Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Bad deal and guys can get mad but trading one player for two top 6 picks has a chance to work-out (as well as being a complete disaster)...gotta believe if he shopped Barkley around he would get a lot more but when it is pre-draft time some guys love having the picks...as soon as he makes the picks and doesn't have the draft to look forward to he will regret it.
I see this from both sides...if you owned Fuller you are probably frustrated and will take a #2 to move on from him...on the other side if you have not experienced those frustrations he could deliver far more then what you could get with the 21st pick...with Hopkins gone the opportunity is there if he can stay on the field.
What Sanders owner toughs out 2019 waiting for their top pick to blossom only to turn around and sell for (most likely) a lower pick than they spent? I traded UP to 1.05 last year to get him and wouldn't even consider this in return. And that was a superflex where the top skill positions all drop a few spots to make room for round 1 QBs.
What a foolish trade for the other guy...I just don't understand the thinking here...Sanders is on the doorstep of being a top 10 RB so do you really think you can do better with the 1.7 and why even risk it...Cohen could not move the needle less for me with regard to this deal...I hate when deals just don't make any sense
Don't like the chargers offense enough to give up three guys in that third tier wr/first tier defense range. Probably could have gotten 90% of Henry's perceived value with just one of those picks.
1 - I see this as three immediate impact players for an upside wr and a 2nd. Feel like you could have gotten more if you split up Rodgers and Gurley. I hear Gurley is going for the third overall.
two firsts is probably too much for Evans and even if it isn't, I wouldn't have given the 2.09 to boot, especially in this draft.
Nah. Ruggs/Reagor are fine but no sure thing. And a later 1st is no guarantee either.
I'm not even sure who is interesting at 1.10 in non-ppr and especially 2.09. Non-ppr really hurts that value of all those 2nd tier WRs. I would take Evans pretty easily here.
I have Mostert. Love the guy. But he'd be gone in a second if I were offered a first for him.
I like the Zeke side. Unless somehow you know those 1sts are both top 6 picks. Even thenI see it as close.
I'm going with Higgins/Michel roughly equal to Claypool, the second and 6th.
I absolutely agree with this. If I could have gotten or could get a first for him, I sure would.
I'm really surprised by this deal. Why would you give Sanders, who just showed prowess catching the ball, for presumably somebody like Jeudy and Cohen. He must like this year's draft class a lot.
I like it for you and think Evans will score plenty of touchdowns, but I would have tried to hold on to the 2.09. Just for neatness' sake.
Love that deal for you. In my dynasty (no ppr) went after Sanders but owner wanted DWatson and CGodwin for Sanders and Darnold. (Mahomes is my starter). I also have 1.07 (and 1.01 as well) so maybe I can try Watson and 1.07 for Sanders and Darnold or Big Ben. Look this thread for seeing what the value is off players and coming up with offers.
"You know what, I'm good. I probably shouldn't even be selling Evans for this I'm gonna hold off".
Ow. Sounds more like the 101 to me.Hankmoody said:
That's great as long as you're willing to lose the deal over such a pittance of a difference. It's a lot easier to walk away when the principal parts are very close in value.
Yeah sometimes I know there is more value to be had, but the risk of giving the other guy (or gal) cold feet is enough to just take a great *enough* deal when it's on your table. I don't like getting cute when my opponent is presumably making a mistake.Hankmoody said:
