Couldn't we say that about any player?Risky, but so is holding onto Gronk when you're a rebuilding team. Anything could happen the rest of the season to crush his value. That's a solid trade for a team that's not in it.Adam Harstad said:Woof. Assuming random 1sts (as opposed to, say, guaranteed top-4 picks), you might well have to add two more 1st rounders to the Jeffery/Blackmon side to get me to move Gronk for that.Ron_Mexico said:After making a couple of trades it worked out to be
Gronk
2nd 2014
for
Jeffery
Blackmon
1st 2014
3rd 2014
.
I like Thomas but this is valuing him way too high unless TE premium scoring.12 team ppr QB_2RB_3WR_TE_FL
- Team S gave up Flacco, Joe BAL QB;Thomas, Julius DEN TE
- Team M gave up Wilson, Russell SEA QB; Floyd, Michael ARI WR
Seems pretty horrible for the side getting Peterson. Very short-sighted. Martin probably has more remaining career value. I'd take any future 1st over Lattimore.Also a few weeks ago - same league 10 team Non-PPR
Team A Trades:
Adrian Peterson
Reggie Wayne
Marcus Lattimore
2nd round pick 2014
Team B Trades:
Doug Martin
Percy Harvin
1st round pick 2014
1st round pick 2015
Agreed. That one is about as bad as it gets. Just absolutely awful.Seems pretty horrible for the side getting Peterson. Very short-sighted. Martin probably has more remaining career value. I'd take any future 1st over Lattimore.Also a few weeks ago - same league 10 team Non-PPR
Team A Trades:
Adrian Peterson
Reggie Wayne
Marcus Lattimore
2nd round pick 2014
Team B Trades:
Doug Martin
Percy Harvin
1st round pick 2014
1st round pick 2015
You could remove Harvin and one of the firsts and this might still be slanted in favor of the Martin side. Throw those pieces into the equation and it's a disaster.
We could, but this is a guy who just recovered from some serious injuries. He's getting back a couple potential #1 WR's and 1st in a good class.Couldn't we say that about any player?Risky, but so is holding onto Gronk when you're a rebuilding team. Anything could happen the rest of the season to crush his value. That's a solid trade for a team that's not in it.Adam Harstad said:Woof. Assuming random 1sts (as opposed to, say, guaranteed top-4 picks), you might well have to add two more 1st rounders to the Jeffery/Blackmon side to get me to move Gronk for that.Ron_Mexico said:After making a couple of trades it worked out to be
Gronk
2nd 2014
for
Jeffery
Blackmon
1st 2014
3rd 2014
.
12 Team 1PPR 2QB-2RB-2WR-1TE-1Flex
Team A Gave - Teddy Bridgewater, Hakeem Nicks, Kenbrell Thompkins, 2014 3rd (3.10-3.12)
Team B Gave - Ryan Tannehill, Jonathan Stewart, Quinton Patton, 2014 2nd (2.01-2.02)
Team A is contending, just lost Aaron Rodgers/Sam Bradford/EJ Manuel, and still hasn't gotten off the Stewart bandwagon (me).
Team B is in last looking towards the future and wasn't a fan of Tannehill but is a huge Hakeem Nicks supporter. Should have the 1.01 (1.02 at worst with the bracket set up) AND already will already have Teddy Bridgewater/Marqise Lee rostered due to the devy/rookie drafts (will also get Cobb/Crabtree back so he's a worst to first candidate in 2014)
I agree. I had tried to come up with an offer he would accept straight away with no counter needed and that was it.Concept Coop said:Have to agree. In a start 2 QB league, I'd trade that for Teddy alone. I like Tannehill more as an NFL prospect than a fantasy prospect.Clear win for the Bridgewater/Nicks side
I just think you should have found a better way to fill the short-term hole you have that didn't include giving away Bridgewater in this format.12 Team 1PPR 2QB-2RB-2WR-1TE-1Flex
Team A Gave - Teddy Bridgewater, Hakeem Nicks, Kenbrell Thompkins, 2014 3rd (3.10-3.12)
Team B Gave - Ryan Tannehill, Jonathan Stewart, Quinton Patton, 2014 2nd (2.01-2.02)Team A is contending, just lost Aaron Rodgers/Sam Bradford/EJ Manuel, and still hasn't gotten off the Stewart bandwagon (me).
Team B is in last looking towards the future and wasn't a fan of Tannehill but is a huge Hakeem Nicks supporter. Should have the 1.01 (1.02 at worst with the bracket set up) AND already will already have Teddy Bridgewater/Marqise Lee rostered due to the devy/rookie drafts (will also get Cobb/Crabtree back so he's a worst to first candidate in 2014)I agree. I had tried to come up with an offer he would accept straight away with no counter needed and that was it.Concept Coop said:Have to agree. In a start 2 QB league, I'd trade that for Teddy alone. I like Tannehill more as an NFL prospect than a fantasy prospect.Clear win for the Bridgewater/Nicks side
Losing Bridgewater/Nicks doesn't kill me though as I still have Aaron Rodgers/RG3/SamBradford/EJ Manuel and now Tannehill at QB, and Calvin/Dez/AJG/Harvin/DenariusMoore/Amari Cooper/Diggs at WR. I still like Stewart so adding him and a short term QB2 while all of my guys are out without really hurting my team was worth it (from my perspective, even though its a loss on paper)
Romo for me. The team getting Ridley/Eli would have to have nothing at RB, or close to it.12 team Superflex (so basically a 2 QB):
Team A got: Tony Romo
Team B got: Eli Manning, Stevan Ridley, 2014 2nd (devy weakened, and pick is from a top 3 team in league, so it's like a late 3rd rounder)
I probably take Kendal Wright over Manuel and Ball....................Bernard?? Lord.10 team. Non-PPR
Team A Trades:
Kendall Wright
Giovani Bernard
Team B Trades:
EJ Manuel
Montee Ball
Seems like a win for the Wright/Bernard team currently.
PLus it looks like he traded Gronk assumign his value was already crushed. That is SUPER light for Gronk.Couldn't we say that about any player?Risky, but so is holding onto Gronk when you're a rebuilding team. Anything could happen the rest of the season to crush his value. That's a solid trade for a team that's not in it.Adam Harstad said:Woof. Assuming random 1sts (as opposed to, say, guaranteed top-4 picks), you might well have to add two more 1st rounders to the Jeffery/Blackmon side to get me to move Gronk for that.Ron_Mexico said:After making a couple of trades it worked out to be
Gronk
2nd 2014
for
Jeffery
Blackmon
1st 2014
3rd 2014
.
I'd make the case for Keenan Allen.2qb ?Team A gave: Cobb
Team B gave: Keenan
although I'd take Cobb, was thinking KeenumI'd make the case for Keenan Allen.2qb ?Team A gave: Cobb
Team B gave: Keenan
I was wondering why the hell you asked, lol.although I'd take Cobb, was thinking KeenumI'd make the case for Keenan Allen.2qb ?Team A gave: Cobb
Team B gave: Keenan
Sure, or something could happen to Jeffery and you were just the guy who sold Rob Gronkowski for a random rookie 1st round pick.Risky, but so is holding onto Gronk when you're a rebuilding team. Anything could happen the rest of the season to crush his value. That's a solid trade for a team that's not in it.Adam Harstad said:Woof. Assuming random 1sts (as opposed to, say, guaranteed top-4 picks), you might well have to add two more 1st rounders to the Jeffery/Blackmon side to get me to move Gronk for that.Ron_Mexico said:After making a couple of trades it worked out to be
Gronk
2nd 2014
for
Jeffery
Blackmon
1st 2014
3rd 2014
.
