the lone star
Footballguy
So the commissioner in a league I'm in updated the rulebook recently. Inside of this most recent update, we saw that he added a rule that states the commissioner is obliged to adjudicate matters in the league's best interest. However, it is not defined what is in the league's best interest, or if there are other ways to gauge it outside of the commissioner's judgment.
Furthermore, the commissioner did not discuss such a rule change with anybody, and the league always votes on rule changes. In fact, if the commissioner has not notified anyone of the change, has not posted it onto the league's message board, and/or has not put it up to a league-wide vote, then such incorporation into the bylaws technically violates the existing rules.
So what do you make of this? Was the commissioner wrong for doing this?
Furthermore, the commissioner did not discuss such a rule change with anybody, and the league always votes on rule changes. In fact, if the commissioner has not notified anyone of the change, has not posted it onto the league's message board, and/or has not put it up to a league-wide vote, then such incorporation into the bylaws technically violates the existing rules.
So what do you make of this? Was the commissioner wrong for doing this?
Last edited by a moderator: