line is much better than last year's line. It isn't considered a good line, but it should be adequate enough so we don't have to avoid drafting Lions' skill players.
I hope so, but with more longevity than Sayers.......Clifton said:That's where I took him in Dynasty. After my pick I was like but after reading this thread I'm pretty sure we've got a Gale Sayers on our hands here, folks.ufshowboat said:Best just went at 2.07 in my 14-team Classic draft.
Watching Best hit the holes is a thing of beauty. I have never seen a running back hit holes so quickly, and then he has incredible break away speed once he is through. The one thing he lacks is power. The thing that concerns me is he runs fearlessly. He is going to have to learn to pick his battles and avoid hits if he wants to last long in this league. You don't have to finish off those 20 yard runs trying to squeak out another yard.Best will make the OL better. He doesn't need as big a hole or for the hole to be opened as long as most other backs due to his speed and vision.I saw a stat posted elsewhere comparing the 4 top backs (Best, Matthews, Spiller and Gerhart) in this year's draft:Just for fun. 20+ yard runs-these are from 2007-2009RB A: 24 on 477 carriesRB B: 25 on 565 carriesRB C: 34 on 363 carriesRB D: 28 on 534 carriesBest is C. This stat is indicative of his big play ability. All he needs is one or two plays where he gets decent blocking and he'll run for 20+ yards.His college game translates very well into the NFL. If Best stays healthy, he will have a long and very productive career.
I have four of the six. Love the Pool.timschochet said:I own Jermichael Finley, Arian Foster, Jahvid Best, Kareem Huggins, and both Mike Williams. I am dialed in. The Shark Pool hype train is for me this year!
Stafford was a rookie. QB's make their biggest leap from their first to second year. Stafford will be a much better QB this year. Kevin Smith got holes last year, just had no breakaway ability. Sure, the improvements to the Offensive Line seems only a small step, but when you have a back who can break big runs at any time, you motivate the line to block a little harder and you keep the defense on their heels. The Lions will easily one of the most improved teams in the NFL, despite the naysayers. Winning is contagious, and as the Lions climb back to respectability, players will start performing to their true potential instead of just mailing it in. There is real hope for a decent football team in Detroit, something that hasn't been there in many of years.OK, so far we have:a) Det's OL only looked bad last year because Kevin Smith and their QBs were badb) Rob Sims (an average LG) will save the dayc) Jahvid Best doesn't need an OL at all, because of how super awesome he isIs there anything else?
The major concern I have is he runs with reckless abandon.For the people citing the concussion, here it is.
One concussion does lead to others....I did research on it. It wasn't Best's first concussion however....so they are even more likely now.For the people citing the concussion, here it is.
The actual hit on Best was worse against Maryland in 08. He got smashed there. I think he puked on the field after that one.For the people citing the concussion, here it is.
I have Finley, Best, Spiller, and Stafford to go with Moss, Nicks, and Sjax in my money league this year. Unfortunately that's the only team I have Best on.One thing to think about that everyone on this thread should consider. The Bears in recent years have been just awful when it comes to stopping electric backs. The way AP has torn them a new one is becoming epic:2008:22 121 5.5 54 28 131 4.7 59 12009:25 85 3.4 15 124 94 3.9 10 2MJD 2008:12 55 4.6 14 0 7 47 6.7 19 1I think Best is going to tear the Bears a new one and possibly go off for 100+ rushing, 50+ receiving, and maybe multiple TDs. It will be hard for his value to get any higher than that. The smart move is to trade him if that happens. It will be hard to do but if one of Gore, Sjax, Mendenhall, or D-Will has a bad game week 1, you could get one of them straight up. Then it really becomes a question of just how special you think this kid is going to be.timschochet said:I own Jermichael Finley, Arian Foster, Jahvid Best, Kareem Huggins, and both Mike Williams. I am dialed in. The Shark Pool hype train is for me this year!
Best went first overall in your draft?I like Best, but I have to agree that the hype train is WAY out of control. At least the Finley hype can be tied to pretty impressive production the second half of the season last year. Dynasty wise, I'd go all in on Best. Redraft, this is still a 2-14 team with a second year qb, below average o-line and a pretty difficult schedule vs. the run. I see improvement from Detroit but Best is officially being drafted at his ceiling. Certain people are making it sound like Detroit is going to have a jauggernaut offense. These guys aren't going to average 28 points a game. I have him in 1 league, and honestly, I'm excited about his potential, but I was able to get him I in the 6th round. He is starting to go in the low 2nd.
