What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

How drunk was Namath during the halftime interview (1 Viewer)

What an idiotic comment. I enjoyed seeing Joe be Joe. But what's your purpose in ripping people who belong to that category. Is there something wrong with being 60 or southern, or republican or a bible thumper? Or all of these things? What a jack*ss.
He's giving you a straw man to attack, and you fell for it. Same with the liberal media comment he made to me. It shows that he doesn't really want to debate the issue and is hoping that someone will go off on a tangent based on his red herring. It apparently worked.
 
Im not defending what he did. I am defending his right and you'all judging him because you think it was 'improper' or 'outrageous', etc.I encourage you to make your own opinions, but to judge him on it is not right.What is the difference between 'forming your own opinion' and 'judging' you ask?Opinion: What Joe did is not something I agree with.Jusdging: Joe should be embarassed and his wife upset because he was trying to kiss Susie.JAA
Again, I enjoyed the whole namath thing, but aren't you judging those who are judging Namath? Who the heck are YOU to judge "so-and-so-posters" decision to judge Joe Namath? You said "to judge him on it is not right". OK, Pot. What you should have said, according to your own post, is "What you did by judging Joe Namath is not something I agree with." Now me, I have no problem judging you, and have never stated that people should not make judgments, so I feel fine saying that you made a couple of idiotic statements here and may well be a jack*ss. But given what you've said about not judging people, you should just stick to saying that you don't agree with me. :P I love it when people do themselves in with their own words.
 
What an idiotic comment. I enjoyed seeing Joe be Joe. But what's your purpose in ripping people who belong to that category. Is there something wrong with being 60 or southern, or republican or a bible thumper? Or all of these things? What a jack*ss.
He's giving you a straw man to attack, and you fell for it. Same with the liberal media comment he made to me. It shows that he doesn't really want to debate the issue and is hoping that someone will go off on a tangent based on his red herring. It apparently worked.
You give the man too much credit.
 
I have absolutely no idea if it was an 'inside joke'.
Exactly my point. What if it was, would you still feel the same way?
Although I seriously doubt it (Suzie cut the interview short, which leads me to believe she had had enough of him), it's always a possiblility. It does not matter.
It does matter, and that is exaclty what LIBERAL MEDIA does.
Joe got liquored up and repeatedly asked some chick to kiss him.
Thats not how I saw it, you are entitled to your opinion
My judgement of Joe is that his actions were not classy nor were they respectful. I have every right in the world to make that judgement, whether I'm correct or not.
Riiight, you have the right to make a judgement on someone like Joe Namath ... now where did I leave my stereo-type bag o tricksJAA
 
Im not defending what he did. I am defending his right and you'all judging him because you think it was 'improper' or 'outrageous', etc.

I encourage you to make your own opinions, but to judge him on it is not right.

What is the difference between 'forming your own opinion' and 'judging' you ask?

Opinion: What Joe did is not something I agree with.

Jusdging: Joe should be embarassed and his wife upset because he was trying to kiss Susie.

JAA
Again, I enjoyed the whole namath thing, but aren't you judging those who are judging Namath? Who the heck are YOU to judge "so-and-so-posters" decision to judge Joe Namath? You said "to judge him on it is not right". OK, Pot. What you should have said, according to your own post, is "What you did by judging Joe Namath is not something I agree with." Now me, I have no problem judging you, and have never stated that people should not make judgments, so I feel fine saying that you made a couple of idiotic statements here and may well be a jack*ss. But given what you've said about not judging people, you should just stick to saying that you don't agree with me.

:P

I love it when people do themselves in with their own words.
Yes I am, though I see myself as a marytr in Joe Namaths name.However, you do agree with me?