I'd like the Martin/Harvin side even without the 1st round picks.Also a few weeks ago - same league 10 team Non-PPR
Team A Trades:
Adrian Peterson
Reggie Wayne
Marcus Lattimore
2nd round pick 2014
Team B Trades:
Doug Martin
Percy Harvin
1st round pick 2014
1st round pick 2015
Potential #1 WRs are neither particularly rare nor particularly valuable. I can probably name 30+ potential #1 WRs. Absent scarcity, there is no value.We could, but this is a guy who just recovered from some serious injuries. He's getting back a couple potential #1 WR's and 1st in a good class.Couldn't we say that about any player?Risky, but so is holding onto Gronk when you're a rebuilding team. Anything could happen the rest of the season to crush his value. That's a solid trade for a team that's not in it.Adam Harstad said:Woof. Assuming random 1sts (as opposed to, say, guaranteed top-4 picks), you might well have to add two more 1st rounders to the Jeffery/Blackmon side to get me to move Gronk for that.Ron_Mexico said:After making a couple of trades it worked out to be
Gronk
2nd 2014
for
Jeffery
Blackmon
1st 2014
3rd 2014
.
Don't sugar coat it lol. This is a horrible tradeI'd like the Martin/Harvin side even without the 1st round picks.Also a few weeks ago - same league 10 team Non-PPR
Team A Trades:
Adrian Peterson
Reggie Wayne
Marcus Lattimore
2nd round pick 2014
Team B Trades:
Doug Martin
Percy Harvin
1st round pick 2014
1st round pick 2015
Martin on both trades by A LOT!!!FFPC - $2500
I gave Torrey Smith, Andre Ellington and 2014 2nd (likely a 2.1-2.4)
I got Doug Martin
DFWC - $299 (PPR, must start 2-4 RB and 3-5WR - 2RB/5WR most point-effective combo)
I traded Justin Blackmon (pre-suspension)
I got Doug Martin
You're coming at it from a pretty negative perspective. Only looking at the positives with the Gronk side and the negatives with the other side. I'm not the world's biggest Jeffery fan and I think his production would be more impressive if he didn't have Marshall working on the other side of him, but the guy is on pace for 1200+ yards in his sophomore NFL season. Pretty damn good. You've banged the drum for injury-prone ppg monsters like Gronk and Harvin in the past, but now you're disregarding Justin Blackmon. It's a slightly different situation with Blackmon, but he's similar to those guys in the sense that when he plays he can be relied on to deliver a big ppg advantage. IF he comes back and stays out of trouble he's going to be a massive steal. If you assign something like a 35% probability to that he looks like a pretty significant piece. And you just never know with a late 1st. It's not worth a superstar alone, but you have a real shot at an eventual FF starter there.Adam Harstad said:The guy traded a player who scores like a top-5 fantasy WR, except he's eligible to be started at the TE position. In return, he got an addict serving an indefinite suspension and one strike away from an even more indefinite suspension, a promising receiver prospect with under 1,000 career receiving yards, and a random first. Would any rebuilding team have traded Dez for that package? Demaryius? Julio? Green? Because Gronk scores as many points as those guys, except as I said, he has TE eligibility.