I am taking this as a jokeBest went first overall in your draft?I like Best, but I have to agree that the hype train is WAY out of control. At least the Finley hype can be tied to pretty impressive production the second half of the season last year. Dynasty wise, I'd go all in on Best. Redraft, this is still a 2-14 team with a second year qb, below average o-line and a pretty difficult schedule vs. the run. I see improvement from Detroit but Best is officially being drafted at his ceiling. Certain people are making it sound like Detroit is going to have a jauggernaut offense. These guys aren't going to average 28 points a game. I have him in 1 league, and honestly, I'm excited about his potential, but I was able to get him I in the 6th round. He is starting to go in the low 2nd.
a) No, Kevin Smith looked bad because Kevin Smith was badb) Nobody said Sims would save the day even if I knew what saving the day equates to in football. He's an improvement.c) Nobody said Jahvid Best doesn't need an offensive line but great running backs tend to make an average line look pretty damn good.OK, so far we have:a) Det's OL only looked bad last year because Kevin Smith and their QBs were badb) Rob Sims (an average LG) will save the dayc) Jahvid Best doesn't need an OL at all, because of how super awesome he isIs there anything else?
You don't understand. The next letter is "d"a) No, Kevin Smith looked bad because Kevin Smith was badb) Nobody said Sims would save the day even if I knew what saving the day equates to in football. He's an improvement.c) Nobody said Jahvid Best doesn't need an offensive line but great running backs tend to make an average line look pretty damn good.OK, so far we have:a) Det's OL only looked bad last year because Kevin Smith and their QBs were badb) Rob Sims (an average LG) will save the dayc) Jahvid Best doesn't need an OL at all, because of how super awesome he isIs there anything else?
It'd be great if your next post had some sort of substance.ROBOPUNTER said:You don't understand. The next letter is "d"shnikies said:a) No, Kevin Smith looked bad because Kevin Smith was badb) Nobody said Sims would save the day even if I knew what saving the day equates to in football. He's an improvement.c) Nobody said Jahvid Best doesn't need an offensive line but great running backs tend to make an average line look pretty damn good.ROBOPUNTER said:OK, so far we have:a) Det's OL only looked bad last year because Kevin Smith and their QBs were badb) Rob Sims (an average LG) will save the dayc) Jahvid Best doesn't need an OL at all, because of how super awesome he isIs there anything else?
What else is there to say? You are going nuts over a guy from his youtube college and preseason highlights. You want to ignore my own opinion on how poorly Det's OL played last year and got your feelings hurt when I told you FO said the same thing. You want to blame failures of Det's OL on Kevin Smith and assume they are going to not cause issues in 2010. You automatically assume Stafford is going to get better this year, but that's no guarantee either. People are even citing a three years removed free agent el-busto Nate Burleson as reasons for the Det offense to improve. I think I even read some insanity suggesting Pettigrew and Scheffler were the most talented (or among the most talented, whatever that means (considering there are only 32 teams in the league, it's easy to be top 10 in anything) Hell, you are already calling Jahvid Best a "great" running back before he has taken a single NFL snap yet. I went back and re-read your posts, and I initially thought you were just using hyperbole to have fun with the other posters here, but now I do see that you are just swept up in this nutcassery that is the Jahvid Best fanclub. I don't think you even entertain the idea that he may not have a great season. Substance? Of course I'm not giving you substance. Would you know what a substantive post that disagrees with you look like anyway? This is a Jahvid Best fanclub headed by a homer dressed in expert's clothing. This gives the rest of the folks posting in this thread license to run away with the craziness. You don't want substance anyway. You want people to agree with you. You want people to go to your silly McDonald's shake post, or think you actually made a point with your comparison of a writer's piece two years ago with something that he said this year, because, you know... if a writer gets something wrong once, he should just change his profession. But please, tell me what you think I should say, besides "Jahvid Best is perhaps the most powerful force in the universe" because that's all there is really left to say in this thread.It'd be great if your next post had some sort of substance.ROBOPUNTER said:You don't understand. The next letter is "d"shnikies said:a) No, Kevin Smith looked bad because Kevin Smith was badb) Nobody said Sims would save the day even if I knew what saving the day equates to in football. He's an improvement.c) Nobody said Jahvid Best doesn't need an offensive line but great running backs tend to make an average line look pretty damn good.ROBOPUNTER said:OK, so far we have:a) Det's OL only looked bad last year because Kevin Smith and their QBs were badb) Rob Sims (an average LG) will save the dayc) Jahvid Best doesn't need an OL at all, because of how super awesome he isIs there anything else?
