What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Squeegee workers are being threatened on the job (1 Viewer)

Should people be allowed to approach you in traffic, touch/spray your car, ask for money in exchange

  • Yes

    Votes: 1 2.8%
  • No

    Votes: 35 97.2%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    36
So guy A acts threateningly towards dude B who's happily minding his own business when guy A crosses his path.  Dude B takes exception, confronts guy A, gets violent and ends up dead when guy A shoots him.

But enough about Trayvon Martin.  What do you guys think about this case?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I added the poll late but so far the overwhelming majority of people are voting against squeegee work.  Tim tried to defend the journalistic usage of the term squeegee worker, but even he acknowledged being intimidated and not liking the practice.  So why tolerate and defend this behavior?

Reynolds, the guy with the bat, was obviously a hot head and while we do not yet know what provocation sparked his horrible decision, we do know he has been bothered by these squeegee workers in the past.  He accelerated the situation but he did not create it.  It was not his illegal yet tolerated behavior that infringed upon and impaired the quality of life of all those around them.  Harrassing motorists and intimidating them into giving you money is a problem and it shouldn't be excused by tracing its roots back to slavery.  The behavior is the problem and it should not be tolerated.

 
So guy A acts threateningly towards dude B who's happily minding his own business when guy A crosses his path.  Dude B takes exception, confronts guy A, gets violent and ends up dead when guy A shoots him.

But enough about Trayvon Martin.  What do you guys think about this case?
There are slightly more similarities with this situation and the Trayvon Martin incident as opposed to the Rittenhbouse comparison, but why is this comparison what you bring to the conversation?  No thoughts on the case?  

 
Another entry for the "things that are racist" thread?
I thought it was an honest assessment of the argument I have seen in articles about how the squeegee work exists because these African-American youth lag in opportunity and employment due to systemic racism and a family structure fractured by slavery.

 
Harrassing motorists and intimidating them into giving you money is a problem and it shouldn't be excused by tracing its roots back to slavery.  The behavior is the problem and it should not be tolerated.


:mellow:

Wait, what?

Who is saying this is excused by tracing its roots back to slavery?

 
I thought it was an honest assessment of the argument I have seen in articles about how the squeegee work exists because these African-American youth lag in opportunity and employment due to systemic racism and a family structure fractured by slavery.
Right now there is real work for anyone who wants it.  I certainly agree with a fractured family structure (though I don't necessarily track it back to slavery) - all the more reason to be frustrated with the blue team.  That team has has tried to systematically dismantle the family unit for decades now.  I written before and will say it again - among the African-American community I'd like to see a Manhattan Project on reestablishing family units and father figures.  Well worth billions and billions in expenditure.

 
:mellow:

Wait, what?

Who is saying this is excused by tracing its roots back to slavery?
Ok, it looks like I was wrong.  I looked through the articles and there was this, "Mayor Brandon Scott said the city would also send staff from the Mayor’s Office of African American Male Engagement, which is tasked with identifying the needs of and supporting young Black men, to squeegee intersections."  But that is not representative of what I was claiming so I retract that statement.

 
Ok, it looks like I was wrong.  I looked through the articles and there was this, "Mayor Brandon Scott said the city would also send staff from the Mayor’s Office of African American Male Engagement, which is tasked with identifying the needs of and supporting young Black men, to squeegee intersections."  But that is not representative of what I was claiming so I retract that statement.
Well tim basically did what you said. 

Eta: he will probably deny this because thats what he does, but tims arguments for systemic racism obviously dont just say it appeared out of thin air. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You're likely to have a gun pulled on you if you did that.  Maybe one of your windows broken or worse.  Not smart to escalate things. 

Do other cities have these young guys on busy corners like BMore?
i think his post was in referencing  the gun control thread.     we good with property damage though.      what service are these young guys providing that isn't free on my own volition?

 
The bat was a little much.  I'm sure the "squeegee worker" would have appreciated it if the driver had turned out to be a "spit shine specialist" and suddenly started working on his shoes in repayment for the windshield work.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top