2010 Draft - Top 25 Dynasty Prospects (1 Viewer)

[Miro Z]

1 Ryan Matthews

2 CJ Spiller

3 Jahvid Best

4 Dez Bryant

5 Ben Tate

All of these guys are elite talents, and there's a bit of a drop-off after the top 5.

6 Montario Hardesty

7 Toby Gerhart

8 DeMaryius Thomas

9 Golden Tate

10 Arrelious Benn

11 Brandon LaFell

12 Taylor Price

Hardesty and Gerhart could both be useful contributors at RB. Not entirely sold on Tate, Benn, LaFell or Price, but it's likely one or two could become starters sooner rather than later.

13 Tim Tebow

14 Sam Bradford

15 Colt McCoy

16 Jimmy Clausen

17 Joe McKnight

I don't think any of the QBs are worth taking in the first round (for a 12 team league). Tebow probably has the greatest upside if he can become a running/passing dual threat, but that's a big if. McKnight is the last back in the top 25.

18 Jermaine Gresham

19 Rob Gronkowski

Both these guys are likely to start and offer solid value but I don't think either are a future top 10 TE.

20 Mike Williams

21 Damian Williams

22 Eric Decker

23 Mardy Gilyard

These guys all have a shot at starting at WR in the near future.

24 John Skelton

25 Tony Pike

Both of these guys are potentially very good QBs who could eventually start down the road, but it's a long way away.

 

[LionsFan78]

I would certainly not call Ben Tate an elite talent. But otherwise a good list.

 

[healthpellets]

is this a good time to ask why people choose to play in non ppr leagues?

honest question, not trying to start a war.

 

[Cassius]

is this a good time to ask why people choose to play in non ppr leagues?honest question, not trying to start a war.

Because a 1 yard catch shouldn't be the same as a 10 yard run.ETA: I play in both. Just one of the reasons I don't have a problem with non-PPR.

 

[footballsavvy]

is this a good time to ask why people choose to play in non ppr leagues?honest question, not trying to start a war.

Because a 1 yard catch shouldn't be the same as a 10 yard run.ETA: I play in both. Just one of the reasons I don't have a problem with non-PPR.

The reason PPR is so popular isn't because we feel like 1 reception is worth exactly 1 fantasy point. It's more a matter of bringing up receiver values to be competitive with running back values. It also helps TE value significantly. It's boring when running backs are far and away the most valuable commodities in fantasy football. PPR fixes that.

 

[Cassius]

is this a good time to ask why people choose to play in non ppr leagues?honest question, not trying to start a war.

Because a 1 yard catch shouldn't be the same as a 10 yard run.ETA: I play in both. Just one of the reasons I don't have a problem with non-PPR.

The reason PPR is so popular isn't because we feel like 1 reception is worth exactly 1 fantasy point. It's more a matter of bringing up receiver values to be competitive with running back values. It also helps TE value significantly. It's boring when running backs are far and away the most valuable commodities in fantasy football. PPR fixes that.

I didn't say it was. He asked why some people play in non-PPR leagues.

 

[The Captain]

Only took 2 posts to derail this thread.

A new record?

 

[mikel2014]

I would certainly not call Ben Tate an elite talent. But otherwise a good list.

This. Tate is only going as high as #5 because of situation. Talent wise he and Montario Hardesty belong in the same tier.

 

[gianmarco]

Only took 2 posts to derail this thread. A new record?

New here?

 

[Ramblin Wreck]

The reason PPR is so popular isn't because we feel like 1 reception is worth exactly 1 fantasy point. It's more a matter of bringing up receiver values to be competitive with running back values. It also helps TE value significantly. It's boring when running backs are far and away the most valuable commodities in fantasy football. PPR fixes that.

PPR doesn't do that. Starting more WR and less RB would accomplish that..... supply and demand.

 

[Cassius]

The reason PPR is so popular isn't because we feel like 1 reception is worth exactly 1 fantasy point. It's more a matter of bringing up receiver values to be competitive with running back values. It also helps TE value significantly. It's boring when running backs are far and away the most valuable commodities in fantasy football. PPR fixes that.

PPR doesn't do that. Starting more WR and less RB would accomplish that..... supply and demand.

This is how my dynasty non-PPR leagues work.

 

[Football Critic]

is this a good time to ask why people choose to play in non ppr leagues?honest question, not trying to start a war.

Because a 1 yard catch shouldn't be the same as a 10 yard run.ETA: I play in both. Just one of the reasons I don't have a problem with non-PPR.

The reason PPR is so popular isn't because we feel like 1 reception is worth exactly 1 fantasy point. It's more a matter of bringing up receiver values to be competitive with running back values. It also helps TE value significantly. It's boring when running backs are far and away the most valuable commodities in fantasy football. PPR fixes that.

I didn't say it was. He asked why some people play in non-PPR leagues.

This is not a PPR thread, its a value discussion, move along to another thread please, ty!

 

[finito]

I like Ben Tate and Hardesty a notch below the top 4 --- and I'd put D Thomas and Benn in the same tier.

To me it would look like:

Bryant

Spiller

Matthews

Best

Hardesty

Ben Tate

A Benn

D Thomas

Bradford

G Tate

LaFell

Clausen

 

[Cassius]

is this a good time to ask why people choose to play in non ppr leagues?honest question, not trying to start a war.

Because a 1 yard catch shouldn't be the same as a 10 yard run.ETA: I play in both. Just one of the reasons I don't have a problem with non-PPR.

The reason PPR is so popular isn't because we feel like 1 reception is worth exactly 1 fantasy point. It's more a matter of bringing up receiver values to be competitive with running back values. It also helps TE value significantly. It's boring when running backs are far and away the most valuable commodities in fantasy football. PPR fixes that.

I didn't say it was. He asked why some people play in non-PPR leagues.

This is not a PPR thread, its a value discussion, move along to another thread please, ty!

Actually it's a ranking thread, and a discussion, and discussions tend to evolve. ty!

 

[Miro Z]

Tempted to move Mike Williams up the rankings, Tampa press is suggesting he will start.

 

[THE UNDERCOVER BROTHA]

Love the list bro....

Geez it gets UGLY in a non ppr after 5.

I think Benn is a better long term choice than Hardesty but you

will have to grab a rb with a pulse in non ppr whenever you can.