Does he really matter in this scheme?I mean when have 22 sacks mattered this little? I want Frazier and the Cover 2 gone. If that means a soon to be 30 year old DE has to go, so be it... I think the 3-4 is the only way to get "consistent" pressure on the QB, especially when your DBs are as pathetic as we have.So you don't want Jared Allen?THIS!!!!OK, well I don't believe Morris was even being considered for DC after that news. More likely he was being looked at in a similar role here. God I hope Spags gets the DC job. It would be nice to move away from this stupid cover 2 that we've been getting beat on for the last 5 years.
I want a 3-4 so bad I can taste it!
Wait. So you're calling for a change to the 3-4 in order to get consistent pressure? The Vikes LED THE NFL in sacks this year. They generate plenty of pressure from the 4-3. Their back 7 couldn't cover ANYONE. Switching to the 3-4 won't change that.Does he really matter in this scheme?I mean when have 22 sacks mattered this little? I want Frazier and the Cover 2 gone. If that means a soon to be 30 year old DE has to go, so be it... I think the 3-4 is the only way to get "consistent" pressure on the QB, especially when your DBs are as pathetic as we have.So you don't want Jared Allen?THIS!!!!OK, well I don't believe Morris was even being considered for DC after that news. More likely he was being looked at in a similar role here. God I hope Spags gets the DC job. It would be nice to move away from this stupid cover 2 that we've been getting beat on for the last 5 years.
I want a 3-4 so bad I can taste it!
Yes, "Consistent" pressure. It seemed when teams wanted/needed to shut down the front 4 of the Vikings, they did as evident by our crappy Pass D. 50 sacks and yet the opposing offense still managed the best QB rating Vs. (107.6) and the most TDs (34). When you know where the rush is coming from (front 4) it's pretty easy to block or double team big Hoss. So while they tied for the league in Sacks did it really matter?Wait. So you're calling for a change to the 3-4 in order to get consistent pressure? The Vikes LED THE NFL in sacks this year. They generate plenty of pressure from the 4-3. Their back 7 couldn't cover ANYONE. Switching to the 3-4 won't change that.Does he really matter in this scheme?I mean when have 22 sacks mattered this little? I want Frazier and the Cover 2 gone. If that means a soon to be 30 year old DE has to go, so be it... I think the 3-4 is the only way to get "consistent" pressure on the QB, especially when your DBs are as pathetic as we have.So you don't want Jared Allen?THIS!!!!OK, well I don't believe Morris was even being considered for DC after that news. More likely he was being looked at in a similar role here. God I hope Spags gets the DC job. It would be nice to move away from this stupid cover 2 that we've been getting beat on for the last 5 years.
I want a 3-4 so bad I can taste it!
Yes... and no. The pass rush was not entirely consistent, but you're not going to sack every opponent 4-5 times per game. Some o-lines/QBs/TEs are better than others or game plan better than others to neutralize the pass rush... My point is that they generated pressure as well as anyone while playing the 4-3. They were horrendous in coverage. I would argue the worst in the NFL, although there were other teams that gave up more yards. That's much less a scheme issue and much more a personnel issue IMO. Changing to a scheme that neutralizes their best defender is cutting off their nose to spite an already very homely face. Good god, can you imagine the numbers they would have given up if their pass rush wasn't effective?Yes, "Consistent" pressure. It seemed when teams wanted/needed to shut down the front 4 of the Vikings, they did as evident by our crappy Pass D. 50 sacks and yet the opposing offense still managed the best QB rating Vs. (107.6) and the most TDs (34). When you know where the rush is coming from (front 4) it's pretty easy to block or double team big Hoss. So while they tied for the league in Sacks did it really matter?Wait. So you're calling for a change to the 3-4 in order to get consistent pressure? The Vikes LED THE NFL in sacks this year. They generate plenty of pressure from the 4-3. Their back 7 couldn't cover ANYONE. Switching to the 3-4 won't change that.Does he really matter in this scheme?I mean when have 22 sacks mattered this little? I want Frazier and the Cover 2 gone. If that means a soon to be 30 year old DE has to go, so be it... I think the 3-4 is the only way to get "consistent" pressure on the QB, especially when your DBs are as pathetic as we have.So you don't want Jared Allen?THIS!!!!OK, well I don't believe Morris was even being considered for DC after that news. More likely he was being looked at in a similar role here. God I hope Spags gets the DC job. It would be nice to move away from this stupid cover 2 that we've been getting beat on for the last 5 years.
