2011 NFL draft (1 Viewer)

[eakfootball]

These rankings are on both likely hood of them wanting the player and likely hood of availibility. ex. Obviously Nick Fairly would be the Bills choice over Robert Quinn, but he will likely be gone by then.

1) Panthers

1 Nick Fairly

2 AJ Green

3 Daquan bowers

2) Denver Broncos

1 Patrick Peterson

2 Nick Fairly

3 Marcell Dareus

3) Buffalo Bills

1 Cam Newton

2 Robert Quinn

3 Nick Fairly

4) Bengals

1 DaQuan Bowers

2 AJ Green

3 Blaine Gabbert

5) Cardinals

1 Blaine Gabbert

2 Ryan Mallett

3 Robert Quinn

6) Browns

1 AJ Green

2 Marcell Dareus

3 Julio Jones

7) 49ers

1 Blaine Gabbert

2 Prince Amukamara

3 Patrick Peterson

8) Titans

1 Ryan Mallett

2 Blaine Gabbert

3 Prince Amukamara

9) Cowboys

1 Prince Amukamara

2 Cam Jordan

3 Patrick Peterson

10) Redskins

1 Cam Newton

2 JJ Watt

3 Ryan Mallett

11) Texans

1 Ryan Kerrigan

2 Brandon Harris

3 Von Miller

12) Vikings

1 Jake Locker

2 Adrian Clayborn

3 Ryan Kerrigan

13) Lions

1 Brandon Harris

2 Aldon Smith

3 Ryan Kerrigan

14) Rams

1 Justin Blackmon

2 Julio Jones

3 Jonathan Baldwin

15) Dolphins

1 Jake Locker

2 Mark Ingram

3 Cam Newton

16) Jaguars

1 Aldon Smith

2 Adrian Clayborn

3 Brandon Harris

17) Patriots

1 Justin Blackmon

2 Mark Ingram

3 Cameron Jordan

18) Chargers

1 Ryan Kerrigan

2 Jonathan Baldwin

3 Von Miller

19) Giants

1 Akeem Ayers

2 Stephen Paea

3 Mark Ingram

20) Buceneers

1 Aldon Smith

2 Rahim Moore

3 Adrian Clayborn

21) Cheifs

1 Jonathan Baldwin

2 Justin Blackmon

3 Anthony Costanzo

22) Colts

1 Anthony Costanzo

2 Stephen Paea

3 Derek Sherrod

23) Eagles

1 Gabe Carimi

2 Anthony Costanzo

3 Brandon Burtan

24) Saints

1 Akeem Ayers

2 Stephen Paea

3 Adrian Clayborn

25) Seahawks

1 Michael Flyod

2 Jonathan Baldwin

3 Brandon Burtan

26) Packers

1 Justin Houston

2 Akeem Ayers

3 Mikel Leshoure

27) Jets

1 Cam Jordan

2 Justin Houston

3 Cam Heyward

28) Ravens

1 Titus Young

2 Michael Floyd

3 Aaron Williams

29) Bears

1 Nate Solder

2 Aaron Williams

3 Brandon Burtan

30) Steelers

1 Gabe Carimi

2 Mike Puncey

3 Ras I Dowling

31) Faclons

1 Adrian Clayborn

2 Derek Sherrod

3 Aldon Smith

32) Patriots

1 Michael Floyd

2 Mikel Leahoure

3 Mike Pouncey

 

[eakfootball]

Floyds staying, that messes up some of the late first mocks

 

[sho nuff]

Not sure of any of those 3 for GB.

Yes, OLB could be nice. We will see how they go through the rest of the year and what they play even with Barnett.

I still see them going Oline early in this draft.

I don't see RB early. Likely keeping Grant, Starks, Kuhn and Jackson instead.

 

[Chuck the Roc]

you might want to update this list, since the pats have 42 first round picks

 

[footballsavvy]

Would AJ Green go to waste with McCoy throwing to him? Not that Palmer would be much better these days.

Cam Newton #3 overall? I am a huge Auburn fan, but I can't see passing up other sure bets at 1.03. I really hope he doesn't end up as a Redskin though. I was wanting TEN to take him, but they have other needs and a high enough pick to fill another hole nicely.

 

[Typical White Guy]

DB is definitely a priority for Houston going into this draft --- especially since they butchered that pick last year (Kareem Jackson). Though the next two picks from last year made our actual draft a complete mess (Ben Tate, Earl Mitchell).

If Von Miller is available, I'd love to get him, even though I don't think LB is our most glaring need (DB, DE, new head coach).

