Pm Sent.Lets do $50.
Pm Sent.Lets do $50.
You know, he's that exact type of guy that you can draft 5-7 rounds later than Tebow and get roughly the same production when he's healthy.You're not going to buy into the Stafford hype next year? You didn't hear, he's going to throw 25 Td passes to Calvin next year.
You know, he's that exact type of guy that you can draft 5-7 rounds later than Tebow and get roughly the same production when he's healthy.You're not going to buy into the Stafford hype next year? You didn't hear, he's going to throw 25 Td passes to Calvin next year.
but this is the part that really spooks mewhen he's healthy.
Wow. Your really wasting your breath. It's apparent a lot of people will make their projections a few days after the Footballguys do. Then when he does well they tell you they knew he would.....or if he does bad they'll say they told you so.Complete waste of your time. Thanks for the actual projections though.No. Vick was the back up at the time. Tim Tebow is the starter right now. I think Tim Tebow will be the starter next year. Tell me what is crazy about that, please.If it was before we knew Vick was the starter, then yes, you would've been called crazy (and rightfully so). Get it yet?If I came out and said Vick > Rivers a couple months ago, I would be getting the same safe and comfortable owners calling me crazy.
Just two days ago...from the same site, this was reported.John Elway apparently is not currently a fan of Tebow. Does that change anyone's opinion?
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/...dnt-want-tebow/2. Elway lit up when talking about Tim Tebow, saying he was everything the team expected. Elway mentioned he could help with quarterbacks. “Tim Tebow is a darn good football player. What we’ve got to make him is a darn good quarterback.”
3. The next coach will decide who the starting quarterback is. But Elway can’t imagine a head coach that wouldn’t want to coach Tebow. While it’s early, it definitely didn’t sound like the Broncos would be thinking quarterback at the No. 2 overall pick.
Something doesn't add up . . .Just two days ago...from the same site, this was reported.John Elway apparently is not currently a fan of Tebow. Does that change anyone's opinion?http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/...dnt-want-tebow/2. Elway lit up when talking about Tim Tebow, saying he was everything the team expected. Elway mentioned he could help with quarterbacks. “Tim Tebow is a darn good football player. What we’ve got to make him is a darn good quarterback.”
3. The next coach will decide who the starting quarterback is. But Elway can’t imagine a head coach that wouldn’t want to coach Tebow. While it’s early, it definitely didn’t sound like the Broncos would be thinking quarterback at the No. 2 overall pick.
Peter King per Twitter.John Elway apparently is not currently a fan of Tebow. Does that change anyone's opinion?
To clarify, John Elway never told me he wants to trade Tebow. My report was about how I thought McD, w/QB-needy team, could pursue trade.
Seems like the Tebow hype train ran out of steam.
Seems like the Tebow hype train ran out of steam.
I feel completely opposite. If some one wants to spend an early round draft pick based on 3 meaningless games against weak pass defenses I'd question that. I'm not a Tebow hater and will admit that he looked far better than I thought he would as a rookie - but I don't think what he did in those three games is sustainable, His passing was good enough to see a few big plays get made, but he didn't look pro-ready yet. As far as his running style - no coach in his right mind is going to let that continue if they beleive he is a franchise QB. As big and tough as he is, he'll be constantly nicked up or worse is he tries to bull doze his was against NFL lineman, linebackers and safeties.If Tebow is not drafted in the first 5 rounds, I would seriously question the league I was playing in.And so it begins! Doubt I will have Tebow on any of my teams next year as someone will probably pull the trigger in the first 5 rounds.
