What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Retirement. What age is your goal (1 Viewer)

Goal age to retire

  • 40s

    Votes: 9 5.1%
  • 50s

    Votes: 64 36.6%
  • 60s

    Votes: 81 46.3%
  • 70s

    Votes: 3 1.7%
  • When I die

    Votes: 15 8.6%
  • Don't work. Live off the government

    Votes: 3 1.7%

  • Total voters
    175
I basically expect that I’ll just continue to save and grow it until I die. I don’t think I’d be a good retiree at all.  I’ve got a ways to go anyway (just turned 37), but I’m not big on material things and I don’t relax very well if I don’t have things going on. I have a hard time seeing myself just sitting on a patio without some kind of work to do. My grandfather is 80 and still consults / probably end up the same way. 

 
I have 6 more years and I'm already talking about it.  I've spent the last 34 years as a software developer and have worked even longer (43 years), since I was 16, I feel so excited to move on to that chapter of my life.  I've invested wisely and will have a nice pension, savings, social security, medicare, and 403b.  My wife has also invested wisely and we're both looking forward to our retirement.  Longevity isn't a thing in my family (father 48, mother 74), so here is hoping I beat those odds.  The last thing I want after my death is my wife's new boyfriend spending my retirement :)
So then why wait? You sound like you are prepared and with a family history like that why don't you enjoy it while you can? We slow down very fast from 70 on. You've spent your best years working so be a little selfish and enjoy life while you can.

 
Gonna retire at 56 along with wife who will be 55. We will still do a little something but for reasons I stated to JohnnyU above we want to live and have some fun while all our parts still work.

 
I have already missed my goal by several years.  Caring the past 20 years for my facility bound older brother came with substantial costs.  No regrets though, he would have done the same or more for me if the shoe was on the other foot.  BTW, I once held his aorta in my hand.  I was 11 at the time.  He got run over by a motor boat.  He was laid open from his neck to his hip.  My dad, a doctor, jumped in and grabbed him.  He called to me.  I went over.  he grabbed my hand, stuffed it into my brother and said "hold this", "Its his heart and if you let go or slip he will die".  I held it as we rushed the several hundred yards up to the house and the car, and held it as we drove 25 miles on bumpy back country roads to the hospital.  I miss him now that he is gone.  I would happily pay the nearly $7,000 I was out of pocket every month on his care to have him still around.

 
Most of my projections go to 63...I think financially I could retire prior to that, but - healthcare.  Geez Louise...

And by retire, I mean like golf every day retire, not ‘consult’.  I figure I can start that phase at 55

 
I have already missed my goal by several years.  Caring the past 20 years for my facility bound older brother came with substantial costs.  No regrets though, he would have done the same or more for me if the shoe was on the other foot.  BTW, I once held his aorta in my hand.  I was 11 at the time.  He got run over by a motor boat.  He was laid open from his neck to his hip.  My dad, a doctor, jumped in and grabbed him.  He called to me.  I went over.  he grabbed my hand, stuffed it into my brother and said "hold this", "Its his heart and if you let go or slip he will die".  I held it as we rushed the several hundred yards up to the house and the car, and held it as we drove 25 miles on bumpy back country roads to the hospital.  I miss him now that he is gone.  I would happily pay the nearly $7,000 I was out of pocket every month on his care to have him still around.
Wow!  You definitely have a Ditka.

 
Most of my projections go to 63...I think financially I could retire prior to that, but - healthcare.  Geez Louise...

And by retire, I mean like golf every day retire, not ‘consult’.  I figure I can start that phase at 55
this exactly for me. don't think i even want to retire earlier than i have to, i'm sure even golfing everyday would get old. i came out of college at the heat of the internet boom, so i was sure i'd be living the good life already. missed that boat by a mile.

 
So then why wait? You sound like you are prepared and with a family history like that why don't you enjoy it while you can? We slow down very fast from 70 on. You've spent your best years working so be a little selfish and enjoy life while you can.
I need to wait until I'm 65 to get the full benefits that I want.  I could even wait until I'm 70 for even better social security but I'm not on board with that.  I'm done when I'm 65 (6years from now). regardless of my financial situation. 

