Diggs and Thielen were interchangeable as far as where they line up in the offense. Under Norv Turner Diggs played the X position more. Under DeFlippo Diggs played the Z more. Both are very effective from the slot.KChusker said:Who is the Vikings X receiver and Diggs replacement going to be?
Jefferson is slot for now I assume.
Whoever it is could be a sneaky deep league sleeper, especially if Cook holds out
I'd be shocked if Cook actually held out. I can't see any point to it. He's got zero leverage, and with all the talk of the cap going down, I can't see the Vikings(or any team) extending a RB already under contract, especially an injury prone one. Also, the new CBA basically made holding out a major unlikelihood with fines no longer being waivable.I think it is very unlikely that Cook holds out. If he does the offense doesn't really change though. They will still use 2 TE and they will still use CJ Ham a lot in that situation, as they have done when Cook has been out of the line up before.
Yeah. We know the Vikings have offered Cook a contract extension. Its just that what they offered and what Cook is seeking do not meet yet.I'd be shocked if Cook actually held out. I can't see any point to it. He's got zero leverage, and with all the talk of the cap going down, I can't see the Vikings(or any team) extending a RB already under contract, especially an injury prone one. Also, the new CBA basically made holding out a major unlikelihood with fines no longer being waivable.
So if this is correct it looks like this frees up $3 million in cap space.Salary-cap analyst Jason Fitzgerald said Pierce’s cap number will be $2 million this season, a third of his $6 million signing bonus last March, or $2.35 million if the NFL ends up counting the $350,000. His cap number was to have been $5 million. Pierce’s cap number in 2021 will be $5 million instead of $10.5 million.
conditional 7th-round pick? Nice trade for the VikingsBiabreakable said:
I am hoping so. I spent some time watching him a bit today. There are some things to like about him but there are obviously some negatives too. I wonder a bit about those and I would like to ask Raiders fans for their opinion.conditional 7th-round pick? Nice trade for the Vikings
Ah that might be why.Annnnd....he failed his physical.
It should not have been obvious, and I also don't think that continuity is a good thing in all instances. JMHO, the Vikings are in desperate need of challenging their group-think notion of how to build a complete football team.Biabreakable said:Obviously Spielman was going to be extended along with the head coach Mike Zimmer.
The coaches management and scouting are all aligned which is important and something that cant happen if the team does not have continuity.
Well I think the addition of Kibiak has galvanized their vision on offense. I dont think they have had that during Zimmers time here. He had obvious philosophical differences with DeFluppo for example.It should not have been obvious, and I also don't think that continuity is a good thing in all instances. JMHO, the Vikings are in desperate need of challenging their group-think notion of how to build a complete football team.
I don’t doubt that an all star cast of coaches believe they can coach a team being constructed outside->in. I just don’t think continuity with a do-the-opposite GM is all that important. It’s undermining. Coaching will have no impact whatsoever competing against Bears-Packer-49er DLs. The draftees you mentioned anchor a bottom 5 NFL OL, so I guess I’m not that thrilled about scouting continuity either.Biabreakable said:Well I think the addition of Kibiak has galvanized their vision on offense. I dont think they have had that during Zimmers time here. He had obvious philosophical differences with DeFluppo for example.
We have discussed how the Vikings value offensive linemen, and in your view they do not value them enough, which I do agree with in the past. That year where TJ Clemmings had to start a lot of games was terrible and the Vikings did not take upgrading the position seriously enough that offseason.
I do think this has changed though. The Vikings have invested pretty high picks into Brian O'Neil, Pat Elflien, Garrett Bradbury and this year Ezra Cleveland.
Right or wrong there is a method to this. All of these linemen are very fast relative to their peers. Good fits for the ZBS and Kubiaks offense. I think they have been valuing the players this way for a long time actually, its just more focused now with Cook and Kubiak in tow and they have been making higher investments as far as draft picks into these positions recently.
Pat Elflien hasn't really panned out but that is going to happen. They wont all hit. If Cleveland does become an average starting offensive lineman or better and Bradbury does as well, they should be in pretty good shape for a change at offensive line. I think they have quality depth in Hill and the younger guys like Samia and Udoh waiting in the wings as well.
Zimmer said he brought in Dom Capers to be that devils advocate for Zimmer in regards to the defense. Based on ZImmers statements about that hire, it seems he agrees with you.
What do you mean by this? Ezra Cleveland was the Vikings 3rd pick in the 2020 draft. Do you think they should have prioritized that over WR and CB?I don’t doubt that an all star cast of coaches believe they can coach a team being constructed outside->in.
What do you mean by a do the opposite GM? Are you saying the GM and coaches are not on the same page? I don't think that is the case at all.I just don’t think continuity with a do-the-opposite GM is all that important. It’s undermining.
The Vikings really struggled to move the ball against those teams last year. Those were also some of the best defensive lines in the league last year. They need to do better.Coaching will have no impact whatsoever competing against Bears-Packer-49er DLs. The draftees you mentioned anchor a bottom 5 NFL OL, so I guess I’m not that thrilled about scouting continuity either.
I mean honestly, it doesn't seem like we're in that much disagreement, other than you seem very glass-half-full solving OL in the 3rd. I thought O'Neil was a reach, but I do like how he's played and admit he might be part of the solution. Bradbury is undersized vs power DTs and it's fair to say he's TBD at best and must be protected with strong G's at worst. Elflien is irrelevant, and band-aid journeymen G are gone from the roster. Cleveland is a rookie who slid in the draft for unknown reasons. Do you feel we've held the pocket pretty well and I'm just seeing it wrong? I wouldn't call sliding backwards #19->#23 by PFF an endorsement. Would it make you feel better if I was as optimistic as PFF and called them bottom 10? Would that make them competitive against top teams?What do you mean by this? Ezra Cleveland was the Vikings 3rd pick in the 2020 draft. Do you think they should have prioritized that over WR and CB?
If so who do you think they should have picked over Jefferson and Gladney?
For me I thought Cleveland was worth a 1st round pick. They got him anyways. The other tackle I thought was good enough was Josh Jones but he ended up being a 3rd round pick in the draft and the Vikings preferred Cleveland over him.
In 2019 they drafted Bradbury at pick 18 before any other player.
What do you mean by a do the opposite GM? Are you saying the GM and coaches are not on the same page? I don't think that is the case at all.
The Vikings really struggled to move the ball against those teams last year. Those were also some of the best defensive lines in the league last year. They need to do better.
What makes you think the Vikings are a bottom 5 offensive line?
According to FBO the Vikings were in the top half of offensive lines last year.
Pff has the Vikings as the 23rd offensive line going into 2020. They were 19th overall according to them last season.
Yeah I don't think we disagree about the importance of trench players at all Jim. It seems like eons ago but when I was mock drafting for the Vikings back in March/April that is what I was trying to do, taking offensive linemen and defensive linemen and waiting to address WR and CB until the 3rd round. The 2020 draft class was not very good at the guard or center position but there were a lot of good tackles.I mean honestly, it doesn't seem like we're in that much disagreement, other than you seem very glass-half-full solving OL in the 3rd. I thought O'Neil was a reach, but I do like how he's played and admit he might be part of the solution. Bradbury is undersized vs power DTs and it's fair to say he's TBD at best and must be protected with strong G's at worst. Elflien is irrelevant, and band-aid journeymen G are gone from the roster. Cleveland is a rookie who slid in the draft for unknown reasons. Do you feel we've held the pocket pretty well and I'm just seeing it wrong? I wouldn't call sliding backwards #19->#23 by PFF an endorsement. Would it make you feel better if I was as optimistic as PFF and called them bottom 10? Would that make them competitive against top teams?
My do-the-opposite comment on Spielman is his approach favoring specialty positions over trench players, where they can't realistically live up to the investment. I could talk about 1st round/uber expensive CBs for a zone scheme that has them not even playing the ball, but let's just focus on the offense: They have a 1st round rookie WR who won't have time to get open, a former early 2nd rookie RB in serious contract talks to become top 10 $ (at least) without holes to run through, and an immobile $30M QB who can't conceivably live up to a huge contract with poor pass protection. All of it is bass ackwards. They've had a turnstile at OL coach, and a never ending parade of former head coach assistants trying to help solve the rubiks cube of how to become that rare successful NFL team that can't win trenches.
I'm not going to play armchair NFL scout on the "who other than a Jefferson/Gladney?" The more important question is how do you envision this team competing against a Niners DL who absolutely humiliated the Vikes in the trenches last year, added DT Kinlaw, and is rumored to add DE Dion Jordan? By adding a 3rd round G? And actually, the answer to that question might be irrelevant. Are you even improving vs Packers/Bears DLs (0-4 last year) vying for the playoffs to begin with, adding Jefferson/Gladney? I'd have to say no.
Interesting quote from Rhodes on the Colts scheme he finds better suited to him. Definitely validates what my eyes saw last year:I could talk about 1st round/uber expensive CBs for a zone scheme that has them not even playing the ball,
“It’s so much easier,” Rhodes said, via Joel A. Erickson of the Indianapolis Star. “I’ll tell you that. . . . This one is more zone, eyes to the quarterback. That’s going to be the main difference for me, is being able to play looking at the quarterback, rather than looking at the man.”
I can see all of this. I think reasonable minds can quibble about specific players, but what I'd expect to see from the organization after literally 2 decades of OL incompetence is focus and urgency. Not continued prioritization of other positions. Think of what the Packers did the very year after Moss was drafted: They drafted 3 CBs to begin the draft realizing they needed an answer to compete with a divisional foe. Not a doubt in my mind Ron Wolf had other positions of need on the team, but solving those would not fix an achilles heel.How the 2020 draft played out, four of the top tackles were selected by pick 13. Derrick Brown and Kinlaw who you mention were selected in the top 14 picks as well. It would have been expensive for the Vikings to try to move up that high in the draft for one of those players imo. Austin Jackson was another tackle selected by the Dolphins who I did not like as much as Jones or Cleveland. I would have been fine with the Vikings selecting one of them instead of Jefferson or Gladney, but they didn't, yet they still were able to get Cleveland with their 2nd round pick, (he was selected 58 overall he was not a 3rd round pick) so in my view no harm in that. I suppose they could have selected them both instead of taking Gladney, do you think that would have been better?
The Vikings did have huge needs at corner considering all the players they lost at that position and I do like Gladney so I am not unhappy about their decision to go that way. By the time they selected Cameron Dantzler in the 3rd round Josh Jones was gone (pick 72) also DT Blackmon (pick 40) and Madubuike (pick 71) were gone before that pick and as we saw the Vikings had a plan to address their defensive line depth in the 4th round where they got DJ Wonnum (was not on my radar) and James Lynch.
I think we'll just agree to disagree. I don't think targeting undersized centers with early picks over the last few years is scratching the itch I described. I just don't understand the perspective when everyone with eyes agreed after the 49er game that this catastrophic unit needed to finally be solved. Somehow I guess that turned into they already prioritized the fix previously.So from my perspective your criticism is a couple years old and the Vikings have made some changes in how they are prioritizing things since then
Zone or no zone, Vikings CBs will be picked on relentlessly if they don't have any idea where the ball is according to the scheme. There is literally zero risk passing a ball you know won't be intercepted.I am guessing the Vikings will use more zone coverage this year because of the young inexperienced players and also because of some influence from Dom Capers. Zimmer prefers to run more man coverage.
Yeah I get what you are saying Jim. I even agree with it in a vacuum as far as prioritization of position goes. As I mentioned before when mocking for the Vikings I took that approach and did not target WR until the 3rd round. The way that things were falling this usually meant drafting a defensive lineman earlier than the Vikings did, and if the players they selected there in the 4th round pan out (given their successful track record of developing these guys, good chance they do) it would have been a waste of draft capital on my part to be selecting defensive linemen in the 1st and/or 2nd round instead.I can see all of this. I think reasonable minds can quibble about specific players, but what I'd expect to see from the organization after literally 2 decades of OL incompetence is focus and urgency. Not continued prioritization of other positions. Think of what the Packers did the very year after Moss was drafted: They drafted 3 CBs to begin the draft realizing they needed an answer to compete with a divisional foe. Not a doubt in my mind Ron Wolf had other positions of need on the team, but solving those would not fix an achilles heel.