JAA

 
That's because most people here have a sense of humor and don't take ourselves too seriously.Namath is a legendary party animal.  And a HOF quarterback.  And one of the most recognizable athletes of all time.Do you think he really cares about what people think?  Do you think people will actually think differently of him because of this?  Lighten up.
There's no doubt this will affect people's attitudes about Joe. I never saw Nameth play and I don't care about the Jets. When I saw Nameth I was wondering whether he had a stroke or not because he was such a mess. After he tried to plant one on the reporter my next thought was whether or not he was married. Maybe if I grew up a Nameth fan I could just ignore the whole thing. But as it stands my main impression of Joe is as an drunken idiot.That was an embarrassing moment no matter how much you like Nameth. It's definitely funny but it's funny at Nameth's expense. I can't imagine he's watching footage of that inteview with any pride at all.
You sound like my mom. Jeez, what are you 60 year old bible thumper southern republican? What is embarassing about someone who haves fun a little more intoxicated than you do? Who is a little more 'flirtatious' than you think someone should be? Who are you to ####en judge Joe Namath? I know I have no ### #### arguement to make against a guy who is all abouy happy, fun, peace, love and rock-n-roll or whatever.GB people who can still have fun and be happy at Joe's age. GB viagra, and GB Broadway JoeJAA
Actually I'm just a 29 year-old kid. But when I've gotten that drunk and made a spectacle of myself I've felt embarrassed about it. If it's on New Years eve at a big party then I wouldnt think too much of it. But if I got like that at my sister's wedding and hit on the bridesmaids with my girlfriend sitting at the next table I'd have some apologizing to do.If I was on national TV at the time and MARRIED I'd really feel like a total heel. It wouldnt matter if I won 10 superbowls and had half a million fans defending me, I'd know I embarrassed myself and my family and I'd feel regret for making such a bad decision.That's just me though. Maybe if I was a Jet fan I'd have to feel different. As it is I don't really care about Joe's career since I never saw any of it. Right now Namath is just a punch line to me for the most drunken interview I've ever seen in football. I have the whole thing TIVO'd and we laughed our asses off at Joe hours after the game was over. Before the Superbowl we will probably put it back on again and laugh at him some more.I'm sorry if he's anyone's hero, but to me and people younger he seems like a total joke.
 
Riiight, you have the right to make a judgement on someone like Joe Namath ... now where did I leave my stereo-type bag o tricks
Just out of curiosity, why exactly do I not have the right to make a judgement on someone like Joe Namath? You're starting to sound like one of those bible-thumping republicans yourself. :P
 
1. I am not on a fishing trip2. I have made my own mistakes3. Joe had a fair amount to drink (though I would not call him drunk but my 65 year mom and aunt would)4. You have no right to condem Joe for what may have happened between him and Suzie because you do not know their relationship/friendship or Joe as a person ... periodJAAPS For what it is worth I would take 1 joe Namath over ten thousand RMoss, Deion Sanders, Willie Green, etc.

 
Sure he could have said no to the interview because after having a few drink he might say something that isn't PC or he could have gone on the air and said the same bs that we hear athletes say all the time, only to watch the news a few days later and see that they lived their lives in the exact opposite manner that they preached.You don't have to respect him for his womanizing and partying ways, but at least respect the fact that he doesn't feel the need to be a fraud or a fake. It's a shame that so many people feel that our sport "idols" need to fit a certain mould. I have a feeling that great number of people on this board would have led a very similar lifestyle that Joe did, if they were given the same opportunities that had.
This is not an issue of political correctness. There is nothing politically correct about showing some restraint and acting like a man. He knew in advance that he was going to be interviewed on television by Suzie. He should have A) Waited until after the interview to get smashed or B) turned down the interview altogether. This is not a difficult issue. Joe was an ### and any aura of greatness he had in my mind will now be overshadowed by his disrespectful and piggish attitude in that interview. Sure, I still like the guy and what he did for football, but anyone who can't respect other people loses some points with me.
Who is he trying to impress? I guess the "manly" thing for him to do would be to go in front of the camera and spew out tired cliche after tired cliche and not be who he really is. These two aren't co-workers, so I think it would be a tough sell for sexual harassment. This type of exchange goes on millions of times a day between men and women. Do I think it's acceptable in the workplace? No. But this wasn't a workplace and if she had acted any bit uncomfortable then this would have been an entirely different story.I find it laughable that you lose respect for Joe because he gets a little drunk and flirts with a lady, but somehow forget to include his womanizing ways in your assesment of him before this incident. I don't think Joe really cares that you lost respect for him because he wouldn't want anybody with such an entirely opposite view of life admiring him in the first place.I really doubt his wife cares if she stuck around this long. Some men actually have wives that understand a little payful flirting doesn't hurt anybody.
 
