That's what convinces me that other teams were seeing something on tape when they watched. He had a horrid line and eight or nine in the box all the time last year from what I've heard.He didn’t even last 24 hrs as a free agent.
What I think is that no one plops down three million non-refundable dollars on a one-year contract for a "savvy veteran used in passing situations"...they do it as a calculated risk based on what they've recently seen that he will emerge as a much better option than Reid currently has.I mean washed up as an every down back. I think he can add a little value as a savvy veteran and will be used more in passing situations. As I said in my initial post maybe a change of scenery will help and the offense is obviously a million times better than the Bills. If he were in such high demand don't you think the Bills could have traded him for even a late round draft pick?
I agree if you change "much better option" to "supplemental option."What I think is that no one plops down three million non-refundable dollars on a one-year contract for a "savvy veteran used in passing situations"...they do it as a calculated risk based on what they've recently seen that he will emerge as a much better option than Reid currently has.
If they were that worried about their RBsbdon't you think they would have done something about it long before the final wave of preseason cuts?What I think is that no one plops down three million non-refundable dollars on a one-year contract for a "savvy veteran used in passing situations"...they do it as a calculated risk based on what they've recently seen that he will emerge as a much better option than Reid currently has.
Yup. We're all going to have to make that determination one way or the other. IMO Reid will not take long to ride the more talented guy...they do need to win games and their schedule is not easy.I agree if you change "much better option" to "supplemental option."
I don't think they were "that worried." I think they saw a better option become available and pounced on it with no hesitation.If they were that worried about their RBsbdon't you think they would have done something about it long before the final wave of preseason cuts?
Signing McCoy is more likely a statement about Thompson and Hyde than anything.
That's what I gathered from the press conference, too. You just said it more eloquently than I could. The last sentence is exactly what I figured the role of McCoy would be by looking at the tea leaves -- DWill is still RB25 by most experts and McCoy RB40 or so.Reid said they watched Shady's preseason film (and undoubtedly his film from the last couple years) and determined that he can still play.
He also said he told McCoy that DWill is a great player, insinuating a pre-signing agreement to tolerate a limited role of some sort.
Then he went on to say that they view both backs as starting RBs. Not starting for them is how I inferred, but starting caliber.
Reid also said McCoy needs to learn the playbook before getting major playing time and that the current Chiefs offense is very different than what they ran in Philly.
All these comments considered, I see McCoy stepping into Darwin's presumed role to start the season and then casting a long shadow on DWill should the latter falter (unlikely, IMO) or get dinged (arguably more likely than your avg starting RB).
So my question is, if DWill is really a "great player" then why wasn't he ahead of Spencer Ware on the depth chart last year?Reid said they watched Shady's preseason film (and undoubtedly his film from the last couple years) and determined that he can still play.
He also said he told McCoy that DWill is a great player, insinuating a pre-signing agreement to tolerate a limited role of some sort.
Then he went on to say that they view both backs as starting RBs. Not starting for them is how I inferred, but starting caliber.
Reid also said McCoy needs to learn the playbook before getting major playing time and that the current Chiefs offense is very different than what they ran in Philly.
All these comments considered, I see McCoy stepping into Darwin's presumed role to start the season and then casting a long shadow on DWill should the latter falter (unlikely, IMO) or get dinged (arguably more likely than your avg starting RB).
Again, a better option to who?I don't think they were "that worried." I think they saw a better option become available and pounced on it with no hesitation.
That feels about right. The bolded is particularly well stated.Reid said they watched Shady's preseason film (and undoubtedly his film from the last couple years) and determined that he can still play.
He also said he told McCoy that DWill is a great player, insinuating a pre-signing agreement to tolerate a limited role of some sort.
Then he went on to say that they view both backs as starting RBs. Not starting for them is how I inferred, but starting caliber.
Reid also said McCoy needs to learn the playbook before getting major playing time and that the current Chiefs offense is very different than what they ran in Philly.
All these comments considered, I see McCoy stepping into Darwin's presumed role to start the season and then casting a long shadow on DWill should the latter falter (unlikely, IMO) or get dinged (arguably more likely than your avg starting RB).
He’s already got a hammy. Tweak and done.That feels about right. The bolded is particularly well stated.
Why do you think Williams is more prone to injury than an average starting RB? He's listed at 5'11", 224lbs on PFR.
It’s not about being “worried”. It’s about signing a guy who upgrades you at the position. This team is trying to win a super bowl.If they were that worried about their RBsbdon't you think they would have done something about it long before the final wave of preseason cuts?
Signing McCoy is more likely a statement about Thompson and Hyde than anything.
You know what other savvy veteran just got $3 million one 1 year deal?What I think is that no one plops down three million non-refundable dollars on a one-year contract for a "savvy veteran used in passing situations"...they do it as a calculated risk based on what they've recently seen that he will emerge as a much better option than Reid currently has.
Is he being used in passing situations?You know what other savvy veteran just got $3 million on a 1 year deal?
Matt Bryant.
Was he added for depth?You know what other savvy veteran just got $3 million on a 1 year deal?
Matt Bryant.
That's a question for big Andy. I would speculate it had to do with legacy status on the roster more than anything else. Hunt and Ware had both proven themselves heading into last year, whereas DWill was the newb.So my question is, if DWill is really a "great player" then why wasn't he ahead of Spencer Ware on the depth chart last year?
Spencer Ware is a very good player, who always played well whenever he has gooten the chance. The only issue stopping Ware from being a starting RB in the league, is he has been completely unable to stay healthy. Talent wise, he's arguably more talented than any RB on the Chiefs. He's basically midwest Kenneth Dixon, or CJ Prosise.So my question is, if DWill is really a "great player" then why wasn't he ahead of Spencer Ware on the depth chart last year?
I was thinking specifically of 2013 when Charles had something like 1300 yards and 60+ receptions and 12 TDS or so despite Reid doing these weird things all year where he would go a quarter and a half or more and Charles would get like 3 touches. There were so many games that year when Charles would end up with less than 20 carries despite being crazy productiVery when he did get the ball.You are thinking of haley. Reid's never had prime charles
Shoot he didn’t last 12 hours.He didn’t even last 24 hrs as a free agent.
We have seen this 100 times. Coaches aren’t gonna say “we sprinted to the phone to call shady and offer him twice as much guaranteed money than Damien because Damien is a jag and now we have a stud.” They are professional about it.That's a question for big Andy. I would speculate it had to do with legacy status on the roster more than anything else. Hunt and Ware had both proven themselves heading into last year, whereas DWill was the newb.
Is he being used in passing situations?
In ,one with that thought, shady had a choice between the chargers and chiefs. So, two teams with Superbowl aspirations wanted him before he could clear out his locker in Buffalo. There is information to be understood there.WiDDoW_MaKeR said:McCoy has a lot more left in the tank than most are giving him credit for. He was a beast two years ago. Last year he had limited touches on a pathetic team. I guarantee that NFL coaches are smart enough to know that. Which is why he got so much interest and was signed so fast. Do you think McCoy... as proud as he is... signed on so fast with a team to he a backup? You don't think that he talked to Reid and made sure that he would have the kind of role that he wants?
Opportunity. Much earlier, there wasn't a great RB available. Then there was and they acted upon it quickly.If they were that worried about their RBsbdon't you think they would have done something about it long before the final wave of preseason cuts?
Signing McCoy is more likely a statement about Thompson and Hyde than anything.
And Matt Bryant is the starter right?You know what other savvy veteran just got $3 million one 1 year deal?
Matt Bryant.
If he can learn the playbook between now and week 1 he should start.And Matt Bryant is the starter right?
I get your point, but in this instance Reid was describing how he *told McCoy before signing him* about what a great player DWill is - I think fairly implying that Shady wouldn't be coming in to be the starter (at least not right away).We have seen this 100 times. Coaches aren’t gonna say “we sprinted to the phone to call shady and offer him twice as much guaranteed money than Damien because Damien is a jag and now we have a stud.” They are professional about it.
According to Reid.I get your point, but in this instance Reid was describing how he *told McCoy before signing him* about what a great player DWill is - I think fairly implying that Shady wouldn't be coming in to be the starter (at least not right away).
If a bunch of us on a ff message were pretty sure he was going to be cut, don’t you think actual NFL coaches had a plan for when he got cut?Shoot he didn’t last 12 hours.
Well sure, of course, but the relevant point is that multiple teams knew they wanted him if and when the bills chose to cut him. Meaning they think he can still play.If a bunch of us on a ff message were pretty sure he was going to be cut, don’t you think actual NFL coaches had a plan for when he got cut?
Yeah, somebody was using the benchmark that you expect Williams to get 15 or so touches per game. Surely there's room for more than that to go around.I really don't know how you couldn't have been impressed with what Shady showed this preseason. Thought he looked very spry with some classic cuts of his. Maybe he's done as a bellcow back but I can't help but think he can still help an NFL team.
