What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

*** OFFICIAL *** 13/14 Off-Season Dynasty Trade Thread (1 Viewer)

Ben Tate

Terrance West

kenny Britt

For

Trent

2nd
Trent and the pick for me
Ugly
I can't see it being a bad trade either way, personally. TRich has more market value than Tate/West, but functionally, I can certainly see taking the CLE duo. Britt was just listed as a starter and could prove to be worth a 2nd round pick. Maybe the old Trent owner should have kept the 2nd, but I wouldn't call it a bad trade.
Me neither. Depending on the league/roster, could easily go with Tate/West/Britt
No matter what the league/roster, I easily go with Tate/west/Britt.
When I said ugly, I mean ugly in favor of the NON Trent side.
Good. I was worried for a bit there.
 
PPR devy league

Storm Johnson and Mike Evans for

two 2015 firsts, one likely the 1.01, and the other likely middle of pack

 
PPR devy league

Storm Johnson and Mike Evans for

two 2015 firsts, one likely the 1.01, and the other likely middle of pack
Which 2015 RBs are unowned?
Easier to list the ones who are owned, but not sure it matters. WHoever the RB1 is, from what I can tell in Devy leagues there's about a 60% chance he's already rostered. Similar for RB2 and WR1. A 1.01 in a devy could be the same as a 1.01 in a regular league, or as low as a 1.03, but rarely lower. Obviously the top current names are gone (Gurley, Gordon, Yeldon, etc.)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
PPR devy league

Storm Johnson and Mike Evans for

two 2015 firsts, one likely the 1.01, and the other likely middle of pack
Which 2015 RBs are unowned?
Easier to list the ones who are owned, but not sure it matters. WHoever the RB1 is, from what I can tell in Devy leagues there's about a 60% chance he's already rostered. Similar for RB2 and WR1. A 1.01 in a devy could be the same as a 1.01 in a regular league, or as low as a 1.03, but rarely lower. Obviously the top current names are gone (Gurley, Gordon, Yeldon, etc.)
In a devy, I like the Evans side. I'm pretty high on his outlook.

 
Dyno - nonPPR

Team A gave

Jimmy Graham

Team B gave

Montee Ball

Golden Tate

2015 2nd

2015 3rd

-----------------------

Team A gave

Devonte Adams

2015 2nd

Team B gave

Kevin Norwood

2015 1st.

.
Graham Slam!!! Guy who dealt Graham must have been drunk!

Second deal depends on where the 1st falls.
Graham but it may be closer with nonPPR than a slam dunk...still Graham by a good margin though

I'll take Adams for the difference between a 1st and a 2nd

 
PPR devy league

Storm Johnson and Mike Evans for

two 2015 firsts, one likely the 1.01, and the other likely middle of pack
Which 2015 RBs are unowned?
Easier to list the ones who are owned, but not sure it matters. WHoever the RB1 is, from what I can tell in Devy leagues there's about a 60% chance he's already rostered. Similar for RB2 and WR1. A 1.01 in a devy could be the same as a 1.01 in a regular league, or as low as a 1.03, but rarely lower. Obviously the top current names are gone (Gurley, Gordon, Yeldon, etc.)
In a devy, I like the Evans side. I'm pretty high on his outlook.
I'll take the picks. 1.01 will still be worth alot next year and I am not a great Evans supporter

 
PPR devy league

Storm Johnson and Mike Evans for

two 2015 firsts, one likely the 1.01, and the other likely middle of pack
Which 2015 RBs are unowned?
18 RBs and 6 WRs are already on rosters.

Some OK talent left at RB (Drake, Marshall OR, Allen, Madden, Abdullah, etc)

WRs probably will have one or two that will go in the first round (Strong, Aghlor, Greenberry, Davis, Montgomery)

 
Dynasty salary cap league:

Giovanni Bernard for AJ Green
How did salaries play into this, because on its face its a clear AJ Green win?
Yeah, AJ is the guy I'd want, too. But that's what makes salary cap leagues interesting.

AJ's cap figure is $31 ($100 salary cap). Gio's number is only $16 and we can franchise one player - in this case, Gio franchise is only $1.
No contract length?

