OK. I have been thinkin a bit on how to be objective.
So, I asked myself, "What do good movies do?"
So far, I have: "They
touch and
move us."
They touch and move us:
- physically (e.g. light waves/sound waves/neural excitation/adrenaline/goosebumps/hair standing/gut wrenching/sensual shivers/pounding heart/pissing laughter/salty tears)
- emotionally (love/hate/joy/horror/empathy/compassion/pain/rage/fear/desire/dispair/grief/glory/jubilation/bliss)
- intellectually (think/question/dream/aspire/confound/learn/surprise/expand/shock)
- artistically (argue with god/commune with beauty/writhe in hell/skydive thru space/dance with glee/sing triumphant/find the grail/uplift to heaven) ....
- individually (entertainment/understanding/growth/escape/relaxation/thrill/fantasy/release/comfort/challenge)
- socially (bonding/rebelling/ethics/morals/zeitgeist/pop culture/counter culture/community/market)
- etc.
Note: a good movie can't satisfy
all of the above. Rather, those are things that can be a factor; some more important than others (especially in the Genre & specialty categories). Plus, I'm missing lots, I'm sure. (I'll take suggestions.)
And the good movies can do these things in many different ways; potentially impacting & affecting viewers differently. This includes the typical technical and craft aspects of the process. I do value this part, but I view it as a means to achieve the
touch & move I note above. Thus, I don't necessary value any particular "style", "type" or "method" over the others. As long as it "works" to achieve what makes it great, I'm good.
Now, how does one weigh all that ... objectively?
I think the answer must lie within and across the field of contenders as much as myself, as a judge.
So, tell me. How do y'all weigh movies?
The more perspectives I get, the more objective I can be.