I want a 3-4 so bad I can taste it!
The DBs weren't that terrible when Winfield was healthy, Griffin was fresh and Cook wasn't choking women. The safeties have been terrible for a long time, but when Asher Allen has to start alongside those terrible safeties and Griffin who was coming off of 2 ACL surgeries, the back 7 is going to get eaten up. 4-3/3-4 won't matter at that point.Yes... and no. The pass rush was not entirely consistent, but you're not going to sack every opponent 4-5 times per game. Some o-lines/QBs/TEs are better than others or game plan better than others to neutralize the pass rush... My point is that they generated pressure as well as anyone while playing the 4-3. They were horrendous in coverage. I would argue the worst in the NFL, although there were other teams that gave up more yards. That's much less a scheme issue and much more a personnel issue IMO. Changing to a scheme that neutralizes their best defender is cutting off their nose to spite an already very homely face. Good god, can you imagine the numbers they would have given up if their pass rush wasn't effective?Yes, "Consistent" pressure. It seemed when teams wanted/needed to shut down the front 4 of the Vikings, they did as evident by our crappy Pass D. 50 sacks and yet the opposing offense still managed the best QB rating Vs. (107.6) and the most TDs (34). When you know where the rush is coming from (front 4) it's pretty easy to block or double team big Hoss. So while they tied for the league in Sacks did it really matter?Wait. So you're calling for a change to the 3-4 in order to get consistent pressure? The Vikes LED THE NFL in sacks this year. They generate plenty of pressure from the 4-3. Their back 7 couldn't cover ANYONE. Switching to the 3-4 won't change that.Does he really matter in this scheme?I mean when have 22 sacks mattered this little? I want Frazier and the Cover 2 gone. If that means a soon to be 30 year old DE has to go, so be it... I think the 3-4 is the only way to get "consistent" pressure on the QB, especially when your DBs are as pathetic as we have.So you don't want Jared Allen?THIS!!!!OK, well I don't believe Morris was even being considered for DC after that news. More likely he was being looked at in a similar role here. God I hope Spags gets the DC job. It would be nice to move away from this stupid cover 2 that we've been getting beat on for the last 5 years.
I want a 3-4 so bad I can taste it!
Is this speculation on your part or did you hear/ read something? Oh, and for so many reasons...Time for Brett Favre part duex - here comes Manning!
No, they shouldn't IMO. And also no RG3 if he's available at 3.I like Ponder and all, but I wonder if they should consider trading up for Luck if they can.
RG3 and Luck aren't even close in talent.Ponder may develop into a fine quarterback but I don't think he can be elite. Luck will be at least that and possibly elite. I think you have to at least consider it.No, they shouldn't IMO. And also no RG3 if he's available at 3.I like Ponder and all, but I wonder if they should consider trading up for Luck if they can.
Jeezus. For real?I am honestly thinking of giving up on this franchise.Vikings set to offer defensive coordinator job to Alan WilliamsPosted by Michael David Smith on January 18, 2012, 2:17 PM EST Alan Williams appears to be the next defensive coordinator of the Minnesota Vikings.NFL Network’s Jason La Canfora reports that the Vikings are expected to offer the defensive coordinator position to Williams, who was previously the Colts’ defensive backs coach.Presumably, Williams will accept the offer, as it’s a step up in job title — and until the Colts have a head coach, there’s no way of knowing whether he’d have a job in Indianapolis at all even if he wants to stay.Williams has worked for the Colts for 10 years, including two years alongside Vikings head coach Leslie Frazier.
Nothing new except the report of Manning not wanting to push back his 28 mil bonus date, meaning he will stay or be released, probability of being released rising.No connection to us and definitely no definite word on release, but man, are we not just the type of battered wife franchise that would go after another mess like this?Is this speculation on your part or did you hear/ read something? Oh, and for so many reasons...Time for Brett Favre part duex - here comes Manning!
