NutterButter
Footballguy
This time is different. There's a pandemic.That's what Hillary thought too!!
This time is different. There's a pandemic.That's what Hillary thought too!!
Trump is not going to win New York and might be in trouble in Washington and California?Presidential elections for a second term are always a referendum on the incumbent and ads like the below that Biden is now running, with Trump's own words, will be devastating to him in November, particularly in states hard hit by the coronavirus.
https://twitter.com/joncoopertweets/status/1243126834612572162
How do you keep track of all your accounts?Trump is not going to win New York and might be in trouble in Washington and California?
Trump uses words to illicit actions. He has been doing that for over four years. When he says it’s under control, the action he is trying to illicit is a reduction in the level of panic. It’s similar to trying to tell somebody everything will be ok when things are looking grim.I have to say this last response has been niggling at me. I think the reason is the inherent contradiction it presents. You seem to be saying, or acknowledging, that Trump says something different from what he does. Isn't that implicitly saying that he misleads or alternatively is uninformed about his own administration or the issues with which he he is dealing?
I guess this post occurred to me for a couple reasons yesterday:
- His throwdown with the reporter over his "threat" to lock down NY State.What a bizarre exchange, he had just said what he said the day before? The threat itself - it was one - was horrible, it caused panic in NY, it was a totally useless thing to do unless it was meant to somehow punish Cuomo or NY itself? I guess it's forgivable if one considers it was made ignorantly or capriciously?
- Biden right now is calling for a far more robust deployment of the Defense Production Act.
And Here.
And Here.
Getting back to our original discussion, this appears like the far more aggressive approach to me. I see nothing in anything Trump has done that could be called "aggressive" as to any of this.
I didn't blame Trump for Florida's, SoFla's or Miami's cv19 problems. I'm just saying there were numerous, powerful influential people who came out of that meeting infected or exposed. Ivanka herself self-isolated. We haven't heard of any such from Biden's event.Two thirds of Michigan's coronavirus cases that has resulted in 727 deaths so far are in the 3 counties that surround the plant...
This like a truism, yeah people say things to communicate and get desired responses from people. - If you're trying to say that Trump uses words to generate a certain response from people, I certainly agree. Personally I think that a public official has a duty to inform the public accurately, safely, and without causing general harm. I don't think that happened here until it was forced.Trump uses words to illicit actions. He has been doing that for over four years. When he says it’s under control, the action he is trying to illicit is a reduction in the level of panic. It’s similar to trying to tell somebody everything will be ok when things are looking grim.
No end game really- just discussing politics in one of the few places I still can.I get that you hate Biden (I'm not a huge fan, either, to be honest), but for every complaint you seem to have about him, Trump is far, far worse. Biden has gaffes? Trump sounds less educated than an average second-grade kid. Biden has questionable conduct related to female staffers? Trump's conduct is worse AND he brags about it.
What's your end game or goal here?
Please quit editing my posts when you quote them changing the context.I didn't blame Trump for Florida's, SoFla's or Miami's cv19 problems. I'm just saying there were numerous, powerful influential people who came out of that meeting infected or exposed. Ivanka herself self-isolated. We haven't heard of any such from Biden's event.
You started the comparison. You tried to make a case that Trump was being irresponsible. You can look at the sheer numbers and dates to see which was worse without even looking at the type of event.Two thirds of Michigan's coronavirus cases that has resulted in 727 deaths so far are in the 3 counties that surround the plant where Joe's spittle was coming out of his mouth when he got into an argument with those workers. Up close and personal.
Tony I choose to respect you by responding to the substantive parts of your post. Ascribing "spittle" to Biden is neither here nor there for me, it just kills what I think is an otherwise decent point from you I'd like to address. Same with the emojis and stuff like that. Thanks.Please quit editing my posts when you quote them changing the context.
I think the point of social distancing is a decent one, I grant you that. The claim about putting Detroit's numbers on Biden is ridiculous. Trump holding a private event at his own private club where people were and did in fact get infected is I think distinguishable. - And IIRC while perhaps it was the same day Trump followed the decisions by Biden and Sanders to suspend, he did not lead as usual.You started the comparison. You tried to make a case that Trump was being irresponsible. You can look at the sheer numbers and dates to see which was worse without even looking at the type of event.
In reality, in the real world - Biden, Bernie and Trump all suspended gatherings and rallies the same day. March 11th.
