kremenull
Footballguy
Rivers is very good, I believe, and had a phenomenal season. But no, I do not place him at the same level as Manning or Brady or Brees or Rodgers. First off, last year was Rodgers' 1st year starting, not 3rd or 4th like Rivers. Rodgers instantly jumped into the elite, meaning the guy was ready to go and should only improve as he gets more comfortable in and masters the system. Second, Rivers isn't anywhere close to having the physical abilities of Rodgers, as he is much closer to Ryan in arm strength, mobility, quickness, etc. Third, the passing game in S.D. is not the same as the passing game in G.B., the Packers are much more dynamic in structure of their passing game as Turner and McCarthy have much different philosophies. And Green Bay has shown that they will continue down a path with similar offensive philosophy through their most recent HC eras: Holmgren, Sherman, and McCarthy all promoted W.C. offensive tendencies, and McCarthy's is as sophisticated and dynamic as there is. And when you have the proper trigger man like Rodgers, they almost assuredly will not deviate from this proven structure. Turner's offense is essentially a run-based offense that looks to make big plays in the passing game but doesn't offer the consistent opportunities in the passing game as a QB-friendly WCO will. And last year, sure Rivers executed brilliantly in Turner's system. But feel free to expect that same type of ypa from Rivers and ypr from V-Jax this year. I am not. Can things change over time with Rivers to get more passing opportunities, sure. But that is simply a guess, not a certain projection.Interesting that you would use this logic to say Rodgers is special and clearly imply Rivers isn't, when Rivers was better last year at every measure you cited. With arguably lesser targets than Rodgers had.Your comment on Rivers' opportunities implies that you are assuming they won't change in the future. IMO the Chargers' passing game was so dominant last year, it is a nobrainer for the Chargers to gradually switch more to a passing oriented offense as LT declines, particularly since it does not appear they have an heir apparent as a feature back replacement. I would be extremely surprised if Rivers doesn't have more attempts this year than last, more next year than this year, etc.No, I was not expecting consensus as I actually do like your approach to rankings and non-consensus thinking. And if Ryan is on the way to being special in your eyes, I don't disagree with that position either. My point is that Rodgers should be considered already there, i.e., special, and already in the highest tier. When you can connect on over 63% of 536 pass attempts at 7.5 ypa with a TD/int of over 2/1, along with a high number of TDs (28), this is no fluke in the NFL. Combine this type of QB play with well-above average athleticism and a very strong arm, and probably one of the most QB-friendly systems along the lines of a Manning or Brees type of situation. With all of these things as an advantage over Ryan, I just don't see how Ryan can outdo him.kremenull, I respect your opinion, and I like Aaron Rodgers because he's very good. But you may have stumbled on the wrong thread. One thing I've tried all along not to be is consensus. I like Rodgers a lot b/c he's very good, but personally I believe Matt Ryan can be special. And I'm a lot more concerned about anticipation than consensus. I anticipate that Ryan will be a difference maker. I might be wrong, but I'm standing by it.Rodgers is right there with the consensus Top 3 (Brady, Manning, and Brees), possibly the 4th of the trio based on proven track record but I'd have a very hard time taking more than one of these guys over Rodgers in a dynasty startup draft.
I think a good comparison and target point for Ryan is to become a Philip Rivers. This is not a diss on Ryan, not in the least as Rivers is very good, IMO, and productive. He just doesn't get as many opportunities as the upper-tier QBs, and I think Ryan will also fall into this category, especially with Turner around.
But I respect the opinion though, and in "sticking to your guns" on this one.
Rivers has a higher career QB rating than Rodgers, and that is despite playing one of his three seasons in Marty's conservative offense and a second year in transition due to a new coaching staff and significant turnover in his receiving corps. IMO there is absolutely no reason to expect Rodgers to be better going forward.
Rivers' '08 was slightly reminiscient of Big Ben's '07, IMO. Not saying that he will fall back to Big Ben's next season ('07 to '08), but I do expect a fall back. Rodgers =