at the time they played OAK they were ranked (5th) against the pass.....when they played SD they were ranked (1st) against the pass....so your comment about weak pass defenses is inaccurate....he brings a different element to the game.....he is not your traditional drop back passer, neither is Vick....but he is working on it everyday, and really all he cares about doing is doing whatever it takes to win the game....I believe DEN will rally around this guy and use his skill set to their advantage....I hate the Broncos, but personally I think they will have him in some traditional sets/dropbacks, but also roll him out on bootlegs looking for the TE, etc coming back across the field.....much like what DEN did under Shanny when they had Plummer/Sharpe, etc....that play killed teams...also part of the reason I think DEN went out and got two very athletic TE's later in the draft....I think this team will be fun to watch on offense and very unpredictable....Tebow is going to have monster weeks, kid is a baller....I think he cracks top 10 of fantasy QB's with ease....I feel completely opposite. If some one wants to spend an early round draft pick based on 3 meaningless games against weak pass defenses I'd question that. I'm not a Tebow hater and will admit that he looked far better than I thought he would as a rookie - but I don't think what he did in those three games is sustainable, His passing was good enough to see a few big plays get made, but he didn't look pro-ready yet. As far as his running style - no coach in his right mind is going to let that continue if they beleive he is a franchise QB. As big and tough as he is, he'll be constantly nicked up or worse is he tries to bull doze his was against NFL lineman, linebackers and safeties.If Tebow is not drafted in the first 5 rounds, I would seriously question the league I was playing in.And so it begins! Doubt I will have Tebow on any of my teams next year as someone will probably pull the trigger in the first 5 rounds.
he ain't going nowhere.....he will be this teams future....Orton is notI would not be surprised to see a team like Miami go after Tebow if the price is right. Miami's uses some spread elements in their passing attack and Tebow could help get UF fans who live down here (and there are plenty) to reup their season tickets.
I was specifically thinking about Houston. He completed 8 passess against Oakland's 5th ranked pass defense and the one long touchdown wasn't a particularly well thrown ball and required an outstanding catch. He only threw for 205 yards against SD and let's face it they had very little to play for in Week 17.Like I said he looked far better than I thought he would so early but he didn't look like he's an NFL ready thrower yet. I don't think those rushing totals are sustainable over a full season either since he doesn't have the speed and avoidance techniques of a Vick - he'll take a beating.My main point however was in response to some one that tried to say that any league where he is not taken in the top five rounds has something wrong with it. He has way more risk than any of the top QBs that should go that early and I don't think he has as much upside as some others seem to.I'd like to see him succeed as it was always fun to watch him at Florida - I just think people are over-reacting (imagine that) to three late season games and are getting carried away with their proclamations.at the time they played OAK they were ranked (5th) against the pass.....when they played SD they were ranked (1st) against the pass....so your comment about weak pass defenses is inaccurate....I feel completely opposite. If some one wants to spend an early round draft pick based on 3 meaningless games against weak pass defenses I'd question that. I'm not a Tebow hater and will admit that he looked far better than I thought he would as a rookie - but I don't think what he did in those three games is sustainable, His passing was good enough to see a few big plays get made, but he didn't look pro-ready yet. As far as his running style - no coach in his right mind is going to let that continue if they beleive he is a franchise QB. As big and tough as he is, he'll be constantly nicked up or worse is he tries to bull doze his was against NFL lineman, linebackers and safeties.If Tebow is not drafted in the first 5 rounds, I would seriously question the league I was playing in.And so it begins! Doubt I will have Tebow on any of my teams next year as someone will probably pull the trigger in the first 5 rounds.
i agree wholeheartedly. This was my plan and i already pulled the trigger and got the 1.01 and Brady for Tebow and Bowe (Bronco homer wanted him). Later turned Brady and my 2nd and 3rd next year into McCoy and 1st and 2nd round picks for a team likely to finish at or near the bottom of the league. With Ryan as QB starter i'm happy with the swaps, but if Tebow pushes his ceiling i may come to regret it. We shall see.In dynasty, I think he is a great canidate to roster if you have a top tier guy. You can have the luxury of waiting to see who the real Tim Tebow is ... we should all have a good idea by mid November. If he doesn't work out, no harm. If he becomes quality fantasy currency then you have instant trade ammo.This one is going to be fun to watch. Tebow is one of those rare players that could be awesome or crap and anybody who is honest with themselves curently has no clue.
Look at Tebows numbers when the games were still close. Tebow put up most of his numbers in those two games in the 2nd half against prevent defenses. I wouldnt want to have to rely on garbage time for my QB to get ff points.I'm not saying what he did last season was bad, they were the first three starts of his career, so I didn't expect much, and thats exactly what he did...not much. People are looking at his fantasy points as a good sign for him. He will not start in the NFL very long if he doesnt become a much better passer/decision maker. I hope I'm wrong but I don't think he will be a starting QB for long. He is a football player no doubt, but I think he might be a better TE or FB.at the time they played OAK they were ranked (5th) against the pass.....when they played SD they were ranked (1st) against the pass....so your comment about weak pass defenses is inaccurate....I feel completely opposite. If some one wants to spend an early round draft pick based on 3 meaningless games against weak pass defenses I'd question that. I'm not a Tebow hater and will admit that he looked far better than I thought he would as a rookie - but I don't think what he did in those three games is sustainable, His passing was good enough to see a few big plays get made, but he didn't look pro-ready yet. As far as his running style - no coach in his right mind is going to let that continue if they beleive he is a franchise QB. As big and tough as he is, he'll be constantly nicked up or worse is he tries to bull doze his was against NFL lineman, linebackers and safeties.If Tebow is not drafted in the first 5 rounds, I would seriously question the league I was playing in.And so it begins! Doubt I will have Tebow on any of my teams next year as someone will probably pull the trigger in the first 5 rounds.
A guy traded you Mccoy, his 1st & 2nd for Brady, 2nd and 3rd? And you say he is near the bottom of the league? Makes prefect sense.I thought getting Brady and the 1.1 for Bowe and Tebow was robbery until I saw that trade. Nice job for you, I hope your dog and cat dont drop out of the league once your team becomes dominant.i agree wholeheartedly. This was my plan and i already pulled the trigger and got the 1.01 and Brady for Tebow and Bowe (Bronco homer wanted him). Later turned Brady and my 2nd and 3rd next year into McCoy and 1st and 2nd round picks for a team likely to finish at or near the bottom of the league. With Ryan as QB starter i'm happy with the swaps, but if Tebow pushes his ceiling i may come to regret it. We shall see.In dynasty, I think he is a great canidate to roster if you have a top tier guy. You can have the luxury of waiting to see who the real Tim Tebow is ... we should all have a good idea by mid November. If he doesn't work out, no harm. If he becomes quality fantasy currency then you have instant trade ammo.This one is going to be fun to watch. Tebow is one of those rare players that could be awesome or crap and anybody who is honest with themselves curently has no clue.
bolded.... ....besides lead all QB's in fantasy scoring the last 3 weeks.....Look at Tebows numbers when the games were still close. Tebow put up most of his numbers in those two games in the 2nd half against prevent defenses. I wouldnt want to have to rely on garbage time for my QB to get ff points.I'm not saying what he did last season was bad, they were the first three starts of his career, so I didn't expect much, and thats exactly what he did...not much. People are looking at his fantasy points as a good sign for him. He will not start in the NFL very long if he doesnt become a much better passer/decision maker. I hope I'm wrong but I don't think he will be a starting QB for long. He is a football player no doubt, but I think he might be a better TE or FB.at the time they played OAK they were ranked (5th) against the pass.....when they played SD they were ranked (1st) against the pass....so your comment about weak pass defenses is inaccurate....I feel completely opposite. If some one wants to spend an early round draft pick based on 3 meaningless games against weak pass defenses I'd question that. I'm not a Tebow hater and will admit that he looked far better than I thought he would as a rookie - but I don't think what he did in those three games is sustainable, His passing was good enough to see a few big plays get made, but he didn't look pro-ready yet. As far as his running style - no coach in his right mind is going to let that continue if they beleive he is a franchise QB. As big and tough as he is, he'll be constantly nicked up or worse is he tries to bull doze his was against NFL lineman, linebackers and safeties.If Tebow is not drafted in the first 5 rounds, I would seriously question the league I was playing in.And so it begins! Doubt I will have Tebow on any of my teams next year as someone will probably pull the trigger in the first 5 rounds.
And by "when the games were still close" you mean when they were still close early on, but not when they were close late after Tebow led them back, because that doesn't count, right?And while we're at it can we remove the 2nd half of the Oakland game since Denver went into the prevent offense to protect him in his first start (seriously...32 carries for 34 yards out of the running backs even when they were down by multiple scores)? Yeah...I didn't think so..Denver's defense still sucks. They're going to have plenty of garbage time next year, whether or not Tebow needs it.Look at Tebows numbers when the games were still close. Tebow put up most of his numbers in those two games in the 2nd half against prevent defenses. I wouldnt want to have to rely on garbage time for my QB to get ff points.I'm not saying what he did last season was bad, they were the first three starts of his career, so I didn't expect much, and thats exactly what he did...not much. People are looking at his fantasy points as a good sign for him. He will not start in the NFL very long if he doesnt become a much better passer/decision maker. I hope I'm wrong but I don't think he will be a starting QB for long. He is a football player no doubt, but I think he might be a better TE or FB.
I watched all three of the games he played at the end if the year. He looked very lost and didn't really do much until opposing defense basically let him. The Chargers were never in danger if losing that game. If you want to think that Tebow almost led them to a come from behind victory thats fine by me, its just not true. I'm not here to bash Tebow, I want him to succeed, but I just dont think he is an NFL QB.And by "when the games were still close" you mean when they were still close early on, but not when they were close late after Tebow led them back, because that doesn't count, right?And while we're at it can we remove the 2nd half of the Oakland game since Denver went into the prevent offense to protect him in his first start (seriously...32 carries for 34 yards out of the running backs even when they were down by multiple scores)? Yeah...I didn't think so..Denver's defense still sucks. They're going to have plenty of garbage time next year, whether or not Tebow needs it.Look at Tebows numbers when the games were still close. Tebow put up most of his numbers in those two games in the 2nd half against prevent defenses. I wouldnt want to have to rely on garbage time for my QB to get ff points.I'm not saying what he did last season was bad, they were the first three starts of his career, so I didn't expect much, and thats exactly what he did...not much. People are looking at his fantasy points as a good sign for him. He will not start in the NFL very long if he doesnt become a much better passer/decision maker. I hope I'm wrong but I don't think he will be a starting QB for long. He is a football player no doubt, but I think he might be a better TE or FB.
I dont think the Broncos organization cares about Tebows fantasy points.So you want to call a QB a stud because he has lots of fantasy points.....ok.....got it.....bolded.... ....besides lead all QB's in fantasy scoring the last 3 weeks.....so you want a stud QB who only puts up on a good team when he team is ahead and against non prevent defenses that are ranked towards the top of the league in the first half of the game....ok....got it....
no..... one of those guys in fantasy is probably called a "bust"..... ...and most organizations would rather have their QB put up zero fantasy points each week...'Go deep said:I dont think the Broncos organization cares about Tebows fantasy points.So you want to call a QB a stud because he has lots of fantasy points.....ok.....got it.....'Stinkin Ref said:bolded.... ....besides lead all QB's in fantasy scoring the last 3 weeks.....
so you want a stud QB who only puts up on a good team when he team is ahead and against non prevent defenses that are ranked towards the top of the league in the first half of the game....ok....got it....
I'll try one more time. When I said I didn't expect much from him("not much"), and thats exactly what happened, I was referring to his ability to play QB in the NFL, NOT his fantasy production. I never said he didnt have alot of fantasy points in those 3 games either.no..... one of those guys in fantasy is probably called a "bust"..... ...and most organizations would rather have their QB put up zero fantasy points each week...'Go deep said:I dont think the Broncos organization cares about Tebows fantasy points.So you want to call a QB a stud because he has lots of fantasy points.....ok.....got it.....'Stinkin Ref said:bolded.... ....besides lead all QB's in fantasy scoring the last 3 weeks.....
so you want a stud QB who only puts up on a good team when he team is ahead and against non prevent defenses that are ranked towards the top of the league in the first half of the game....ok....got it....
why are you here...i don't care what you call him...a stud...a #####... a gomer...a wannabe...etc....
I hate guys that score a lot of fantasy points when they play....
where's the forum on FBG's for "I Wanna Score the Least Amount of Fantasy Points As Possible This Week"...let's check the hits that one gets....
I'm not on this message board applying for a job as a NFL GM....
I could really care less what the organization thinks about his fantasy points...or lack thereof...he produced in fantasy when he got to play...he probably won a bunch of guys a championship as well as lost a bunch of guys one when they didn't start him those last three weeks....if you're not on board fantasy wise...no problem, plenty of reason not to be....but it ain't because he didn't produce when he got to play...it definately wasn't "not much"...
if a "stud" isn't someone who scores a lot of fantasy points then he has a lot of company at QB....start with the top 6 or so and move on....
he's played 3 games...trying to indicate that will be his career completion % is almost as crazy as me saying he will put up FF points every game like he did those 3 weeks....but to say he didn't show much is ridiculous.....if you ask anybody, including yourself, as you have kind of admitted....he actually outperformed expectations.....and you probably can't name one player in the NFL that has the want, desire, and pedigree to try to improve more than him....there is probably only one person that is really disapointed in the way he played those 3 weeks....and that's Tebow....and I'd be willing to bet...there isn't a player in the NFL right now that could care less about his "fantasy" points more than him...I'll try one more time. When I said I didn't expect much from him("not much"), and thats exactly what happened, I was referring to his ability to play QB in the NFL, NOT his fantasy production. I never said he didnt have alot of fantasy points in those 3 games either.no..... one of those guys in fantasy is probably called a "bust"..... ...and most organizations would rather have their QB put up zero fantasy points each week...'Go deep said:I dont think the Broncos organization cares about Tebows fantasy points.So you want to call a QB a stud because he has lots of fantasy points.....ok.....got it.....'Stinkin Ref said:bolded.... ....besides lead all QB's in fantasy scoring the last 3 weeks.....
so you want a stud QB who only puts up on a good team when he team is ahead and against non prevent defenses that are ranked towards the top of the league in the first half of the game....ok....got it....
why are you here...i don't care what you call him...a stud...a #####... a gomer...a wannabe...etc....
I hate guys that score a lot of fantasy points when they play....
where's the forum on FBG's for "I Wanna Score the Least Amount of Fantasy Points As Possible This Week"...let's check the hits that one gets....
I'm not on this message board applying for a job as a NFL GM....
I could really care less what the organization thinks about his fantasy points...or lack thereof...he produced in fantasy when he got to play...he probably won a bunch of guys a championship as well as lost a bunch of guys one when they didn't start him those last three weeks....if you're not on board fantasy wise...no problem, plenty of reason not to be....but it ain't because he didn't produce when he got to play...it definately wasn't "not much"...
if a "stud" isn't someone who scores a lot of fantasy points then he has a lot of company at QB....start with the top 6 or so and move on....
QBs who have a competition % in the 50 range tend to lose their starting jobs pretty quick. You can't score ff points from the bench.
Not sure why you are getting so worked up over it. Is just my opinion that he will never be a good NFL starter(or any kind of starter for very long). You disagree, thats fine, there is nothing wrong with that. I could be wrong, this is one of those cases I hope I am.
Although I was kind of on the other side of the argument - as I'm not quite ready to say that Tebow should be drafted amongst the top tier QBs and any league where he's not is lacking something - it would be tough for anyone to disagree with this statement.To me he's a great "upside" backup QB in re-draft leagues. If that means I lose out on him because some one else drafts him as a starter, then so be it. Obviously he has shown the ability to put up fantasy points (in fact on a point per games basis that was the greatest fantasy season ever for a rookie QB http://www.fftoday.com/articles/marcoccio/11_rookie_impact_qbs.htm), I'm just not sure that production is sustainable and the sample size leaves much to be desired.....he actually outperformed expectations.....
How much longer do you think Tebow will be the Den starter?I'll try one more time. When I said I didn't expect much from him("not much"), and thats exactly what happened, I was referring to his ability to play QB in the NFL, NOT his fantasy production. I never said he didnt have alot of fantasy points in those 3 games either.no..... one of those guys in fantasy is probably called a "bust"..... ...and most organizations would rather have their QB put up zero fantasy points each week...'Go deep said:I dont think the Broncos organization cares about Tebows fantasy points.So you want to call a QB a stud because he has lots of fantasy points.....ok.....got it.....'Stinkin Ref said:bolded.... ....besides lead all QB's in fantasy scoring the last 3 weeks.....
so you want a stud QB who only puts up on a good team when he team is ahead and against non prevent defenses that are ranked towards the top of the league in the first half of the game....ok....got it....
why are you here...i don't care what you call him...a stud...a #####... a gomer...a wannabe...etc....
I hate guys that score a lot of fantasy points when they play....
where's the forum on FBG's for "I Wanna Score the Least Amount of Fantasy Points As Possible This Week"...let's check the hits that one gets....
I'm not on this message board applying for a job as a NFL GM....
I could really care less what the organization thinks about his fantasy points...or lack thereof...he produced in fantasy when he got to play...he probably won a bunch of guys a championship as well as lost a bunch of guys one when they didn't start him those last three weeks....if you're not on board fantasy wise...no problem, plenty of reason not to be....but it ain't because he didn't produce when he got to play...it definately wasn't "not much"...
if a "stud" isn't someone who scores a lot of fantasy points then he has a lot of company at QB....start with the top 6 or so and move on....
QBs who have a competition % in the 50 range tend to lose their starting jobs pretty quick. You can't score ff points from the bench.
Not sure why you are getting so worked up over it. Is just my opinion that he will never be a good NFL starter(or any kind of starter for very long). You disagree, thats fine, there is nothing wrong with that. I could be wrong, this is one of those cases I hope I am.
I'm not so sure he will start this season.How much longer do you think Tebow will be the Den starter?I'll try one more time. When I said I didn't expect much from him("not much"), and thats exactly what happened, I was referring to his ability to play QB in the NFL, NOT his fantasy production. I never said he didnt have alot of fantasy points in those 3 games either.no..... one of those guys in fantasy is probably called a "bust"..... ...and most organizations would rather have their QB put up zero fantasy points each week...'Go deep said:I dont think the Broncos organization cares about Tebows fantasy points.So you want to call a QB a stud because he has lots of fantasy points.....ok.....got it.....'Stinkin Ref said:bolded.... ....besides lead all QB's in fantasy scoring the last 3 weeks.....
so you want a stud QB who only puts up on a good team when he team is ahead and against non prevent defenses that are ranked towards the top of the league in the first half of the game....ok....got it....
why are you here...i don't care what you call him...a stud...a #####... a gomer...a wannabe...etc....
I hafGte guys that score a lot of fantasy points when they play....
where's the forum on FBG's for "I Wanna Score the Least Amount of Fantasy Points As Possible This Week"...let's check the hits that one gets....
I'm not on this message board applying for a job as a NFL GM....
I could really care less what the organization thinks about his fantasy points...or lack thereof...he produced in fantasy when he got to play...he probably won a bunch of guys a championship as well as lost a bunch of guys one when they didn't start him those last three weeks....if you're not on board fantasy wise...no problem, plenty of reason not to be....but it ain't because he didn't produce when he got to play...it definately wasn't "not much"...
if a "stud" isn't someone who scores a lot of fantasy points then he has a lot of company at QB....start with the top 6 or so and move on....
QBs who have a competition % in the 50 range tend to lose their starting jobs pretty quick. You can't score ff points from the bench.
Not sure why you are getting so worked up over it. Is just my opinion that he will never be a good NFL starter(or any kind of starter for very long). You disagree, thats fine, there is nothing wrong with that. I could be wrong, this is one of those cases I hope I am.
You have to be a Chiefs fan. I still have nightmares about the naked bootleg working again and again against the Chief D.at the time they played OAK they were ranked (5th) against the pass.....when they played SD they were ranked (1st) against the pass....so your comment about weak pass defenses is inaccurate....he brings a different element to the game.....he is not your traditional drop back passer, neither is Vick....but he is working on it everyday, and really all he cares about doing is doing whatever it takes to win the game....I believe DEN will rally around this guy and use his skill set to their advantage....I hate the Broncos, but personally I think they will have him in some traditional sets/dropbacks, but also roll him out on bootlegs looking for the TE, etc coming back across the field.....much like what DEN did under Shanny when they had Plummer/Sharpe, etc....that play killed teams...also part of the reason I think DEN went out and got two very athletic TE's later in the draft....I think this team will be fun to watch on offense and very unpredictable....Tebow is going to have monster weeks, kid is a baller....I think he cracks top 10 of fantasy QB's with ease....I feel completely opposite. If some one wants to spend an early round draft pick based on 3 meaningless games against weak pass defenses I'd question that. I'm not a Tebow hater and will admit that he looked far better than I thought he would as a rookie - but I don't think what he did in those three games is sustainable, His passing was good enough to see a few big plays get made, but he didn't look pro-ready yet. As far as his running style - no coach in his right mind is going to let that continue if they beleive he is a franchise QB. As big and tough as he is, he'll be constantly nicked up or worse is he tries to bull doze his was against NFL lineman, linebackers and safeties.If Tebow is not drafted in the first 5 rounds, I would seriously question the league I was playing in.And so it begins! Doubt I will have Tebow on any of my teams next year as someone will probably pull the trigger in the first 5 rounds.
it seemed unstoppableYou have to be a Chiefs fan. I still have nightmares about the naked bootleg working again and again against the Chief D.at the time they played OAK they were ranked (5th) against the pass.....when they played SD they were ranked (1st) against the pass....so your comment about weak pass defenses is inaccurate....he brings a different element to the game.....he is not your traditional drop back passer, neither is Vick....but he is working on it everyday, and really all he cares about doing is doing whatever it takes to win the game....I believe DEN will rally around this guy and use his skill set to their advantage....I hate the Broncos, but personally I think they will have him in some traditional sets/dropbacks, but also roll him out on bootlegs looking for the TE, etc coming back across the field.....much like what DEN did under Shanny when they had Plummer/Sharpe, etc....that play killed teams...also part of the reason I think DEN went out and got two very athletic TE's later in the draft....I think this team will be fun to watch on offense and very unpredictable....Tebow is going to have monster weeks, kid is a baller....I think he cracks top 10 of fantasy QB's with ease....I feel completely opposite. If some one wants to spend an early round draft pick based on 3 meaningless games against weak pass defenses I'd question that. I'm not a Tebow hater and will admit that he looked far better than I thought he would as a rookie - but I don't think what he did in those three games is sustainable, His passing was good enough to see a few big plays get made, but he didn't look pro-ready yet. As far as his running style - no coach in his right mind is going to let that continue if they beleive he is a franchise QB. As big and tough as he is, he'll be constantly nicked up or worse is he tries to bull doze his was against NFL lineman, linebackers and safeties.If Tebow is not drafted in the first 5 rounds, I would seriously question the league I was playing in.And so it begins! Doubt I will have Tebow on any of my teams next year as someone will probably pull the trigger in the first 5 rounds.
Really?http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=4016429Looking forward to him having to answer questions after a tough loss where things didn't go as planned...wonder if his faith will be able to conquer the media.
He was admired and kept out of harm's way by Urban in Gainesville, JM made him a special project thru the draft last year, now he is face to face with Fox who probably doesn't want him on the field right now and IMO he might not be handling that so well. He said "it was taken from me"...almost like he feels entitled to the job. I'm just offering my perspective on what I am reading and surely there is room for differing opinions.Really?http://sports.espn.g...tory?id=4016429Looking forward to him having to answer questions after a tough loss where things didn't go as planned...wonder if his faith will be able to conquer the media.
Is this really different than what anybody expected though? I can guarantee that if "play in practice will dictate your team spot" Tebow will never see the light of day in Denver. Because the only things you can do in practice (timing, footwork backing out from under center, defensive reads and delivery) are all Tebow's shortcomings. Some are lack of experience, some are physical limitations. Let's face it, he could work on all of those things his entire career and he'll never look better than slightly above average in practice. Conversely, all of Tebow's strengths (competitiveness, field vision, strength and footwork running with the ball), there's no way to display that in non-game situations. I think you can only truly evaluate Tebow on Sundays. Which is why I don't think he ever gets another shot in Denver. He'll need a team that's willing to unleash the good, the bad and the ugly of him - a coach that says, "just go out there and play the game kid".Word around the practice field today is that Quinn's really pushing Tebow for the 2 spot. Radio chatter is mostly about how Brady Quinn's actually looked better in every practice. Tebow's accuracy is not impressing John Fox and he's let it be known that everyone's starting even - play in practice will dictate your team spot. I wouldn't be surprised to see Tebow drop to 3rd string unless he really shows something in a preseason game (or Quinn doesn't).
Seems that all of our local media who are at the practices say Quinn looks better. Most of the local callers are defending Tebow (god knows why - maybe literally).
I wish the kid the best but he's just not looking good (especially with accuracy) right now. Too many people have the rose-colored glasses on in Denver right now, though.
So do you have a particular system/team in mind in which he would flourish? Certainly Denver would be open to trading him, it seems.Is this really different than what anybody expected though? I can guarantee that if "play in practice will dictate your team spot" Tebow will never see the light of day in Denver. Because the only things you can do in practice (timing, footwork backing out from under center, defensive reads and delivery) are all Tebow's shortcomings. Some are lack of experience, some are physical limitations. Let's face it, he could work on all of those things his entire career and he'll never look better than slightly above average in practice. Conversely, all of Tebow's strengths (competitiveness, field vision, strength and footwork running with the ball), there's no way to display that in non-game situations. I think you can only truly evaluate Tebow on Sundays. Which is why I don't think he ever gets another shot in Denver. He'll need a team that's willing to unleash the good, the bad and the ugly of him - a coach that says, "just go out there and play the game kid".Word around the practice field today is that Quinn's really pushing Tebow for the 2 spot. Radio chatter is mostly about how Brady Quinn's actually looked better in every practice. Tebow's accuracy is not impressing John Fox and he's let it be known that everyone's starting even - play in practice will dictate your team spot. I wouldn't be surprised to see Tebow drop to 3rd string unless he really shows something in a preseason game (or Quinn doesn't).
Seems that all of our local media who are at the practices say Quinn looks better. Most of the local callers are defending Tebow (god knows why - maybe literally).
I wish the kid the best but he's just not looking good (especially with accuracy) right now. Too many people have the rose-colored glasses on in Denver right now, though.
That'll never happen in Denver.
Competitiveness. Field vision. Strength. Footwork running with the ball. Combine all those and they are solid foundational skills - for a Running Back. I could have great field vision but if I'm a QB and am not accurate then what's the use? Tebow's accuracy leaves much to be desired so far. As a Broncos Fan whose been to a few practices so far I can honestly say that I don't think Tebow can take us farther than Orton.And if Tebow willConversely, all of Tebow's strengths (competitiveness, field vision, strength and footwork running with the ball)...
I would be a happy Broncos fan.I'm in the minority here in Denver, though, and get crushed on a daily basis for saying this. I'm sticking to my guns anyway.never happen in Denver.
Don't forget John Fox is a guy that stuck with Delhomme to the bitter end. You could make a case that he is more that type of coach that any other in the league.He'll need a team that's willing to unleash the good, the bad and the ugly of him - a coach that says, "just go out there and play the game kid". That'll never happen in Denver.
I think he stuck with Delhomme because Jake had a history of previous success though. That, and the options behind him sucked.Don't forget John Fox is a guy that stuck with Delhomme to the bitter end. You could make a case that he is more that type of coach that any other in the league.He'll need a team that's willing to unleash the good, the bad and the ugly of him - a coach that says, "just go out there and play the game kid". That'll never happen in Denver.