Think I would be OK on either side but Gio is pretty attractive at that cost

 
Dynasty salary cap league:

Giovanni Bernard for AJ Green
How did salaries play into this, because on its face its a clear AJ Green win?
Yeah, AJ is the guy I'd want, too. But that's what makes salary cap leagues interesting.

AJ's cap figure is $31 ($100 salary cap). Gio's number is only $16 and we can franchise one player - in this case, Gio franchise is only $1.
No contract length?

Think I would be OK on either side but Gio is pretty attractive at that cost
We don't do contracts. Price of players fluctuates year to year based on year-end performance.

 
Dynasty salary cap league:

Giovanni Bernard for AJ Green
How did salaries play into this, because on its face its a clear AJ Green win?
Yeah, AJ is the guy I'd want, too. But that's what makes salary cap leagues interesting.

AJ's cap figure is $31 ($100 salary cap). Gio's number is only $16 and we can franchise one player - in this case, Gio franchise is only $1.
No contract length?

Think I would be OK on either side but Gio is pretty attractive at that cost
We don't do contracts. Price of players fluctuates year to year based on year-end performance.
I guess that will encourage trading but sort of punishes smart buys on breakout players.

Curious what that means for a Julio Jones or Alshon Jeffery?

 
Dynasty salary cap league:

Giovanni Bernard for AJ Green
How did salaries play into this, because on its face its a clear AJ Green win?
Yeah, AJ is the guy I'd want, too. But that's what makes salary cap leagues interesting.

AJ's cap figure is $31 ($100 salary cap). Gio's number is only $16 and we can franchise one player - in this case, Gio franchise is only $1.
No contract length?

Think I would be OK on either side but Gio is pretty attractive at that cost
We don't do contracts. Price of players fluctuates year to year based on year-end performance.
I guess that will encourage trading but sort of punishes smart buys on breakout players.

Curious what that means for a Julio Jones or Alshon Jeffery?
I picked up Alshon for only $5 before he blew up. His performance hikes up his cap figure to $21, but I get to franchise him once for $5. Julio's been owned by the same person since his rookie season. Since Julio got hurt last year, his cap figure is only $8 - which was his original purchase price as a rookie.

 
12 team PPR QB/2RB/2WR/TE/2Flex

Team A gave:

Sammy Watkins & 2.10 (drafted Johnny Manziel)

Team B gave:

Julius Thomas & 1.10 (drafted Kelvin Benjamin)

 
PPR devy league

Storm Johnson and Mike Evans for

two 2015 firsts, one likely the 1.01, and the other likely middle of pack
Which 2015 RBs are unowned?
18 RBs and 6 WRs are already on rosters.

Some OK talent left at RB (Drake, Marshall OR, Allen, Madden, Abdullah, etc)

WRs probably will have one or two that will go in the first round (Strong, Aghlor, Greenberry, Davis, Montgomery)
In that case, Evans by a long shot.

 
PPR devy league

Storm Johnson and Mike Evans for

two 2015 firsts, one likely the 1.01, and the other likely middle of pack
Which 2015 RBs are unowned?
Easier to list the ones who are owned, but not sure it matters. WHoever the RB1 is, from what I can tell in Devy leagues there's about a 60% chance he's already rostered. Similar for RB2 and WR1. A 1.01 in a devy could be the same as a 1.01 in a regular league, or as low as a 1.03, but rarely lower. Obviously the top current names are gone (Gurley, Gordon, Yeldon, etc.)
How could it not matter?

 
PPR devy league

Storm Johnson and Mike Evans for

two 2015 firsts, one likely the 1.01, and the other likely middle of pack
Which 2015 RBs are unowned?
Easier to list the ones who are owned, but not sure it matters. WHoever the RB1 is, from what I can tell in Devy leagues there's about a 60% chance he's already rostered. Similar for RB2 and WR1. A 1.01 in a devy could be the same as a 1.01 in a regular league, or as low as a 1.03, but rarely lower. Obviously the top current names are gone (Gurley, Gordon, Yeldon, etc.)
How could it not matter?
Because there are always multiple players who emerge. First round picks, especially early ones, are often downgraded too much in devy leagues IMO. As an example, the first five picks in this leagues rookie draft this year were Evans, Ebron, Sankey, Cooks, and Hyde. You can find these same five in the top 7 or 8 picks of most NON DEVY rookie drafts this year.

 
jeaton6 said:
PPR startup:

Rashad Jennings and 2015 2

For

Bernard Pierce
pick on the wrong side??

