Mr. Mojo
Footballguy
It was the worst garbage the Coen brothers ever had anything to do with.I know I'm late to the party but just watched "A Serious Man". What was that crap?
It was the worst garbage the Coen brothers ever had anything to do with.I know I'm late to the party but just watched "A Serious Man". What was that crap?
How about top 5 movies with a surprise ending?I think all of mine would be fairly recent.1. The Usual Suspects2. Primal Fear3. The Prestige4. Se7en5. The Game
You 2 basically covered the main ones. I'd probably find a place for Psycho on there, though.Sixth SenseFight ClubUsual SuspectsPlanet Of The ApesEmpire Strikes Back6. Frailty
Wasn't there just a thread about this?To which, I added: Jacob's LadderHow about top 5 movies with a surprise ending?I think all of mine would be fairly recent.1. The Usual Suspects2. Primal Fear3. The Prestige4. Se7en5. The GameYou 2 basically covered the main ones. I'd probably find a place for Psycho on there, though.Sixth SenseFight ClubUsual SuspectsPlanet Of The ApesEmpire Strikes Back6. Frailty
Knowing that you were my partner on the front lines of the anti-voice-over crusade, I figured this might bother you, too. I'm glad you still loved the movie. Even more glad to see that at least a couple of others think it's overrated, too.I didn't mind the MacGuffin, FWIW.Inception:
Just watched this for the 2nd time and would like to extend a friendly #### you to Krista for decreasing my enjoyment of the movie. You are right that as soon as he meets Juno, it turns into at least a 45 explanation as to WTF is going on. My memory of watching it was that it was a couple minutes of explaining the rules, but it is much longer than that.
Also, with other poster's beefs, there are a couple things that seem to be put in there just to move along the movie or provide drama - most notably that Scarecrow's been trained to defend an extraction, hence his subconscious projections are militarized and that they are too sedated and now dying in the dream will send you to limbo.
HOWEVER, I can still put that aside and I still think this is a damn fun movie to watch. I don't fault it much because I view it as an action movie that at least tried (and I think for the most part succeeded) to infuse some brains into the genre. Maybe others were disappointed b/c they were expecting more of The Prestige, and it broke down into an action movie. I still expect this to land on my list of movies of the year, which means it gets an 8/10.
And don't forget the most important rule: To prevent Leo's subconscious psychotic demon ##### wife from coming in and ####ing everything up you must never, ever, under any circumstances tell Leo about the design of the dream maze...unless of course you are on the third dream level where the rule that Leo can't under any circumstances hand Ellen his walkie talkie and plug his ears while she relays the vital maze information to the people who need it, supersedes the other rule. I am sorry for bashing Inception because I thought it was fun to watch and interesting enough but I just feel that much of the positive response is driven by a great cast, pervasive marketing campaign and a slick presentation by Nolan.Inception:
Just watched this for the 2nd time and would like to extend a friendly #### you to Krista for decreasing my enjoyment of the movie. You are right that as soon as he meets Juno, it turns into at least a 45 explanation as to WTF is going on. My memory of watching it was that it was a couple minutes of explaining the rules, but it is much longer than that.
Also, with other poster's beefs, there are a couple things that seem to be put in there just to move along the movie or provide drama - most notably that Scarecrow's been trained to defend an extraction, hence his subconscious projections are militarized and that they are too sedated and now dying in the dream will send you to limbo.
HOWEVER, I can still put that aside and I still think this is a damn fun movie to watch. I don't fault it much because I view it as an action movie that at least tried (and I think for the most part succeeded) to infuse some brains into the genre. Maybe others were disappointed b/c they were expecting more of The Prestige, and it broke down into an action movie. I still expect this to land on my list of movies of the year, which means it gets an 8/10.
In the 1980's Spacey played a supporting character for a year on a show called "Wiseguy".I don't know how many people recall the show but it was like "Donnie Brasco"--except it came out about ten years before that film.Spacey played a really mean villian, quite memorable. When I first saw "Se7en" that's immediately where I recognized him.Yah it looks like you are correct. Looking at Spacey's filmography prior to Se7en, there isn't much there (although he was in Glengarry Glen Ross, but I haven't seen that movie and don't know how prominent his role in that film was). Because of that, the surprise/shock value of seeing Spacey as the "main suspect" probably was far less back in 1995 when the movie came out then if you saw it for the first time these days. Because of that, it's somewhat odd that Spacey was completely left out of the opening credits, but was the first name listed and it had the whole screen to itself at the beginning of the end credits.
oteGuess the FBG:
Just watched this movie, and holy crap it's the best movie I've seen in a long time. We've got a bunch of morons over in the Avatar cartoon thread raving about what a "great movie" it is. This was a great, great movie. Awesome acting, awesome dialogue, awesome script, awesome story. Fiance and I both absolutely loved it. This is what filmmaking is about. James Cameron can take his special effects and sinking ships and blockbusters. I'll take this every day of the week.Loved it.
It's a tool that might be leaned on too much, but it usually doesn't annoy me instantly like the voiceover does. Maybe part of it the first time was that I was interested enough in the 'rules' that I wasn't paying attention. Now I had a background in the rules and the long explanations stuck out all the more and were a little distracting. I am sure that I'll notice it all the more in other movies now thoughKnowing that you were my partner on the front lines of the anti-voice-over crusade, I figured this might bother you, too. I'm glad you still loved the movie. Even more glad to see that at least a couple of others think it's overrated, too.I didn't mind the MacGuffin, FWIW.Inception:
Just watched this for the 2nd time and would like to extend a friendly #### you to Krista for decreasing my enjoyment of the movie. You are right that as soon as he meets Juno, it turns into at least a 45 explanation as to WTF is going on. My memory of watching it was that it was a couple minutes of explaining the rules, but it is much longer than that.