Justin Blackmon produces huge per-game numbers, but has missed a lot of games already due to "injury", will be out an unspecified amount of time with his current "injury", and is at a dramatically (DRAMATICALLY) increased risk of receiving another "injury" at any given moment that will keep him out for a year (if it doesn't end his career entirely). His NFL future is totally uncertain- iirc, Jacksonville can cut him with no further financial implications. In other words, if you really want to go making the "injury" analogy, then Justin Blackmon is... Danario Alexander.You're coming at it from a pretty negative perspective. Only looking at the positives with the Gronk side and the negatives with the other side. I'm not the world's biggest Jeffery fan and I think his production would be more impressive if he didn't have Marshall working on the other side of him, but the guy is on pace for 1200+ yards in his sophomore NFL season. Pretty damn good. You've banged the drum for injury-prone ppg monsters like Gronk and Harvin in the past, but now you're disregarding Justin Blackmon. It's a slightly different situation with Blackmon, but he's similar to those guys in the sense that when he plays he can be relied on to deliver a big ppg advantage. IF he comes back and stays out of trouble he's going to be a massive steal. If you assign something like a 35% probability to that he looks like a pretty significant piece. And you just never know with a late 1st. It's not worth a superstar alone, but you have a real shot at an eventual FF starter there.Adam Harstad said:The guy traded a player who scores like a top-5 fantasy WR, except he's eligible to be started at the TE position. In return, he got an addict serving an indefinite suspension and one strike away from an even more indefinite suspension, a promising receiver prospect with under 1,000 career receiving yards, and a random first. Would any rebuilding team have traded Dez for that package? Demaryius? Julio? Green? Because Gronk scores as many points as those guys, except as I said, he has TE eligibility.
Do I love the trade? No, but there's upside/downside to both sides. If Gronk gets slowed down by his injuries it will turn the whole thing on its ear. Given his track record, I would say that's a pretty significant possibility. I think if I were moving him I'd rather get an established commodity like Green or Demaryius, but two premium young prospects (even with Blackmon's warts he's still a top 5-6 under-25 WR in the NFL) and a high draft pick is not the worst package you can get if you decide to split a key player into smaller pieces (which I generally don't advocate).
I am among the few that do not view this as a bad trade. I wouldn’t be jumping to accept, but I would have considered it as a Gronk owner.Adam Harstad said:Potential #1 WRs are neither particularly rare nor particularly valuable. I can probably name 30+ potential #1 WRs. Absent scarcity, there is no value.We could, but this is a guy who just recovered from some serious injuries. He's getting back a couple potential #1 WR's and 1st in a good class.Couldn't we say that about any player?Risky, but so is holding onto Gronk when you're a rebuilding team. Anything could happen the rest of the season to crush his value. That's a solid trade for a team that's not in it.Adam Harstad said:Woof. Assuming random 1sts (as opposed to, say, guaranteed top-4 picks), you might well have to add two more 1st rounders to the Jeffery/Blackmon side to get me to move Gronk for that.After making a couple of trades it worked out to be
Gronk
2nd 2014
for
Jeffery
Blackmon
1st 2014
3rd 2014
.
The guy traded a player who scores like a top-5 fantasy WR, except he's eligible to be started at the TE position. In return, he got an addict serving an indefinite suspension and one strike away from an even more indefinite suspension, a promising receiver prospect with under 1,000 career receiving yards, and a random first. Would any rebuilding team have traded Dez for that package? Demaryius? Julio? Green? Because Gronk scores as many points as those guys, except as I said, he has TE eligibility.
Almost mentioned that myself. I have Graham in a couple leagues and occasionally get offers for him. Someone came calling this morning offering Hakeem Nicks and some other smaller piece. I rejected that immediately. He came back asking what it would take to get it done and I said any deal would have to involve AJ Green.While Gronk may have historically scored similar to Dez, Demaryius, Julio, Calvin and AJ Green, I find in 1PPR that Gronk typically can’t buy you any of those top 5 guys (not always the case).
Unless I'm missing something, he doesn't even have a short term hole. He mentioned going after Tannehill because Rodgers went down, but then listed RGIII and Manuel among his QBs later. Was Stewart the target here? Seems like a huge overpay for him.I just think you should have found a better way to fill the short-term hole you have that didn't include giving away Bridgewater in this format.12 Team 1PPR 2QB-2RB-2WR-1TE-1Flex
Team A Gave - Teddy Bridgewater, Hakeem Nicks, Kenbrell Thompkins, 2014 3rd (3.10-3.12)
Team B Gave - Ryan Tannehill, Jonathan Stewart, Quinton Patton, 2014 2nd (2.01-2.02)Team A is contending, just lost Aaron Rodgers/Sam Bradford/EJ Manuel, and still hasn't gotten off the Stewart bandwagon (me).
Team B is in last looking towards the future and wasn't a fan of Tannehill but is a huge Hakeem Nicks supporter. Should have the 1.01 (1.02 at worst with the bracket set up) AND already will already have Teddy Bridgewater/Marqise Lee rostered due to the devy/rookie drafts (will also get Cobb/Crabtree back so he's a worst to first candidate in 2014)I agree. I had tried to come up with an offer he would accept straight away with no counter needed and that was it.Have to agree. In a start 2 QB league, I'd trade that for Teddy alone. I like Tannehill more as an NFL prospect than a fantasy prospect.Clear win for the Bridgewater/Nicks side
Losing Bridgewater/Nicks doesn't kill me though as I still have Aaron Rodgers/RG3/SamBradford/EJ Manuel and now Tannehill at QB, and Calvin/Dez/AJG/Harvin/DenariusMoore/Amari Cooper/Diggs at WR. I still like Stewart so adding him and a short term QB2 while all of my guys are out without really hurting my team was worth it (from my perspective, even though its a loss on paper)
Just because you have a stacked team that can afford the loss, doesn't mean you should make a bad trade.
It's funny that this is mentioned. Right now, I view Jimmy as just about the only untradable player in dynasty. In one of my rebuilds, where I have lots of youth, I was offered something like Julio/VD for Jimmy/DBowe. I told the owner that sure, getting rid of Jimmy for Julio loses me games now, but even with Gronk, a healthy Jimmy is maybe the best asset to have in dynasty. There has been the emergence of Cameron and Julius, and of course, Gronk is on Jimmy's level too, but Gronk does have serious injury risk. With Gronk's injury risk, it does make him more affordable and I've taken advantage of that in two of my leagues, though, I still paid a decent price on him. With Jimmy's injuries being way less severe, and him being as dominant as he is in a position where he's going to average way more points over the #3 TE (with a healthy Gronk), it makes him extremely valuable since you're getting such a stud where there's hardly anyone that comes close to Jimmy on the week-to-week basis.Almost mentioned that myself. I have Graham in a couple leagues and occasionally get offers for him. Someone came calling this morning offering Hakeem Nicks and some other smaller piece. I rejected that immediately. He came back asking what it would take to get it done and I said any deal would have to involve AJ Green.While Gronk may have historically scored similar to Dez, Demaryius, Julio, Calvin and AJ Green, I find in 1PPR that Gronk typically cant buy you any of those top 5 guys (not always the case).
Haven't heard back from him since. Doubt I will. In the offseason in that same league I offered Graham for Dez straight up. Rejected. Graham for Julio straight up. Rejected.
Everyone wants to get something without giving up something. So if you're looking to shift one of these beast TEs for a premium player elsewhere, you might find it hard in practice. That doesn't necessarily mean you need to go accepting the first halfway decent proposition that crosses your desk, but it's worth mentioning. If for some reason you decide that it's a ripe time to move one of these guys, a volatile deal with several smaller high upside pieces might be the best offer you get.
I've taken to the strategy of getting a true elite stud QB early in a dynasty build. (My dynasty QBs currently are Luck, Stafford, and RG3) but if you start more than 3 WRs, I'd probably prefer Cobb. Just by a little.5 pt per TD Passing, 1/2 pt PPR.
Team A:
Randall Cobb, Mike Wallace
Team B:
Andrew Luck
I have Brady so I got a little freaked out when he was slumping. This is a true dynasty, so I figure Luck is a 10 yr investment. I have Harvin, Fitz, Crabtree, VJax and Kendall Wright as my other WRs so had the depth to make it happen
We start 2RB, 3WR, 1TE and 1 FLEX - WR/RB/TE.I've taken to the strategy of getting a true elite stud QB early in a dynasty build. (My dynasty QBs currently are Luck, Stafford, and RG3) but if you start more than 3 WRs, I'd probably prefer Cobb. Just by a little.5 pt per TD Passing, 1/2 pt PPR.