I dont care for either player really, but jennings should at least score points for someone this year

 
jeaton6 said:
PPR startup:

Rashad Jennings and 2015 2

For

Bernard Pierce
pick on the wrong side??

I dont care for either player really, but jennings should at least score points for someone this year
Exactly my thoughts when I saw the trade. Strange thing is guy taking Pierce is win now and drafted Jennings in 7th, Pierce drafted in 11th (before Ray rice suspension) and to me Pierces value certainly hasn't increased post suspension.

 
jeaton6 said:
PPR startup:

Rashad Jennings and 2015 2

For

Bernard Pierce
pick on the wrong side??

I dont care for either player really, but jennings should at least score points for someone this year
Exactly my thoughts when I saw the trade. Strange thing is guy taking Pierce is win now and drafted Jennings in 7th, Pierce drafted in 11th (before Ray rice suspension) and to me Pierces value certainly hasn't increased post suspension.
DLF ADP had Pierce going about a round and a half before Jennings in July, and I'd imagine some Jennings owners might be getting worried after the first preseason game, (though I think any such worry is absurdly premature.)

 
jeaton6 said:
PPR startup:

Rashad Jennings and 2015 2

For

Bernard Pierce
pick on the wrong side??

I dont care for either player really, but jennings should at least score points for someone this year
Exactly my thoughts when I saw the trade. Strange thing is guy taking Pierce is win now and drafted Jennings in 7th, Pierce drafted in 11th (before Ray rice suspension) and to me Pierces value certainly hasn't increased post suspension.
DLF ADP had Pierce going about a round and a half before Jennings in July, and I'd imagine some Jennings owners might be getting worried after the first preseason game, (though I think any such worry is absurdly premature.)
I see it as 13 spots in DLF but either way it's interesting to me that mocks 1-3 his ADP was 91 and 4-6 they were 116. Not sure of mock timing but seems to indicate (though really small sample) that as word came out on likely shorter Rice suspension Pierces ADP crept up (2 full rounds) and pretty much aligned with Jennings in mocks 4-6.

Anyways, I agree with you that the worry is premature if anything I saw Jennings as a guy who is going to get a lot of work, maybe not goal line but lots of dump offs which will make him very valuable in PPR this year.

 
jeaton6 said:
PPR startup:

Rashad Jennings and 2015 2

For

Bernard Pierce
pick on the wrong side??

I dont care for either player really, but jennings should at least score points for someone this year
Exactly my thoughts when I saw the trade. Strange thing is guy taking Pierce is win now and drafted Jennings in 7th, Pierce drafted in 11th (before Ray rice suspension) and to me Pierces value certainly hasn't increased post suspension.
DLF ADP had Pierce going about a round and a half before Jennings in July, and I'd imagine some Jennings owners might be getting worried after the first preseason game, (though I think any such worry is absurdly premature.)
I see it as 13 spots in DLF but either way it's interesting to me that mocks 1-3 his ADP was 91 and 4-6 they were 116. Not sure of mock timing but seems to indicate (though really small sample) that as word came out on likely shorter Rice suspension Pierces ADP crept up (2 full rounds) and pretty much aligned with Jennings in mocks 4-6.

Anyways, I agree with you that the worry is premature if anything I saw Jennings as a guy who is going to get a lot of work, maybe not goal line but lots of dump offs which will make him very valuable in PPR this year.
DLF runs all six of its mocks concurrently, so if Pierce went later in mocks 4-6 than he did in mocks 1-3, that was just random chance. They should have the August mocks up before too long and then we'll get a pretty good feel for what impact Rice's suspension had on Pierce (though the August mocks will have started too early to capture the overreaction to Jennings' first preseason game.)

 
I would think the 2 game Rice suspension would HURT Pierce's value, since I think people previously expected more games for Rice.

