3C's
Footballguy
As evidenced on Sunday, the Steelers line isn't really all that great. Esp. with Wallace in place of Pouncey (despite my earlier comments that Wallace would be okay). Rams Dline is great and can expose an Oline for sure, but the Oline did give up 5 sacks. Quick dump offs, which the Steelers did early (and for some unknown reason got away from), were key to keeping BB upright. Vick can do that better than Clausen and he can escape the pass rush better than Clausen.Clausen is a better fit, imo, for this offense in the short term than Vick. Not saying he's a better player. Chicago is a dumpster fire. He'd do much better behind our line with our skill players.You would not want Clausen running the offense. Not a defense of Vick but that's just a bad statement. I thought Landry actually made some good reads during preseason but was hurt by the derelict talent he was throwing to. I expect a lot of screens to AB and a high volume amount of carries to Bell/DeAngelo even if the score isn't in our favor.Yeah. A lot of my friends didn't like the Vick signing for off the field reasons. I didn't like it for on the field reasons. He's not a good fit for our offense. I'd rather have Matt Cassel or Jimmy Clausen running our offense right now. A left-handed risk taker isn't what we need.Just gotta try to stay afloat.Biggest reason I did not like this signing when it happened: If Vick were forced into action, and now he has been, the Steelers' defense isn't good enough for the amount of times Vick is likely to hand the ball over to the other team.What really scares me is that Vick has been a turnover machine
Most likely gonna be ugly.