 
I’ve heard the SSA did some analysis and said that a lot of people wait too long to start earning SS. A lot of people are waiting and then not collecting (living) long enough to make up for the time they got nothing. 

 
Thanks Eephus. That's not how I meant it though. I see it more often in accumulating toys and material stuff. I saw it when we owned the boat company and I see it among a lot of people with money. Sacrificing family life or enjoyable time for saving for retirement can have its issues too. But I was more speaking to the "get the most toys before you die" aspect I see people do. 
this is why i spend my money on vacations

 
Well, the absolute highest they can be is about $7k for an individual, $14k for a family.  Yes, that's high, but you'd only hit the $14k mark if multiple family members each hit their $7k.  Also, if you're only paying $50 a month for a family, you can likely get a silver tier plan where even teh deductible and OOP are subsidized (max of like 2,500 OOP or something).  You do have to get your MAGI (modified, adjusted gross income) pretty low, even for a family, for that to apply, though.

So even if you hit the max OOP, for the family, and yet are paying only $50 a month - works out to just over $1k a month.  That's a pretty good deal, in today's environment, for health care for a "family". 
So for those of us that want to retire before 62, the cost for medical is approx $1000/month for family (wife and myself)?  I haven't looked into it yet as we both are in our early 50s and have no plans on retiring in the next 5 years...

 
I need to wait until I'm 65 to get the full benefits that I want.  I could even wait until I'm 70 for even better social security but I'm not on board with that.  I'm done when I'm 65 (6years from now). regardless of my financial situation. 
Just as a note that strategizing for couples can pay off pretty handsomely.  Not sure if you're married, but if so you should look into that - survivor benefits can make a big difference, depending on ages, lifetime income, etc.  For a single it's pretty easy as actuarily the result is about the same no matter the age you take it.

 
Just a cautionary tale. My wife was with the post office for 30 years. She was about 6 years away from her minimum retirement age when she was diagnosed with a rare eye disease. A couple of years later she was forced into FERS Disability retirement. Her ability to retire at 56.5,take the supplemental retirement and FERS annuity vanished. Instead she gets the small disability check that will convert to SS payment at 62. She will also be able to take the FERS annuity at that time. Point of the story is that we thought we had it all figured out. Things change in the blink of an eye (no pun intended).

The other side of this is that we don't know how quickly her vision will deteriorate. We want to live in an RV full time for a few years. I want her to see as much of the country as she can, while she can. I would hate to wait another 10-15 years, only have her not be able to see retirement. Hopefully everything works out and we'll be on the road in 2 years. If I have to work at 65 or 70, I will gladly take that bullet to give her a few years of happiness now. 

 
Just as a note that strategizing for couples can pay off pretty handsomely.  Not sure if you're married, but if so you should look into that - survivor benefits can make a big difference, depending on ages, lifetime income, etc.  For a single it's pretty easy as actuarily the result is about the same no matter the age you take it.
Yes I'm married.  We have a plan based upon my pension, our savings, our 403b and her 401k and my social security and her social security right now.  She is older than me and we're collecting her social security now and her pension now, but not her 401k and I'm still working.  I retire in 6 years and then mine kicks in, which my social security is obviously a lot higher than hers.  I plan on taking a lump sum for my pension and rolling it over, along with my 403b and her 401k to an IRA and draw a monthly salary off of that, to go along with my social security.  Then add in medicare on top of that.  That alone should suffice, but in addition to that we have been saving.

 
For those of you retiring prior to qualifying for Medicare and do not have company sponsored healthcare in retirement, how do you afford the healthcare premiums when retiring prior to 62?
Obamacare.  Figure out how your taxes work, and figure out how to keep your MAGI under the subsidization threshold (4 x the poverty guideline) during those years.  You do that, and your premiums are very manageable.  For example, a 2-person household:  The poverty guideline for a two-person household in 2018 is $16,460.  4 x that is $65,840.  That's your threshold to stay under.