 

[Mr. Peterson]

I would replace Bowers with Quinn for the Buffalo Bills. In my opinion the Bills top 3 should be:

1) Fairly

2) Bowers (he could possibly be #1)

3) Newton (but I'm not totally sold on him yet)

I don't think the Bills take a guy like Quinn that high after him not playing this year. Too much a risk for a top 3 pick.

But excellent job on this list.

 

[Boston]

Picking the Pats is like playing the lottery but I think you went a little offense-heavy with them in putting four skill players as possibilities...there biggest need (by far) is in the front-seven of their D...O-line is a possibility as well...do you see Pouncey as a Guard because they're already set at Center with Koppen...

 

[eakfootball]

I would replace Bowers with Quinn for the Buffalo Bills. In my opinion the Bills top 3 should be:1) Fairly2) Bowers (he could possibly be #1)3) Newton (but I'm not totally sold on him yet)I don't think the Bills take a guy like Quinn that high after him not playing this year. Too much a risk for a top 3 pick. But excellent job on this list.

I think fairly will go number 1. Bowers dosnt fit the 3-4. Although I dont love Newton, i think he could do very good things with Chan Gaily. If they dont want a QB, and Fairlys gone I think Quinn is the most likely pick. A peterson or Amukamara wouldnt surprise me either

 

[eakfootball]

Picking the Pats is like playing the lottery but I think you went a little offense-heavy with them in putting four skill players as possibilities...there biggest need (by far) is in the front-seven of their D...O-line is a possibility as well...do you see Pouncey as a Guard because they're already set at Center with Koppen...

Yeah i think Pouncey is a better guard than Center. Also I like the guard from Penn State. I think then with the 33rd pick they will take a Cam Heyward or Allen Baily and with their remaning 2nd rounder take a guard. That is if they go RB and WR in the 1st round, which even though im projecting that i dont really see them taking both positions in the 1st.

 

[Lash]

Are people not listing Newton for the Titans as a choice because of comparisons to VY?

I sure hope not cause I believe they are different, Newton reminds me more of Big Ben

and Gabbert scares the heck out of me

 

[Buckna]

DB is definitely a priority for Houston going into this draft --- especially since they butchered that pick last year (Kareem Jackson). Though the next two picks from last year made our actual draft a complete mess (Ben Tate, Earl Mitchell).If Von Miller is available, I'd love to get him, even though I don't think LB is our most glaring need (DB, DE, new head coach).

With the switch to a 3-4 D there's no telling what direction Houston will go in now. Von Miller seems to be the early favorite in mocks though.

 

[eakfootball]

Are people not listing Newton for the Titans as a choice because of comparisons to VY?I sure hope not cause I believe they are different, Newton reminds me more of Big Benand Gabbert scares the heck out of me

I dont really like any of the QBs in this years draft now that Luck wont be in it. I dont think there is a single guy who will be in the top dozen NFL quarterbacks. I just see 4 guys who will be in the 15-25 guys. And now Blackmon just annonced he is staying. Bad move on his part

 

[grateful zed]

it would have been nice if the positions were included.

 

[Ridgelake]

These rankings are on both likely hood of them wanting the player and likely hood of availibility. ex. Obviously Nick Fairly would be the Bills choice over Robert Quinn, but he will likely be gone by then.9) Cowboys1 Prince Amukamara2 Cam Jordan3 Patrick Peterson

Great job overall! Lots of realistic picks.For Dallas, I'd actually rank them: 1) Jordan, 2) Tyron Smith OT-USC, 3) AmukamaraI don't think Peterson will drop that far. Actually, I don't think they want to take a CB, if other value at need positions is available. That would be 3 first round CBs on the roster. Its easier to find an impact small guy than an impact big guy. Planet theory applies. But if Amukamara is the highest rated player left on their board by a fair measure, they'd go that route.Dareus is a possibilty, but Jordan seems the better fit. Lastly, it would not surprise to see them move down a few spots for a team wanting a QB. Jordan and the OTs would likely still be available a few spots lower.

 

[Mr. Peterson]

I would replace Bowers with Quinn for the Buffalo Bills. In my opinion the Bills top 3 should be:1) Fairly2) Bowers (he could possibly be #1)3) Newton (but I'm not totally sold on him yet)I don't think the Bills take a guy like Quinn that high after him not playing this year. Too much a risk for a top 3 pick. But excellent job on this list.