 
I would think the 2 game Rice suspension would HURT Pierce's value, since I think people previously expected more games for Rice.
Exactly my thoughts when I saw the trade. Strange thing is guy taking Pierce is win now and drafted Jennings in 7th, Pierce drafted in 11th (before Ray rice suspension) and to me Pierces value certainly hasn't increased post suspension.
There was a possibility that Rice wouldn't have been suspended at all (what Gordon drafters are thinking right now).

I'd much rather have a talented 24 yo RB who will be starting the first 2 games of the season over a 29 yo RB who is competing with a talented rookie.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would think the 2 game Rice suspension would HURT Pierce's value, since I think people previously expected more games for Rice.
Exactly my thoughts when I saw the trade. Strange thing is guy taking Pierce is win now and drafted Jennings in 7th, Pierce drafted in 11th (before Ray rice suspension) and to me Pierces value certainly hasn't increased post suspension.
There was a possibility that Rice wouldn't have been suspended at all (what Gordon drafters are thinking right now).

I'd much rather have a talented 24 yo RB who will be starting the first 2 games of the season over a 29 yo RB who is competing with a talented rookie.
Depends. I dont think Pierce is as talented as most other people do, and I think Jennings wil at least provide some points for now.

 
CR69 said:
12 team PPR QB/2RB/2WR/TE/2Flex

Team A gave:

Sammy Watkins & 2.10 (drafted Johnny Manziel)

Team B gave:

Julius Thomas & 1.10 (drafted Kelvin Benjamin)
Sammy and Manziel easily for me and I like Benjamin

 
I would think the 2 game Rice suspension would HURT Pierce's value, since I think people previously expected more games for Rice.
Exactly my thoughts when I saw the trade. Strange thing is guy taking Pierce is win now and drafted Jennings in 7th, Pierce drafted in 11th (before Ray rice suspension) and to me Pierces value certainly hasn't increased post suspension.
There was a possibility that Rice wouldn't have been suspended at all (what Gordon drafters are thinking right now).

I'd much rather have a talented 24 yo RB who will be starting the first 2 games of the season over a 29 yo RB who is competing with a talented rookie.
Yeah although I would say that is a pretty solid overpay. Even up would be close for me considering Jennings should get alot of work this year

 
Last edited by a moderator:
PPR devy league

Storm Johnson and Mike Evans for

two 2015 firsts, one likely the 1.01, and the other likely middle of pack
Which 2015 RBs are unowned?
Easier to list the ones who are owned, but not sure it matters. WHoever the RB1 is, from what I can tell in Devy leagues there's about a 60% chance he's already rostered. Similar for RB2 and WR1. A 1.01 in a devy could be the same as a 1.01 in a regular league, or as low as a 1.03, but rarely lower. Obviously the top current names are gone (Gurley, Gordon, Yeldon, etc.)
How could it not matter?
Because there are always multiple players who emerge. First round picks, especially early ones, are often downgraded too much in devy leagues IMO. As an example, the first five picks in this leagues rookie draft this year were Evans, Ebron, Sankey, Cooks, and Hyde. You can find these same five in the top 7 or 8 picks of most NON DEVY rookie drafts this year.
Obviously some of the guys available will emerge as better than some of the ones who aren't, but that's a lot different than saying they will emerge as better than all of the ones who aren't. Seeing how you already have 18 RBs rostered, I'd say it's a much higher than 60% chance that the RB1 (and RB2) already are. That's why it matters- if there were only say 10 RBs rostered, the "field" is that much larger, increasing your chances of someone emerging.

 
Obviously some of the guys available will emerge as better than some of the ones who aren't, but that's a lot different than saying they will emerge as better than all of the ones who aren't. Seeing how you already have 18 RBs rostered, I'd say it's a much higher than 60% chance that the RB1 (and RB2) already are. That's why it matters- if there were only say 10 RBs rostered, the "field" is that much larger, increasing your chances of someone emerging.
Still always someone ends up being worthy of a high pick and guys always wonder how he slipped through the devy drafts. If that wasn't the case devy leagues wouldn't have rookie drafts at all and just have a devy draft.

Evans is not worth 2 2015 1sts imo even devalued ones when one is likely 1.01.