Jefferson may turn into an excellent pro, but drafting WRs in the 1st in this particular draft made very little sense to me. I just don't think WRs are ever worth a 1st (I realize the prior Moss mention undermines this statement, but he was a unicorn). I saw guys going in the 4th-5th that I'd have loved to see on this team. I'm not a scout so I expect to be ridiculed for mentioning these names, but Bryan Edwards, Gandy-Golden, Tyler Johnson & even longshot Gabriel Davis caught my eye as viable/dynamic prospects to take a chance on. As we've seen from Diggs/Thielen, WR absolutely is a position that can be figured out later in most drafts. That was particularly true in this class, considering the abundance of mid-round picks the Vikes had. FWIW, I remember having similar back/forth with you prior to the Treadwell pick where I pleaded to take OL & maneuvering to get Michael Thomas in the 2nd. But, it's not always about the merits of the WR you get. It's usually about the guy you could have selected, and whether there really is a downgrade being a bit more patient taking WRs.
Well, I enjoy this back/forth, but that as a summary response is not the point I'm making. Did I say rely on luck? Do you think they selected Diggs as a luck play? Truly, if our scouts rely on luck to find gems in a WR class such as the one just drafted, they should all be fired. I'm also not going to argue against Kubiak's opinion of Jefferson. That can be entirely accurate in the same universe where drafting Jefferson leaves an achilles heel on this team.Bottom line I don't think luck should be part of any teams draft plan.
Yeah maybe your right. The way you describe it does seem like what happened just from their comments in the video. Gary and Spielman valued Jefferson more than the offensive linemen who were available there. I wonder if they would have passed on Wirfs for example if he and Jefferson were still there? Based on the track record, they might have, and that would have bothered me more than what did happen. Zimmer likely was out voted here as far as going with corner first.Well, I enjoy this back/forth, but that as a summary response is not the point I'm making. Did I say rely on luck? Do you think they selected Diggs as a luck play? Truly, if our scouts rely on luck to find gems in a WR class such as the one just drafted, they should all be fired. I'm also not going to argue against Kubiak's opinion of Jefferson. That can be entirely accurate in the same universe where drafting Jefferson leaves an achilles heel on this team.
Just remember this exchange began with me saying continuity of the apparent groupthink approach to how to construct a football team should be challenged, and it should not be obvious that Speilman be extended. Spielman prioritized WR, Kubiak agrees. Probably Zimmer insisted on another 1st round CB and Spielman acted... again in the 3rd. Where is the voice championing to solve OL with the same vigor? You're assuming it exists, I'm assuming it doesn't.
I have no idea how the Vikings can afford Ngakoues contract. According to the above article he is signing a deal for less than the franchise tender. Not sure if that will be a one year or long term deal.Does this mess their cap up to where they won't be resigning Cook? Someone here has to know better than me.
To be fair, Ngakoue is a much more valuable player than Cook is. If acquiring him costs them Cook after this season, I'm fine with it.I have no idea how the Vikings can afford Ngakoues contract. According to the above article he is signing a deal for less than the franchise tender. Not sure if that will be a one year or long term deal.
I thought when contract talks with Cook broke down that the Vikings might sign Griffen. Looks like they set their setting their sights higher.
Dannelle Hunter hasn't been practicing and we dont know why. Hoping he is ok.
The Vikings may still have to cut a player to fit Ngakoues new contract under the cap.
With the Vikings spending all of their cap space it doesn't look like a deal with Cook will happen this year and if so Cook will be a UFA next year.
Its my understanding that Ngakoue contract will only be for the 2020 season. So he will be a free agent in 2021 as well.To be fair, Ngakoue is a much more valuable player than Cook is. If acquiring him costs them Cook after this season, I'm fine with it.