I think fairly will go number 1. Bowers dosnt fit the 3-4. Although I dont love Newton, i think he could do very good things with Chan Gaily. If they dont want a QB, and Fairlys gone I think Quinn is the most likely pick. A peterson or Amukamara wouldnt surprise me either

The Bills actually plan on using a hybrid D and switching back and forth between the 3-4 and 4-3. Besides, I think Bowers is one of those talents where you take him and make him fit your philosophy. He might be too good to pass up. Whoever the Bills take I just hope he's the best player available no matter what position.

 

[Tigerbot Hesh]

 

[RC94]

Interesting thread. I will comment on the NYG picks. IIRC Ayers is being projected as a 3-4 LB. The NYG play a 4-3 (this year they actually played a 4-2-5 because the LBs are so bad they played an extra safety instead of a 3rd LB most of the time) so he may not be the best fit. I would still love a LB in the 1st but maybe one that better fits their scheme. I need to do more research into Ayers before writing him off, but the last high pick the NYG spent on a LB was a 2nd round pick on Sintim, who was also projected as a 3-4 LB and that hasn't worked out. Paea is an interesting player for the NYG. DT isn't one of the top 2 needs but it is a need and if he is as elite as some people think he would be a better pick than a LB who doesn't fit the NYG scheme. The NYG defense as a whole is driven by the defensive line and the current DTs are pretty average so an elite DT would be a great addition. They have such a huge hole in the LB corps that they can't neglect that area but there is the 2nd round and free agency to upgrade at LB. I like Ingram as a player but I really don't think the NYG are taking a RB in the 1st. Even if they lose one of Bradshaw or Jacobs, they still have the other plus Ware. They have also had very good success finding good RBs later in the draft. An offensive lineman would be a better projection there.

 

[Abraham]

No idea if AJ GReen would slide to Tennessee, but I'd be in favor of drafting him and sending a 2nd rounder for Orton.

 

[omahabrad]

Ariz. wont draft another project QB, they already have 2 on the roster.

 

[cheese]

Suprised Newton isn't on the Bengals list. I can't see them taking Gabbert over Newton.

I highly doubt they would take a DE with the emergence of Dunlap and (to a lesser extent) MJohnson. AJ Green is a possibility, but they may feel that Simpson can be a similar player for cheap.

Its anyone guess though because the positions they could really use (LB, Safety, interior OLine) don't seem to be good value where they are picking. A normal team would probably trade down in this case, but its the Bengals so Newton or BPA it is.

 

[JohnnyU]

Suprised Newton isn't on the Bengals list. I can't see them taking Gabbert over Newton.

If they are smart they will take Gabbert over Newton.

 

[cheese]

Suprised Newton isn't on the Bengals list. I can't see them taking Gabbert over Newton.

If they are smart they will take Gabbert over Newton.

You might be right, but they do have a small advantage of having Palmer for another year or 2 if they want to develop Newton. I think a lot of Gabbert's appeal is his readiness to play almost right away. More importantly, the Bengals seem to value college success, name recognition, and combine results all above a player's ability to translate to the NFL game. That sounded more negative than I meant it, but it does seem to be the pattern.The other X factor for the Bengals is coaching the senior bowl. It wouldn't surprise me if they fell in love with a guy down there and he ended up here. Jake Locker or someone could convince them to wait on QB.

 

[Andy Dufresne]

I think Gabbert might be the only 1st round QB this year. My updated mock (yet to be released) has it that way anyway.

 

[bicycle_seat_sniffer]

I think Gabbert might be the only 1st round QB this year. My updated mock (yet to be released) has it that way anyway.

someone will fall in love with Ryan Mallet's arm. And Cam newtons natural ability, both are first rounders IMO

 

[Andy Dufresne]

I think Gabbert might be the only 1st round QB this year. My updated mock (yet to be released) has it that way anyway.

someone will fall in love with Ryan Mallet's arm. And Cam newtons natural ability, both are first rounders IMO

But they'll fall out of love with Mallet's head & poor footwork and remember that Newton has started too few games in college.Look at the draft order. If they don't go in the top 15 they'll go in the 2nd round unlesss someone trades up.

 

[eakfootball]

These rankings are on both likely hood of them wanting the player and likely hood of availibility. ex. Obviously Nick Fairly would be the Bills choice over Robert Quinn, but he will likely be gone by then.9) Cowboys1 Prince Amukamara2 Cam Jordan3 Patrick Peterson

Great job overall! Lots of realistic picks.For Dallas, I'd actually rank them: 1) Jordan, 2) Tyron Smith OT-USC, 3) AmukamaraI don't think Peterson will drop that far. Actually, I don't think they want to take a CB, if other value at need positions is available. That would be 3 first round CBs on the roster. Its easier to find an impact small guy than an impact big guy. Planet theory applies. But if Amukamara is the highest rated player left on their board by a fair measure, they'd go that route.Dareus is a possibilty, but Jordan seems the better fit. Lastly, it would not surprise to see them move down a few spots for a team wanting a QB. Jordan and the OTs would likely still be available a few spots lower.