Also, with other poster's beefs, there are a couple things that seem to be put in there just to move along the movie or provide drama - most notably that Scarecrow's been trained to defend an extraction, hence his subconscious projections are militarized and that they are too sedated and now dying in the dream will send you to limbo.
HOWEVER, I can still put that aside and I still think this is a damn fun movie to watch. I don't fault it much because I view it as an action movie that at least tried (and I think for the most part succeeded) to infuse some brains into the genre. Maybe others were disappointed b/c they were expecting more of The Prestige, and it broke down into an action movie. I still expect this to land on my list of movies of the year, which means it gets an 8/10.
Not only the best movie Ive seen this year, but probably my favorite in maybe 5 years. Its so complex Im not sure if you know what youre calling "flaws" are actually flaws. I dont recall all the "rule breaking" occuring in dreams that you are referring to, although I need to see it again as a couple concepts confused me on how they were feasible, the gravity situation not being one of them.It was a massively anticipated movie, and it exceeded expectations. Really the only thing I can knock it for is despite a very talented cast, no one has a great performance. Even with that in mind, best movie of the year for me. I cant wait to see The Fighter and True Grit, but there's just no way theyll blow me away and leave me in awe, talking about the movie weeks after Ive seen it like Inception did. That not the criteria to win the Academy Award obviously, but enough for me to call it the best film of the year.Really?I mean it was an interesting concept and all...I guess I really need to see the Social Network. Im amazed at how many lists Ive seen it at #1, or in the top 3 in almost all of them. It looks good, but that good. I dunno, and I think Eisenberg is a very good actor.
Black Swan doesnt look all that appealing to me, but also is killing it in these lists. Might have to see that sooner rather than later.
....Now I havent seen Winter's Bone, King's Speech, and a couple other highly acclaimed movies that should be good, But Id wish somebody would just grow some balls and put Inception #1. I dont think Ive seen a list that has it #1 yet, and I am certain that none of these movies will surpass it - for me - including True Grit and The Fighter which I'll probably enjoy more than all the above mentioned anyway.
And would someone please explain why if there is no gravity on level one (van chase shootout on the bridge) there cannot be gravity on level two (Gordon Levitt fighting in the hotel), but even if there is no gravity on level one and/or two there can be gravity on level three (the snow fortress fight)? WTF?
And did all the bad guys get their weapons training from COBRA? They couldn't hit the ocean from the beach.
Sure the ending was interesting, but it was pretty much the most obvious ending possible. Is he or isn't he? Ooooooooooo. Well no ####! What other direction would any film director possibly have chosen to go? Ambiguity was really the only option for an ending.
*** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***");document.close();Again, I thought it was interesting but not everything people made it out to be. This film has many flaws.
I was 11 when Se7en came out, so clearly by the time I got around to seeing it Spacey had made a bigger name for himself, but Usual Suspects and Outbreak both came out before Se7en (although all 3 in 1995. He also had a few other recognizable movie before 95 - Glengarry Glen Ross, The Ref, Consenting Adults, Swimming With Sharks.ETA - 95 was the year that really put him on the map thoughInteresting...But at that point, I had never seen or heard of Kevin Spacey- had anybody else? I'm sure he'd been working prior to that, but enough to be a household name? I could be wrong, but I say no. For me, that was his debut- and what a debut.Didn't even think about that, but now that you mention it I think you're right in that he wasn't listed in the opening credits. Opening credits were pretty cool also.I believe his name was deliberately left off the opening credits.Was also surprised to see Kevin Spacey was the "main suspect", had no idea coming in he was in the movie
Not only the best movie Ive seen this year, but probably my favorite in maybe 5 years. Its so complex Im not sure if you know what youre calling "flaws" are actually flaws. I dont recall all the "rule breaking" occuring in dreams that you are referring to, although I need to see it again as a couple concepts confused me on how they were feasible, the gravity situation not being one of them.It was a massively anticipated movie, and it exceeded expectations. Really the only thing I can knock it for is despite a very talented cast, no one has a great performance. Even with that in mind, best movie of the year for me. I cant wait to see The Fighter and True Grit, but there's just no way theyll blow me away and leave me in awe, talking about the movie weeks after Ive seen it like Inception did. That not the criteria to win the Academy Award obviously, but enough for me to call it the best film of the year.");document.close();Again, I thought it was interesting but not everything people made it out to be. This film has many flaws.Really?I mean it was an interesting concept and all...I guess I really need to see the Social Network. Im amazed at how many lists Ive seen it at #1, or in the top 3 in almost all of them. It looks good, but that good. I dunno, and I think Eisenberg is a very good actor.
Black Swan doesnt look all that appealing to me, but also is killing it in these lists. Might have to see that sooner rather than later.
....Now I havent seen Winter's Bone, King's Speech, and a couple other highly acclaimed movies that should be good, But Id wish somebody would just grow some balls and put Inception #1. I dont think Ive seen a list that has it #1 yet, and I am certain that none of these movies will surpass it - for me - including True Grit and The Fighter which I'll probably enjoy more than all the above mentioned anyway.
And would someone please explain why if there is no gravity on level one (van chase shootout on the bridge) there cannot be gravity on level two (Gordon Levitt fighting in the hotel), but even if there is no gravity on level one and/or two there can be gravity on level three (the snow fortress fight)? WTF?
And did all the bad guys get their weapons training from COBRA? They couldn't hit the ocean from the beach.
Sure the ending was interesting, but it was pretty much the most obvious ending possible. Is he or isn't he? Ooooooooooo. Well no ####! What other direction would any film director possibly have chosen to go? Ambiguity was really the only option for an ending.
*** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***
I wouldnt argue with people calling it an action movie covered up as a suspenseful drama, but its just as much sci-fi too....I dont know about you, but when Im watching sci-fi movies I dont become less interested, more skeptical, or quit watching because I dont believe whats happening is actually possible.I'm with Chaka on this one. Great visuals/audio, which covers up some pretty glaring holes in the premise/plot. I had a hard time getting on board with how what they were doing was even possible, they didn't really bother to explain it, just offer it as granted. Eventually the whole "what's real/what's dream" wasn't really compelling and it devolved into action sequences for the sake of action sequences - which were rendered spectacularly - leaving me to feel they could have done somewhat better if they had found other things to explore in these dream states than straight up violence.
Unpleasant though it is, I really love this movie.Saw Se7en for the first time. Really good story; Morgan Freeman was phenomenal, surprised he wasn't nominated for an Oscar for his performance. Was also surprised to see Kevin Spacey was the "main suspect", had no idea coming in he was in the movie. He plays that creepy/#######/annoying bad guy very well, he makes me want to punch him in the face every time. The ending of that film could have gone a lot of different ways, I think I would have liked it to end slightly differently.
It is neither of those things. I'm not sure it's entirely successful, but it presents the central lesbian couple as an admirably flawed marriage.The Kids Are All Right looks terrible. Preachy and agenda-driven. I could be wrong, but I saw that director in an interview and she did not come across very well.HERE is the A.V. Club's top movies of the year.Ebert's top 10 movies of 2010---
1. The Social Network
2. The King's Speech
3. Black Swan
4. I Am Love
5. Winter's Bone
6. Inception
7. The Secret in Their Eyes
8. The American
9. The Kids Are All Right
10. The Ghost Writer
Wow, no wonder I'm the way I am. I was 11 in 95 as well and I remember watching se7en from the new release section, so that had to be around the age of 12. Must have been 11 when I watched Pulp Fiction for the first time because I had my mom call in and reserve it on it's release date.I was 11 when Se7en came out, so clearly by the time I got around to seeing it Spacey had made a bigger name for himself, but Usual Suspects and Outbreak both came out before Se7en (although all 3 in 1995. He also had a few other recognizable movie before 95 - Glengarry Glen Ross, The Ref, Consenting Adults, Swimming With Sharks.ETA - 95 was the year that really put him on the map thoughInteresting...But at that point, I had never seen or heard of Kevin Spacey- had anybody else? I'm sure he'd been working prior to that, but enough to be a household name? I could be wrong, but I say no. For me, that was his debut- and what a debut.Didn't even think about that, but now that you mention it I think you're right in that he wasn't listed in the opening credits. Opening credits were pretty cool also.I believe his name was deliberately left off the opening credits.Was also surprised to see Kevin Spacey was the "main suspect", had no idea coming in he was in the movie
First DVD I ever bought.Recent views -Unpleasant though it is, I really love this movie.Saw Se7en for the first time. Really good story; Morgan Freeman was phenomenal, surprised he wasn't nominated for an Oscar for his performance. Was also surprised to see Kevin Spacey was the "main suspect", had no idea coming in he was in the movie. He plays that creepy/#######/annoying bad guy very well, he makes me want to punch him in the face every time. The ending of that film could have gone a lot of different ways, I think I would have liked it to end slightly differently.
that's because it's awesomeUnpleasant though it is, I really love this movie.Saw Se7en for the first time. Really good story; Morgan Freeman was phenomenal, surprised he wasn't nominated for an Oscar for his performance. Was also surprised to see Kevin Spacey was the "main suspect", had no idea coming in he was in the movie. He plays that creepy/#######/annoying bad guy very well, he makes me want to punch him in the face every time. The ending of that film could have gone a lot of different ways, I think I would have liked it to end slightly differently.
Not only the best movie Ive seen this year, but probably my favorite in maybe 5 years. Its so complex Im not sure if you know what youre calling "flaws" are actually flaws. I dont recall all the "rule breaking" occuring in dreams that you are referring to, although I need to see it again as a couple concepts confused me on how they were feasible, the gravity situation not being one of them.It was a massively anticipated movie, and it exceeded expectations. Really the only thing I can knock it for is despite a very talented cast, no one has a great performance. Even with that in mind, best movie of the year for me. I cant wait to see The Fighter and True Grit, but there's just no way theyll blow me away and leave me in awe, talking about the movie weeks after Ive seen it like Inception did. That not the criteria to win the Academy Award obviously, but enough for me to call it the best film of the year.");document.close();Again, I thought it was interesting but not everything people made it out to be. This film has many flaws.Really?I mean it was an interesting concept and all...I guess I really need to see the Social Network. Im amazed at how many lists Ive seen it at #1, or in the top 3 in almost all of them. It looks good, but that good. I dunno, and I think Eisenberg is a very good actor.
Black Swan doesnt look all that appealing to me, but also is killing it in these lists. Might have to see that sooner rather than later.
....Now I havent seen Winter's Bone, King's Speech, and a couple other highly acclaimed movies that should be good, But Id wish somebody would just grow some balls and put Inception #1. I dont think Ive seen a list that has it #1 yet, and I am certain that none of these movies will surpass it - for me - including True Grit and The Fighter which I'll probably enjoy more than all the above mentioned anyway.
