What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

I LOVE Elizabeth Warren: All aboard - WOO WOO!!! (3 Viewers)

One issue with the wealth tax is that many of the Uber rich may not have the quick liquidity to pay the new tax debt.  As a result, they will have to relatively quickly sell off some assets.  We don’t know what unintended consequences we may unleash (good or bad) from these moves.  
There are a lot of reasons why this is a dumb idea.  Like Cooperman said, just raise the effective tax rate and capital gains tax on the ultra wealthy.  

 
He really does play right into her hand, though. He keeps coming back on air and trying to read the letter and talk about Ken Langone and others. He needs to stop.
Cuban seems to be starting to get involved, though, and I think he could take her on in a smarter way.

 
He really does play right into her hand, though. He keeps coming back on air and trying to read the letter and talk about Ken Langone and others. He needs to stop.
Cuban seems to be starting to get involved, though, and I think he could take her on in a smarter way.
I have to confess that Warren “owning the billionaires” excites me on a visceral level that I think is probably akin to the way a lot of Trump fans get excited by “owning liberals.”  I don’t think I’m alone— I think it’s a big part of Warren’s appeal.  

 
I am sure it does.That mug is selling very well.Could she maybe do it without mis-characterizing what people said, though? Or implying Cooperman is guilty because he settled with the SEC? Don't we want to move on to where that kind of stuff is beneath the presidency again?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
fatguyinalittlecoat said:
I have to confess that Warren “owning the billionaires” excites me on a visceral level that I think is probably akin to the way a lot of Trump fans get excited by “owning liberals.”  I don’t think I’m alone— I think it’s a big part of Warren’s appeal.  
Bingo!

 
Mystery Achiever said:
I am sure it does.That mug is selling very well.Could she maybe do it without mis-characterizing what people said, though? Or implying Cooperman is guilty because he settled with the SEC? Don't we want to move on to where that kind of stuff is beneath the presidency again?
Sure, there are probably some ways she could be more careful with her wording in speeches or in ads and tweets.  But overall I wouldn’t want her to change her aggressive posture towards corporations, Wall Street, and billionaires.  That’s why I like her best.

 
There are a lot of reasons why this is a dumb idea.  Like Cooperman said, just raise the effective tax rate and capital gains tax on the ultra wealthy.  
That will be unacceptable. That would mean if somebody was worth 100billion and lost 5 billion that year they wouldnt pay their fair share. 

 
So the Uber rich have an army of tax attorneys and accountants , they can and will find a way around a tax so who are we kidding.  

 
Eliana Johnson@elianayjohnson·19m

"The offer: A $1 million check from a major Democratic donor to a major Democratic group.

The one condition: The money would be refunded if Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren becomes the party's nominee" -

See, I don't like stuff like this.  They should out the Donor.  Either donate, or don't - but don't extort the party along the way.  Let the people decide who they want.  If you want a moderate - then back a moderate candidate now...

 
My guess is this person is just trying to scare the party to the right, like the donors threatening to back Trump if she's nominated. vs a serious conditional donation. I don't condone that or the threat.  Use the money to support your preferred candidate.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sinn Fein said:
Eliana Johnson@elianayjohnson·19m

"The offer: A $1 million check from a major Democratic donor to a major Democratic group.

The one condition: The money would be refunded if Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren becomes the party's nominee" -

See, I don't like stuff like this.  They should out the Donor.  Either donate, or don't - but don't extort the party along the way.  Let the people decide who they want.  If you want a moderate - then back a moderate candidate now...
Warren is a moderate

 
I think you, and I, have a different definition of "moderate"

I'll leave it at that.
She was a super delegate in the bag for HRC in '16.  Didn't support MFA until she thought she could pilfer some of the progressive vote but she's already exposing herself back pedaling before the primaries even begin.  She is trying to replicate what BHO did, ie campaign as FDR and govern like Romney.

 
I am a democrat and if she is the nominee (or Bernie) I will vote third party or not vote at all. These two are an existential threat to the party and to the country. Bernie isn’t even a democrat and warren is potentially worse with her foreign policy stances.
 

Tar and feather me, but this is almost like a Trump moment — he took over their party because they just wanted to win and I don’t want the “democratic-socialists” taking over the democrats.  Any of the other candidates (most of which aren’t great either) will get my vote. Even Tulsi. 

 
I am a democrat and if she is the nominee (or Bernie) I will vote third party or not vote at all. These two are an existential threat to the party and to the country. Bernie isn’t even a democrat and warren is potentially worse with her foreign policy stances.
My feeling too.

Hypothetical for you:  You live in a real battleground state like, say, PA.  The matchup is Trump vs. Warren.  Do you vote 3rd party (or not at all), or is Warren so unpalatable to you that you pull the lever for Trump?

Rough question, I know.

 
My feeling too.

Hypothetical for you:  You live in a real battleground state like, say, PA.  The matchup is Trump vs. Warren.  Do you vote 3rd party (or not at all), or is Warren so unpalatable to you that you pull the lever for Trump?

Rough question, I know.
I am in PA. I won’t vote for Trump. So I either don’t vote or vote for a third party. 

 
Not a good look.  
 

Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra)

11/22/19, 4:53 PM

Elizabeth Warren is caught on camera lying about where she sent her kids to school

Woman: "I read that your children went to private schools"

Warren: "No my children went to public schools"

pic.twitter.com/tLOV0zgK9y

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not a good look.  
 

Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra)

11/22/19, 4:53 PM

Elizabeth Warren is caught on camera lying about where she sent her kids to school

Woman: "I read that your children went to private schools"

Warren: "No my children went to public schools"

pic.twitter.com/tLOV0zgK9y
I just read her daughter went to public schools and her son went to both public and private schools.

 
The woman states, “I read that your children went to private schools.”

Elizabeth replies “No, my children went to public schools.”

I’ll give this statement two Pinocchios.  What she says is technically true but there is omission of the whole truth. 

 
Not a good look.  
 

Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra)

11/22/19, 4:53 PM

Elizabeth Warren is caught on camera lying about where she sent her kids to school

Woman: "I read that your children went to private schools"

Warren: "No my children went to public schools"

pic.twitter.com/tLOV0zgK9y
I don't like Warren, at all, but Trump supporters playing gotcha with anyone's half-truths is really rich. 

 
Reason 200 why we have people who dislike Trump but would vote for him if a Liz Warren won the nomination. 

Elizabeth Warren@ewarren

Let’s be clear: It’s time for our government to have a full-blown national conversation about reparations. We must be honest about our history, and do what’s right so that our nation can begin to heal. #AtlantaWithWarren

https://twitter.com/ewarren/status/1197725287896752128?s=21
This is a GREAT idea though. 

 
Not a good look.  
 

Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra)

11/22/19, 4:53 PM

Elizabeth Warren is caught on camera lying about where she sent her kids to school

Woman: "I read that your children went to private schools"

Warren: "No my children went to public schools"

pic.twitter.com/tLOV0zgK9y
Is anybody not surprised?

This woman has been power hungry since the beginning.   She is primarily interested in promoting her political career.

Can't get her off the stage fast enough as far as I'm concerned.

I actually don't believe this to be true for the majority of the Dem candidates.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I’m not wild about her antagonistic approach toward the financial sector and the ultra wealthy. Demonizing people isn’t the answer. We can have a conversation and an approach that doesn’t have to rise to a level of vitriol. She dialed it back somewhat on MFA, would also like to see a more measured approach on tax policy so that we’re not creating “bad guys”. We need less “us vs. them” in this country, not more.

 
The woman states, “I read that your children went to private schools.”

Elizabeth replies “No, my children went to public schools.”

I’ll give this statement two Pinocchios.  What she says is technically true but there is omission of the whole truth. 
Not technically true by any means

 
She wasn’t asked a question.

It is a true statement that her children went to public schools. (Both did.)

It is not true that her children went to private schools. (Only one did.)
Unfortunately, and I write this even though I have always liked her personally (though I disagree with her politics and oppose her right now because I think she would lose to Trump)...this is becoming a pattern. 

From the silly Native American scandal to the question of Medicare for All involving new taxation on the middle class and now to this, she prevaricates. She tells half truths or deceptive truths. She appears to be hiding something. It’s not a good look. 

All she had to say is “yes in part they did. I’m one of the very lucky few that were privileged enough to send my kids, at times, to ritzy private schools. Most people can’t. That’s why we need to improve public education...etc.” 

 
She wasn’t asked a question.

It is a true statement that her children went to public schools. (Both did.)

It is not true that her children went to private schools. (Only one did.)
She was being deliberately disingenuous on a fairly mundane topic where the truth would have sufficed.  You can choose to enable her all you want.  Doesn't change the fact that she is a flawed candidate.

 
She was being deliberately disingenuous on a fairly mundane topic where the truth would have sufficed.  You can choose to enable her all you want.  Doesn't change the fact that she is a flawed candidate.


Not technically true by any means
But to me this is what i disagreed with...yes, technically saying both of her children attended public schools is true...they dod, in fact, both attend public schools.  We can agree she could have expanded...and should have to be more forthcoming.  But what she said is, most certainly, technically true.  Even of it is incomplete.

 
But to me this is what i disagreed with...yes, technically saying both of her children attended public schools is true...they dod, in fact, both attend public schools.  We can agree she could have expanded...and should have to be more forthcoming.  But what she said is, most certainly, technically true.  Even of it is incomplete.
It was still wrong.

 
I am not going to get bent out of shape over her lying or telling a half-truth, because all politicians lie; it's what they do.  But the optics are bad for her, since she keeps getting caught in telling these lies/half-truths, and in this case, the fact that her immediate reaction to a question or comment she likely wasn't totally prepared for was to not tell the truth is indicative of her character, or lack thereof.  Biden might be a gaffe machine, but at least at least seems more real with his mess-ups and gaffes, unlike Warren who often seems like she is throwing out lies and whatever she thinks will make people vote for her.  She comes off as very fake. 

 
I just watched the clip of Warren saying her kids went to public school.  Meh, feels like people getting worked up over nothing.
Maybe so, but Warren should know that people from both parties are going to get "worked up" over her half-truths, and she should have been better prepared for that question.

To me, her response was a parallel to the way she handled the Native American issue.  She is so afraid to acknowledge basic facts (because she thinks it will be seen as a weakness), that she overcompensates by saying something incomplete or misleading. Those types of moments might be acceptable in a Senate campaign, but they're going to backfire on her when she's in the national spotlight.

An ounce of prevention would have saved her from a pound of corrections.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top