It depends on the subject matter, but I don't think there should editorializing in thread titles, whether whoever starts them is left or right leaning.Just from the first page...
"The North Korea Thread: Trump has completely Blown this"
"....Barr Completely Lied About it"
"The Trump Years: Every Day Something More Shocking than the Last"
"Fox News Cracks Me Up"
Are these the types of titles that are conducive to constructive conversation? Further, why are a disproportionate number of the thread titles obviously left leaning? Is this a left of center forum so it's accepted?
ExactlyIt depends on the subject matter, but I don't think there should editorializing in thread titles, whether whoever starts them is left or right leaning.
Of the four above you mention, three should be changed to
The North Korea Thread
The Trump Years
Fox News Thread
As far as The Russia Investigation thread is concerned, Barr did lie about it, so that is factually correct as far as I am concerned, although some might disagree (not sure on what grounds if they have been following the news). If I were the OP I would probably qualify the title to something like "Barr appears to have lied about it"
Being relatively new to this forum, I was mostly just disappointed in the overall tone and content in the forum.Are you really that upset about thread titles???
I disagree. This isn’t CNN. This is an opinion board. Thread titles, like posts, should reflect the opinion of the person who started them. Or not. Actually, so long as it’s within the rules and not rude or insulting to somebody here, the thread title should be whatever the person who started it wants it to be. If you don’t like it, don’t read it or start your own thread with your own opinion.It depends on the subject matter, but I don't think there should editorializing in thread titles,
You have a real knack of using thread titles as a trolling device, kudosI disagree. This isn’t CNN. This is an opinion board. Thread titles, like posts, should reflect the opinion of the person who started them. Or not. Actually, so long as it’s within the rules and not rude or insulting to somebody here, the thread title should be whatever the person who started it wants it to be. If you don’t like it, don’t read it or start your own thread with your own opinion.
Unfortunately we can't put thread titles we find offensive on ignore, we have to look at them whether we want to or not and seeing something like "North Korea, Trump has really blown this" or "Don Jr. has committed treason, maybe" every single day for months gets really tiresome.I disagree. This isn’t CNN. This is an opinion board. Thread titles, like posts, should reflect the opinion of the person who started them. Or not. Actually, so long as it’s within the rules and not rude or insulting to somebody here, the thread title should be whatever the person who started it wants it to be. If you don’t like it, don’t read it or start your own thread with your own opinion.
I remember back in the good old days when we had subtitles and people had a sense of humor about them.Are you really that upset about thread titles???
I don’t start threads unless I believe what the title says. Shall we examine some of your thread titles? The ones in which you don’t attempt to change the entire subject half way through.You have a real knack of using thread titles as a trolling device, kudos
I've asked Tim to limit this in the past.You have a real knack of using thread titles as a trolling device, kudos
I miss those days too when every discussion wasn't a fight and the goal wasn't to "destroy" the other side. Back when people actually had an interest in hearing a viewpoint different than their own.I remember back in the good old days when we had subtitles and people had a sense of humor about them.
Umm, you’ve asked me to limit stating opinions, which I’ve done. You’ve NEVER asked me to limit trolling in a thread title, because I’ve never done that. And the person you’re responding to has a long record of doing exactly that.I've asked Tim to limit this in the past.
AgreedYou have a real knack of using thread titles as a trolling device, kudos
I think most discussions about issues still tend to be like this. Look at the wealth inequality thread for example. Or the various health care threads. Sure people disagree but there’s a lot of good discussion.I miss those days too when every discussion wasn't a fight and the goal wasn't to "destroy" the other side. Back when people actually had an interest in hearing a viewpoint different than their own.
And you would never do that, right HTP?You have a real knack of using thread titles as a trolling device, kudos
Can you offer me an example of a thread title I’ve started that is clearly trolling?Agreed
Not to mention white guys and Christians.When will conservatives finally get a fair shake in America?
NoJust from the first page...
"The North Korea Thread: Trump has completely Blown this"
"....Barr Completely Lied About it"
"The Trump Years: Every Day Something More Shocking than the Last"
"Fox News Cracks Me Up"
Are these the types of titles that are conducive to constructive conversation? Further, why are a disproportionate number of the thread titles obviously left leaning? Is this a left of center forum so it's accepted?
I'll hang up and listen.
Bump. I don’t appreciate that this accusation was made and that anyone agreed with it. I have certainly started a lot of threads in the PSF, some with titles that are quite opinionated. I can’t think of a single one that was trolling. If you guys have an example please show me.Can you offer me an example of a thread title I’ve started that is clearly trolling?
Let me comment on this one since it was offered in the OP. It was not trolling, it was added to the title to express my sincere disappointment. If you look back through that thread you will find that I praised Trump for his initial efforts to meet with Kim. In fact, I wrote that if he made it work I would have to regard him as a good President no matter what I thought of his other policies and statements; that’s how important I thought it was. I was ready to give him every benefit of the doubt. But he failed to gain anything constructive and then he lied and bragged about it. He has actually made the situation worse. That is my judgment and the title reflected that; it was not dishonest and not meant to troll anyone."The North Korea Thread: Trump has completely Blown this"
Are these the types of titles that are conducive to constructive conversation?
I have zero desire to engage with you on this. The one I recall was asking you to stop with the "Dow Collapses" in the titles.Bump. I don’t appreciate that this accusation was made and that anyone agreed with it. I have certainly started a lot of threads in the PSF, some with titles that are quite opinionated. I can’t think of a single one that was trolling. If you guys have an example please show me.
Eh, I think it's about the same, except lots of people seem to lack a sense of humor (or even try to be funny / witty).I miss those days too when every discussion wasn't a fight and the goal wasn't to "destroy" the other side. Back when people actually had an interest in hearing a viewpoint different than their own.
I wasn’t trying to engage you. I was asking @HellToupee and @Ramblin Wreck who made the accusation and agreed with it. I had no problem with your request and I followed through with it- but it was an opinion, not a troll.I have zero desire to engage with you on this. The one I recall was asking you to stop with the "Dow Collapses" in the titles.
And please drop the "who me?" act. It's insulting to even the most casual board reader here. We've all been guilty of trolling in some ways. We all can do better.
That's all from me on this.
I have zero desire to engage you on this.I wasn’t trying to engage you. I was asking @HellToupee and @Ramblin Wreck who made the accusation and agreed with it. I had no problem with your request and I followed through with it- but it was an opinion, not a troll.
I agree with you that we are all guilty of trolling. I’ve done my share from time to time. I can do better and I try. But never in thread titles; that’s what I took issue with.
Then please don’t agree with the accusation. Lol.I have zero desire to engage you on this.
I have zero desire to engage you on this without an apologyI wasn’t trying to engage you. I was asking @HellToupee and @Ramblin Wreck who made the accusation and agreed with it. I had no problem with your request and I followed through with it- but it was an opinion, not a troll.
I agree with you that we are all guilty of trolling. I’ve done my share from time to time. I can do better and I try. But never in thread titles; that’s what I took issue with.
Sounds good to me. So go ahead and offer me one, and after I accept it we can continue.I have zero desire to engage you on this without an apology
I was engaging with HT.Then please don’t agree with the accusation. Lol.
This is funny. Don’t forget about how often liberals here use the ignore feature.Censoring, getting triggered, safe spaces. I remember when those were for Lefties. How times have changed.
https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a27356822/donald-trump-anti-vaccine-climate-change-denial-pseudoscience/Mister CIA said:Are you the anti-vaxxer?
This is the same shtick about being reported. It's their own self fulfilling prophecy.....producing the ultimate "echo chamber"...it really is the irony of ironies.Guys, Opie to his credit has no problem starting his own threads. Neither did HT. Supermike also has done it.
He’s constantly changing them. I imagine it’s hard to keep up with a revolving door of trolling.Ramblin Wreck said:Agreed
Hey you’re welcome to provide an example of trolling as well. Nobody else has.He’s constantly changing them. I imagine it’s hard to keep up with a revolving door of trolling.
No. Not really. While there certainly are conservatives that whine and attempt to create safe spaces, the left is the one obsessed with shielding themselves from opinions from differing viewpoints. Colleges and universities have been particularly guilty of shutting down speech they do not like.Censoring, getting triggered, safe spaces. I remember when those were for Lefties. How times have changed.
That’s why I chose to disengage. He was changing them and trying to play The Who me shtickHe’s constantly changing them. I imagine it’s hard to keep up with a revolving door of trolling.
Sick burn! It's so impressive when you take jabs just cause a thread isn't a tantrum by the left. Got em!Censoring, getting triggered, safe spaces. I remember when those were for Lefties. How times have changed.
Ironic that this forum is their safe space and how triggered they get by a thread like this.This is funny. Don’t forget about how often liberals here use the ignore feature.
The same people who complain about whining have the mods on speed dial.Ironic that this forum is their safe space and how triggered they get by a thread like this.
He’s constantly changing them. I imagine it’s hard to keep up with a revolving door of trolling.