Team A:
Randall Cobb, Mike Wallace
Team B:
Andrew Luck
I have Brady so I got a little freaked out when he was slumping. This is a true dynasty, so I figure Luck is a 10 yr investment. I have Harvin, Fitz, Crabtree, VJax and Kendall Wright as my other WRs so had the depth to make it happen
Agreed that cobbs value is tied to his qb. Thankfully that likely won't change any time soon.We start 2RB, 3WR, 1TE and 1 FLEX - WR/RB/TE.TEs have premium PPR (1 pt per).I've taken to the strategy of getting a true elite stud QB early in a dynasty build. (My dynasty QBs currently are Luck, Stafford, and RG3) but if you start more than 3 WRs, I'd probably prefer Cobb. Just by a little.5 pt per TD Passing, 1/2 pt PPR.
Team A:
Randall Cobb, Mike Wallace
Team B:
Andrew Luck
I have Brady so I got a little freaked out when he was slumping. This is a true dynasty, so I figure Luck is a 10 yr investment. I have Harvin, Fitz, Crabtree, VJax and Kendall Wright as my other WRs so had the depth to make it happen
At full PPR for WR, I probably wouldn't have done the deal. At 4 pts per TD, probably wouldn't have done it either.
I figured with Lacy emerging and Nelson establishing himself as the 1/1A, it was worth the risk. I was never all that sold on Cobb as a top 10WR long term - I think he's very highly ranked now because of his QB only.
Wallace was warming the bench so he was a throw-in IMO.
I also have Michael Floyd, Eifert, and 3 solid options at RB which means WR rarely fills my flex slot.
There is risk with all slot options. Not many teams - including GB, up to this year - use the slot enough to produce top 5-10 numbers. Cobb did so last year, in large part, due to getting time on the outisde.I figured with Lacy emerging and Nelson establishing himself as the 1/1A, it was worth the risk. I was never all that sold on Cobb as a top 10WR long term - I think he's very highly ranked now because of his QB only.
Agreed, I just think Luck will have value wherever he goes- was more talking about Cobb switching teams once his rookie deal is up. Will be hard to pay/keep Jordy, Cobb, Rodgers, Mathews, etc.Agreed that cobbs value is tied to his qb. Thankfully that likely won't change any time soon.We start 2RB, 3WR, 1TE and 1 FLEX - WR/RB/TE.TEs have premium PPR (1 pt per).I've taken to the strategy of getting a true elite stud QB early in a dynasty build. (My dynasty QBs currently are Luck, Stafford, and RG3) but if you start more than 3 WRs, I'd probably prefer Cobb. Just by a little.5 pt per TD Passing, 1/2 pt PPR.
Team A:
Randall Cobb, Mike Wallace
Team B:
Andrew Luck
I have Brady so I got a little freaked out when he was slumping. This is a true dynasty, so I figure Luck is a 10 yr investment. I have Harvin, Fitz, Crabtree, VJax and Kendall Wright as my other WRs so had the depth to make it happen
At full PPR for WR, I probably wouldn't have done the deal. At 4 pts per TD, probably wouldn't have done it either.
I figured with Lacy emerging and Nelson establishing himself as the 1/1A, it was worth the risk. I was never all that sold on Cobb as a top 10WR long term - I think he's very highly ranked now because of his QB only.
Wallace was warming the bench so he was a throw-in IMO.
I also have Michael Floyd, Eifert, and 3 solid options at RB which means WR rarely fills my flex slot.
