What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2011 - Post-Combine Mock Draft ***Now with round 2!*** (1 Viewer)

Maybe Broncos fans can speak more intelligently to the point, but I thought the move to Tebow last year was not because Orton was ineffective but because the season was essentially over and they decided to "see what they had" in TT. Fox has already gone on record saying that Orton's the starter, so it seems like it would be an awful lot of money wasted to have two first-rounders (including a #2 pick, which, unless they implement a rookie wage scale, is going to cost them $8-9 million just in guaranteed money) sitting on the bench backing up one guy. Orton is making $9 million this season, Newton would be getting approximately that much in salary and bonus, and Tebow is due something like $2 million - that's $20 million in QBs alone. I can't see them taking a QB unless they could trade one of the other two, which won't even be possible if there's no new CBA in place.Add to this the fact that Newton in many ways mirrors Tebow as a player and it seems like it would be a very redundant pick.
Fox "already going on record" means nothing in February. Orton could be cut/traded and they don't have that much invested in Tebow (financially speaking).And I don't get the thinking that taking another QB wastes the #1 that was spent on Tebow. It was a waste WHEN they spent it. Not fixing the problem would be the real waste.Like I said, if you don't like Newton, put in Gabbert. But reading the tea leaves and between the lines of Elway quotes, they're not satisfied with the QB spot.
It wouldn't shock me to see Tebow traded. I think he showed a lot of promise in year 1, and I know the fans love him. But I agree, that it seems management isn't enamored with him.You have to think they could easily get a 1st rounder for Tebow.
 
Doesn't Thompson more often than not go BPA?Even with Starks playing well in the playoffs and Grant returning, might they take a chance on a guy like Leshoure?
I don't see it. Grant is obviously someone they trust to carry the load (but is coming back off of injury) and they like starks enough they didn't chase anyone during the season.I think the Pack are conviced they don't need a rb. And, they proved it.
 
If I fell into this fairytale trap, I'd take Gabbert here. QB is by far the biggest need.I believe Prince is a top 10 player by all rights. If I was constructing a "draft board" strictly by talent only based upon who was left after the first 6 picks, Green and Prince would be #1 and #2. Based upon talent, team need, salary structure, and immediate impact, the hands down pick is Prince.You gave it a good try, Andy. :loco: Nice to see some outside the box thinking, even if it is wrong in places ;)
I can see them taking Prince.And I wasn't striving for "accuracy". I was bored with the pattern that all mock drafts have fallen into (happens every year about this time) and wanted to discuss different scenarios.
If you aren't striving to be accurate, why do you care that people think your picks are unrealistic?
 
8. Tennessee - Nick FairleyA better option than bringing back Haynesworth.
this is a pretty big tumble for fairley, right? also, what does Tenn do about QB? i thought young was going to be released. if that is true then they have to look at QB because the options in FA are so limited.
If a CBA deal gets done, the options are plentiful. McNabb, Palmer, Orton, Kolb, Alex Smith, Tavaris Jackson...I certainly don't mind if the Titans choose to take a QB in round 1..but I don't want them to force it. Just drafting a QB because you need one is a bad idea, if there is a stud defensive player on the board (and we need stud defensive players).
Dallas would love to have Fairley. I have every idea that Dallas would pay a 5th or more to move up to take Fairley. Tenn drops down, still gets the QB they would have taken anyway, and gets another pick.
 
If you aren't striving to be accurate, why do you care that people think your picks are unrealistic?
I can handle the "unrealistic" debate as in why team "x" wouldn't take player "y". But the "I stopped reading at xxx" stuff bugs me. There's no amount of craziness that can't happen in a draft. I don't know that there's any such thing as unrealistic. "Unlikely", yes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Even if Denver doesn't like Orton or Tebow don't you think it makes more sense to get back into the Luck Lottery next year rather than add another ? at QB?The Broncos could upgrade at virtually every position on the field. Maybe I'm just not sold on Ayers, maybe the move to 4-3 will bring out the best in him.
You don't play an entire season with the thought that you might get the #1 pick the next year.
Not even a strike/lock-out shortend season?Maybe that's not good logic for passing on QB in this spot. How about the fact that they just cut 3 D-linemen. At this point I can't see them passing on either Dareus or Fairly.
 