And would someone please explain why if there is no gravity on level one (van chase shootout on the bridge) there cannot be gravity on level two (Gordon Levitt fighting in the hotel), but even if there is no gravity on level one and/or two there can be gravity on level three (the snow fortress fight)? WTF?
And did all the bad guys get their weapons training from COBRA? They couldn't hit the ocean from the beach.
Sure the ending was interesting, but it was pretty much the most obvious ending possible. Is he or isn't he? Ooooooooooo. Well no ####! What other direction would any film director possibly have chosen to go? Ambiguity was really the only option for an ending.
*** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***
Not only the best movie Ive seen this year, but probably my favorite in maybe 5 years. Its so complex Im not sure if you know what youre calling "flaws" are actually flaws. I dont recall all the "rule breaking" occuring in dreams that you are referring to, although I need to see it again as a couple concepts confused me on how they were feasible, the gravity situation not being one of them.It was a massively anticipated movie, and it exceeded expectations. Really the only thing I can knock it for is despite a very talented cast, no one has a great performance. Even with that in mind, best movie of the year for me. I cant wait to see The Fighter and True Grit, but there's just no way theyll blow me away and leave me in awe, talking about the movie weeks after Ive seen it like Inception did. That not the criteria to win the Academy Award obviously, but enough for me to call it the best film of the year.");document.close();Again, I thought it was interesting but not everything people made it out to be. This film has many flaws.Really?I mean it was an interesting concept and all...I guess I really need to see the Social Network. Im amazed at how many lists Ive seen it at #1, or in the top 3 in almost all of them. It looks good, but that good. I dunno, and I think Eisenberg is a very good actor.
Black Swan doesnt look all that appealing to me, but also is killing it in these lists. Might have to see that sooner rather than later.
....Now I havent seen Winter's Bone, King's Speech, and a couple other highly acclaimed movies that should be good, But Id wish somebody would just grow some balls and put Inception #1. I dont think Ive seen a list that has it #1 yet, and I am certain that none of these movies will surpass it - for me - including True Grit and The Fighter which I'll probably enjoy more than all the above mentioned anyway.
And would someone please explain why if there is no gravity on level one (van chase shootout on the bridge) there cannot be gravity on level two (Gordon Levitt fighting in the hotel), but even if there is no gravity on level one and/or two there can be gravity on level three (the snow fortress fight)? WTF?
And did all the bad guys get their weapons training from COBRA? They couldn't hit the ocean from the beach.
Sure the ending was interesting, but it was pretty much the most obvious ending possible. Is he or isn't he? Ooooooooooo. Well no ####! What other direction would any film director possibly have chosen to go? Ambiguity was really the only option for an ending.
*** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***
I have no problem suspending disbelief (like I said earlier I don't need an explanation of how entering dreams is possible, it just is).What I have a problem with is when they make a point of defining the system in great detail and then proceed to ignore most of what they just spent time explaining. Would have been better without going so far in depth into what was and was not possible within dreams.I wouldnt argue with people calling it an action movie covered up as a suspenseful drama, but its just as much sci-fi too....I dont know about you, but when Im watching sci-fi movies I dont become less interested, more skeptical, or quit watching because I dont believe whats happening is actually possible.I'm with Chaka on this one. Great visuals/audio, which covers up some pretty glaring holes in the premise/plot. I had a hard time getting on board with how what they were doing was even possible, they didn't really bother to explain it, just offer it as granted. Eventually the whole "what's real/what's dream" wasn't really compelling and it devolved into action sequences for the sake of action sequences - which were rendered spectacularly - leaving me to feel they could have done somewhat better if they had found other things to explore in these dream states than straight up violence.
Flashback story was the only good part of this movie. The "present day" story didn't even make sense.Stolen...Straight to DVD/HBO movie about a detective trying to find his missing son,
.... However, the acting and flashback story maintained my interest...5/10
####, I had enough trouble getting a hold of parental advisory albums like Pantera, Metallica, Korn, etc. to even think about watching R-Rated movies on the living room TV while my mom was around (which was often since she didnt work) when I was 11-12. I think T2 was the first real R I saw and I was 12 or 13 and that was just thanks to my Pops overruling Mom. After that it was a slippery slope and within a couple years I was watching anything I wanted These kids with DVRs and their own TVs these days dont know how good they got it!!Wow, no wonder I'm the way I am. I was 11 in 95 as well and I remember watching se7en from the new release section, so that had to be around the age of 12. Must have been 11 when I watched Pulp Fiction for the first time because I had my mom call in and reserve it on it's release date.I was 11 when Se7en came out, so clearly by the time I got around to seeing it Spacey had made a bigger name for himself, but Usual Suspects and Outbreak both came out before Se7en (although all 3 in 1995. He also had a few other recognizable movie before 95 - Glengarry Glen Ross, The Ref, Consenting Adults, Swimming With Sharks.ETA - 95 was the year that really put him on the map though
I call this the Cannonball Run situation... they spend a lot of time setting up the rules at the beginning (Cannonball Run's "staggered start", when the official explains it's total travel time, not who gets there first, that decides who wins), then forgetting about them by the end (Cannonball Run's race to the finish line, which shouldn't have been neccessary as Dom DeLuise still has like a whole extra day to cross and still finish in the shortest elapsed time).What I have a problem with is when they make a point of defining the system in great detail and then proceed to ignore most of what they just spent time explaining.
Departed as Scorcese's #2? AND Inception as best film of the last 5 years?Lots of no.Not only the best movie Ive seen this year, but probably my favorite in maybe 5 years. Its so complex Im not sure if you know what youre calling "flaws" are actually flaws. I dont recall all the "rule breaking" occuring in dreams that you are referring to, although I need to see it again as a couple concepts confused me on how they were feasible, the gravity situation not being one of them.It was a massively anticipated movie, and it exceeded expectations. Really the only thing I can knock it for is despite a very talented cast, no one has a great performance. Even with that in mind, best movie of the year for me. I cant wait to see The Fighter and True Grit, but there's just no way theyll blow me away and leave me in awe, talking about the movie weeks after Ive seen it like Inception did. That not the criteria to win the Academy Award obviously, but enough for me to call it the best film of the year.");document.close();Again, I thought it was interesting but not everything people made it out to be. This film has many flaws.Really?I mean it was an interesting concept and all...I guess I really need to see the Social Network. Im amazed at how many lists Ive seen it at #1, or in the top 3 in almost all of them. It looks good, but that good. I dunno, and I think Eisenberg is a very good actor.
Black Swan doesnt look all that appealing to me, but also is killing it in these lists. Might have to see that sooner rather than later.
....Now I havent seen Winter's Bone, King's Speech, and a couple other highly acclaimed movies that should be good, But Id wish somebody would just grow some balls and put Inception #1. I dont think Ive seen a list that has it #1 yet, and I am certain that none of these movies will surpass it - for me - including True Grit and The Fighter which I'll probably enjoy more than all the above mentioned anyway.
And would someone please explain why if there is no gravity on level one (van chase shootout on the bridge) there cannot be gravity on level two (Gordon Levitt fighting in the hotel), but even if there is no gravity on level one and/or two there can be gravity on level three (the snow fortress fight)? WTF?
And did all the bad guys get their weapons training from COBRA? They couldn't hit the ocean from the beach.
Sure the ending was interesting, but it was pretty much the most obvious ending possible. Is he or isn't he? Ooooooooooo. Well no ####! What other direction would any film director possibly have chosen to go? Ambiguity was really the only option for an ending.
*** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***
I also loved The Departed and probably rank it #2 for Scorsese movies though so Im probably crazy*
*Havent seen King of Comedy or After Hours
I call this the Cannonball Run situation... they spend a lot of time setting up the rules at the beginning (Cannonball Run's "staggered start", when the official explains it's total travel time, not who gets there first, that decides who wins), then forgetting about them by the end (Cannonball Run's race to the finish line, which shouldn't have been neccessary as Dom DeLuise still has like a whole extra day to cross and still finish in the shortest elapsed time).What I have a problem with is when they make a point of defining the system in great detail and then proceed to ignore most of what they just spent time explaining.
Im not going to get into an Inception depate/argument, but my answers to 1 and 2 would be:1) When you die in dreams you wake up (or go up to the next level). Until it became convenient for the plot to violate that rule. They explained it with the narcotic effect of the new drug but they felt like an add on (a mea culpa) and they could have dealt with the limbo situation earlier.
2) Floating on level 1 = floating on level 2 <> floating on level 3. The rule was clearly violated with zero explanation or justification.
3) More of a guideline than a rule but Leo made not letting him know the layout of the maze a very critical point in the planning of the mission but then violated his own rule when he could have just as easily told Paige to relay the information about the tunnel through the snow fortress. Makes no sense except as a device to get Leo into Limbo.
*** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***");document.close();And while I enjoyed the ending it was about the most obvious choice for Nolan to make. No doubt it worked but was anyone really surprised?
you just blew my mind.I call this the Cannonball Run situation... they spend a lot of time setting up the rules at the beginning (Cannonball Run's "staggered start", when the official explains it's total travel time, not who gets there first, that decides who wins), then forgetting about them by the end (Cannonball Run's race to the finish line, which shouldn't have been neccessary as Dom DeLuise still has like a whole extra day to cross and still finish in the shortest elapsed time).What I have a problem with is when they make a point of defining the system in great detail and then proceed to ignore most of what they just spent time explaining.
Eh, for Scorsese Id be likeGoodfellasDeparted/Casino (tie)Taxi DriverGangs of New York....and dare I say Shutter Island might be 6th ...I havent seen KoC, After Hours but want to...Didnt like Raging Bull much at all...Have no interest to see LToCAgain, Lives of Others is another perfect example. I loved it, thought it was great (best foreign film besides City of God for me) and wouldnt mind seeing it again, but its not classic for me or something I'll want to watch as often as a lot of other movies.but Departed as the #2? Without googling, I'd put a lot of his films ahead of it- and again- I liked the Departed. Off hand: KoC, After Hours, Taxi Driver, Raging Bull, LToC, Goodfellas... I'm sure I'm spacing on some.I preferred Winter's Bone this year, and in terms of the last few years- Lives of Others is hand's down my favorite film of the last... dunno- long time.
I'll watch Costner's the Postman 8 million times, but it doesn't make it a good movie. and yeah- City of God was pretty great too. but are you saying best foreign of all time, or recently?Eh, for Scorsese Id be likeGoodfellasbut Departed as the #2? Without googling, I'd put a lot of his films ahead of it- and again- I liked the Departed. Off hand: KoC, After Hours, Taxi Driver, Raging Bull, LToC, Goodfellas... I'm sure I'm spacing on some.
I preferred Winter's Bone this year, and in terms of the last few years- Lives of Others is hand's down my favorite film of the last... dunno- long time.
Departed/Casino (tie)
Taxi Driver
Gangs of New York
...I havent seen KoC, After Hours but want to...Didnt like Raging Bull much at all...Have no interest to see LToC
Again, Lives of Others is another perfect example. I loved it, thought it was great (best foreign film besides City of God for me) and wouldnt mind seeing it again, but its not classic for me or something I'll want to watch as often as a lot of other movies.