I'm sorry if he's anyone's hero, but to me and people younger he seems like a total joke
BS. Im younger than you, hate the jets, and I think it was awesome. To take your analogy to the proper place, if I saw my buddy hitting on a bridemaid in front of his girlfriend I would laugh my rear off. I sure as heck wouldnt tell him how ashamed I was of his making a spectacle of himself.Some people just wouldnt know a good time if it was sitting on Joe Namaths face. :excited:
 
Im not defending what he did.  I am defending his right and you'all judging him because you think it was 'improper' or 'outrageous', etc.

I encourage you to make your own opinions, but to judge him on it is not right.

What is the difference between 'forming your own opinion' and 'judging' you ask?

Opinion:  What Joe did is not something I agree with.

Jusdging:  Joe should be embarassed and his wife upset because he was trying to kiss Susie.

JAA
Again, I enjoyed the whole namath thing, but aren't you judging those who are judging Namath? Who the heck are YOU to judge "so-and-so-posters" decision to judge Joe Namath? You said "to judge him on it is not right". OK, Pot. What you should have said, according to your own post, is "What you did by judging Joe Namath is not something I agree with." Now me, I have no problem judging you, and have never stated that people should not make judgments, so I feel fine saying that you made a couple of idiotic statements here and may well be a jack*ss. But given what you've said about not judging people, you should just stick to saying that you don't agree with me.

:P

I love it when people do themselves in with their own words.
Yes I am, though I see myself as a marytr in Joe Namaths name.However, you do agree with me?

JAA
JAA - Not sure what I'm agreeing with you on. Yes, I enjoyed the Namath interview. I hate that people are so sensitive to this stuff. I also think everybody makes judgments all the time, and it is my opinion that people have the right to express their judgments. I have no problem with you disagreeing with someone's opinion, just that you attacked their right to do so.And I like the bible and I am a republican, so you ticked me off a bit.

 
If I was on national TV at the time and MARRIED I'd really feel like a total heel. It wouldnt matter if I won 10 superbowls and had half a million fans defending me, I'd know I embarrassed myself and my family and I'd feel regret for making such a bad decision.That's just me though. .
Exactly ... that is how you would feel. Joe has lived a different life than you and you dont have a right to judge him on his actions. He was intoxicated, not drunk, but buzzed.RE your wedding example:What were your intentions? Some people are much better flirts than others. Were you trying to score or be a funny guy? Would you have crossed the line given the opportunity with the bridesmaid?I dont know if Joe was kidding, but maybe he was. If you want to know if Suzie was offended you should ask her. At this moment in time you are saying that you would not have done the same things Joe did. So ####### what ... you are not Joe Namath, I am not you, you have your own life and get to make your own decisions. Just like Joe and I get to. be happy with your life and dont worry about Joe, he is a classy guy whether or not you like it.Eagles fan,JAA
 
Just out of curiosity, why exactly do I not have the right to make a judgement on someone like Joe Namath? You're starting to sound like one of those bible-thumping republicans yourself. :P
ToucheeYou dont have the right (nor do I) because until you have walked a mile etc etc.

JAA

 
Eric, no need to delete your last post. I thought it was funny. Unlike JAA, I think you have the right to express your judgment - even though I disagree.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
if I saw my buddy hitting on a bridemaid in front of his girlfriend I would laugh my rear off. :thumbdown:
Why do I picture you as that old guy from Footloose tryin to stop all those young heathan punks from dancin?
 