You are wrong. CNN even called the exchange a "spat". It's exactly what happened.Tony I choose to respect you by responding to the substantive parts of your post. Ascribing "spittle" to Biden is neither here nor there for me, it just kills what I think is an otherwise decent point from you I'd like to address. Same with the emojis and stuff like that. Thanks.
A spat is not "spittle." I fully agree it was a spat.You are wrong. CNN even called the exchange a "spat". It's exactly what happened.
I agree. China is going to take a hit next election.This time is different. There's a pandemic.
Where do you think the name came from? And the CDC 6-foot rule along with Biden stuttering in his face all but guarantees droplet transmission. Stop editing my posts just because you don't like them.A spat is not "spittle." I fully agree it was a spat.
Ok we will file that one somewhere between "speculation" and "baseless accusation." - Trump causes way more risk daily on that dais waaayyyy past the due date for claiming ignorance of social separation. - Compare Cuomo's pressers or any other official who is regularly doing these with others yards apart. Heck Kemp just did his presser on doing a lockdown for GA and the interpreter was practically in the azaleas.Where do you think the name came from? And the CDC 6-foot rule along with Biden stuttering in his face all but guarantees droplet transmission. Stop editing my posts just because you don't like them.
Wow they made Joe Biden’s picture on Twitter look exactly like the 40yo virgin.Joe Biden @JoeBiden 9m9 minutes ago
We need a president who actually listens to the experts and heeds their advice.
https://twitter.com/JoeBiden/status/1247232309549555715
As I recall, this strategy was also used by Joseph Goebbels in 1945, and by Saddam Hussein’s Press Secretary in 2003.Trump uses words to illicit actions. He has been doing that for over four years. When he says it’s under control, the action he is trying to illicit is a reduction in the level of panic. It’s similar to trying to tell somebody everything will be ok when things are looking grim.
As someone who has grown to place an immense emphasis on sourcing information before presenting as fact, I can't help but notice how liberals have found comfort doing the exact opposite. Hear rumor, run with rumor, go silent when rumor quashed.I almost forgot about Hunter’s trips to China with Joe on Air Force 2.
@DonJR
The same media that has absolutely no problem with Hunter Biden taking in $1.5 billion directly from the Chinese govt has a problem that @realDonaldTrump may own $99 of a stock (through a mutual fund) that happens to make a drug he’s hopeful could work against the pandemic
https://twitter.com/donaldjtrumpjr/status/1247569146675474433?s=21
There are some news reports unpacking this in the conspiracy thread, it's a total lie. Junior pleaded the 5th before a grand jury, gut duped (kind version) into a meeting with GRU and at least two other people ultimately indicted (Veselnitskaya, Manifort), then lied about it afterwards, and yet you listen to him. No idea why.Widbil83 said:Hunter Biden taking in $1.5 billion directly from the Chinese govt
Sorry, where is this number coming from?Widbil83 said:@realDonaldTrump may own $99 of a stock
Surely you know how mutual funds work and understand that figure wasn't meant to be an exact dollars and cents the second he said it. It was to add emphasis to the likely magnitude between the two numbers he was comparing. You've been trying waaaaay to hard lately, take a break or something.Sorry, where is this number coming from?
Btw I think I have indicated this is likely a dead end and not worth pursuing, but it's odd of Junior to throw this number out. Is there some sort of basis for it that we know of?
Actually I see now he said “may.” So that’s a non-denial denial. Not that it matters, I don’t think that’s really driving Trump, but it’s odd for Junior to even bring up how much it is or might be.Surely you know how mutual funds work and understand that figure wasn't meant to be an exact dollars and cents the second he said it. It was to add emphasis to the likely magnitude between the two numbers he was comparing. ...
I’m doing good, just working really hard. Had a nice break midday today. Hanging in there. Take care, thanks.You've been trying waaaaay to hard lately, take a break or something.
BloombergJoe Biden told donors on a virtual fundraiser this afternoon that he and Bernie Sanders spoke just before the fundraiser started. Of dropping out of the race, Biden said "I know how hard that is." He adds that Sanders "created an entire movement. He put his heart and soul into not only running for president but the causes and issues he’s been dedicated to his whole life."
I think you mean elicit. Illicit is too funnyTrump uses words to illicit actions. He has been doing that for over four years. When he says it’s under control, the action he is trying to illicit is a reduction in the level of panic. It’s similar to trying to tell somebody everything will be ok when things are looking grim.