Used to have to bust out the head phones to listen to the Friday soundtrack cassette I some how got my hands on, but that was the only thing I can remember being censored on. I don't even know if my mom knew what the ratings system was when I was growing up.She did bust my Butthole Surfers cd in high school while she was searching my car for drugs, she thought that maybe I had caught a case of the gay.I my mother.####, I had enough trouble getting a hold of parental advisory albums like Pantera, Metallica, Korn, etc. to even think about watching R-Rated movies on the living room TV while my mom was around (which was often since she didnt work) when I was 11-12. I think T2 was the first real R I saw and I was 12 or 13 and that was just thanks to my Pops overruling Mom. After that it was a slippery slope and within a couple years I was watching anything I wanted These kids with DVRs and their own TVs these days dont know how good they got it!!Wow, no wonder I'm the way I am. I was 11 in 95 as well and I remember watching se7en from the new release section, so that had to be around the age of 12. Must have been 11 when I watched Pulp Fiction for the first time because I had my mom call in and reserve it on it's release date.I was 11 when Se7en came out, so clearly by the time I got around to seeing it Spacey had made a bigger name for himself, but Usual Suspects and Outbreak both came out before Se7en (although all 3 in 1995. He also had a few other recognizable movie before 95 - Glengarry Glen Ross, The Ref, Consenting Adults, Swimming With Sharks.ETA - 95 was the year that really put him on the map though
It's an area I've been trying to expand my scope on, but yeah, City of God is #1 on my foreign films list too.I'll watch Costner's the Postman 8 million times, but it doesn't make it a good movie. and yeah- City of God was pretty great too. but are you saying best foreign of all time, or recently?Eh, for Scorsese Id be likeGoodfellasbut Departed as the #2? Without googling, I'd put a lot of his films ahead of it- and again- I liked the Departed. Off hand: KoC, After Hours, Taxi Driver, Raging Bull, LToC, Goodfellas... I'm sure I'm spacing on some.
I preferred Winter's Bone this year, and in terms of the last few years- Lives of Others is hand's down my favorite film of the last... dunno- long time.
Departed/Casino (tie)
Taxi Driver
Gangs of New York
...I havent seen KoC, After Hours but want to...Didnt like Raging Bull much at all...Have no interest to see LToC
Again, Lives of Others is another perfect example. I loved it, thought it was great (best foreign film besides City of God for me) and wouldnt mind seeing it again, but its not classic for me or something I'll want to watch as often as a lot of other movies.
if you get a chance, IMO Last Temptation is very worth the watch. Oh... Kundun too- I prefer that to the Departed. Age of Innocence and Shutter Island, not so much.... although I feel like I need to give the former another try.
eta: is there a particular reason LToC doesn't appeal? the whole... religion thing?
Im not going to get into an Inception depate/argument, but my answers to 1 and 2 would be:");document.close();And while I enjoyed the ending it was about the most obvious choice for Nolan to make. No doubt it worked but was anyone really surprised?1) When you die in dreams you wake up (or go up to the next level). Until it became convenient for the plot to violate that rule. They explained it with the narcotic effect of the new drug but they felt like an add on (a mea culpa) and they could have dealt with the limbo situation earlier.
2) Floating on level 1 = floating on level 2 <> floating on level 3. The rule was clearly violated with zero explanation or justification.
3) More of a guideline than a rule but Leo made not letting him know the layout of the maze a very critical point in the planning of the mission but then violated his own rule when he could have just as easily told Paige to relay the information about the tunnel through the snow fortress. Makes no sense except as a device to get Leo into Limbo.
*** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***
So- interesting, I've been thinking more about WInter's Bone lately- it's stuck with me. Pretty sure I commented that something was missing for me in the movie- a kind of edge related to suspense maybe (it's still not entirely clear to me what was lacking at the time for me, just that I wasn't all googly moogly over it). But as I reflect- what came up missing for me while watching, actually resonates with me in the reflection. That movie was SOOOO much about real life in a corner of the world... and real life isn't necessarily suspenseful, even when you're in the middle of something important. The film carried the sense of drama (more than suspense... and maybe my connecting to the movie with a "suspense movie" is part of what was missing for me?) over the family situation amazingly well and didn't need any white-knuckled freakouts (even if the lake scene had a lot of cringe/creepy in it).And hot-damn, it was so well written and performed, let alone directed and especially art-directed (lighting was amazing too in it's naturalness).
Definitely not Krista. She's not into calling people "morons."Either Krista or Tim.Guess the FBG:
Just watched this movie, and holy crap it's the best movie I've seen in a long time. We've got a bunch of morons over in the Avatar cartoon thread raving about what a "great movie" it is. This was a great, great movie. Awesome acting, awesome dialogue, awesome script, awesome story. Fiance and I both absolutely loved it. This is what filmmaking is about. James Cameron can take his special effects and sinking ships and blockbusters. I'll take this every day of the week.Loved it.