MAGI is taxable income, in retirement typically from pension, social security, dividends, interest, capital gains, and IRA (non-Roth) withdrawals.  If that 2-person household can keep their taxable income under $65,840, the O-care premiums are heavily subsidized.  Figure on that household paying $5k-$7k / year in premiums.  I think the max premium the household combined can pay is 12% of that $65,840.  $7k more or less.  You will have to factor in out-of-pocket expenses as well.

Many folks don't want to live on income at or below that threshold.  How to get income from sources other than those listed above:  (a) cash, (b) Roth IRA, (c) selling stocks with little/no capital gains, etc.

In this case, one would definitely want to hold off taking social security until age 65, when you are transitioning off of O-care and into Medicare.

Fun stuff - makes my head hurt.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I’ve heard the SSA did some analysis and said that a lot of people wait too long to start earning SS. A lot of people are waiting and then not collecting (living) long enough to make up for the time they got nothing. 
It is actually the opposite, too many people are taking social security at 62 and giving up 25% of income by not waiting until 66.

 
So for those of us that want to retire before 62, the cost for medical is approx $1000/month for family (wife and myself)?  I haven't looked into it yet as we both are in our early 50s and have no plans on retiring in the next 5 years...
Lots and lots (and lots) of factors.  Feel free to PM your details if you like and I’ll give you my thoughts.

 
So for those of us that want to retire before 62, the cost for medical is approx $1000/month for family (wife and myself)?  I haven't looked into it yet as we both are in our early 50s and have no plans on retiring in the next 5 years...
This is the only benefit of my wife's FERS disability. She was able to keep her Federal insurance plan. Our family of 4 (technically 5) is covered for $550 a month. 

 
This is the only benefit of my wife's FERS disability. She was able to keep her Federal insurance plan. Our family of 4 (technically 5) is covered for $550 a month. 
People can go on the healthcare.gov website and look at plans and also see the "estimated premium tax credit".  I entered in 2 people, married, Fort Meyers area, annual income of $50k (so under the $64k limit).

Estimated premium tax credit was $1,986 per month.  That's the subsidization.  Now onto the plans...

8 Bronze, 8 Silver, 4 Gold and 4 Platinum plans are available.  My current Fed employee health plan is BCBS, so basically a Gold plan.  I pay about what you pay, on the order of $6500 in premiums.  The deductible is very low, however, at $350 per person as I recall.  We probably spent $8000 overall last year between premiums, deductibles, and some OOP.

The most attractive options are:

(1) BCBS Bronze.  EPO (not HMO).  $0 premium (after subsidy).  Deductible $12,800 for family total.  Max OOP $13,800.  Generic drugs $24, Primary Doc $35, Specialist $65, ER 50% covered AFTER massive deductible (ugh - useless - after deductible there is only $1000 more before you hit max OOP).  Basically, a great choice if you are fairly healthy, and can stand some big expenses now and again.

(2) BCBS Gold.  HMO.  $364 premium (after subsidy).  Deductible $4000.  Max OOP $11000.  Decent plan.

(3) BCBS Silver.  EPO.  $864 premium (after subsidy).  Deductible $12,100.  Max OOP 14,700.  $100 Primary Doc and $150 Specialist.  I don't see the point of this plan - I'd rather do #1.  Maybe I'm missing something.

Anyway, there are options out there.  #1 might run your family only $2000 in a "good year".  Guaranteed to run you no more than $13,800 in a bad one.  We run $7k - $8k as it is, in a Fed plan, so I don't see a massive difference, other than it is an EPO, and I'm in a PPO now.

The key is being able to manage your MAGI each year.

 
Just a cautionary tale. My wife was with the post office for 30 years. She was about 6 years away from her minimum retirement age when she was diagnosed with a rare eye disease. A couple of years later she was forced into FERS Disability retirement. Her ability to retire at 56.5,take the supplemental retirement and FERS annuity vanished. Instead she gets the small disability check that will convert to SS payment at 62. She will also be able to take the FERS annuity at that time. Point of the story is that we thought we had it all figured out. Things change in the blink of an eye (no pun intended).