Yes, I was making a similar assumption based on the team's history, that unless Ngakoue suffers a major injury or somehow forgets how to play football, he'll be a bigger priority to extend than Cook. Ngakoue at times flashed a similar level of ability as Hunter, and could a devastating tag partner for years to come.Its my understanding that Ngakoue contract will only be for the 2020 season. So he will be a free agent in 2021 as well.
The Vikings do have a history of not investing into players unless they are young and Ngakoue fits that strategy if they do sign him to a long term deal. They likely hope or intend to do that. They value their draft picks, but its not a guarantee they get a new deal with him done.
They might have to cut someone to fit under the cap this year.
I am happy about the move. I didnt expect this to happen because the Vikings are so cap strapped but they found a way. It does seem like the Vikings are going all in to try to win this year. The 2021 team may have a lot of turnover as well.
Cook is a special player and I hope they find a way to keep him. I think they have a budget in mind for player positions though and his asking price may be more than they are willing to give to any RB. Adrian Peterson used to be the Vikings highest paid player. They could afford to do that because they had Teddy and Ponder on rookie contracts. Once Teddy got injured the Vikings decided to invest more cap space into the QB position which may have priced out Cook or any RB getting a top $$ contract.
From what I heard they offered Griffen a $4 million per year type of deal. He took a bit more money than that to sign with the Cowboys but not a lot more. Bringing him back would have been a lot cheaper than paying Ngakoue. Griffen is 33 years old though while Ngakoue is only 25. Speilman has stated before that if they are going to give free agents big contracts that they need to be younger and hopefully play for the Vikings for awhile.
I haven't looked at 2021 salary cap but the Vikings will free up a lot of dead money from the Diggs deal and other moves they have made that have them in a bind right now. I would expect the Vikings to try to keep Ngakoue long term.
I am still wondering if a trade or cut by the Vikings needs to happen to fit him under the cap this year.
eta - This move does make me worry that Hunter may be injured more than we know. He hasn't practiced for like 10 or 11 practices now.
I think that is a lot of money to invest based on the franchise tag. So I wonder how that is going to work out. No guarantee he signs with the Vikings in 2021. He will be a free agent. So perhaps this is why the price is only a 2nd round pick and conditional pick in 2022.Yes, I was making a similar assumption based on the team's history, that unless Ngakoue suffers a major injury or somehow forgets how to play football, he'll be a bigger priority to extend than Cook. Ngakoue at times flashed a similar level of ability as Hunter, and could a devastating tag partner for years to come.
Funny thing about Cook is he said he has patterned his game after Freeman who I guess he knew from before college.I'm not sure Cook is a special player. I think he's a very good player, but we have a lot of history that suggests the Kubiak system doesn't need the most talented RB to work. Cook had the lowest YPC of any RB on the team last year, and really petered out in the second half of the season. Combined with this health issues, I have some concern that he is similar to his predecessor at FSU in Devonta Freeman, and that he'll also burn bright and fall fast. I'm not sure I'd have wanted to pay him before this move, but a similarly(or more) talented player at a much more important position seems like a far bigger priority.
Yeah for all his flaws Peterson was pretty special.True, Peterson was once the team's highest paid player, but Cook isn't even remotely in the same league as prime Peterson was. Unlike many who unjustly get the moniker, Peterson really was a generational player, and is the best runner of the last 25 years in my opinion. He was probably the exception(and even then it was a little questionable) to the rule about not paying RB's.
Yeah I like the trade aside from it making me worry about Hunter more than before the deal.Regardless of all that though, the most important thing is, this a very good trade for the Vikings. I think they solidified a potential weakness, and acquired a great player, for below market value, from a potentially tanking team.
And the Browns (currently) have 5.The Vikings only kept 3 TE but 7 WR on the roster.
They have usually kept 4 TE so I wonder if they are planning fewer 2 TE sets than last season because of this decision.
I had some questions about if Stefanski would run similar offense with the Browns as the Vikings ran in 2019 as Kubiak did have a lot of influence on the offense and Stefanski has always seemed like an open minded coach and I think he still is. Every move they have made though and things that he has said does point to the Browns running more 2 TE this season. Keeping 5 TE further points toward that.And the Browns (currently) have 5.