...And the Jones pick assumes they lose Sidney Rice, which is a distinct and very real possibility.
Let me try this again. Who would you make the Vikes' pick if you assume they don't lose Rice. And, would you mock Jones to the Rams under that scenario? Julio would only have to fall one more pick (past Detroit) here.
 
Predicting the top 10 this year is a nightmare. ...let's discuss. It's better than talking about the stupid labor dispute.

1. Carolina - Patrick Peterson

In a division with Ryan/White, Brees/Colston, Freeman/Williams, why not take the safest player that also potentially shuts down your opponents biggest threat?

2. Denver - Cam Newton

Kyle Orton is not the long term answer and Tim Tebow is not an NFL quarterback.

3. Buffalo - Von Miller

This should certainly fix the Maybin whiff.

4. Cincinnati - Marcel Dareus

After getting some surprisingly solid play from their young DE's, this could shore up what was a disappointing 2010 defense.

5. Arizona - Robert Quinn

Although the QB play killed them they can't pass up the opportunity to select an elite rush prospect. Da'Quan Bowers wishes he was a 3-4 prospect.

6. Cleveland - Da'Quan Bowers

Switching to the 4-3, the Browns luck out that Bowers falls to them.

7. San Francisco - A.J. Green

A still tepid offense could really get a jolt with a guy like Green - he might even make Smith respectable.

8. Tennessee - Nick Fairley

A better option than bringing back Haynesworth.

9. Dallas - Tyron Smith

Can play either side and provides a nice bookend to the only lineman they have that's worth anything in Doug Free.

10. Washington - J.J. Watt
I tweaked my orignal top-ten so I'll compare/constrast with your top-ten.Orginal top-ten

==============

1. Carolina - DT Nick Farley

2. Denver - DE Da Quan Bowers

3. Buffalo - CB Patrick Paterson

4. Cincinnati - WR A.J. Green

5. Arizona - LB Von Miller

6. **trade** Cleveland trades down with Washington**Washington - QB Cam Newton

7. San Francisco - QB Blaine Gabbert

8. Tennessee - DE/DT Marcell Dereus

9. Dallas - CB Pince Akumara

10. **trade** Cleveland w/Washington - DE Robert Quinn

Updated top-ten list

==============

1. Carolina - DE/DT Marcell Dereus

The Combine hurt Fairley's value. Peter King swears he has fallen. On the other hand Dereus had a great combine and the raw numbers show him being 20 lbs heavier and having a quicker short-shuttle, i.e., explosion off the snap than Fairley. All signs point to him being a 'safer' pick and rising up draft boards so I moved him in to the top slot.

2. Denver - DE Da Quan Bowers

I stick with Bowers going to Denver.

3. Buffalo - LB Von Miller

I've come around on Von Miller having big time pass rush game.

4. Cincinnati - CB Patrick Paterson

No corner has ever gone with the first pick before so I don't see it.

5. Arizona - QB Blaine Gabbert

Cam raised enough questions that his stock dropped. Comparatively Gabbert's stock rose and I think if Miller is off the board that Arizona will go QB and nab Gabbert.

6. Cleveland - WR A.J. Green

Green has done nothing wrong but is nudged down due to Gabbert getting taken higher.

7. San Francisco - DE/OLB Robert Quinn

Quinn's is a pass rushing force who projects as an OLB ALA DeMarcus Ware and that could work in his favor rather than having to play up on the LOS because I think he's weak against the run and he could fit better if he doesn't have to directly take on blockers every snap.

8. Tennessee - DT Nick Farley

Fairely could go much higher, even back to #1 but if he gets passed on the top three picks then he could slide all the way down to the 8th pick.

9. Dallas - CB Pince Akumara

Prince to Dallas still seems a good fit to me.

10. Washington - QB Cam Newton

Cam is at least one year away from transfering his raw incredible athletic skills into being a legit starter. I don't feel he's ready to plug and play and that he needs a solid offensive QB guru like Shanahan to, coach, mentor, ride him into growing into his potential.

 
12. Minnesota - Julio Jones
I am on board with pick. I see a lot of similarities between Peterson pick and the Julio Jones pick. Jones, like Peterson, has shone on the field and at the combine. Even the fact that Jones has an injury (like Peterson did) that might allow him to slip to the Vikings is similar. I think Spielman grabs him if he is there. But I don't know how any team (even Jacksonville) could draft Jake Locker that high. I am thinking that college passing percentage is a huge red flag and I won't be surprised if he free falls like Clausen. Gabbert, although he did not workout, was rumored to be the best QB on the black board at the combine. I think some team's OC will fall in love with him and he goes way before Locker.
 
'Andy Dufresne said:
If you aren't striving to be accurate, why do you care that people think your picks are unrealistic?
I can handle the "unrealistic" debate as in why team "x" wouldn't take player "y". But the "I stopped reading at xxx" stuff bugs me. There's no amount of craziness that can't happen in a draft. I don't know that there's any such thing as unrealistic. "Unlikely", yes.
When I read stuff like this, I wonder if the person has watched/paid attention to the real NFL draft. Without fail, there is some dude no draftguy has as a top ten player go in the top ten. And even in the rareest of case where this would happen, the neat team need to so-called highest rated player never works out. In fact, I think this year is going to be one of worse for that because of the shallow gap between players probably all the way down to 18-20 or so. If the new CBA is not agreed upon it will be worse.
 
'GoL said:
Even if Denver doesn't like Orton or Tebow don't you think it makes more sense to get back into the Luck Lottery next year rather than add another ? at QB?

The Broncos could upgrade at virtually every position on the field. Maybe I'm just not sold on Ayers, maybe the move to 4-3 will bring out the best in him.
You don't play an entire season with the thought that you might get the #1 pick the next year.
Not even a strike/lock-out shortend season?Maybe that's not good logic for passing on QB in this spot. How about the fact that they just cut 3 D-linemen. At this point I can't see them passing on either Dareus or Fairly.
If anything fewer games makes betting on draft position worse. If a team unexpectedly wins a game or two, then there is less time for them the play to their true level.
 
Going by John Fox's track record I say they go M.Ingram 1.2 (and then sit him behind Moreno for 3 years).

 
I can't fathom Denver using a first rounder on a QB for the second straight year, especially when it's another spread offense run/pass QB. Plus, Orton was pretty good last year - seems they have much greater needs. I'd be surprised not to see them take a DE or CB (if Peterson makes it to #2.)
I think Carolian takes Cam Newton, why? Because He will sell jerseys a la Tim TebowNo way Denver takes another QB, that would be a terrible decision.
Orton was good at the beginning of the year but tailed off later on, with Tebow starting the last three(?) games.And just because they took a bad QB last year doesn't mean that they shouldn't take a guy better than him this year. Remember, it's a new regime this year that wasn't involved in drafting Tebow last year.
From what I saw Cam Newton isn't an NFL QB either ;)
 
4. Cincinnati - Marcel DareusAfter getting some surprisingly solid play from their young DE's, this could shore up what was a disappointing 2010 defense.
If the Bengals don't trade their pick no way do they pass on AJ Green.
I agree AJ Green is a big possibility for the Bengals but there are no certainties in a draft other then you can be certain that Al Davis will draft the fastest guy at the combine. :football:
 
I would be very surprised if the Patriots didn't adress their needs along the o-line adding at least one with one of their first three-picks.

Personally I don't like Justin Houston as much as others but I can't argue with picking a pass-rusher. I also love the addition of Phil Taylor. It could be they focused on offensive later but if Gabe Carimi is there at 1.28 I don't see the Pats passing on him (I also doubt Ingram will be there at that point).

 
Going by John Fox's track record I say they go M.Ingram 1.2 (and then sit him behind Moreno for 3 years).
ingram had some of the worst results of any RB picked in the 1st round in the past 10 years. I could easily see him fall out of the 1st and not even be the top rb taken.
 