1. The Usual Suspects2. Fight Club3. PsychoHow about top 5 movies with a surprise ending?I think all of mine would be fairly recent.1. The Usual Suspects2. Primal Fear3. The Prestige4. Se7en5. The Game
I'm on board with that. I am glad Floppo has backed off the notion that WB would have been more interesting as a revenge thriller. That was you Floppo, wasn't it?So- interesting, I've been thinking more about WInter's Bone lately- it's stuck with me. Pretty sure I commented that something was missing for me in the movie- a kind of edge related to suspense maybe (it's still not entirely clear to me what was lacking at the time for me, just that I wasn't all googly moogly over it). But as I reflect- what came up missing for me while watching, actually resonates with me in the reflection. That movie was SOOOO much about real life in a corner of the world... and real life isn't necessarily suspenseful, even when you're in the middle of something important. The film carried the sense of drama (more than suspense... and maybe my connecting to the movie with a "suspense movie" is part of what was missing for me?) over the family situation amazingly well and didn't need any white-knuckled freakouts (even if the lake scene had a lot of cringe/creepy in it).And hot-damn, it was so well written and performed, let alone directed and especially art-directed (lighting was amazing too in it's naturalness).
That was hooter, I thinkI'm on board with that. I am glad Floppo has backed off the notion that WB would have been more interesting as a revenge thriller. That was you Floppo, wasn't it?So- interesting, I've been thinking more about WInter's Bone lately- it's stuck with me. Pretty sure I commented that something was missing for me in the movie- a kind of edge related to suspense maybe (it's still not entirely clear to me what was lacking at the time for me, just that I wasn't all googly moogly over it). But as I reflect- what came up missing for me while watching, actually resonates with me in the reflection. That movie was SOOOO much about real life in a corner of the world... and real life isn't necessarily suspenseful, even when you're in the middle of something important. The film carried the sense of drama (more than suspense... and maybe my connecting to the movie with a "suspense movie" is part of what was missing for me?) over the family situation amazingly well and didn't need any white-knuckled freakouts (even if the lake scene had a lot of cringe/creepy in it).And hot-damn, it was so well written and performed, let alone directed and especially art-directed (lighting was amazing too in it's naturalness).
Pre-Law, Pre-Med what's the difference?That was hooter, I thinkI'm on board with that. I am glad Floppo has backed off the notion that WB would have been more interesting as a revenge thriller. That was you Floppo, wasn't it?So- interesting, I've been thinking more about WInter's Bone lately- it's stuck with me. Pretty sure I commented that something was missing for me in the movie- a kind of edge related to suspense maybe (it's still not entirely clear to me what was lacking at the time for me, just that I wasn't all googly moogly over it). But as I reflect- what came up missing for me while watching, actually resonates with me in the reflection. That movie was SOOOO much about real life in a corner of the world... and real life isn't necessarily suspenseful, even when you're in the middle of something important. The film carried the sense of drama (more than suspense... and maybe my connecting to the movie with a "suspense movie" is part of what was missing for me?) over the family situation amazingly well and didn't need any white-knuckled freakouts (even if the lake scene had a lot of cringe/creepy in it).And hot-damn, it was so well written and performed, let alone directed and especially art-directed (lighting was amazing too in it's naturalness).
I wish I was pre something.Pre-Law, Pre-Med what's the difference?That was hooter, I thinkI'm on board with that. I am glad Floppo has backed off the notion that WB would have been more interesting as a revenge thriller. That was you Floppo, wasn't it?So- interesting, I've been thinking more about WInter's Bone lately- it's stuck with me. Pretty sure I commented that something was missing for me in the movie- a kind of edge related to suspense maybe (it's still not entirely clear to me what was lacking at the time for me, just that I wasn't all googly moogly over it). But as I reflect- what came up missing for me while watching, actually resonates with me in the reflection. That movie was SOOOO much about real life in a corner of the world... and real life isn't necessarily suspenseful, even when you're in the middle of something important. The film carried the sense of drama (more than suspense... and maybe my connecting to the movie with a "suspense movie" is part of what was missing for me?) over the family situation amazingly well and didn't need any white-knuckled freakouts (even if the lake scene had a lot of cringe/creepy in it).And hot-damn, it was so well written and performed, let alone directed and especially art-directed (lighting was amazing too in it's naturalness).
It didn't have to be a full out revenge thriller, but yes, it would have been nice if Teardrop capped somebody.Pre-Law, Pre-Med what's the difference?That was hooter, I thinkI'm on board with that. I am glad Floppo has backed off the notion that WB would have been more interesting as a revenge thriller. That was you Floppo, wasn't it?So- interesting, I've been thinking more about WInter's Bone lately- it's stuck with me. Pretty sure I commented that something was missing for me in the movie- a kind of edge related to suspense maybe (it's still not entirely clear to me what was lacking at the time for me, just that I wasn't all googly moogly over it). But as I reflect- what came up missing for me while watching, actually resonates with me in the reflection. That movie was SOOOO much about real life in a corner of the world... and real life isn't necessarily suspenseful, even when you're in the middle of something important. The film carried the sense of drama (more than suspense... and maybe my connecting to the movie with a "suspense movie" is part of what was missing for me?) over the family situation amazingly well and didn't need any white-knuckled freakouts (even if the lake scene had a lot of cringe/creepy in it).And hot-damn, it was so well written and performed, let alone directed and especially art-directed (lighting was amazing too in it's naturalness).
I'd put it behind Following, too.I have no problem suspending disbelief (like I said earlier I don't need an explanation of how entering dreams is possible, it just is).What I have a problem with is when they make a point of defining the system in great detail and then proceed to ignore most of what they just spent time explaining. Would have been better without going so far in depth into what was and was not possible within dreams.I wouldnt argue with people calling it an action movie covered up as a suspenseful drama, but its just as much sci-fi too....I dont know about you, but when Im watching sci-fi movies I dont become less interested, more skeptical, or quit watching because I dont believe whats happening is actually possible.I'm with Chaka on this one. Great visuals/audio, which covers up some pretty glaring holes in the premise/plot. I had a hard time getting on board with how what they were doing was even possible, they didn't really bother to explain it, just offer it as granted. Eventually the whole "what's real/what's dream" wasn't really compelling and it devolved into action sequences for the sake of action sequences - which were rendered spectacularly - leaving me to feel they could have done somewhat better if they had found other things to explore in these dream states than straight up violence.