As soon as he was released, the guy that went through my mind was Correll Buckhalter. I think he can easily fulfill at role with KC at a minimum with a guy that's never had more that what 13 (?...going off memory) carries in a game before.
PPR:Buy Shady stock; sell Williams.
I agree with this with one quibble about the last statement: I think most people were excited about Darwin in this offense as opposed to Darwin as a pure player. They saw a lottery ticket there and wanted to cash against a back they think is average (Williams). Now that McCoy is in the mix, the opportunity doesn't seem as immediate.PPR:
I'm just buying the situation.
From my auction experiences today, it isn't overly expensive. (Total cost of both today is around what Damien was going for prior).
If both healthy = Minimum of 1 RB2
If one is hurt = RB1 production
If one extremely high on Darwin's 2019 redraft value still (and there's folks that still are), I can see bailing on one/both of the KC guys. Barring injury, I personally don't see it for 2019.
I suppose the other side of that coin is if he was so popular as a free agent and if he was still confident in his abilities, then why did he jump on the first offer that came along?He didn’t even last 24 hrs as a free agent.
What opportunity do you envision being better than potentially getting the starting running back on the league’s most potent offense? That opportunity is the reason why Damien Williams was being drafted so high in the first place.I suppose the other side of that coin is if he was so popular as a free agent and if he was still confident in his abilities, then why did he jump on the first offer that came along?
P.S. I'm grabbing everywhere I can in order to protect my investment in Williams. But if I weren't a Williams owner I'd approach with extreme caution and wouldn't be throwing any top waiver priorities at him. I'd rather save my priority claim to see if something better comes along.
I guess that's league specific. But week 1 hasn't even been played yet and we don't know how this is going to play out. Reports are it's more likely going to be some sort of RBBC mix. Who knows what that mix is at this point?What opportunity do you envision being better than potentially getting the starting running back on the league’s most potent offense? That opportunity is the reason why Damien Williams was being drafted so high in the first place.
Andy Reid has said that he views both Williams and McCoy as the starting RBs. I would imagine they're going to split carries. They both have their knocks. Williams doesn't have a big body of work, questions about his ability to handle a full-time load. McCoy had a rough year in Buffalo last year under different circumstances than he's currently in, but also aging at a position that shows strong correlation between age and declining performance.I guess that's league specific. But week 1 hasn't even been played yet and we don't know how this is going to play out. Reports are it's more likely going to be some sort of RBBC mix. Who knows what that mix is at this point?
An injury to a starting RB could change a lot. If Ingram goes down then I'd hope to have my top waiver wire priority for Hill. If Bell goes down I'd like the opportunity to consider Montgomery. I'd rather have a no. 1 RB (due to injury) on a decent offense than the possibly no. 2 RB on the top offense. And, yes, he has the potential to be the top option on the no. 1 offense in the NFL but it's also possible he's part of a RBBC mix with a 30% share at this point. But it depends on yor league and bench length and who's available. We have short benches so there are a lot of potential league-winner handcuffs out there at maybe a much cheaper price.
That's my point. As a Williams owner I'll do whatever I can to acquire McCoy and I like his situation. But if I didn't own Williams I'm not sure at this point if he's worthy of a top waiver claim. Too many questions for that at this point. But I also understand in deeper leagues you may have to pounce now.Andy Reid has said that he views both Williams and McCoy as the starting RBs. I would imagine they're going to split carries. They both have their knocks. Williams doesn't have a big body of work, questions about his ability to handle a full-time load. McCoy had a rough year in Buffalo last year under different circumstances than he's currently in, but also aging at a position that shows strong correlation between age and declining performance.
I share your skepticism. It's a great fit for McCoy, not a great fit for fantasy purposes. Their standalone value will likely only be strong if either fails, gets injured or suspended.
Or they could both be very startable. If they were playing on some avg offense this would not be a good situation but their offense is the best in the leagueAndy Reid has said that he views both Williams and McCoy as the starting RBs. I would imagine they're going to split carries. They both have their knocks. Williams doesn't have a big body of work, questions about his ability to handle a full-time load. McCoy had a rough year in Buffalo last year under different circumstances than he's currently in, but also aging at a position that shows strong correlation between age and declining performance.
I share your skepticism. It's a great fit for McCoy, not a great fit for fantasy purposes. Their standalone value will likely only be strong if either fails, gets injured or suspended.
The paint on this is still not dry.Where are people seeing McCoy's ADP in recent redrafts?
I would think Latavius Murray at RB33 is a good benchmark...but there is probably some pretty high variance given the late breaking news and divergent opinions.