 
Because there are always multiple players who emerge. First round picks, especially early ones, are often downgraded too much in devy leagues IMO. As an example, the first five picks in this leagues rookie draft this year were Evans, Ebron, Sankey, Cooks, and Hyde. You can find these same five in the top 7 or 8 picks of most NON DEVY rookie drafts this year.
I'm the former Evans owner, and these are my thoughts as well. It's the mid-to-late first round picks that take the biggest hit. I don't know that there will be a prospect on Evans' level with the 1.01 next May, but I feel very confident that the gap won't be bigger than the additional 1st I received.

The upside--there is an Evans-esque prospect and I got an extra 1st rounder for free. The downside--there isn't and I traded down a tier--Ebron, Sankey, Cooks level-- for a first round pick. That's worst case for me and I'm okay with that risk.

I certainly understand the other owner's thinking as well--immediate gratification/production and safety.

 
Obviously some of the guys available will emerge as better than some of the ones who aren't, but that's a lot different than saying they will emerge as better than all of the ones who aren't. Seeing how you already have 18 RBs rostered, I'd say it's a much higher than 60% chance that the RB1 (and RB2) already are. That's why it matters- if there were only say 10 RBs rostered, the "field" is that much larger, increasing your chances of someone emerging.
Still always someone ends up being worthy of a high pick and guys always wonder how he slipped through the devy drafts. If that wasn't the case devy leagues wouldn't have rookie drafts at all and just have a devy draft.

Evans is not worth 2 2015 1sts imo even devalued ones when one is likely 1.01.
I didn't say Evans is or is not worth 2 2015 1sts, all I said is that the value of the 1.01 in a devy draft will certainly vary depending on how many players are already rostered and who they are. Do you disagree with that?

 
Obviously some of the guys available will emerge as better than some of the ones who aren't, but that's a lot different than saying they will emerge as better than all of the ones who aren't. Seeing how you already have 18 RBs rostered, I'd say it's a much higher than 60% chance that the RB1 (and RB2) already are. That's why it matters- if there were only say 10 RBs rostered, the "field" is that much larger, increasing your chances of someone emerging.
Still always someone ends up being worthy of a high pick and guys always wonder how he slipped through the devy drafts. If that wasn't the case devy leagues wouldn't have rookie drafts at all and just have a devy draft.

Evans is not worth 2 2015 1sts imo even devalued ones when one is likely 1.01.
I didn't say Evans is or is not worth 2 2015 1sts, all I said is that the value of the 1.01 in a devy draft will certainly vary depending on how many players are already rostered and who they are. Do you disagree with that?
Everything is relative. Within a league I am not sure I do agree with that. The best available non-rostered player's relative value is virtually the same year to year. In devy leagues there is always a chance that everyone hits on their devy picks and drastically decreases the talent pool but that hasn't been my experience...to date anyway

 
Obviously some of the guys available will emerge as better than some of the ones who aren't, but that's a lot different than saying they will emerge as better than all of the ones who aren't. Seeing how you already have 18 RBs rostered, I'd say it's a much higher than 60% chance that the RB1 (and RB2) already are. That's why it matters- if there were only say 10 RBs rostered, the "field" is that much larger, increasing your chances of someone emerging.
Still always someone ends up being worthy of a high pick and guys always wonder how he slipped through the devy drafts. If that wasn't the case devy leagues wouldn't have rookie drafts at all and just have a devy draft.

Evans is not worth 2 2015 1sts imo even devalued ones when one is likely 1.01.
I didn't say Evans is or is not worth 2 2015 1sts, all I said is that the value of the 1.01 in a devy draft will certainly vary depending on how many players are already rostered and who they are. Do you disagree with that?
Everything is relative. Within a league I am not sure I do agree with that. The best available non-rostered player's relative value is virtually the same year to year. In devy leagues there is always a chance that everyone hits on their devy picks and drastically decreases the talent pool but that hasn't been my experience...to date anyway
Yes, it's all relative- the relative value from year to year within the same league might be about the same, but from league to league it could vary substantially. We're (at least I'm) not in that league, which is why the question was asked- we (I) don't know how valuable the 1.01 devy pick is in this league. I certainly think it's relevant. :shrug:

 
i think the verbiage is getting a little confusing here... we are talking about the (likely) 1.01 2015 Rookie pick in a league where there are already 24 college/devy players on rosters, not what the 1.01 2015 Devy pick is worth.

to renesauz's point (and probably Coop's) is that even though there are a lot of players already on rosters, someone will likely breakout.

in this league, Evans, Ebron, Sankey, Cooks, and Hyde were available in the first five picks (heck, Beckham, Matthews, Adams, Benjamin and Latimer all went in the top 15).