JAA - Not sure what I'm agreeing with you on. Yes, I enjoyed the Namath interview. I hate that people are so sensitive to this stuff. I also think everybody makes judgments all the time, and it is my opinion that people have the right to express their judgments. I have no problem with you disagreeing with someone's opinion, just that you attacked their right to do so.And I like the bible and I am a republican, so you ticked me off a bit.
Fair enough, it was a shock value post.I think you summed up what I want to say, but I am still a bit more edgie on the topic than you. I am really sick and tired of people openly judging others and the liberal media making more out of things than need to be.I see a lot of that here and it pisses me off because Joe could have been drunkingly joking about what he said, and/or he could have been flirting. I doubt it was serious, but mayb he and his wife have and open relationship ... I know I dont know, but GB Joe and Joe just being Joe not some cookie-cutter asswipe up in the booth.JAA
 
You dont have the right (nor do I) because until you have walked a mile etc etc.
I'm a computer programmer. If you're not a computer programmer, you have no right to judge me when I ask the secretary at work to kiss me in front of the guys while my wife sits at home with the kids. You have not walked a mile in a computer programmer's shoes, therefore you have no idea what our social mores are.That's how logical your statement is.

 
Wow, some of you people need to lighten up! Could it be that deep down you're jealous it wasn't you hitting on Suzy? I'm sure today he's thinking about it, or watching the replay and thinking and going "ah ####!" Everybody that's ripping the guy must not have ever made an ### out of themselves after drinking a little too much. I have and I guarantee I will again in the future (probably tonight at the bar watching the game!) GB Joe! I just wish I could've been drinking with him at the game, and I don't even like the J-E-T-S. Wonder what Jets94 would say about this?

 
Eric, no need to delete your last post. I thought it was funny. Unlike JAA, I think you have the right to express your judgment - even though I disagree.
I agree with you, but I think I want to draw the line where I stand.It may be better for me to say:

I dont think it is fair that all of you are openly judging Joe Namath and his actions

JAA

 
Eric, no need to delete your last post. I thought it was funny. Unlike JAA, I think you have the right to express your judgment - even though I disagree.
Damn...I was hoping you didn't see that. I was trying to be humorous, but I came out sounding like a jackass after I reread it, sorry. I agree with your statement, however...thanks.
 
I'm a computer programmer. If you're not a computer programmer, you have no right to judge me when I ask the secretary at work to kiss me in front of the guys while my wife sits at home with the kids. You have not walked a mile in a computer programmer's shoes, therefore you have no idea what our social mores are.That's how logical your statement is.
Im a Software Engineer and it would be improper for me to ask the secretary to kiss me in the office.Game-Set-Match:At our x-mas party this year the company only gave 2 drink tickets to everyone. I told my co-workers that I would be 'pimping' myself for drink tickets. I would give a kiss on the cheek to anyone who gave me a ticket. I made 8 tickets and thankfully no guys gave me tickets. My wife didnt have a problem with it, my boss didnt have a problem with it, my coworkers didnt have a problem with it, why do you have a problem with it?JAA
 
I'm a computer programmer. If you're not a computer programmer, you have no right to judge me when I ask the secretary at work to kiss me in front of the guys while my wife sits at home with the kids. You have not walked a mile in a computer programmer's shoes, therefore you have no idea what our social mores are.That's how logical your statement is.
A) They were not at work. If they were, I think it would be imposssible to find someone who would support Joe.B) Because I am sure that you and the Namaths are so close since you know what they both find acceptable, you'd realize that Joe is just a flirt by nature and does this all time even while his wife is right beside him. She might just accept this as Joe being Joe and knows that it would never go past that point and she just feels very happy that she has such a great husband who is such a great dad and would always be there for the family, even though he likes to flirt with the ladies every once in a while.Your statement of "logic" is full of assumptions about how Joe's relationship is and what his intentions are.
 
Game-Set-Match:At our x-mas party this year the company only gave 2 drink tickets to everyone. I told my co-workers that I would be 'pimping' myself for drink tickets. I would give a kiss on the cheek to anyone who gave me a ticket. I made 8 tickets and thankfully no guys gave me tickets. My wife didnt have a problem with it, my boss didnt have a problem with it, my coworkers didnt have a problem with it, why do you have a problem with it?
Close but no cigar.While the situations are anecdotaly similar, they are very different. You were in a familiar environment with familiar people and your wife apparently knew what your intentions were.Suzie was an interviewer, Joe was an interviewee. The way it works nearly all of the time is that interviews are prearranged, so Joe knew about it...but chose to get drunk anyway. Suzie was asking him questions and he was answering them with "kiss me". Suzie cut the interview short after he did this twice.It may be subjective, but it is my opinion that Joe was being disrespectful, and it wasn't fair to Suzie, Joe's family, or Joe's fans.
 
JAA - Not sure what I'm agreeing with you on. Yes, I enjoyed the Namath interview. I hate that people are so sensitive to this stuff. I also think everybody makes judgments all the time, and it is my opinion that people have the right to express their judgments. I have no problem with you disagreeing with someone's opinion, just that you attacked their right to do so.And I like the bible and I am a republican, so you ticked me off a bit.
Fair enough, it was a shock value post.I think you summed up what I want to say, but I am still a bit more edgie on the topic than you. I am really sick and tired of people openly judging others and the liberal media making more out of things than need to be.I see a lot of that here and it pisses me off because Joe could have been drunkingly joking about what he said, and/or he could have been flirting. I doubt it was serious, but mayb he and his wife have and open relationship ... I know I dont know, but GB Joe and Joe just being Joe not some cookie-cutter asswipe up in the booth.JAA
As far as I know, Namath was divorced about 4 years ago. His wife left him and it hit him real hard. Not sure if he's remarried, but I doubt it.
 
Game-Set-Match:At our x-mas party this year the company only gave 2 drink tickets to everyone. I told my co-workers that I would be 'pimping' myself for drink tickets. I would give a kiss on the cheek to anyone who gave me a ticket. I made 8 tickets and thankfully no guys gave me tickets. My wife didnt have a problem with it, my boss didnt have a problem with it, my coworkers didnt have a problem with it, why do you have a problem with it?
Close but no cigar.While the situations are anecdotaly similar, they are very different. You were in a familiar environment with familiar people and your wife apparently knew what your intentions were.
You have no idea Joe's perspective or Suzies perspective on it. I am not saying I do, but you dont and it could have been an inside joke.Ill tell ya what, if it was a problem, the liberal media is going to have a field day ... where is my NYTime and LATimes?JAA
 
Your statement of "logic" is full of assumptions about how Joe's relationship is and what his intentions are.
Isn't yours? How do you know what kind of person Joe is? Like I said before, this is all very subjective. I'm looking at it differently than you are. Either one of us could be correct, or we could both be partially correct. I don't really care. I simply discussing my point of view. I don't appreciate people like you coming in here telling me that I have no right to discuss my opinion just because I don't know Joe.
 
Ill tell ya what, if it was a problem, the liberal media is going to have a field day ... where is my NYTime and LATimes?
Just wait till the republicans and their "conservative family values" get ahold of it ;)
 
Isn't yours? How do you know what kind of person Joe is? Like I said before, this is all very subjective. I'm looking at it differently than you are. Either one of us could be correct, or we could both be partially correct. I don't really care. I simply discussing my point of view. I don't appreciate people like you coming in here telling me that I have no right to discuss my opinion just because I don't know Joe.
Yes it is, thats the point. We can make judgements on someone without knowing all the facts.You can discuss your opinion on certain scenarios, but not condem Joe on what may or may not have happened.JAA
 
Just wait till the republicans and their "conservative family values" get ahold of it ;)
From what I remember on the ESPN Namath stuff I saw was that Joe always a ladies man, but never tried to do the right thing, the right thing according to society and media. He was himself, a great Qb, a ladies man who loved the spotlight, and now a guy who likes to party.Sign me up to one of his parties :thumbup:
 
Yes it is, thats the point. We can make judgements on someone without knowing all the facts.You can discuss your opinion on certain scenarios, but not condem Joe on what may or may not have happened.JAA
I never claimed to know all the facts. What if it is my opinion that Joe should be condemned based on his remarks and actions?Sure, he was a great football player -- one of the best -- but that does not exempt him from recognizing acceptable human behavior. It is my opinion that hitting on some poor chick trying to do her job is not acceptable.
 
Isn't yours? How do you know what kind of person Joe is? Like I said before, this is all very subjective. I'm looking at it differently than you are. Either one of us could be correct, or we could both be partially correct. I don't really care. I simply discussing my point of view. I don't appreciate people like you coming in here telling me that I have no right to discuss my opinion just because I don't know Joe.
My assumptions were for dramatic affect.Please refer to where I said you don't have any right to express your opinion? :confused: I'm just pointing out how fla\/\/ed your opinion is of the man. You seem a little to willing to lose respect for someone over an "incident" that you know none of the detailsI just find it odd that you're willing to take a situation that you acknowledge to know nothing about, except what you saw on tv, and make these huge value and moral judgements about a man and his situation, who again you acknowledge to not really know at all.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This has turned into the funniest thread I've read here in a long time. I could just kiss everybody. :lol:

 
Please refer to where I said you don't have any right to express your opinion? :confused: I'm just pointing out how fla\/\/ed your opinion is of the man. You seem a little to willing to lose respect for someone over an "incident" that you know none of the detailsI just find it odd that you're willing to take a situation that you acknowledge to know nothing about, except what you saw on tv, and make these huge value and moral judgements about a man and his situation, who again you acknowledge to not really know at all.
You were inferring that since I was not a close person friend of the Namath family, that it was illogical of me to say that his statement of "I want to kiss you" was uncalled for.Someone earlier on this thread said that Joe was a class act and was ALWAYS respectful of others. That is the main point I am disagreeing with. If Joe is truly respectful of others, he wouldn't have acted that way. If it really was an 'inside joke', Suzie wouldn't have cut the interview like that. Those are my observations, and I've made my opinions known on the matter.
 
is my opinion that hitting on some poor chick trying to do her job is not acceptable.
I diagree with your assumptions in that statement. Personally I dont think he was hitting on her, and since you cant prove he was, we cant argue about it.I think Namath was being friendly. Seriosly, I think Namath walked away from Suzie right after the interview and went back to the HOT CHICKS in his booth.ormaybe some of the 40 year green guys put him up to snagging a kiss from Suzie during the interview. GB the ole football club :thumbup:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I diagree with your assumptions in that statement. Personally I dont think he was hitting on her, and since you cant prove he was, we cant argue about it.I think Namath was being friendly. Seriosly, I think Namath walked away from Suzie right after the interview and went back to the HOT CHICKS in his booth.ormaybe some of the 40 year green guys put him up to snagging a kiss from Suzie during the interview. GB the ole football club :thumbup:
Joe: Hey guys, remember when I guaranteed our Super Bowl win? Well guess what? I guarantee I'll get Suzie Kolber to kiss me on TV!
 
I agree, gee whiz lighten up... he's a famous football player, not the president. Expecting him to act all that intellectual is sort of unrealistic.Besides, I thought everyone got ripped at football games. Right?

 
Public drunkeness can be funny. Joe Namath can be funny. That interview was very funny. I'd rather watch that interview than a lot of other interviews I've seen. I don't think any serious harm was done to anyone. I've been drunk and said things I regretted later. OK, all that said...On a personal level, I don't know any of these guys from Adam. They might be great guys, or they might be idiots. On a case-by-case basis I'll probably never really know for sure. All I have to JUDGE them on is their public appearances which may or may not give you any real insight into their character.Based on THIS publc appearance alone, I'd say Joe Namath is an idiot. It isn't too bright to go on national television that hammered up. It WAS mildy inappropriate for him to say what he said on national television - it didn't really hurt anybody (except maybe his family) but it made him look like a moron. IF he's currently married, it DOES show a lack of respect for his wife - there is no question in my mind about that. It was funny, but I still don't think it was the right thing to do. I also think that if my sister's husband did it I might want to kick his ###.

