bc hes tough and likes to play football? i dunno why he was out there. it was clearly, to me, the person who actually watched the game, severe enough that it limited his ability. mike bell had 12 carries and 6 catches in those 2 games. in his other 9 games on the browns he had 19 carries and 0 catches. wonder why his role increased?If the injury was so severe, why was he still playing in the 3rd and 4th quarter and in the next meaningless game? That makes zero sense. If he could play through it and play the next week when the Browns could have easily rested him with no repercussions, then I wouldn't call it severe. Also, please re-read what I wrote, I said hard hits happen a lot to RBs.
most rbs dont injure ribs and need to wear a flack jacket. when they do, they almost always sit out. you didnt see the hit. you didnt see hillis play before or afterward. it even seems like you are intimating that most rbs would not have been hurt on that play. or that hillis is somehow unable to take a hit.Also, please re-read what I wrote, I said hard hits happen a lot to RBs.
i think every rb will be "dinged" at some point. and hillis slightly more likely than others.Do you think he won't be "dinged" up at that point?
Last edited by a moderator: