What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2008 Redskins defense discussion (1 Viewer)

Mr Capicollo

Footballguy
I found this interesting in light of Jason Taylor's acquisition, from a blog maintained by the Washington Post's Redskins beat writers:

Pre-Practice P.M. Ramblings

The Redskins have been playing a lot of press-man coverage with their corners early in camp, more than what seemed to be the norm. Playing man is nothing new around here, but there was no cushion being given at all. Fred Smoot and Shawn Springs, the starting corners, have loved it, 'cuz now they're even closer to the WRs to beat them up a bit and also to ensure all of their smack talk is audible.

Smoot said he expects the team to play a ton of it this season, and that CB Coach Jerry Gray is stressing press technique. I asked Jim Zorn if the prevalence of the coverage was just to give the offense that look in practice, and he said, no, that he figured the Redskins would be a pressing team. Not 100 percent of the time, of course, but given the size and skills of their corner, the enhanced pass rush with Jason Taylor and the presence of a ball-hawk, head-hunter like LaRon Landry behind the corners at safety, it makes a lot of sense.
This, plus the confirmation that Landry will play FS and fill the deep centerfield role that Sean Taylor used to fill (Cover-1, essentially) starts allowing us to picture a little more clearly what Blache wants to do on defense.
 
redskins look like a top 3 defense and should be a blast to watch!!!!!!!!!!!!!! this D will give alot of O corrdinators a head ache and if your a slot WR and your QB over throws it can you say LIGHTS OUT!!!!!

 
In case anyone cares, the 'Skins signed LB Alfred Fincher. Given their thin situation at LB, he has a decent shot of making the roster, believe it or not.

 
Tatum Bell said:
In case anyone cares, the 'Skins signed LB Alfred Fincher. Given their thin situation at LB, he has a decent shot of making the roster, believe it or not.
He's pretty bad. He couldn't even make the Lion's roster.
 
Tatum Bell said:
In case anyone cares, the 'Skins signed LB Alfred Fincher. Given their thin situation at LB, he has a decent shot of making the roster, believe it or not.
He's pretty bad. He couldn't even make the Lion's roster.
I thought he'd been pretty affected by injures dating to his rookie season. Is that not an adequate alibi for his previous suckage?
 
According to Zorn:

Marcus Washington has a minor hip flexor issue, so you should watch this.

Laron Landry is right on the verge of returning to the field; probably won't play in the upcoming preseason game, but doesn't sound like a concern to start the season.

Erasmus James will get a good amount of work this week in the game.

 
I thought this forum would find this game tape breakdown of the Redskins defense vs. the Saints in week 2 interesting (with some insightful/important observations highlighted):

Redskins vs. Saints Game Tape Review — Defense

By Greg Trippiedi | September 16th, 2008

E-mail | Print | Share

I do both the offensive and game reviews because it helps me paint the whole picture of why the Redskins win or lose. And I enjoy it. But my background in the game of football is on offense. When I watch a football game, I know exactly what and why things are happening on offense. I don’t learn all that much from breaking down the tape because I already saw the game live.

But it’s just the opposite on defense. I learn so much from doing these game breakdowns that I wouldn’t otherwise know. It makes the 5 hours a week I spend reviewing the tape totally worth it. And now, allow me to share what I’ve found with you.

Blache

57 Total Defensive Plays

Formation Selection:

4-3 - 26 (46%)

Nickel - 21 (37%)

Dime - 7 (12%)

Goal line - 3 (5%)

Some obvious stuff here: Greg Blache likes to keep it simple. Yes, he’s learned some exotic blitz schemes and fronts from his days with Gregg Williams, but his personnel packages are simple: 1) Rotate in EVERYONE on the defensive line, 2) Play 4-3 defense when the opposition has 2 WRs, 3) Play Nickel when the opposition has 3+ receivers, 4) Play Dime if time is on your side. Sometimes he plays dime on third down, but that’s really asking him to go off a whim.

We are seeing a lot more DL rotation than we were with Williams. The reason the Redskins have 5 active defensive ends is because the team plays with 4 DEs on the line in clear passing situations. Lorenzo Alexander, Chris Wilson, and Erasmus James all play inside on third down. For the first time in his Redskins career, Cornelius Griffin is a two down player.

Blitz Packages:

The Redskins did not want to blitz Drew Brees often. They actually blitzed Brees ONCE in the entire first half. Out of 38 total passes:

5+ rushers: 6 (16%)

6+ rushers: 3 (8%)

The interesting thing was, the first three blitzes the Redskins used were 6 man blitzes. They showed a favoritism for sometimes lining up in the dime on a clear passing down, and then blitzing the dime back (Torrence), and one safety (Landry or Horton). The first time, it worked. The second time, Brees found a wide open Pierre Thomas. The third 6 man blitz was the first time the Redskins sent a linebacker (McIntosh) along with Horton. Brees got rid of the ball quickly for an easy first against Smoot.

At that point, Blache scrapped the 6 man blitz, opting to sparingly bring an extra rusher. The results were much better. McIntosh was sent on two more blitzes, and Griffin sacked Brees on the first one, while the other time, Andre Carter got heavy pressure on Brees. Springs came on a nickel back fire on a third down in which Landry defensed a pass.

Mostly though, the Redskins attacked with a 4 man rush.

Pass Defense

Success Rate (of New Orleans offense): 17/38 = 45%

Success Rate is a bit misleading here, because the Saints only generated three passing plays of more than 15 yards on the day. Success Rate obviously treats all successful plays as equal to measure consistency, so whether a first down play goes for 5 yards or 65 yards, it’s charted as “a successful play”. The Redskins passing offense looks much better than that as well.

Fun Fact of the day: I mentioned that the Redskins gave up only three passing plays over 15 yards on the day. One of those plays was the 19 yard Touchdown throw to Robert Meachem. That play just happened (not so coincidentally) to be the only play that Carlos Rogers was not on the field for all game. The Redskins were in a cover three there. The announcers improperly attributed the fault for the play to Shawn Springs not getting depth, but that’s because Brian Baldinger is what’s known as a “moron.” The line of scrimmage was the 19. Springs has the responsibility of the left defensive flat. He should NOT BY ANY MEANS be expected to cover someone in the back of the end zone. Rather, Leigh Torrance was responsible for the outside third of the field, and LaRon Landry was responsible for the middle third. Torrence was slow to react to the inside man (Meachem) going up the field, but Torrence was at least there when the ball was thrown. LaRon Landry took Jeremy Shockey on a drag route in which he had underneath help. The Skins were probably damned either way, but Landry showed his hand too early, allowing Brees to hit Meachem before Torrence got over.

This all happened because Rogers was not in the game. Offenses are not throwing to Rogers’ side at all. Here’s the YPA breakdown per targeted player in the passing game during the Redskins-Saints game.

Carlos Rogers targeted 2 times, 2.5 yards/attempt.

Fred Smoot targeted 5 times, 9.8 yards/attempt

Shawn Springs targeted 2 times, 2 yards/attempt.

Leigh Torrence targeted 2 times, 9.5 yards/attempt with the TD.

LaRon Landry targeted 2 times, no completions allowed, both passes defensed.

Chris Horton targeted 1 time, no completions allowed, also the two INTs off deflected passes.

H.B. Blades targeted 2 times, 2 yards/attempt.

London Fletcher targeted 5 times for 8.8 yards/attempt.

Rocky McIntosh targeted 6 times for 4.2 yards/attempt.

(Brees was 4/5 throwing at Smoot, but the one non-completion was a pass defensed by Smoot and intercepted on the deflection by Horton).

Know that in the “nickel” formation, Springs was substituted for H.B. Blades. They were on the field together for one play all game.

Defensive Line:

Sacks: 2

Jason Taylor

Cornelius Griffin

Hits: 1

Cornelius Griffin

Pressures: 5

Corneilus Griffin x 3

Andre Carter

London Fletcher

Tipped Passes: 2

Demetric Evans

Jason Taylor

Any question who the MVP of the D-Line was? Well, don’t forget about Kedric Golston. He was great vs. the run and his heady recognition of a middle screen to Pierre Thomas might have saved a touchdown. (Though the Saints would score anyway).

Run Defense

Run defense has been the bane of the Redskins over two games. And that’s saying something about the Giants game since the Saints have absolutely no semblance of a running game whatsoever. Want proof?

Saints’ running game success rate: 8/19 = 42%

Longest run: 9 yards

It would have been 6/17 (35%) if not for two Reggie Bush draws against a dime defense at the end of the first half.

I said last week the linebackers were the reason the run D was poor. They were MUCH improved this week. Here are the YPA stats for the Redskins defenders against the run:

London Fletcher: 2 tackles, 5.5 yards per

Rocky McIntosh: 1 tackle, 5 yards

HB Blades: 3 tackles, 0.7 yards per!

Kedric Golston: 2 tackles, 0.5 yards per!!

Jason Taylor: 1 tackle, 2 yards

Fred Smoot: 1 tackle, -3 yards

Lorenzo Alexander: 1 tackle, 1 yard

Corneilius Griffin: 1 tackle, 2 yards

Andre Carter: 2 tackles, 6 yards per (Brees’ bootleg)

LaRon Landry: 1 tackle, 2 yards

Chris Horton: 2 tackles, 4 yards per

So you can take all that with a grain of salt because it’s a very small sample. New Orleans doesn’t run much, and for good reason.

H.B. Blades deserves special mention for his play. This kid can already start on my team at OLB. Might the Skins be looking to have him succeed London Fletcher at MLB instead?

Overall Defense

The Redskins did not allow a successful play until midway through the 2nd quarter. The Saints found a few plays they could rely on, and created a few mismatches (the most critical one being Demetric Evans on Reggie Bush). But the defense won this game for us.

245 total yards allowed

Success Rate (for Saints): 25/57 = 44%

We matched the Saints evenly in success rate. Hmm, imagine that? The Redskins won because they won the turnover battle (+2), and created more big plays on offense.
Link
 
Last edited by a moderator:
FYI, Shawn Springs was matched up on Anquan Boldin all day, and shut Boldin down. One of Boldin's two receptions was actually tipped by Springs first; the other one, for the short TD, was one of the rare plays in which Springs was not covering Boldin. Boldin was targeted only 5 times, his season low (11, 6, 5).

It looks to me like Springs is healthy and in top form. The CB's to have on this team as IDP's are Rogers and Smoot as opposing teams seem to be throwing away from Springs.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
FYI, Shawn Springs was matched up on Anquan Boldin all day, and shut Boldin down. One of Boldin's two receptions was actually tipped by Springs first; the other one, for the short TD, was one of the rare plays in which Springs was not covering Boldin. Boldin was targeted only 5 times, his season low (11, 6, 5).

It looks to me like Springs is healthy and in top form. The CB's to have on this team as IDP's are Rogers and Smoot as opposing teams seem to be throwing away from Springs.
Rogers is definitely the one to have for the near future. Smoot is still battling an injury and was used sparingly on Sunday.
 
Marcus Washington (hammy) and Sean Springs (calf) are both game time decisions on Sunday per Zorn today.

Also, from last week, here's a pretty cool breakdown of the defense used to induce the Romo INT in the Dallas game. They did two interesting things, 1) a role reversal with the S playing underneath with the CB giving coverage up top, and 2) making the S appear to be "in the box" to give a run look before sprinting out into the underneath coverage to get a pick. Cool insight into the NFL chess match.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top