Tyron Smith will not go that high. He will likely be availible at the cowboys 2nd round pick, so if they want him they could wait. I dont think a single OT will go in the top 20. The first couple taken will likely be Derek Sherrod and Nate Solder.

 

[Andy Dufresne]

Tyron Smith will not go that high. He will likely be availible at the cowboys 2nd round pick, so if they want him they could wait. I dont think a single OT will go in the top 20. The first couple taken will likely be Derek Sherrod and Nate Solder.

The stock of the tackles will fluctuate quite a bit as the draft nears. They're all equally average is the bigger problem.I don't think Smith will slide out of the 1st.

 

[Ridgelake]

Tyron Smith will not go that high. He will likely be availible at the cowboys 2nd round pick, so if they want him they could wait. I dont think a single OT will go in the top 20. The first couple taken will likely be Derek Sherrod and Nate Solder.

I'd be willing to make a wager that he goes in the first.Tackles always rise. There's far too much demand and not enough supply. Second, Smith is very young, only 20. He's been off a lot of folks' radar. Wait til the tape gets reviewed on this guy. Draftniks will focus on him a lot more when the final underclassman declaration list is set. Once they do, they'll see what excellent feet he's got. He needs strength work. No doubt. But he's got a ton of athleticism. Think D-Brickashaw Ferguson. Similar profile.

 

[eakfootball]

Tyron Smith will not go that high. He will likely be availible at the cowboys 2nd round pick, so if they want him they could wait. I dont think a single OT will go in the top 20. The first couple taken will likely be Derek Sherrod and Nate Solder.

I'd be willing to make a wager that he goes in the first.Tackles always rise. There's far too much demand and not enough supply. Second, Smith is very young, only 20. He's been off a lot of folks' radar. Wait til the tape gets reviewed on this guy. Draftniks will focus on him a lot more when the final underclassman declaration list is set. Once they do, they'll see what excellent feet he's got. He needs strength work. No doubt. But he's got a ton of athleticism. Think D-Brickashaw Ferguson. Similar profile.

Smith currently lacks the bulk to play O-Line at the next level at only 280 pounds. People say he will get in the weight room and bulk up, but its not like he hasnt been lifting frequently for 6 years.

 

[Tanner9919]

Interesting thread. I will comment on the NYG picks. IIRC Ayers is being projected as a 3-4 LB. The NYG play a 4-3 (this year they actually played a 4-2-5 because the LBs are so bad they played an extra safety instead of a 3rd LB most of the time) so he may not be the best fit. I would still love a LB in the 1st but maybe one that better fits their scheme. I need to do more research into Ayers before writing him off, but the last high pick the NYG spent on a LB was a 2nd round pick on Sintim, who was also projected as a 3-4 LB and that hasn't worked out. Paea is an interesting player for the NYG. DT isn't one of the top 2 needs but it is a need and if he is as elite as some people think he would be a better pick than a LB who doesn't fit the NYG scheme. The NYG defense as a whole is driven by the defensive line and the current DTs are pretty average so an elite DT would be a great addition. They have such a huge hole in the LB corps that they can't neglect that area but there is the 2nd round and free agency to upgrade at LB. I like Ingram as a player but I really don't think the NYG are taking a RB in the 1st. Even if they lose one of Bradshaw or Jacobs, they still have the other plus Ware. They have also had very good success finding good RBs later in the draft. An offensive lineman would be a better projection there.

good post.while the the Giants do need a LB makeover, you can't deny what Ingram would bring to the table...Jacobs and Bradshaw are nice RB's and all, but they're amazingly average..and what has Ware done to be considered anything *special*? he's a ho-hum RB that wouldn't start on any of the other 31 NFL teams...the Giants need to get their Curtis Martin/Ray Rice type of stud - a dependable/reliable RB..not a whiney crybaby like Jacobs, or an fumbler/injury risk like Bradshaw, who has some talent but can't shy away from delivering hits to defenders , and seems to take big shots as well..Ingram seems to be an Emmitt Smith clone...he's someone who'll make a difference in that offense..the other route is for the Giants to draft a solid secondary...safety for starters..maybe you can sign a LB or two via free agency and draft S and RB? if they really want to go for it, sign Asomugha, and you've instantly shutdown 1/2 of the football field..obviously the O-line needs some tweaking, and I wouldn't shy away from drafting or signing a quality, stud TE...