It's a 2QB league, so that's probably where the hole is after a Rodgers injury--but that's also what makes Bridgewater worth so much.Unless I'm missing something, he doesn't even have a short term hole. He mentioned going after Tannehill because Rodgers went down, but then listed RGIII and Manuel among his QBs later. Was Stewart the target here? Seems like a huge overpay for him.I just think you should have found a better way to fill the short-term hole you have that didn't include giving away Bridgewater in this format.12 Team 1PPR 2QB-2RB-2WR-1TE-1Flex
Team A Gave - Teddy Bridgewater, Hakeem Nicks, Kenbrell Thompkins, 2014 3rd (3.10-3.12)
Team B Gave - Ryan Tannehill, Jonathan Stewart, Quinton Patton, 2014 2nd (2.01-2.02)Team A is contending, just lost Aaron Rodgers/Sam Bradford/EJ Manuel, and still hasn't gotten off the Stewart bandwagon (me).
Team B is in last looking towards the future and wasn't a fan of Tannehill but is a huge Hakeem Nicks supporter. Should have the 1.01 (1.02 at worst with the bracket set up) AND already will already have Teddy Bridgewater/Marqise Lee rostered due to the devy/rookie drafts (will also get Cobb/Crabtree back so he's a worst to first candidate in 2014)I agree. I had tried to come up with an offer he would accept straight away with no counter needed and that was it.Have to agree. In a start 2 QB league, I'd trade that for Teddy alone. I like Tannehill more as an NFL prospect than a fantasy prospect.Clear win for the Bridgewater/Nicks side
Losing Bridgewater/Nicks doesn't kill me though as I still have Aaron Rodgers/RG3/SamBradford/EJ Manuel and now Tannehill at QB, and Calvin/Dez/AJG/Harvin/DenariusMoore/Amari Cooper/Diggs at WR. I still like Stewart so adding him and a short term QB2 while all of my guys are out without really hurting my team was worth it (from my perspective, even though its a loss on paper)
Just because you have a stacked team that can afford the loss, doesn't mean you should make a bad trade.
I'd be ok starting RGIII and Manuel (he's back this week), rather than adding Tannehill at the price. I really see little to no difference between Manuel and Tannehill for this season - but yeah I guess for depth purposes.It's a 2QB league, so that's probably where the hole is after a Rodgers injury--but that's also what makes Bridgewater worth so much.Unless I'm missing something, he doesn't even have a short term hole. He mentioned going after Tannehill because Rodgers went down, but then listed RGIII and Manuel among his QBs later. Was Stewart the target here? Seems like a huge overpay for him.I just think you should have found a better way to fill the short-term hole you have that didn't include giving away Bridgewater in this format.12 Team 1PPR 2QB-2RB-2WR-1TE-1Flex
Team A Gave - Teddy Bridgewater, Hakeem Nicks, Kenbrell Thompkins, 2014 3rd (3.10-3.12)
Team B Gave - Ryan Tannehill, Jonathan Stewart, Quinton Patton, 2014 2nd (2.01-2.02)Team A is contending, just lost Aaron Rodgers/Sam Bradford/EJ Manuel, and still hasn't gotten off the Stewart bandwagon (me).
Team B is in last looking towards the future and wasn't a fan of Tannehill but is a huge Hakeem Nicks supporter. Should have the 1.01 (1.02 at worst with the bracket set up) AND already will already have Teddy Bridgewater/Marqise Lee rostered due to the devy/rookie drafts (will also get Cobb/Crabtree back so he's a worst to first candidate in 2014)I agree. I had tried to come up with an offer he would accept straight away with no counter needed and that was it.Have to agree. In a start 2 QB league, I'd trade that for Teddy alone. I like Tannehill more as an NFL prospect than a fantasy prospect.Clear win for the Bridgewater/Nicks side
Losing Bridgewater/Nicks doesn't kill me though as I still have Aaron Rodgers/RG3/SamBradford/EJ Manuel and now Tannehill at QB, and Calvin/Dez/AJG/Harvin/DenariusMoore/Amari Cooper/Diggs at WR. I still like Stewart so adding him and a short term QB2 while all of my guys are out without really hurting my team was worth it (from my perspective, even though its a loss on paper)
Just because you have a stacked team that can afford the loss, doesn't mean you should make a bad trade.