I need to watch it again, perhaps it will clear up my own problems with the film. On first blush Inception is Nolan's fifth best film on my list (in no particular order: Both Batman films, Memento & The Prestige).
"gumball rally">"cannonball run"I call this the Cannonball Run situation... they spend a lot of time setting up the rules at the beginning (Cannonball Run's "staggered start", when the official explains it's total travel time, not who gets there first, that decides who wins), then forgetting about them by the end (Cannonball Run's race to the finish line, which shouldn't have been neccessary as Dom DeLuise still has like a whole extra day to cross and still finish in the shortest elapsed time).What I have a problem with is when they make a point of defining the system in great detail and then proceed to ignore most of what they just spent time explaining.
I'll you over The Age of Innocence. It's been a long time, but I loved that movie.I'll watch Costner's the Postman 8 million times, but it doesn't make it a good movie. and yeah- City of God was pretty great too. but are you saying best foreign of all time, or recently?Eh, for Scorsese Id be likeGoodfellasbut Departed as the #2? Without googling, I'd put a lot of his films ahead of it- and again- I liked the Departed. Off hand: KoC, After Hours, Taxi Driver, Raging Bull, LToC, Goodfellas... I'm sure I'm spacing on some.
I preferred Winter's Bone this year, and in terms of the last few years- Lives of Others is hand's down my favorite film of the last... dunno- long time.
Departed/Casino (tie)
Taxi Driver
Gangs of New York
...I havent seen KoC, After Hours but want to...Didnt like Raging Bull much at all...Have no interest to see LToC
Again, Lives of Others is another perfect example. I loved it, thought it was great (best foreign film besides City of God for me) and wouldnt mind seeing it again, but its not classic for me or something I'll want to watch as often as a lot of other movies.
if you get a chance, IMO Last Temptation is very worth the watch. Oh... Kundun too- I prefer that to the Departed. Age of Innocence and Shutter Island, not so much.... although I feel like I need to give the former another try.
eta: is there a particular reason LToC doesn't appeal? the whole... religion thing?
Gumball Rally? Wow, that's digging deep, deep into the Way-Back Machine.Funny thing (to me) is that I got nostalgic for Gumball Rally a couple months ago and re-watched it. It's still a fun movie. I never thought it would get a mention here. Nice one."gumball rally">"cannonball run"I call this the Cannonball Run situation... they spend a lot of time setting up the rules at the beginning (Cannonball Run's "staggered start", when the official explains it's total travel time, not who gets there first, that decides who wins), then forgetting about them by the end (Cannonball Run's race to the finish line, which shouldn't have been neccessary as Dom DeLuise still has like a whole extra day to cross and still finish in the shortest elapsed time).What I have a problem with is when they make a point of defining the system in great detail and then proceed to ignore most of what they just spent time explaining.
Never seen it. I'll have to check it out.I'd put it behind Following, too.I have no problem suspending disbelief (like I said earlier I don't need an explanation of how entering dreams is possible, it just is).What I have a problem with is when they make a point of defining the system in great detail and then proceed to ignore most of what they just spent time explaining. Would have been better without going so far in depth into what was and was not possible within dreams.I wouldnt argue with people calling it an action movie covered up as a suspenseful drama, but its just as much sci-fi too....I dont know about you, but when Im watching sci-fi movies I dont become less interested, more skeptical, or quit watching because I dont believe whats happening is actually possible.I'm with Chaka on this one. Great visuals/audio, which covers up some pretty glaring holes in the premise/plot. I had a hard time getting on board with how what they were doing was even possible, they didn't really bother to explain it, just offer it as granted. Eventually the whole "what's real/what's dream" wasn't really compelling and it devolved into action sequences for the sake of action sequences - which were rendered spectacularly - leaving me to feel they could have done somewhat better if they had found other things to explore in these dream states than straight up violence.
I need to watch it again, perhaps it will clear up my own problems with the film. On first blush Inception is Nolan's fifth best film on my list (in no particular order: Both Batman films, Memento & The Prestige).
Those Daring Young Men in Their Jaunty Jalopies (1969) down?Gumball Rally? Wow, that's digging deep, deep into the Way-Back Machine.Funny thing (to me) is that I got nostalgic for Gumball Rally a couple months ago and re-watched it. It's still a fun movie. I never thought it would get a mention here. Nice one."gumball rally">"cannonball run"I call this the Cannonball Run situation... they spend a lot of time setting up the rules at the beginning (Cannonball Run's "staggered start", when the official explains it's total travel time, not who gets there first, that decides who wins), then forgetting about them by the end (Cannonball Run's race to the finish line, which shouldn't have been neccessary as Dom DeLuise still has like a whole extra day to cross and still finish in the shortest elapsed time).What I have a problem with is when they make a point of defining the system in great detail and then proceed to ignore most of what they just spent time explaining.
Oh come on you two. Following is good, but relies WAY too much on coincidence to make the plot work. And the two Batman movies are decent but in no way are they superior to Inception (especially the first).I would put Memento above it, though.I'd put it behind Following, too.I need to watch it again, perhaps it will clear up my own problems with the film. On first blush Inception is Nolan's fifth best film on my list (in no particular order: Both Batman films, Memento & The Prestige).