The other side of this is that we don't know how quickly her vision will deteriorate. We want to live in an RV full time for a few years. I want her to see as much of the country as she can, while she can. I would hate to wait another 10-15 years, only have her not be able to see retirement. Hopefully everything works out and we'll be on the road in 2 years. If I have to work at 65 or 70, I will gladly take that bullet to give her a few years of happiness now. 
You are a good man.

 
And I wouldn't count on a lot of pensions. If you are still a few years from retirement and have the ability to get a nice lump sum (a fair one) for your pension...I would suggest doing it.

 
Thanks Eephus. That's not how I meant it though. I see it more often in accumulating toys and material stuff. I saw it when we owned the boat company and I see it among a lot of people with money. Sacrificing family life or enjoyable time for saving for retirement can have its issues too. But I was more speaking to the "get the most toys before you die" aspect I see people do. 
You're using "accumulation phase" in the wrong context.

 
People can go on the healthcare.gov website and look at plans and also see the "estimated premium tax credit".  I entered in 2 people, married, Fort Meyers area, annual income of $50k (so under the $64k limit).

Estimated premium tax credit was $1,986 per month.  That's the subsidization.  Now onto the plans...

8 Bronze, 8 Silver, 4 Gold and 4 Platinum plans are available.  My current Fed employee health plan is BCBS, so basically a Gold plan.  I pay about what you pay, on the order of $6500 in premiums.  The deductible is very low, however, at $350 per person as I recall.  We probably spent $8000 overall last year between premiums, deductibles, and some OOP.

The most attractive options are:

(1) BCBS Bronze.  EPO (not HMO).  $0 premium (after subsidy).  Deductible $12,800 for family total.  Max OOP $13,800.  Generic drugs $24, Primary Doc $35, Specialist $65, ER 50% covered AFTER massive deductible (ugh - useless - after deductible there is only $1000 more before you hit max OOP).  Basically, a great choice if you are fairly healthy, and can stand some big expenses now and again.

(2) BCBS Gold.  HMO.  $364 premium (after subsidy).  Deductible $4000.  Max OOP $11000.  Decent plan.

(3) BCBS Silver.  EPO.  $864 premium (after subsidy).  Deductible $12,100.  Max OOP 14,700.  $100 Primary Doc and $150 Specialist.  I don't see the point of this plan - I'd rather do #1.  Maybe I'm missing something.

Anyway, there are options out there.  #1 might run your family only $2000 in a "good year".  Guaranteed to run you no more than $13,800 in a bad one.  We run $7k - $8k as it is, in a Fed plan, so I don't see a massive difference, other than it is an EPO, and I'm in a PPO now.

The key is being able to manage your MAGI each year.
Full disclosure. I don't think this would work for us in our current situation. Not that it isn't great info and a great option for others. The one benefit of FERS disability is that you can take another job and make 80% of your previous income without losing the disability payment or the insurance. She was able to get a job close to home. She's not allowed to drive at night, so it's possible for us to either pick her up, it's close enough to walk, or she can ride her bike. (we bought her an electric bike a couple of years ago). In reality, our combined income has never been higher at any point in our lives than it is right now. (more because of my salary, but she is still making about 70% what she was at the Post Office) Admittedly, I'm pretty bad at understanding taxes and the best way to reduce our MAGI.

 
Target is 58.  Though i could see wanting to work part time longer than this if i want to.

I'm 40, I'll be 100 percent debt free in 3 years and I'm hoping that i can focus more into savings the rest of this decade of my life but also begin to cut down some time wise as well

 
I basically expect that I’ll just continue to save and grow it until I die. I don’t think I’d be a good retiree at all.  I’ve got a ways to go anyway (just turned 37), but I’m not big on material things and I don’t relax very well if I don’t have things going on. I have a hard time seeing myself just sitting on a patio without some kind of work to do. My grandfather is 80 and still consults / probably end up the same way. 
Same for me.

I think I'm not good on my own with no direction each morning. I don't really know how to relax within my mind. Even on weekend mornings with nothing going on if i am not making it a point to do something i had planned I can just lounge around and accomplish nothing for the day. I'm more relaxed when i have scheduled tasks on daily agenda.

Work, coach kids team, dinner out etc.