'eakfootball said:
I dont like this mock, here are my reasons

-There is no way the Broncos take a QB

Nonsense. Orton has proven that he is an adequate quarterback but nothing more. I don't think the Broncos are interested in adequate. And the group that drafted Tebow is gone. I have no idea if the new group likes Newton or Gabbert or someone else better. But if they do, there's no reason not to take a QB if they think he gives the franchise a better chance of winning than what they currently have now. Good teams don't think like "Well since we drafted a stiff at the position last year, I guess we better not draft a better player than him this year - wouldn't want to admit our mistake..."

It is more likely that they don't draft a QB than that they do. But what's the harm in talking about the "what if". Especially with what it does to the rest of the top 10.

-Bowers will not fall to 6

Oh yes he could. Remember, this is just a post-combine mock. Bowers declared himself healthy for the combine but then didn't participate. That's a red flag for some teams.

-Fairly will not fall to 8

Maybe not. But it's not that far fetched. There have been several "sure thing" fatties that have "fallen" the last few years. And word on the street is that Fairley is a bit immature and teams are worried about him playing hard after he gets paid.

-Anthony Costanzo does not go in the top 20

:shrug: Maybe.

-I see no chance of Dareus ending up in Cincy

Well. I do.

-Jake Locker will not go in the first half of the 1st

Locker lit it up at the combine. From what I've read, a big reason that he had accuracy issues (and with just a little coaching has apparently improved quite a bit this offseason) is because of the baseball he was playing.

-Blaine Gabbert at 25?!?!?!?

If he slides past Miami & Jacksonville, the teams in between there and 25 don't need a qb. What? You've never seen a player fall before? Plus, with as much buzz as he's gotten, he only threw for 16 touchdowns last year. In the Big 12 no less. The QBs are going to fall all over the 1st round.

-Jabal Sherrod and Marvin Austin are 4th and 3rd round picks respectively, not 1st rounders

I don't know who Jabal Sherrod is. ;)

If Austin does last to the third, it's not because of talent.

Neither will last past the 2nd.

-Justin Houston will not go over Aldon Smith

With the preponderance of teams playing the 3-4, guys playing the outside pass rusher are valuable. And since Houston became a stand-up pass rusher in Georgia's 3-4 scheme in 2010 he has a year of experience under his belt as a stand-up pass rusher. Houston racked up 18 tackles for loss and finished second in the SEC behind Fairley with 10 sacks. The only question is his ability to drop into coverage.

The knock on Smith for this mock is that he's a redshirt sophomore and played the more traditional 4-3 end. But if you want to switch him and Houston here, go ahead.

-ST. Louis wont take a 3-4 end, unless they switched schemes and I am unaware

Because he played the 3-4 at Cal that's the only scheme he can play in? The Rams are looking for someone to play the LDE spot opposite Chris Long and that requires a little bigger player like Jordan. Plus, he could easily slide inside on passing downs like a lot of 4-3 teams do.

-I don't see AJ Green falling to 7

Okay.
I get it. People don't like mocks that don't look like all the other mocks.And you don't like this one because it doesn't conform with your personal ratings. From what I gather, you think Bowers, Fairly and Green are all top five picks. You might be right, but you could just as easily be wrong.

The point of this mock was to talk about possibilities different from what all the thousands of other mocks that all say the exact same thing are saying.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
'eakfootball said:
I dont like this mock, here are my reasons

-There is no way the Broncos take a QB

Nonsense. Orton has proven that he is an adequate quarterback but nothing more. I don't think the Broncos are interested in adequate. And the group that drafted Tebow is gone. I have no idea if the new group likes Newton or Gabbert or someone else better. But if they do, there's no reason not to take a QB if they think he gives the franchise a better chance of winning than what they currently have now. Good teams don't think like "Well since we drafted a stiff at the position last year, I guess we better not draft a better player than him this year - wouldn't want to admit our mistake..."

It is more likely that they don't draft a QB than that they do. But what's the harm in talking about the "what if". Especially with what it does to the rest of the top 10.

-Bowers will not fall to 6

Oh yes he could. Remember, this is just a post-combine mock. Bowers declared himself healthy for the combine but then didn't participate. That's a red flag for some teams.

-Fairly will not fall to 8

Maybe not. But it's not that far fetched. There have been several "sure thing" fatties that have "fallen" the last few years. And word on the street is that Fairley is a bit immature and teams are worried about him playing hard after he gets paid.

-Anthony Costanzo does not go in the top 20

:shrug: Maybe.

-I see no chance of Dareus ending up in Cincy

Well. I do.

-Jake Locker will not go in the first half of the 1st

Locker lit it up at the combine. From what I've read, a big reason that he had accuracy issues (and with just a little coaching has apparently improved quite a bit this offseason) is because of the baseball he was playing.

-Blaine Gabbert at 25?!?!?!?

If he slides past Miami & Jacksonville, the teams in between there and 25 don't need a qb. What? You've never seen a player fall before? Plus, with as much buzz as he's gotten, he only threw for 16 touchdowns last year. In the Big 12 no less. The QBs are going to fall all over the 1st round.

-Jabal Sherrod and Marvin Austin are 4th and 3rd round picks respectively, not 1st rounders

I don't know who Jabal Sherrod is. ;)

If Austin does last to the third, it's not because of talent.

Neither will last past the 2nd.

-Justin Houston will not go over Aldon Smith

With the preponderance of teams playing the 3-4, guys playing the outside pass rusher are valuable. And since Houston became a stand-up pass rusher in Georgia's 3-4 scheme in 2010 he has a year of experience under his belt as a stand-up pass rusher. Houston racked up 18 tackles for loss and finished second in the SEC behind Fairley with 10 sacks. The only question is his ability to drop into coverage.

The knock on Smith for this mock is that he's a redshirt sophomore and played the more traditional 4-3 end. But if you want to switch him and Houston here, go ahead.

-ST. Louis wont take a 3-4 end, unless they switched schemes and I am unaware

Because he played the 3-4 at Cal that's the only scheme he can play in? The Rams are looking for someone to play the LDE spot opposite Chris Long and that requires a little bigger player like Jordan. Plus, he could easily slide inside on passing downs like a lot of 4-3 teams do.

-I don't see AJ Green falling to 7

Okay.
I get it. People don't like mocks that don't look like all the other mocks.And you don't like this one because it doesn't conform with your personal ratings. From what I gather, you think Bowers, Fairly and Green are all top five picks. You might be right, but you could just as easily be wrong.

The point of this mock was to talk about possibilities different from what all the thousands of other mocks that all say the exact same thing are saying.
I like unique mocks. I see a lot of mocks that are actually consensus mocks. Rarely do the picks outside the top 3 or 4 go the way of the mock. By the time you hit picks 12-20 the thing is way off of the consensus mark. I like seeing other people speculate on odd happenings. I'd bet AD has as many hits as Kiper and Mayock
 
I like unique mocks. I see a lot of mocks that are actually consensus mocks. Rarely do the picks outside the top 3 or 4 go the way of the mock. By the time you hit picks 12-20 the thing is way off of the consensus mark. I like seeing other people speculate on odd happenings. I'd bet AD has as many hits as Kiper and Mayock
:blush: :hifive: Sorta like how even blind squirrels find nuts every now and then. :lol:

 
Here's an interesting blurb on Rotoworld:

J.J. Watt - DL - PlayerThe Boston Herald's Ian Rapoport believes Wisconsin DE J.J. Watt is an unlikely draft pick for the Patriots because his agent is Tom Condon.The Pats haven't selected a Condon client since a falling out over Ben Watson's contract negotiations five years ago. It may not be a deal-breaker if the Pats fall in love with Watt, but it certainly seems like Bill Belichick has been steering clear. Also represented by Condon: Mizzou DE Aldon Smith, Boston College LB Mark Herzlich, and Texas CB Aaron Williams.
 
I'm surprised by the comments by Pack fans on Andy's 32nd pick in this mock. When I scrolled down and saw Clayborn there, I think it moved.....a little.

A guy who played all 4 years in college, highly productive, the D's emotional leader and captain, and he played for Ferentz. Sounds like a tackle football player to me.

 
Andy, enjoying your mocks and the resulting commentary, as always.

I just focused on the fact that you have a few picks into round 2. First thing, I think the order is off a touch as Dallas has #40, not 41. Maybe double check the order of the 6-10 teams.

Now regarding Dallas' pick of Raheem Moore. Everything I'm reading is saying he doesnt have the right skill set for what Dallas is trying to do and doesnt warrant an early 2nd pick talent-wise. My understanding is that the safeties probably should be in the 3rd-5th rounds.

So who should Dallas pick instead? I'm sure they'd have their eyes on Brandon Harris and Aaron Williams, as you have them going just before them. Not sure if there is value at CB given who's off the board. The other needs for Dallas are OG and DE. I don't know who's available for DE besides the big OSU kid Heyward, but that would be a strong consideration. The OL candidates, even with Smith at 9, would be Danny Watkins or Ben Ijalana. Both appear to be plug-and-play OG candidates, Watkins especially. There would be nothing wrong with Dallas restocking their oline in a hurry with two early picks. Then come back in the 3rd and address the deep CB or DL group. This draft is setting up well for such an overall plan.

 
Andy, enjoying your mocks and the resulting commentary, as always.I just focused on the fact that you have a few picks into round 2. First thing, I think the order is off a touch as Dallas has #40, not 41. Maybe double check the order of the 6-10 teams.Now regarding Dallas' pick of Raheem Moore. Everything I'm reading is saying he doesnt have the right skill set for what Dallas is trying to do and doesnt warrant an early 2nd pick talent-wise. My understanding is that the safeties probably should be in the 3rd-5th rounds. So who should Dallas pick instead? I'm sure they'd have their eyes on Brandon Harris and Aaron Williams, as you have them going just before them. Not sure if there is value at CB given who's off the board. The other needs for Dallas are OG and DE. I don't know who's available for DE besides the big OSU kid Heyward, but that would be a strong consideration. The OL candidates, even with Smith at 9, would be Danny Watkins or Ben Ijalana. Both appear to be plug-and-play OG candidates, Watkins especially. There would be nothing wrong with Dallas restocking their oline in a hurry with two early picks. Then come back in the 3rd and address the deep CB or DL group. This draft is setting up well for such an overall plan.
I gave up on the 2nd round because I got busy and can't seem to find the right draft order.I agree. Moore was a poor selection for the 'Boys' 2nd rounder. Brandon Burton from Utah might also be a consideration.
 
I wonder where Prince Amukamara would go if Peterson wasn't in this draft. He put up pretty good combine numbers!

 
Great mock there AD. And I love those that get angry and say this will NEVER happen and he WONT go there, etc....

Seems every year these scenarios happen:

A big name guy falls: Rodgers, Clausen, couple non QBs i cant remember, etc

A RB that ends up drafted by a team noone suspected like Mendenhall/Pitt, Stewart/Car, D Brown/Indy, Spiller/Buff, etc

A team in the early 2nd moves up into the 1st to grab a QB: cle with quinn?

NE trades down and ends up with another 1st the following year...

I could see a team in need of a QB pass on one early then move back into the 1st to get one. Possible to NE #28 or Philly's #23 pick

Buff or SF moves up to get Ponder, Mallett, Locker after taking another need early.

Most mocks have Ingram going to Miami, I could see him ending up in TB (surprise) where they have Blount. and Mia takes Willaims or Leshoure in the 2nd. Could happen?

I love reading mocks mostly to see how my fantasy players might be effected (who ruins my RB value with another high RB) and who SD is projected to take, but very few even attempt trades, so its all just in fun. AD usually has some good change ups that the common mock wont.

