Dr. Octopus
Footballguy
what's wrong with that?miklia said:Today in 12 team league was offered the 1.11 for my 2.02, 2.04 and 2.07. ermmm.
what's wrong with that?miklia said:Today in 12 team league was offered the 1.11 for my 2.02, 2.04 and 2.07. ermmm.
No. That's awful.Not the worst ever but got a pretty bad offer a few days ago.
PPR 1.5 TE - 16 teams
I was offered Fitzpatrick, Ryan NYJ QB;Jackson, Malik JAC DE
for Ertz, Zach PHI TE; Year 2016 Draft Pick 1.01
Whats this now? So the shark move is to load up on second round picks and move them all for future firsts?He emailed me "Geez man". I told him thats how I felt about his offer to which he replied, "General consensus is future 1sts are worth present late 1sts/early 2nds"
I've seen late 1sts or early 2nds traded for future 1sts quite a few times (not usually as late as 2.6 though), typically when the pick is on the clock and someone is on the board that they team trading up wants. Last year when I was on the clock at 1.12 I had at least 3 offers of a future 1st for the pick, but I was pretty intent on taking David Johnson there.Not worst trade ever received but figured I'd share a funny story.
Offer showed up today:
2.6 for my 2017 1. (I earned the 1.1 this year.)
I countered my 2017 1 for the 1.4 and 2.1.
He emailed me "Geez man". I told him thats how I felt about his offer to which he replied, "General consensus is future 1sts are worth present late 1sts/early 2nds" and "sorry for offering you something I have seen accepted hundreds of times".
I told him I've literally never seen anyone accept an offer like that.
To see a trade like that accepted hundreds of times he must be in thousands of leagues with hundreds of teams that have been ongoing for 30 years.
I laughed.14 team IDP.. Traded up to get the 1.01.. took Easy EZeke Elliot.. an owner just offered me Darren Mcfadden and Alfred Morris.. for... Julio Jones..
I've seen a late first thru early second for a future first about 5-10 times in my 10 leagues over the past 3 years. But only twice when team wasn't on the clock and never has it been for the 2.6 or anything later than the 2.2.I've seen late 1sts or early 2nds traded for future 1sts quite a few times (not usually as late as 2.6 though), typically when the pick is on the clock and someone is on the board that they team trading up wants. Last year when I was on the clock at 1.12 I had at least 3 offers of a future 1st for the pick, but I was pretty intent on taking David Johnson there.
It's just a lot less likely to happen this year given the general feeling about the 2017 class and, for that matter, the 2016 class. We may see a few of them once drafts are ongoing and people can put names to picks, but I would wager a whole lot less of them than usual.
If you got the 1.01 this year because your team is that bad, that would lead me to believe your team could finish with the 1.01-1.03 for 2017. That being the case, I think I would accept an offer of your 2017 1st for my 2016 1.04 and 2.01.Not worst trade ever received but figured I'd share a funny story.
Offer showed up today:
2.6 for my 2017 1. (I earned the 1.1 this year.)
I countered my 2017 1 for the 1.4 and 2.1.
He emailed me "Geez man". I told him thats how I felt about his offer to which he replied, "General consensus is future 1sts are worth present late 1sts/early 2nds" and "sorry for offering you something I have seen accepted hundreds of times".
I told him I've literally never seen anyone accept an offer like that.
To see a trade like that accepted hundreds of times he must be in thousands of leagues with hundreds of teams that have been ongoing for 30 years.
I had quite a few injuries but my receivers do suck.If you got the 1.01 this year because your team is that bad, that would lead me to believe your team could finish with the 1.01-1.03 for 2017. That being the case, I think I would accept an offer of your 2017 1st for my 2016 1.04 and 2.01.
Or am I missing something?
The point I was trying to make is that I think you trading your 2017 1st is a bad move for you.I had quite a few injuries but my receivers do suck.
Start 2 RB/3 WR/1 TE 0.5 PPR
Brees/Wilson
Bell/Forte/Bernard/Woodhead
Hurns/Jones/T. Benj/R. Matthews
Graham/Barnidge
Understood but my team is probably squarely in the middle post draft. Not likely a 1.1-1.3 candidate with a healthy Bell and Zeke (or what I can take in for Zeke).The point I was trying to make is that I think you trading your 2017 1st is a bad move for you.
Honestly I think you're lucky he was insulted by your counter. I'd rather have your 2017 first than the 1.04 and 2.01 - I just think it's going to be a much better class next year and (no offense) but your team looks like it could easily miss the playoffs again even with full health. Those WRs are pretty bad and your TE production is far from guaranteed.I had quite a few injuries but my receivers do suck.
Start 2 RB/3 WR/1 TE 0.5 PPR
Brees/Wilson
Bell/Forte/Bernard/Woodhead
Hurns/Jones/T. Benj/R. Matthews
Graham/Barnidge
No offense taken. Could definitely be the case. I will be adding Zeke at 1.1 and BPA at 1.7 as well as a bunch of 3rd round dart throws but would need some instant production with those 2 firsts for this probably to not be true.Dr. Octopus said:Honestly I think you're lucky he was insulted by your counter. I'd rather have your 2017 first than the 1.04 and 2.01 - I just think it's going to be a much better class next year and (no offense) but your team looks like it could easily miss the playoffs again even with full health. Those WRs are pretty bad and your TE production is far from guaranteed.
These can't be close to the worst you've received. Honestly I'll bet the vote would be split on Algholor or the 2018 1.12 team Superflex.
Was offered Eli Manning and Buck Allen for Aaron Rodgers.
Same owner also offered me a 2018 1st for Agholor
Why are people posting fair offers in this thread?Hopkins and 1.2 for 1.1.
"Sarcasm"Why are people posting fair offers in this thread?
That is pretty bad. Rawls is nothing12 team ppr, 1qb/2rb/2wr/1te/2flex
I just got offered:
Brown, Bryce SEA RB and Rawls, Thomas SEA RB
For:
Agholor, Nelson PHI WR and Evans, Mike TB WR
Wow - I guess he thinks Rawls is a top 5 RB and Brown is his handcuff! ???
This offer isnt that bad. Evans us overrated.12 team ppr, 1qb/2rb/2wr/1te/2flex
I just got offered:
Brown, Bryce SEA RB and Rawls, Thomas SEA RB
For:
Agholor, Nelson PHI WR and Evans, Mike TB WR
Wow - I guess he thinks Rawls is a top 5 RB and Brown is his handcuff! ???
If this were relative to: Rawls for Watkins, Dez and a 1 and you were saying, "This isn't THAT bad" I would agree with this.This offer isnt that bad. Evans us overrated.
While I agree it's not a great offer I could see doing that deal depending on the leagues scoring and your teams roster makeup. Zeke could be that good in Dallas. There are so few bell cows left at RB and none with an offensive line as good as Dallas. Plus with the Texans additions on offfense Hopkins will likely see a drop in targets. RBs that put up 1300 yards and 12 Tds are much harder to find than WRs that can put up those numbers."Sarcasm"
Perhaps it should have read 1.1 for Hopkins and 1.2?
Kind of assumed most would get the idea with this one...
Yeah, and that guy is notorious for sending the worst offers of all time and then trying to convince you to take it, even saying "I hope you dont take it".Certainly not the worst offer I have been offered but 2 years ago I was offered Calvin Johnson for....the world and the other guy was serious with the offer. He still says to this day "It was a fair offer at the time"........
- Newfoundland offers Johnson, Calvin DET WR
- Charlotte for Richardson, Trent IND RB;Hopkins, DeAndre HOU WR;Gronkowski, Rob NEP TE; Year 2014 Draft Pick 4.07; Year 2015 Round 1 Draft Pick from Charlotte;Year 2015 Round 4 Draft Pick from Charlotte;Year 2016 Round 1 Draft Pick from Charlotte;Year 2016 Round 2 Draft Pick from Charlotte;Year 2016 Round 3 Draft Pick from Las Vegas
We have a guy like that in our league, the only difference is he will start you with an offer that is clearly favored to him, but still gives you hope that can talk and work something out and instantly revoke it. He then proceeds to send a couple of offers that are horrible and tries to work it back to the 1st offer and tries to make you think you are robbing him.ghostguy123 said:Yeah, and that guy is notorious for sending the worst offers of all time and then trying to convince you to take it, even saying "I hope you dont take it".
I dont think you comprehend the difference between overrated and underrated.This offer isnt that bad. Evans us overrated.
I guess I'm the first then, and I'm OK with that. Evans is ranked as a top 5 Dynasty WR, and I've seen him ranked as high as #2 & #3 overall in some individual rankings. Yet his best season was his rookie year in which he ranked 11t because of his TD totals. Last year he was 26th - give or take a spot or two based on league scoring - but his numbers don't comprehend to me as a top 5 WR. Pro Football Focus also grades him as a 3rd tier WR and not as an elite NFL WR like those ranked at the top fantasy wise. And then you have the issue of his hands and drops which is kind of a big deal for WRs, but maybe that's me not comprehending the WR position. Evans has potential, I won't deny him that, but IMO, the dynasty love is greater than the analytics.I dont think you comprehend the difference between overrated and underrated.
Because you'd be the first I've heard say he is overrated.
Last year was literally the FIRST season where drops have ever been a concern for Evans.I guess I'm the first then, and I'm OK with that. Evans is ranked as a top 5 Dynasty WR, and I've seen him ranked as high as #2 & #3 overall in some individual rankings. Yet his best season was his rookie year in which he ranked 11t because of his TD totals. Last year he was 26th - give or take a spot or two based on league scoring - but his numbers don't comprehend to me as a top 5 WR. Pro Football Focus also grades him as a 3rd tier WR and not as an elite NFL WR like those ranked at the top fantasy wise. And then you have the issue of his hands and drops which is kind of a big deal for WRs, but maybe that's me not comprehending the WR position. Evans has potential, I won't deny him that, but IMO, the dynasty love is greater than the analytics.
Well, when Jameis can't get the ball within 10 feet of you on 50% of your targets, I think it's forgivable.Well, he's not in my top 5. I value WRs a little different, and ones that only catch 50% of their targets don't grade out as high for me.
catch 50%... ok, how many balls were catchable?Well, he's not in my top 5. I value WRs a little different, and ones that only catch 50% of their targets don't grade out as high for me.
There are many very good WRs so top 5 is rare air... and I could easily see Evans omitted, However, he isn't 3rd tier. Not even close.Well, he's not in my top 5. I value WRs a little different, and ones that only catch 50% of their targets don't grade out as high for me.
3rd tier was Pro Football Focus's analytics, not mine.There are many very good WRs so top 5 is rare air... and I could easily see Evans omitted, However, he isn't 3rd tier. Not even close.