 
For example, also walking that long road from gridiron glory to gelding is Joe Namath, 55. His 37-year-old wife was so bored watching him golf away his retirement in Florida, according to the Enquirer, that she fled to Los Angeles, leaving the couple's two daughters with Namath. She is now dating plastic surgeon Brian Novack, who is, according to the publication, "a renowned expert in penis and breast enhancement." Namath, an insider reports, is "devastated." But Broadway Joe should have seen it coming. When he got married, his wife's name was Deborah, now she calls herself Tatiana. Any divorce lawyer can tell you that when Debbie becomes Tatiana, it's time to freeze your bank accounts.
http://slate.msn.com/id/25161/Guys been divorced since 99. Cut him some slack.
 
Who let the f'n puritans in here? Get out. Get out now. We watch football in here and that includes drunken ex-quarterbacks making fools of themselves. That's funny stuff.Go on over to the curly bored if you want to get all huffy.

 
http://slate.msn.com/id/25161/Guys been divorced since 99. Cut him some slack.
What a horrible person this Joe guy is. His wife leaves him for another man, and he takes on the responsibility of the kids. :rolleyes: GDB people who jump to conclusions about his morals and how his "family" is embarrassed by his antics. :thumbdown:
 
We should be careful to get out of an experience only the wisdomthat is in it- and stop there; lest we be like the cat that sits down ona hot stove lid. She will never sit down on a hot stove lid again-and that is well; but also she will never sit down on a cold oneany more.-- Mark Twain

 
I think a lot of people here might be too young to remember Broadway Joe in his heyday. I'm suprised he was restrained enough not to jam his tounge down her throat. That is the dudes rep, always has been: huge party animal and really, really happy (I loved that). Either love him or hate him, but I gotta think that is him, and I would believe people close to him accept him for it. I'm sure most of his fans do.I think I'd rather have Joe be an open lush and letch than a closet one. There are so many personalities who go out of there way to pull the wool over the publics eyes...O.J. always seemed like a really nice guy to me.

 
I'm a computer programmer. If you're not a computer programmer, you have no right to judge me when I ask the secretary at work to kiss me in front of the guys while my wife sits at home with the kids. You have not walked a mile in a computer programmer's shoes, therefore you have no idea what our social mores are.That's how logical your statement is.
A) They were not at work. If they were, I think it would be imposssible to find someone who would support Joe.
She WAS working while conducting the interview. I'm not saying I think Joe did a terrible thing (part of sports nowadays is entertainment, and THAT was as entertaining as it gets) but she was definitely working when Joe did (or did not) cross the line.
 
"My name is Joe Namath. It's classy for me, a man who has a wife and two daughters, to be hitting on a chick in front of a national audience. I was respectful to Suzie, of course I was! How could you NOT call me a class act? I mean, Suzie's not a REAL journalist, right? Just another sideline bimbo for me to hit on. You know what I mean? It's the sixties, I'm Broadway Joe, I'm wearing this dapper full length fur coat -- what chick WOULDN'T want to kiss me? Oh boy am I happy!" :thumbdown:
Number one, he isn't married anymore. Number 2 his kids are teenagers now, and I don't think he did anything wrong. He was celebrating with his fellow jet club members, had several drinks, got hammered. The interview wasn't planned, they saw him and decided to get a few words. Have you guys every been to a football game? He wasn't being disrespectful, he was flirting and hammered at the time. You guys dissect everything way to much. Joe for being himself and having a good time :thumbup: You dorks who get your panties in a bunch over anything. Just because your parents were complainers, doesn't mean you have to be too. :thumbdown:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top