Well, at least he has experience with their current scheme...I think the O-line and Allen had more deflections than the DBs this season.Jeezus. For real?I am honestly thinking of giving up on this franchise.Vikings set to offer defensive coordinator job to Alan WilliamsPosted by Michael David Smith on January 18, 2012, 2:17 PM EST Alan Williams appears to be the next defensive coordinator of the Minnesota Vikings.NFL Network’s Jason La Canfora reports that the Vikings are expected to offer the defensive coordinator position to Williams, who was previously the Colts’ defensive backs coach.Presumably, Williams will accept the offer, as it’s a step up in job title — and until the Colts have a head coach, there’s no way of knowing whether he’d have a job in Indianapolis at all even if he wants to stay.Williams has worked for the Colts for 10 years, including two years alongside Vikings head coach Leslie Frazier.
Yes. But Peyton wouldn't come near this mess if Cooper was the HC. The Vikes may have interest, but I assure you it would be one-sided.Nothing new except the report of Manning not wanting to push back his 28 mil bonus date, meaning he will stay or be released, probability of being released rising.No connection to us and definitely no definite word on release, but man, are we not just the type of battered wife franchise that would go after another mess like this?Is this speculation on your part or did you hear/ read something? Oh, and for so many reasons...Time for Brett Favre part duex - here comes Manning!
How much more ineptness can we take?'Andy Dufresne said:Jeezus. For real?I am honestly thinking of giving up on this franchise.Vikings set to offer defensive coordinator job to Alan WilliamsPosted by Michael David Smith on January 18, 2012, 2:17 PM EST Alan Williams appears to be the next defensive coordinator of the Minnesota Vikings.NFL Network’s Jason La Canfora reports that the Vikings are expected to offer the defensive coordinator position to Williams, who was previously the Colts’ defensive backs coach.Presumably, Williams will accept the offer, as it’s a step up in job title — and until the Colts have a head coach, there’s no way of knowing whether he’d have a job in Indianapolis at all even if he wants to stay.Williams has worked for the Colts for 10 years, including two years alongside Vikings head coach Leslie Frazier.
I am forced to look for the silver lining. He might be a good hiring. Prior to this year, Indy had 9 years of success. Indy like the Vikings don't spend a lot of high draft picks on DBs. Don't know the stats but I imagine the Colts defense was on the field the majority of the time with Curtis Painter throwing 3 and outs.'Andy Dufresne said:Jeezus. For real?I am honestly thinking of giving up on this franchise.Vikings set to offer defensive coordinator job to Alan Williams
Posted by Michael David Smith on January 18, 2012, 2:17 PM EST
Alan Williams appears to be the next defensive coordinator of the Minnesota Vikings.
NFL Network's Jason La Canfora reports that the Vikings are expected to offer the defensive coordinator position to Williams, who was previously the Colts' defensive backs coach.
Presumably, Williams will accept the offer, as it's a step up in job title — and until the Colts have a head coach, there's no way of knowing whether he'd have a job in Indianapolis at all even if he wants to stay.
Williams has worked for the Colts for 10 years, including two years alongside Vikings head coach Leslie Frazier.
I would think that a team trying to turn around after 3-13 would pick someone who has been a coordinator already, not elevating a d-backs coach from a middling pass defense.I am forced to look for the silver lining. He might be a good hiring. Prior to this year, Indy had 9 years of success. Indy like the Vikings don't spend a lot of high draft picks on DBs. Don't know the stats but I imagine the Colts defense was on the field the majority of the time with Curtis Painter throwing 3 and outs.
'Andy Dufresne said:Jeezus. For real?I am honestly thinking of giving up on this franchise.Vikings set to offer defensive coordinator job to Alan WilliamsPosted by Michael David Smith on January 18, 2012, 2:17 PM EST Alan Williams appears to be the next defensive coordinator of the Minnesota Vikings.NFL Network’s Jason La Canfora reports that the Vikings are expected to offer the defensive coordinator position to Williams, who was previously the Colts’ defensive backs coach.Presumably, Williams will accept the offer, as it’s a step up in job title — and until the Colts have a head coach, there’s no way of knowing whether he’d have a job in Indianapolis at all even if he wants to stay.Williams has worked for the Colts for 10 years, including two years alongside Vikings head coach Leslie Frazier.