The is really well done.Joe Biden @JoeBiden 5h5 hours ago
I know Bernie well. He’s a good man, a great leader, and one of the most powerful voices for change in our country. And it’s hard to sum up his contributions to our politics in one, single tweet. So I won’t try to.
To Bernie and Jane, as friends, from Jill and me: You haven’t just run a political campaign; you’ve created a movement. And make no mistake about it, we believe it’s a movement that is as powerful today as it was yesterday. That’s a good thing for our nation and our future.
We know how hard this is. You have put the interest of the nation – and the need to defeat Donald Trump – above all else. And for that we’re grateful. But we want you to know: we’ll be reaching out. You’ll be heard by me. As you say: Not me, Us.
And to Bernie’s supporters: I know that I need to earn your votes. And I know that might take time. But I want you to know that I see you, I hear you, and I understand the urgency of this moment. I hope you'll join us. You're more than welcome: You're needed.
Together we will defeat Donald Trump. But we will also address the climate crisis. We will make college affordable. And we will make health care available to all. We will not just rebuild this nation – we’ll transform it. And I’m asking you to join me.
https://twitter.com/JoeBiden/status/1247920853410615296
Which proves absolutely nothing.For those still presuming the Bernie supporters are going to fall in line behind Joe Biden in a way they didn't do for Hillary, I suggest you take a look at the replies to Elizabeth Warren's "Thank You" to Bernie Sanders on Twitter. Hint: the responses aren't kind and even though her tweets are presumably seen first by her followers, there don't appear to be many who are coming to her defense.
https://twitter.com/ewarren/status/1247916514885414912
Here is a sampling..
It stirred enough in you to provide this dynamite response.Which proves absolutely nothing.
The last oneFor those still presuming the Bernie supporters are going to fall in line behind Joe Biden in a way they didn't do for Hillary, I suggest you take a look at the replies to Elizabeth Warren's "Thank You" to Bernie Sanders on Twitter. Hint: the responses aren't kind and even though her tweets are presumably seen first by her followers, there don't appear to be many who are coming to her defense.
https://twitter.com/ewarren/status/1247916514885414912
Here is a sampling...
And my personal favorite...
- Thanks Liz just in time
- oh so now you got something to say
- Seriously just send me the ActBlue link to Warren's supporter
- #### Joe Biden, and #### you
- It's really offensive to refer to Senator Warren as a snake. Snakes have spines
- #### all the way off
- who are you again?
- What do you call a progressive who only backs establishment Democrats?
- Sounds pretty endorseable don’t he
- I mean this with every fiber of my being (### you) and I WILL donate every effing dime I can afford to your primary challenger. Until then, I'm gonna ride your ### like a tick that won't let go.
- You’re definitely the kind of person to kill a teammate for the sniper rifle and then miss every shot
Because it was a horrible and unscientific misleading post from a small sample size purporting to show what Elizabeth Warren supporters actually thinkIt stirred enough in you to provide this dynamite response.
Noted.Because it was a horrible and unscientific misleading post from a small sample size purporting to show what Elizabeth Warren supporters actually think
Probably generated by bots? No I didn'tNoted.
I guess you didn't click the link and read the 18.7K mostly negative responses
Doesn't appear that way to me but this is one of those that definitely has too many variables (and time) to have a firm stance right now.@Mr Anonymous I think a significantly higher amount of Bernie supporters will vote for Biden than did for Hillary Clinton.
I think a smaller number of Bernie supporters will vote for Trump this time, but I could see more people staying home (not factoring the virus in to that)@Mr Anonymous I think a significantly higher amount of Bernie supporters will vote for Biden than did for Hillary Clinton.
Lol, it's also closer to the truth.I think you mean elicit. Illicit is too funny
My thought is this: a whole lot of people really, really disliked Hillary.Doesn't appear that way to me but this is one of those that definitely has too many variables (and time) to have a firm stance right now.
Just to recap, the Warren campaign:For those still presuming the Bernie supporters are going to fall in line behind Joe Biden in a way they didn't do for Hillary, I suggest you take a look at the replies to Elizabeth Warren's "Thank You" to Bernie Sanders on Twitter. Hint: the responses aren't kind and even though her tweets are presumably seen first by her followers, there don't appear to be many who are coming to her defense.
https://twitter.com/ewarren/status/1247916514885414912
Here is a sampling...