 

[footballsavvy]

Everyone knows Newton is a risk. That said, he will be taken in the first round (probably in the first half) because the potential reward so damn high. He's a physical freak and has shown at least enough ability passing the ball to be extremely intriguinig. I'm an Auburn grad and now I live in auburn as well. Having seen every snap he took here I am very aware of why scouts are drooling... and also why they have some reservations.

The main question mark with Cam (in my opinion) is how fast he can make decisions in the NFL. Auburn had a studly offensive line this year and almost all of Cam's successful passing plays were the result of him standing in the pocket untouched for 4 or 5 seconds. In fact, I've never seen him fire off a pass within 3 seconds of getting the ball in his hands (other than those no-read quick screens to the WRs). Now that might be due to Gus's offense not being designed that way - but either way, if we haven't seen him make those kinds of reads, we have no reason to believe that he's good at it (other than him being good at everything else he tries to do - besides stealing laptops).

One thing I would not expect is for a team with a new head coach to draft him. If I were a new coach i would not want to tie my success to a rookie QB - and you know fans, owners, and everyone else in the world will practically demand that Cam get on the field as a rookie. At least with Tebow he had tremendous scrutiny over his throwing motion and ability to read defenses. With Cam it seems like all I hear about is his high passing efficiency rating. I'm not saying he's not a good passer, but if you give me 9 seconds in the pocket to throw the ball, my passer rating would be prety damn good too.

He will get drafted in the 1st round by a team like TEN (not a rookie head coach). He will play as a rookie and he will struggle while showing flashes of being a pure stud. He will also probably get injured.

 

[Andy Dufresne]

I think the specter of Ryan Leaf and Jamarcus Russell loom large over Mallett and Newton.

 

[bicycle_seat_sniffer]

I think the specter of Ryan Leaf and Jamarcus Russell loom large over Mallett and Newton.

Whats not to like about Ryan Mallet?? His stats are incredible for playing in the best conference in college football the past 2 seasons.2009 3627 yard 30 tds 7 int and 55% comphe then improved his numbers 2010 3869 yards 32 tds 12 int and 65% comp I dont really re-call Arkansas being this powerhouse of the SEC recently either. He took them to a BCS bowl and he has all the tools to succeed. Could he bust? sure. But he will go in the top10 for sure

 

[Kirby]

I can't see the Bengals taking a QB... I'd add Fairly or Peterson in Gabbert's spot.

 

[Andy Dufresne]

I think the specter of Ryan Leaf and Jamarcus Russell loom large over Mallett and Newton.

Whats not to like about Ryan Mallet?? His stats are incredible for playing in the best conference in college football the past 2 seasons.2009 3627 yard 30 tds 7 int and 55% comp

he then improved his numbers

2010 3869 yards 32 tds 12 int and 65% comp

I dont really re-call Arkansas being this powerhouse of the SEC recently either. He took them to a BCS bowl and he has all the tools to succeed.

Could he bust? sure. But he will go in the top10 for sure

:( Ryan Leaf had great stats too.I'm not saying that Mallett = Leaf. But he does appear to be a bit of a knucklehead. And if you're a franchise picking a QB in the top-10, you're looking for a leader as much as you are an athlete.

He's not a top 3 prospect, so that leaves these teams in the 4-15 spots, and there's no way the teams that are struck through are going to take him (Bengals will likely bring back Plamer):

Cincinnati

Arizona

Cleveland

San Francisco

Tennessee

Dallas

Washington

Houston

Minnesota

Detroit

St. Louis

Miami

So in the top 10, there's Arizona, San Fran, Tennessee, and Washington as candidates. And since I think Gabbert will grade out as the #1 QB, that leaves three teams in the top 10 that would take Mallett (assuming no trades). Could happen I suppose, but no sure thing.

Then in the 10-15 range, there's the Vikings and Dolphins. Both are candidates to take him.

If he gets past there though, watch out, it'll be a freefall.

 

[bicycle_seat_sniffer]

I think the specter of Ryan Leaf and Jamarcus Russell loom large over Mallett and Newton.

Whats not to like about Ryan Mallet?? His stats are incredible for playing in the best conference in college football the past 2 seasons.2009 3627 yard 30 tds 7 int and 55% comp

he then improved his numbers

2010 3869 yards 32 tds 12 int and 65% comp

I dont really re-call Arkansas being this powerhouse of the SEC recently either. He took them to a BCS bowl and he has all the tools to succeed.