Congrats, you finally wrote a post that actually tries to make a point. That's all I was asking for.I have a strange feeling the only analysis you've done on the Lions offensive line is look up Kevin Smith's YPC average. You know what really helps a YPC average? The ability to make someone miss.What else is there to say? You are going nuts over a guy from his youtube college and preseason highlights. You want to ignore my own opinion on how poorly Det's OL played last year and got your feelings hurt when I told you FO said the same thing. You want to blame failures of Det's OL on Kevin Smith and assume they are going to not cause issues in 2010. You automatically assume Stafford is going to get better this year, but that's no guarantee either. People are even citing a three years removed free agent el-busto Nate Burleson as reasons for the Det offense to improve. I think I even read some insanity suggesting Pettigrew and Scheffler were the most talented (or among the most talented, whatever that means (considering there are only 32 teams in the league, it's easy to be top 10 in anything) Hell, you are already calling Jahvid Best a "great" running back before he has taken a single NFL snap yet. I went back and re-read your posts, and I initially thought you were just using hyperbole to have fun with the other posters here, but now I do see that you are just swept up in this nutcassery that is the Jahvid Best fanclub. I don't think you even entertain the idea that he may not have a great season. Substance? Of course I'm not giving you substance. Would you know what a substantive post that disagrees with you look like anyway? This is a Jahvid Best fanclub headed by a homer dressed in expert's clothing. This gives the rest of the folks posting in this thread license to run away with the craziness. You don't want substance anyway. You want people to agree with you. You want people to go to your silly McDonald's shake post, or think you actually made a point with your comparison of a writer's piece two years ago with something that he said this year, because, you know... if a writer gets something wrong once, he should just change his profession. But please, tell me what you think I should say, besides "Jahvid Best is perhaps the most powerful force in the universe" because that's all there is really left to say in this thread.It'd be great if your next post had some sort of substance.ROBOPUNTER said:You don't understand. The next letter is "d"shnikies said:a) No, Kevin Smith looked bad because Kevin Smith was badb) Nobody said Sims would save the day even if I knew what saving the day equates to in football. He's an improvement.ROBOPUNTER said:OK, so far we have:
a) Det's OL only looked bad last year because Kevin Smith and their QBs were bad
b) Rob Sims (an average LG) will save the day
c) Jahvid Best doesn't need an OL at all, because of how super awesome he is
Is there anything else?
c) Nobody said Jahvid Best doesn't need an offensive line but great running backs tend to make an average line look pretty damn good.
Except you.He's got more shake than all the shakes in shakeland! OMG!!!nobody knows for sure.
I drafted Calvin and Best. I'm pondering moving Best so i don't have two DET players in my starting lineup.
ummm without doubt. I benched CHI D this week in anticipation of it..I have Best as well lolYou guys think Best is a good start over Marion Barber this week?? I'm itching to see what this guy can do and would hate to have him explode on my frigging bench!!!!!!
Why wouldn't you start him? He is a featured back who will run and catch balls. His floor will be solid numbers and his ceiling is as high as anyones.I'm starting him week 1...
I wouldnt even think twice about starting Best over Thomas.Id go best and charles. EXPLOSIVEi have to start 2 of Charles, P.Thomas, & Best .... i could be crazy & havent totally made up my mind, but im leaning towards Thomas & Charles .... part of me wants to see Best do it for 4 quarters in NFL.
I am in same boat.I am starting Charles and Best. Not thinking twice about it either. I also love the fact the Chiefs play Monday night 10:15pm. Im hoping my game is already wrapped up by theni have to start 2 of Charles, P.Thomas, & Best .... i could be crazy & havent totally made up my mind, but im leaning towards Thomas & Charles .... part of me wants to see Best do it for 4 quarters in NFL.
#1how would you guys rank best in a ppr?
He should be going #1 overall in Dynasty PPR. No less than #4.#1how would you guys rank best in a ppr?
Now that he'll probably get a few passing td's is he as valuable as guys like 4.24/adp/mjd types in dynasty leagues?Is a stat line of 1,500 rushing/500 receiving/20 total td's with a couple hundred passing yards realistic?CBS saying he was taking snaps today as wildcat QB
why not 40 total td's?Is a stat line of 1,500 rushing/500 receiving/20 total td's with a couple hundred passing yards realistic?CBS saying he was taking snaps today as wildcat QB
C'Mon, He's not Jermichael Finley.why not 40 total td's?Is a stat line of 1,500 rushing/500 receiving/20 total td's with a couple hundred passing yards realistic?CBS saying he was taking snaps today as wildcat QB