WAY too much doom and gloom in here. Can't wait for the draft. Khalil or a trade down is what I'm hoping for. I really could see them taking RG3 if they think he's a stud. A difference maker at QB can turn around a franchise quicker than anything else. I don't think he's that guy but I could see it if they believe.I agree and understand the disappointment in this thread because i too have suffered through the despicable last 2 years of football-but- lets all not overreact because they haven't completely cleaned house. Spielman has been promoted which clearly states he gets to make some big decisions this offseason that will hinge on his future with the team. In the NFL coaching staffs are very important, but personnel on the field is 20x more important. This is a defensive philosophy that 3-4 years ago sent out one of the top defenses in the NFL that eventually became a huge part of the team that should have won the 2009 NFC championship. Lets give Spielman and Frazier this offseason and training camp to establish what direction they want this team to go in. Because we all know that these 2, as well as every coach on Fraziers staff are connected at the hip , and will be gone if this team doesn't improve by leaps and bounds next year. The 2 biggest problems on this team remain the same as they were one year ago- No talent on the OLine, and Not enough players in the secondary. If therse 2 issues are ignored like they were last offseason , don't worry viking fans, we will all be speculating on who the new coach will be one year from now. But for now lets give these men the benefit of the doubt on their knowledge, and hope they can bring in the personnel to not make themselves look like idiots.
Either way next season is the deciding moment of Frasier and he has to know that so he wouldn't have made this move if he didn't think it would work. If it works.. If not, he has no one else to blame so he is gone.Jeezus. For real?I am honestly thinking of giving up on this franchise.Vikings set to offer defensive coordinator job to Alan WilliamsPosted by Michael David Smith on January 18, 2012, 2:17 PM EST Alan Williams appears to be the next defensive coordinator of the Minnesota Vikings.NFL Network’s Jason La Canfora reports that the Vikings are expected to offer the defensive coordinator position to Williams, who was previously the Colts’ defensive backs coach.Presumably, Williams will accept the offer, as it’s a step up in job title — and until the Colts have a head coach, there’s no way of knowing whether he’d have a job in Indianapolis at all even if he wants to stay.Williams has worked for the Colts for 10 years, including two years alongside Vikings head coach Leslie Frazier.
frasier will be gone this time next yearI can honestly say I don't understand a single thing the Vikes have done so far, or see any reason for hope.
They've promoted to GM a guy who was at least 1/3 responsible for current failure. Does anyone think our 1st year coach and capologist were 2/3 responsible for the state of the team?
The only coach fired was the coach of our one performing unit (DL).
They've hired a totally unproven 'coach's crony' as DC, while other teams are hiring proven coaches for the defensive coaching voids.
I couldn't possibly be more underwhelmed with the direction.
#### that guy. I say we cut him. He might be in jail fot three years anyway.Anything new on Chris Cook? I know he's a scumbag but he's also a good player. Will he be back?
Because Minneapolis politicians have more clout than non-Minneapolis politicians.Can someone explain to me exactly why the Metrodome site is being discussed as a location for the new stadium? I thought this whole time Arden Hills was a shoe-in. I HATE the Metrodome location.Tailgating? NOPEParking? NOPE - find a ramp 6 blocks away and walk in the freezing cold to the game. Fun.
Ah ok, that makes sense now. And of course the Governor is beholden to Minneapolis due to the fact that it's where he wins or loses the next election.Because Minneapolis politicians have more clout than non-Minneapolis politicians.Can someone explain to me exactly why the Metrodome site is being discussed as a location for the new stadium? I thought this whole time Arden Hills was a shoe-in. I HATE the Metrodome location.Tailgating? NOPEParking? NOPE - find a ramp 6 blocks away and walk in the freezing cold to the game. Fun.
Yep, that's it. I believe the area was fully vetted, all the plans are in place. And in the 11th hour, Minneapolis busted in and is demanding the new stadium be located on the Metrodome site.I went to college near Arden Hills. Where are they talking about up there, the old military base?
The Vikings did have a deal at one time to take over Property that the Star & Tribune currently owns around the Metrodome. But once they thought they'd build elsewhere they removed the offer.Word has it if the Metrodome site becomes the site, they will probably look to buy that property back from Star & Tribune for parking, tailgating, etc.. At this point I don't give a bleep where they build it.. JUST BUILD IT!Can someone explain to me exactly why the Metrodome site is being discussed as a location for the new stadium? I thought this whole time Arden Hills was a shoe-in. I HATE the Metrodome location.Tailgating? NOPEParking? NOPE - find a ramp 6 blocks away and walk in the freezing cold to the game. Fun.
http://www.gbnreport.com/Vikings put top pick on market … Minnesota G.M. Rick Spielman indicated during an interview on the NFL Network coverage of the Senior Bowl that the Vikings would be willing to move the #3 pick at this year’s draft if the price were right. According to Spielman “if someone wants to come up and get that pick we’ll be listening.” The Vikings, of course, selected QB Christian Ponder at the 2011 draft as their QB of the future, at least for now, so are not likely to be in the market for a passer with the third pick.
+2i was very disappointed to see the speilman promotion. I'll give him his selections in the first round the past few years. Other than that, I have also been completely underwhelmed by his performance.frasier will be gone this time next yearI can honestly say I don't understand a single thing the Vikes have done so far, or see any reason for hope.
They've promoted to GM a guy who was at least 1/3 responsible for current failure. Does anyone think our 1st year coach and capologist were 2/3 responsible for the state of the team?
The only coach fired was the coach of our one performing unit (DL).
They've hired a totally unproven 'coach's crony' as DC, while other teams are hiring proven coaches for the defensive coaching voids.
I couldn't possibly be more underwhelmed with the direction.
Good I would expect the Browns and the Redskins to talk to the Rams and the Vikings to move up and get Robert Griffin III.This should come as no surprise, Vikings looking to trade down:
http://www.gbnreport.com/Vikings put top pick on market … Minnesota G.M. Rick Spielman indicated during an interview on the NFL Network coverage of the Senior Bowl that the Vikings would be willing to move the #3 pick at this year’s draft if the price were right. According to Spielman “if someone wants to come up and get that pick we’ll be listening.” The Vikings, of course, selected QB Christian Ponder at the 2011 draft as their QB of the future, at least for now, so are not likely to be in the market for a passer with the third pick.
In my honest opinion, the Vikings are the worst team at finding talent from undrafted player pool. Is finding quality players from the scrap heap just luck? As a fan of the team, I am here waiting patiently for the next John Randle to appear.NFL teams are built though the NFL Draft. This is a truth that we hold self evident. It's also misleading.
The more-accurate truth is that the successful teams are built through the scrap heap in some way or form. The 2010 Packers, an almost completely homegrown team, are the anomaly. But even the SB champion packers wouldn't have made it as far as they did without something that I will refer to here as an "unexpected" contribution from fourth year CB Tramon Williams and rookie CB Sam Shields, both of whom combined to help Charles Woodson extend the effective portion of his career at cornerback. Williams and Shields have something else in common: both went undrafted by NFL teams in their respective draft years.
I am not sure if I buy that. I assume that Bengarvis Green-Ellis and Laurence Maroney had the same amount of coaching during their time with the Patriots. One thing I like about the Patriots, they leave no stone unturned when looking for players that can help their team.The Patriots have 18 undrafted free agents. EIGHTEEN!Some (a lot?) of their success has to do with good coaching, which I don't think the Vikings have had for a long, long, LONG time.
Cherrypick much?'Donnybrook said:I am not sure if I buy that. I assume that Bengarvis Green-Ellis and Laurence Maroney had the same amount of coaching during their time with the Patriots. One thing I like about the Patriots, they leave no stone unturned when looking for players that can help their team.The Patriots have 18 undrafted free agents. EIGHTEEN!Some (a lot?) of their success has to do with good coaching, which I don't think the Vikings have had for a long, long, LONG time.
Bethel College?I went to college near Arden Hills. Where are they talking about up there, the old military base?
Yep. University now.Bethel College?I went to college near Arden Hills. Where are they talking about up there, the old military base?
Exactly their best coaches have all been DCs who went on to coach other teams. It would be nice to actually have a coach who can run a team on Sunday.The Patriots have 18 undrafted free agents. EIGHTEEN!
Some (a lot?) of their success has to do with good coaching, which I don't think the Vikings have had for a long, long, LONG time.