And my personal favorite...
- Thanks Liz just in time
- oh so now you got something to say
- Seriously just send me the ActBlue link to Warren's supporter
- #### Joe Biden, and #### you
- It's really offensive to refer to Senator Warren as a snake. Snakes have spines
- #### all the way off
- who are you again?
- What do you call a progressive who only backs establishment Democrats?
- Sounds pretty endorseable don’t he
- I mean this with every fiber of my being (### you) and I WILL donate every effing dime I can afford to your primary challenger. Until then, I'm gonna ride your ### like a tick that won't let go.
- You’re definitely the kind of person to kill a teammate for the sniper rifle and then miss every shot
Go on Squis, give me a sample size to your liking. Seriously. Name a number. I'm sure I will be able to find it on Twitter. Said contingent is larger than you're giving credit for.Because it was a horrible and unscientific misleading post from a small sample size purporting to show what Elizabeth Warren supporters actually think
I agree, this is still strange.pulled the contrived sexism stunt 2 weeks before Iowa, despite the fact Sanders pleaded with her to run for prez in 2016
Lord.Just to recap, the Warren campaign:
- pulled the contrived sexism stunt 2 weeks before Iowa, despite the fact Sanders pleaded with her to run for prez in 2016
- lost overwhelmingly in several primaries, hardly registering a blip and ultimately finishing 3rd in her own state, but stayed in race anyway while centrists/establishment consolidated
- went on celebrity tour of SNL, sat quietly on the sidelines while establishment concentrated behind Joe Biden with uncanny synchronicity; completely abdicated any notion of responsibility to the campaign representing the ideas she claimed to believe in at a crucial point when she could have made a difference
- reportedly clutched pearls over Sanders campaigning in Massachusetts; personal vanity more important than principles
- stayed in the race with a dead campaign that voters had rejected, on the strength of a billionaire-funded "PERSIST" superpac by donor that gave money to Joe Arpaio
- found time to complain about 'bernie bros' being mean online; completely ignored sexual assault allegations against Joe Biden
Gee, why don't Sanders supporters like Warren? Why don't they like the person whose only functional purpose was screwing Sanders and helping Joe Biden? It's a huge mystery???
What part of Joe Biden supporting the Iraq War, mass incarceration, drug war, bank bailouts, Patriot Act and pharma/insurance/weapons lobbies makes you think I want him for president. What part of him being an alleged rapist in obvious mental decline am I supposed to like. I don't have an attachment to the Democratic party like you do.Lord.
The opponent is Trump, not Warren.
You seem to bounce from thread to thread, trashing almost everything democratic, but it's all destructive.
The real foe is Trump. Period. Full stop.
If Biden is the candidate, he's head and shoulders above Trump and a far better choice.
Fine. You or someone else may have preferred Bernie.
But this whole butt-hurt whining, to me, is making LITERALL making good the enemy of perfect.
Vote third party, it's a vote for Trump. Stay at home, it's a vote for Trump.
ANYONE who votes for Trump over Biden really has to do a reality check as to what their values really were in the first place.
If the Warren campaign was as lifeless as you say, soundly rejected by the voters and propped up by big money, I can’t imagine an earlier exit or an endorsement helping Bernie very much.Just to recap, the Warren campaign:
- pulled the contrived sexism stunt 2 weeks before Iowa, despite the fact Sanders pleaded with her to run for prez in 2016
- lost overwhelmingly in several primaries, hardly registering a blip and ultimately finishing 3rd in her own state, but stayed in race anyway while centrists/establishment consolidated
- went on celebrity tour of SNL, sat quietly on the sidelines while establishment concentrated behind Joe Biden with uncanny synchronicity; completely abdicated any notion of responsibility to the campaign representing the ideas she claimed to believe in at a crucial point when she could have made a difference
- reportedly clutched pearls over Sanders campaigning in Massachusetts; personal vanity more important than principles
- stayed in the race with a dead campaign that voters had rejected, on the strength of a billionaire-funded "PERSIST" superpac by donor that gave money to Joe Arpaio
- found time to complain about 'bernie bros' being mean online; completely ignored sexual assault allegations against Joe Biden
Gee, why don't Sanders supporters like Warren? Why don't they like the person whose only functional purpose was screwing Sanders and helping Joe Biden? It's a huge mystery???