Running a 5k at 8, family bbq at 2

Etc...

I do love to travel so i can see me either doing that or living in another country. My wife would not care for either.

The thought of waking up every morning with nothing planned kind of gives me anxiety tbh. 

I don't know if i have social issues, am not independent enough, anxiety issues or what.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
As long as I love what I do, I think would want to retire at 70.  Even then that’s likely a good 20+ years of doing nothing.  A lot of people who are retired are a little miserable to be honest.

 
As long as I love what I do, I think would want to retire at 70.  Even then that’s likely a good 20+ years of doing nothing.  A lot of people who are retired are a little miserable to be honest.
I’m guessing they were miserable when they were working as well.

 
It is actually the opposite, too many people are taking social security at 62 and giving up 25% of income by not waiting until 66.
Full retirement age for SS is now 67 for those born after 1960.  It is also a 30 percent hit.  6.67 percent the first three years and a 5 percent hit for the next two.   In addition full retirementment age is a misnomer as your monthly benefit grows 8 percent each year up to 70.   I am not sure if there are caps and how those might impact it though.  

 
It is actually the opposite, too many people are taking social security at 62 and giving up 25% of income by not waiting until 66.
Full retirement age for SS is now 67 for those born after 1960.  It is also a 30 percent hit.  6.67 percent the first three years and a 5 percent hit for the next two.   In addition full retirementment age is a misnomer as your monthly benefit grows 8 percent each year up to 70.   I am not sure if there are caps and how those might impact it though.  
But you only lose money if you live long enough. I did a back of the envelope calculation a few months ago and my tipping point didn't happen until I hit 78 years old for taking it at 62 rather than 67.

 
But you only lose money if you live long enough. I did a back of the envelope calculation a few months ago and my tipping point didn't happen until I hit 78 years old for taking it at 62 rather than 67.
Did you factor in the ability to invest the money also?  That might make it seem like taking it early is even better than that projection.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
But you only lose money if you live long enough. I did a back of the envelope calculation a few months ago and my tipping point didn't happen until I hit 78 years old for taking it at 62 rather than 67.
That is probably about right.  According to SS life expectancy tables a guy who is 62 will live 20 more years.  So most people will be better off waiting.  But really it makes some sense to have extra money while you are still healthy when you can enjoy it more.  Not that it is a huge amount, but still a chunk of money. 

 
MAGI is taxable income, in retirement typically from pension, social security, dividends, interest, capital gains, and IRA (non-Roth) withdrawals. 
Just a note that MAGI includes more than AGI in that it has some items in it that aren't taxed like muni dividends and adding back some deductions like student loan interest, rental losses, etc.  It can bite you if you're not aware of what's in here and want to manage the limit.

 
I'll probably buy a condo at 59.5 and use it to vacation 4 or 5 weeks a year then go at 62/63. If I'm still as healthy as i am now I'll just go at 65. I truly like going to work now at 51.

 
Yep, most of us should be fine considering how old we are.
You are old, but still.  it's projected to run out in 2034 (although benefits would decline at first, not like it would just go to zero immediately).  Are you assuming that there will be fixes implemented to allow it to continue?

I doubt I would be looking to tap in until about 2046.

 
One option is to tap your retirement accounts until you are 67 and then file for SS to get the full benefit. In other words, set aside the money to cover your own SS payment until you hit 67. That's pretty much my plan if I decide to retire before that age.

 
You're using "accumulation phase" in the wrong context.
No I'm not. It depends on what you're accumulating. Some are piling up savings. Others are piling up sportscars. I'm saying accumulating sportscars is definitely overrated. And I'm saying sometimes even the sacrifices made for accumulating savings can be overrated. 

 
are people actually feeling confident about Social Security being there?
100% confident. 

One of the greatest "fears" the press has implemented on an uneducated public is the headline grabbing "social security will run out before you get to it!!!! Click here to see what this means to you"

It is a complete over reaction.  What the press rarely tries to explain (because it does not generate clicks) is that the government can and will eventually implement tiny changes that can extend the life of the program by decades on end.  There are many many ways to extend it significantly beyond any FFA's lifetime.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top