 
Obviously some of the guys available will emerge as better than some of the ones who aren't, but that's a lot different than saying they will emerge as better than all of the ones who aren't. Seeing how you already have 18 RBs rostered, I'd say it's a much higher than 60% chance that the RB1 (and RB2) already are. That's why it matters- if there were only say 10 RBs rostered, the "field" is that much larger, increasing your chances of someone emerging.
Still always someone ends up being worthy of a high pick and guys always wonder how he slipped through the devy drafts. If that wasn't the case devy leagues wouldn't have rookie drafts at all and just have a devy draft.

Evans is not worth 2 2015 1sts imo even devalued ones when one is likely 1.01.
I didn't say Evans is or is not worth 2 2015 1sts, all I said is that the value of the 1.01 in a devy draft will certainly vary depending on how many players are already rostered and who they are. Do you disagree with that?
Not at all. The truth is that the value is unknown, but experience tells me it's worth at least the same as a non-devy 1.03, and could be as valuable as a non-devy 1.01. Considering it the same as a non-devy 1.02 is the reasonable approach. There's just no way to know for sure until next spring.

Keep in mind that to get 18 RBs rostered, a few owners have spent devy's on Freshman and Sophomore RB's- bigger gambles with bigger misses.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
renesauz said:
Not at all. The truth is that the value is unknown, but experience tells me it's worth at least the same as a non-devy 1.03, and could be as valuable as a non-devy 1.01. Considering it the same as a non-devy 1.02 is the reasonable approach. There's just no way to know for sure until next spring.

Keep in mind that to get 18 RBs rostered, a few owners have spent devy's on Freshman and Sophomore RB's- bigger gambles with bigger misses.
I don't play in a devy league so I'm wondering who out of Watkins, Evans, Cooks, Matthews, Beckham, Adams, Benjamin, Lee, Robinson, Sankey, Hyde, and Ebron weren't typically rostered?

 
renesauz said:
Not at all. The truth is that the value is unknown, but experience tells me it's worth at least the same as a non-devy 1.03, and could be as valuable as a non-devy 1.01. Considering it the same as a non-devy 1.02 is the reasonable approach. There's just no way to know for sure until next spring.

Keep in mind that to get 18 RBs rostered, a few owners have spent devy's on Freshman and Sophomore RB's- bigger gambles with bigger misses.
I don't play in a devy league so I'm wondering who out of Watkins, Evans, Cooks, Matthews, Beckham, Adams, Benjamin, Lee, Robinson, Sankey, Hyde, and Ebron weren't typically rostered?
Most of my devy leagues only Watkins and Lee were rostered of those guys

Would likely depend on the devy league settings I guess

 
Last edited by a moderator:
renesauz said:
Not at all. The truth is that the value is unknown, but experience tells me it's worth at least the same as a non-devy 1.03, and could be as valuable as a non-devy 1.01. Considering it the same as a non-devy 1.02 is the reasonable approach. There's just no way to know for sure until next spring.

Keep in mind that to get 18 RBs rostered, a few owners have spent devy's on Freshman and Sophomore RB's- bigger gambles with bigger misses.
I don't play in a devy league so I'm wondering who out of Watkins, Evans, Cooks, Matthews, Beckham, Adams, Benjamin, Lee, Robinson, Sankey, Hyde, and Ebron weren't typically rostered?
Most of my devy leagues only Watkins and Lee were rostered of those guys

Would likely depend on the devy league settings I guess
Don't think it has anything to do with settings, unless your Devy league drafts more then 1 player per team. It's simply much harder than one might think to draft a quality player a year or more before he comes out of college. Of 14 Devy picks in a 14 team league, maybe 5 will be drafted in the NFL draft in the first 3 rounds, and 3 or 4 might not get drafted at all.

Devy picks are over-rated in devy leagues while early-mid firsts are under-rated. I'm sure this will correct over time, but these types of leagues are still relatively new.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top