Could he bust? sure. But he will go in the top10 for sure

Ryan Leaf had great stats too.I'm not saying that Mallett = Leaf. But he does appear to be a bit of a knucklehead. And if you're a franchise picking a QB in the top-10, you're looking for a leader as much as you are an athlete.

He's not a top 3 prospect, so that leaves these teams in the 4-15 spots, and there's no way the teams that are struck through are going to take him (Bengals will likely bring back Plamer):

Cincinnati

Arizona

Cleveland

San Francisco

Tennessee

Dallas

Washington

Houston

Minnesota

Detroit

St. Louis

Miami

So in the top 10, there's Arizona, San Fran, Tennessee, and Washington as candidates. And since I think Gabbert will grade out as the #1 QB, that leaves three teams in the top 10 that would take Mallett (assuming no trades). Could happen I suppose, but no sure thing.

Then in the 10-15 range, there's the Vikings and Dolphins. Both are candidates to take him.

If he gets past there though, watch out, it'll be a freefall.

what knucklehead thing did Mallett do? he left Michigan when RichRod took over (great move on his part). And he throws some interceptions, is there some off-field stuff Im not aware of???The Leaf thing is funny too while he is probably the biggest bust of all time, I dont recall hearing about his knuckleheaded-ness before the draft.

I'll friendly wager you Andy that Mallet infact is a top 10 pick

 

[Andy Dufresne]

what knucklehead thing did Mallett do? he left Michigan when RichRod took over (great move on his part). And he throws some interceptions, is there some off-field stuff Im not aware of???The Leaf thing is funny too while he is probably the biggest bust of all time, I dont recall hearing about his knuckleheaded-ness before the draft. I'll friendly wager you Andy that Mallet infact is a top 10 pick

I think he'll be out of the top 10 for sure, and it's more to do with mechanics than character.We'll just call it a friendly "I was wrong, you were right" wager.

 

[omahabrad]

I think the specter of Ryan Leaf and Jamarcus Russell loom large over Mallett and Newton.

Whats not to like about Ryan Mallet?? His stats are incredible for playing in the best conference in college football the past 2 seasons.2009 3627 yard 30 tds 7 int and 55% comp

he then improved his numbers

2010 3869 yards 32 tds 12 int and 65% comp

I dont really re-call Arkansas being this powerhouse of the SEC recently either. He took them to a BCS bowl and he has all the tools to succeed.

Could he bust? sure. But he will go in the top10 for sure

Ryan Leaf had great stats too.I'm not saying that Mallett = Leaf. But he does appear to be a bit of a knucklehead. And if you're a franchise picking a QB in the top-10, you're looking for a leader as much as you are an athlete.

He's not a top 3 prospect, so that leaves these teams in the 4-15 spots, and there's no way the teams that are struck through are going to take him (Bengals will likely bring back Plamer):

Cincinnati

Arizona

Cleveland

San Francisco

Tennessee

Dallas

Washington

Houston

Minnesota

Detroit

St. Louis

Miami

So in the top 10, there's Arizona, San Fran, Tennessee, and Washington as candidates. And since I think Gabbert will grade out as the #1 QB, that leaves three teams in the top 10 that would take Mallett (assuming no trades). Could happen I suppose, but no sure thing.

Then in the 10-15 range, there's the Vikings and Dolphins. Both are candidates to take him.

If he gets past there though, watch out, it'll be a freefall.

I think you can cross Arizona off the list. With 2 project QB's already on the roster doubt they pick a 3rd one with their 1st round pick.The only teams I think that might draft a QB in the first depending on who is left when these guys draft are

Buffalo

Cincy

Washington-They are my pick to be the only one that drafts a QB in the first

Jacksonville

Kansas City

Alot of the early round teams have too many needs to draft a project QB in the first.

 

[Andy Dufresne]

The only teams I think that might draft a QB in the first depending on who is left when these guys draft are BuffaloCincyWashington-They are my pick to be the only one that drafts a QB in the firstJacksonvilleKansas CityAlot of the early round teams have too many needs to draft a project QB in the first.

Jacksonville (Garrard) and KC (Cassell) won't be taking a QB in the first.

 

[bicycle_seat_sniffer]

I think the specter of Ryan Leaf and Jamarcus Russell loom large over Mallett and Newton.

