This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Take that uppity attitude to the book thread!
Pretty good wiki site, don't know for sure if it has a lot of upcoming book information in it though.http://gameofthrones.wikia.com/wiki/Game_of_Thrones_Wiki
I think they wanted to give hints that Bolton had sold Robb out without making it too obvious. If we knew Bolton's son had Theon and knew Bran/Rickon were alive, yet they were withholding this info from the Starks, it would have been another really huge hint that Bolton was double crossing the Starks.
Eh, there's no way to really know the timeline there. The fact that he was torturing Theon, who had just betrayed the Starks, would have also given the viewer a reason to think they were still on the same side.
Is this correct? I didn't think anyone thought they were still alive. I remember Theon knowing they escaped, but didn't some kids later get burned to death that they assumed were the Stark kids?
When Ramsey was leading him through the tunnels on his fake escape, in addition to saying that he had made a mistake, and that his real father's head was cut off at the Sept of Baelor, he also tells Ramsey that he burned orphans to make everyone think that they were the Stark children.
My question is did Ramsey actually tell Roose this? Everyone is now assuming that Lord Bolton knows the Bran & Rickon are alive, but it hasn't been shown.
That's the problem. Why is everyone assuming it? Ramsey is a ******* and probably doesn't know the ins & out of politics. Why would he send a raven to his dad telling him all about Theon's confession that he didn't kill them and they were missing? It really didn't look like Ramsey was really caring what Theon was saying at that point, just that he was emotionally already breaking down.
Didn't he specifically say something that implied he was interested in it and knew the repercussions. Something like "now I know that Bran and Rickon are still alive" or something to that effect?
He mentioned it specifically in the next episode. That Theon had let that little juicy tidbit slip and something along the lines of he would find the boys because "my hunters are much better than yours."
His own guys which I think was to create this con that the ******* was saving him and allowing Theon to give this confession and to F with him.
What is the leader of a people who have never been on boats doing at a Pirate Festival?
Yeah, seeing Khal Drogo at the Pirate Festival was anachronistic. But oh well!
[inigo Voice]You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.[/inigo Voice]
ah thats right... thanks!
That might have been a power play within his own family. *******'s are generally regarded as just that, bastards with no claims to inheritance or title. Ramsey to that point was in the background and taking orders from those men that he killed. After he corralled Theon, he was giving all the orders.
Run trade, make goods, build ships. She's a long way from being in a position to invade Westeros.
Roose Bolton did tell Robb he was sending his ******* to capture Theon, I took that to mean his son would be in charge there.
"Kind of similar." Theon was raised by Ned Stark, his father basically said he didn't know him and that his sister was more his son than he was. He gave her the most important missions ("I always wanted a castle of my own") and acted as if Theon was just some random person he barely knew. Theon's troops ended up turning him over to their enemies, they obviously didn't have much loyalty or respect for him,
It seems like Roose holds his ******* in much higher regard than Lord Greyjoy did Theon.
IMO, we need separate threads for those that read the article and those that did not.
I think so. The only mention of them I recall is when Cerseis daughter went off to marry a Martell.
