Banger
Footballguy
lol, logic is my life...Whether it works out or not, I appreciate you understand the logic behind it. Because it is pretty logical.that Witten was the #3 overall player in the league and the position turnover analysis. I think his explanation is very rational and methodical. I can possibly see debating a different TE but based on the scoring system TE's are valuable and he's looking for a consistent and reliable one and while Gates would fit the bill ordinarily his injury history knocked him down.I did. And I still think it was silly. What am I missing?not sure if you read Matt's post, if you did you should read it again.There's thinking outside the box, and then there's silly. Sorry Matt, Witten at 1.1 was silly, regardless of scoring system. When there are so few 'feature' RBs in fantasy ball, if you have a chance at one, you take it, then be 'sneaky' with your 2nd rounder if you want to attract attention. But then again, I'm not an expert.