Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
There was conversation brought up about the trade by a couple of owners and I offered the guy I traded with the choice to reverse it if he was unsure. I really didn't care one way or the other. He insisted that he was fine with it, so I'm not saying anything else within the league regarding the trade. If someone hates it bad enough they can bring it to a veto vote, but no one has. Nor do I think it would be vetoed, which would be kind of ridiculous.
Agreed.
If I was in this league I'd have commented on it for sure. Would have either told you it was a great trade or the dragged the other guy for making a bad trade. But I'd have left it at that. I'm against protesting trades that are deemed one sided, I need to think there is something fishy going to start trying to get a trade vetoed. I have opinions but I'm not judge and jury to how people should run their teams.
It certainly shouldn't be vetoed. If I was the other guy, it would have been an instant reject as I see a big tier drop between 4 and 9 but Mostert is certainly capable of having another great year and could be a league winner if he can stay healthy. Ty Chandler is way overrated though. There's no way Minn will go with him as their starter this year. They made that mistake last year with Mattison. They won't do it again.
I don't believe in vetoing trades either. If it happens often or really is insanely ridiculous, probably best to just leave the league since not every owner is playing with a full deck.
hmm, might favor Jacobs since it's 16 teamer and RB starters even harder to find. assuming you must start a RB or 2.
Seems light for JJ but not terribly so.
Thanks, hah. It still doesn't show up in the shark pool for me, weird
Easily
Dude you won the trade pretty handily. Why are you so vehemently defending the side you gave away?
Picks side, feel like the 1.12 and roster spot was adequate.
Devils advocate.
Seems fair to me.
I’d rather have the picks
That seems like fair value.
I know there is the SF element, but I think it's probably unwise to trade Williams cheap this year. He's over a year removed from a terrible injury in 2022 and could be completely back to pre-injury form in 2024. I like this trade for you.
Sacrificing bye week and injury exposure is a small price to pay for a potential breakout RB one year+ removed from injury.
Totally get that. This is an orphan I picked up two years ago that was destitute of any youth/talent. It's been a slow rebuild but I should be able to make the playoffs this year and really start competing in 2025. As such, I'm not super worried about having tons of backup talent. I'll just keep plugging away and picking up young talent.
I would prefer Kyren by himself. Interesting that those picks were added that are pretty close to each other.
Hmmmm. The ol superflex conundrum
Nice trade
Legit starting QB is high praise for a guy without a contract, who's team interviews quite a few potential 1st round QBs at the combine. Honestly, I think Baker has TAM over a barrel right now because there's not much out there in FA except a guy like Cousins. BUT, there is a possibility of them drafting a QB at 26 and signing Cousins. Then where does Mayfield go? MIN? Maybe, but that means learning a new system and whatnot. Word is, Mayfield is apparently asking for $120 million over 4 years. That's a substantial haul for 1 real year of QB8.
Really depends on the guaranteed amount, right? Mayfield hasn't been the best at stringing solid season together. I suspect if he gets in the 30-40mil range, the Bucs would need to have an out just in case.
Great trade, terrible for the other guy.
