Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
to be fair, this is a 40 roster + IR + TS league that starts 10 IDP. 2.6 picks up some extra value from IDP, either a few premium IDP will go before that so it's more like the 2.2 or those premium IDP will be there for that pick. Not to mention you're not picking up this year's WR8 off the wire when he does hit, he's going to be on someone's taxi squad. Better yours than someone else's.
Was Steve Johnson ever a top 10 WR (to get back there)? During his best season he barely broke 1,000 yards and has had one double digit TD season. His numbers have declined each year since 2010 and last season dramatically. I don't think he's a bad player at all but even during his best seasons he seemed like a guy compiling since the Bills had no other options. Fitzgerald was drafted in the top 10 of the NFL draft and has had four seasons over 1,400 yards, a few others at or over 1,000 yards and has exceeded double digits in TDs 5 times.
Stevie's (and many others like him) been chronically under rated for years IMO by most of the fantasy community. Everyone wants that WR1 potential, and turns their nose up at the unsexy WR 2/3 types. It's a mistake -- if your league starts 40+ WRs a week like many do, the steady WR 20 - 30 (and when Johnson's been healthy, he's been better than that) types are quality weekly starters. Yet they are seen as "meh" by the majority of FF owners, who would rather pay more to likely receive less based on perceived upside.
That's pretty awful. I own both Wright and Thompkins and would insta-accept either the pick or Reed for both of them.
I'm never a fan of "rebuilding" a legitimate contending team unless the value is simply too good to pass up. Brees and Matthews for two 2015 1sts doesn't remotely qualify IMO.
Its not bad but I am pretty cautious about Reed and his concussions and likely higher on Wright than someIts Kendall.
Its not bad but I am pretty cautious about Reed and his concussions and likely higher on Wright than someIts Kendall.
I'm very low on Kendall and love the trade.Its not bad but I am pretty cautious about Reed and his concussions and likely higher on Wright than someIts Kendall.
This one is pretty close. I'm not sold on Decker having much fantasy value beyond and spot starter for the next few seasons. Lattimore is a total wildcard. I guess I'd rather the 4 and hope to land Lee.
I can't decide what I'm doing with my roster, but here it is below
I'll take the picks here.
I think so too, but it's pretty close. If I am making a push, I have no problem paying that for the players involved.
Is a no brainer for me...I like Edelman more than that
Agreed -- Fleener is a turd. He only managed TE23 last year in PPG despite a perfect storm of injuries to almost every other receiving option in Indy. I probably wouldn't even bother to pick him up in many leagues if he was sitting free on waivers.
If I needed a RB I would do this move in a heartbeat. Watkins vs. Spiller is very close. I've said previous pages take a risk to possibly get an elite player in Watkins, but Spiller he could be equally elite after a good year. I'd take Spiller over any rookie RB assuming Seastrunk is not taken in the 1st or 2nd. The side orders are a clear benefit to the Spiller side for me.
Yeah, I would too. He's clearly lost a step, but he had a step or two to lose. If he lands in the right spot, I wouldn't be at all surprised to get a year or two of RB2 out of him.Hmm. I'd pay that for MJD.Upgrading for free
I think I'd rather spend that roster spot on an additional rookie prospect. Plus the mid 2s is probably where the last of the good WR rookies will end. Would you rather be on the other side of that tier?Yeah, I would too. He's clearly lost a step, but he had a step or two to lose. If he lands in the right spot, I wouldn't be at all surprised to get a year or two of RB2 out of him.Hmm. I'd pay that for MJD.Upgrading for free
Me threeYeah, I would too. He's clearly lost a step, but he had a step or two to lose. If he lands in the right spot, I wouldn't be at all surprised to get a year or two of RB2 out of him.Hmm. I'd pay that for MJD.Upgrading for free
For MJD I'd risk it. I think the depth will extend to the end of the 2nd this year. While I could miss out on a target of mine--I think the part at 2.09 will have solid value.
I think alot of my opinion is that I am not interested in rostering a guy that will probably get 650 yfs at the end of his career.