Whats not to like about Ryan Mallet?? His stats are incredible for playing in the best conference in college football the past 2 seasons.2009 3627 yard 30 tds 7 int and 55% comp

he then improved his numbers

2010 3869 yards 32 tds 12 int and 65% comp

I dont really re-call Arkansas being this powerhouse of the SEC recently either. He took them to a BCS bowl and he has all the tools to succeed.

Could he bust? sure. But he will go in the top10 for sure

Ryan Leaf had great stats too.I'm not saying that Mallett = Leaf. But he does appear to be a bit of a knucklehead. And if you're a franchise picking a QB in the top-10, you're looking for a leader as much as you are an athlete.

He's not a top 3 prospect, so that leaves these teams in the 4-15 spots, and there's no way the teams that are struck through are going to take him (Bengals will likely bring back Plamer):

Cincinnati

Arizona

Cleveland

San Francisco

Tennessee

Dallas

Washington

Houston

Minnesota

Detroit

St. Louis

Miami

So in the top 10, there's Arizona, San Fran, Tennessee, and Washington as candidates. And since I think Gabbert will grade out as the #1 QB, that leaves three teams in the top 10 that would take Mallett (assuming no trades). Could happen I suppose, but no sure thing.

Then in the 10-15 range, there's the Vikings and Dolphins. Both are candidates to take him.

If he gets past there though, watch out, it'll be a freefall.

I think you can cross Arizona off the list. With 2 project QB's already on the roster doubt they pick a 3rd one with their 1st round pick.The only teams I think that might draft a QB in the first depending on who is left when these guys draft are

Buffalo

Cincy

Washington-They are my pick to be the only one that drafts a QB in the first

Jacksonville

Kansas City

Alot of the early round teams have too many needs to draft a project QB in the first.

I could see Cleveland drafting him easy. McCoy isnt an NFL QB. Arizona? Mallett?>>>>Skelton and Hall. I doubt that Arizona rolls with either next year.

The CBA adds an interesting twist to the draft if not resolved before it. Free Agent QBs will not be signed. I would expect Arizona to go after maybe McNabb or there was some rumbling of Marc Bulger.

 

[Andy Dufresne]

I could see Cleveland drafting him easy. McCoy isnt an NFL QB. Arizona? Mallett?>>>>Skelton and Hall. I doubt that Arizona rolls with either next year. The CBA adds an interesting twist to the draft if not resolved before it. Free Agent QBs will not be signed. I would expect Arizona to go after maybe McNabb or there was some rumbling of Marc Bulger.

I would be shocked, SHOCKED I say, if Cleveland took him.Wouldn't be shocked, just surprised, if Arizona did.

 

[omahabrad]

The only teams I think that might draft a QB in the first depending on who is left when these guys draft are BuffaloCincyWashington-They are my pick to be the only one that drafts a QB in the firstJacksonvilleKansas CityAlot of the early round teams have too many needs to draft a project QB in the first.

Jacksonville (Garrard) and KC (Cassell) won't be taking a QB in the first.

Probably not but I wouldn't be shocked if they did if one of the top 3 qb's fell to them. Both teams have QB's that are just OK as starters and could use another QB to groom into the position.

 

[bicycle_seat_sniffer]

I could see Cleveland drafting him easy. McCoy isnt an NFL QB. Arizona? Mallett?>>>>Skelton and Hall. I doubt that Arizona rolls with either next year. The CBA adds an interesting twist to the draft if not resolved before it. Free Agent QBs will not be signed. I would expect Arizona to go after maybe McNabb or there was some rumbling of Marc Bulger.

I would be shocked, SHOCKED I say, if Cleveland took him.Wouldn't be shocked, just surprised, if Arizona did.

Why Jack Delhomme? Colt McCoy? remember Holmgren begrudgingly took him.The long term QB answer is not on their roster.

 

[omahabrad]

I could see Cleveland drafting him easy. McCoy isnt an NFL QB.

Arizona? Mallett?>>>>Skelton and Hall. I doubt that Arizona rolls with either next year.

The CBA adds an interesting twist to the draft if not resolved before it. Free Agent QBs will not be signed. I would expect Arizona to go after maybe McNabb or there was some rumbling of Marc Bulger.

Cleveland drafting who? Mallet or Newton?

I agree with Andy, Mallet reminds me Ryan Leaf and Newton reminds me of Vince Young.

Mallet being better than both Skelton and Hall, I seriously doubt it. Drafting Mallet would mean they'll have the same problem next year that they had this year. I think they try their hardest to get a Vet QB. Otherwise, I think they just roll with Skelton and pray that he's takes a big step forward.

My thought's on the Qb's in this draft are that none are close to being NFL ready.

 

[Andy Dufresne]

Why Jack Delhomme? Colt McCoy? remember Holmgren begrudgingly took him.The long term QB answer is not on their roster.

He might have begrudgingly taken McCoy, but he showed enough that they don't have to use the #6 pick on a risky investment like Mallett.

Cleveland drafting who? Mallet or Newton?I agree with Andy, Mallet reminds me Ryan Leaf and Newton reminds me of Vince Young.Mallet being better than both Skelton and Hall, I seriously doubt it. Drafting Mallet would mean they'll have the same problem next year that they had this year. I think they try their hardest to get a Vet QB. Otherwise, I think they just roll with Skelton and pray that he's takes a big step forward. My thought's on the Qb's in this draft are that none are close to being NFL ready.

I think Mallett probably is more skilled than Skelton or Hall, but still don't think Arizona would take him with the #5 overall, especially if Gabbert is still available (which he likely will be).

 

[omahabrad]

Why Jack Delhomme? Colt McCoy? remember Holmgren begrudgingly took him.The long term QB answer is not on their roster.

He might have begrudgingly taken McCoy, but he showed enough that they don't have to use the #6 pick on a risky investment like Mallett.

Cleveland drafting who? Mallet or Newton?I agree with Andy, Mallet reminds me Ryan Leaf and Newton reminds me of Vince Young.Mallet being better than both Skelton and Hall, I seriously doubt it. Drafting Mallet would mean they'll have the same problem next year that they had this year. I think they try their hardest to get a Vet QB. Otherwise, I think they just roll with Skelton and pray that he's takes a big step forward. My thought's on the Qb's in this draft are that none are close to being NFL ready.

I think Mallett probably is more skilled than Skelton or Hall, but still don't think Arizona would take him with the #5 overall, especially if Gabbert is still available (which he likely will be).

I hate to say it but I can see Washington taking Mallet, thinking they can turn him into the next Jay Cutler.

 

[cheese]

I can't see the Bengals taking a QB... I'd add Fairly or Peterson in Gabbert's spot.

I would agree with this if I thought either guy would be there. The problem is if the 1st 3 somehow go Fairly, Peterson, Green. They aren't taking Bowers or Quinn. How many more years are people thinking that Palmer will be there? Assuming they don't go QB at #4, I still wouldn't rule them out for some of these QBs. At least somebody will drop to #36.I still think trading out of 4 makes the most sense if it does go Fairly, Peterson, Green in some order (and it might), but you'd have to find a partner willing to give up something decent and that hasn't been that easy lately.

 

[Andy Dufresne]

I can't see the Bengals taking a QB... I'd add Fairly or Peterson in Gabbert's spot.

I would agree with this if I thought either guy would be there. The problem is if the 1st 3 somehow go Fairly, Peterson, Green. They aren't taking Bowers or Quinn. How many more years are people thinking that Palmer will be there? Assuming they don't go QB at #4, I still wouldn't rule them out for some of these QBs. At least somebody will drop to #36.

I still think trading out of 4 makes the most sense if it does go Fairly, Peterson, Green in some order (and it might), but you'd have to find a partner willing to give up something decent and that hasn't been that easy lately.

Quinn no. Bowers - absolutely yes.

They got some nice play from their young guys late in the season, but Bowers would be a big upgrade.

 

[cheese]

I can't see the Bengals taking a QB... I'd add Fairly or Peterson in Gabbert's spot.

I would agree with this if I thought either guy would be there. The problem is if the 1st 3 somehow go Fairly, Peterson, Green. They aren't taking Bowers or Quinn. How many more years are people thinking that Palmer will be there? Assuming they don't go QB at #4, I still wouldn't rule them out for some of these QBs. At least somebody will drop to #36.

I still think trading out of 4 makes the most sense if it does go Fairly, Peterson, Green in some order (and it might), but you'd have to find a partner willing to give up something decent and that hasn't been that easy lately.

Quinn no. Bowers - absolutely yes.

They got some nice play from their young guys late in the season, but Bowers would be a big upgrade.

Dunlap is an absolute lock at one of the DE positions and the coaching staff is constantly talking about Michael Johnson's potential at DE. Drafting Bowers to rotate with those guys (mainly Johnson) would probably mean we're cutting one or both of Odom and Geathers. Is it an upgrade? Sure, I'll take your word for it. But when you have gaping holes at other positions and absolutely no long-term plan at QB, its a luxury they can't afford IMO.