 
I'm surprised by the comments by Pack fans on Andy's 32nd pick in this mock. When I scrolled down and saw Clayborn there, I think it moved.....a little.A guy who played all 4 years in college, highly productive, the D's emotional leader and captain, and he played for Ferentz. Sounds like a tackle football player to me.
He has a pretty serious medical condition called Erb's Palsy which has caused nerve damage in his right arm. His right arm is also mal-developed to a degree which has resulted in him being left-hand dominant. So he can pretty well only play right-end, he can't really move around much on the defensive line. When you consider all this and combine it with his poor play in his senior season and his poor combine performance, I wouldn't want my team drafting him with any early round selection.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I quit reading about half way through. How did the second half of the "Andy Dufresne~it's my mock and I'm not going to listen to any logic from any of you" draft going?

 
I quit reading about half way through. How did the second half of the "Andy Dufresne~it's my mock and I'm not going to listen to any logic from any of you" draft going?
Somehow and some way we are limping along without you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm hearing more and more that Peterson may be the 1st overall pick, but that if he doesn't go there he may fall outside the top 5.

 
I'm surprised by the comments by Pack fans on Andy's 32nd pick in this mock. When I scrolled down and saw Clayborn there, I think it moved.....a little.A guy who played all 4 years in college, highly productive, the D's emotional leader and captain, and he played for Ferentz. Sounds like a tackle football player to me.
The Pack have a lot of d linemen - especially considering that they sometimes play only one of them on the field (psycho defense it is).With Neal, Wilson and Jolly coming back from injury (self inflicted or otherwise) I don't see the need on top of Picket, Raji and Green to use their 1st round pick on a dlineman. Having said that, Ted T is about best player, and I agree if he is available it would be hard to say no, no matter what they think of their other players.
 
Round 2 completed (and slightly revised).

Round 2

New England - from Carolina - Phil Taylor, DT Baylor

Arizona (from Buffalo) - Ryan Mallett, QB Arkansas

Cincinnati - Christian Ponder, QB FSU

Denver - Drake Nevis, DT LSU

Cleveland - Torrey Smith, WR Maryland

Buffalo (from Arizona) - Marcus Cannon, OG/OT TCU

Tennessee - Martez Wilson, ILB Illinois

Dallas - Brandon Harris, CB Miami

Washington - Mikel Leshoure, RB Illinois

Houston - Sam Acho, OLB Texas

Minnesota - Colin Kaepernick, QB Nevada

Detroit - Leonard Hankerson, WR Miami

San Francisco - Aaron Williams, CB Texas

Denver - from Miami - Jarvis Jenkins, DT Clemson

St. Louis - Ryan Williams, RB Virginia Tech

Oakland - Danny Watkins, OG Baylor

Jacksonville - Cameron Heyward, DE Ohio St

San Diego - Quan Sturdivant, ILB North Carolina

Tampa Bay - Orlando Franklin, OT Miami

New York Giants - Kyle Rudolph, TE Notre Dame

Indianapolis - Ben Ijalana, OT/OG Villanova

Philadelphia - Rodney Hudson, C/OG Florida St

Kansas City - Randall Cobb, WR Kentucky

New Orleans - Bruce Carter, OLB North Carolina

Seattle - Stefen Wisniewski, C Penn St.

Baltimore - Titus Young, WR Boise St.

Atlanta - Jerrel Jernigan, WR Troy

New England - Jonathan Baldwin, WR Pitt

San Diego - from New York Jets - Kendall Hunter, RB Okla. St.

Chicago - Greg Little, WR North Carolina

Pittsburgh - Davon House, CB New Mexico St.

Green Bay - Dontay Moch, OLB Nevada

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm surprised by the comments by Pack fans on Andy's 32nd pick in this mock. When I scrolled down and saw Clayborn there, I think it moved.....a little.A guy who played all 4 years in college, highly productive, the D's emotional leader and captain, and he played for Ferentz. Sounds like a tackle football player to me.
I think the hype outweighs the talent. He was mentioned in the same breath as Watt and Kerrigan, but he was not even close to their league IMO. My opinion of him died when he did squat in the Michigan game. That was lined up 1 on 1 against a freshman tackle all game and he did nothing.
 
Buffalo better be getting a lot in return to trade down while Mallet is available and not getting a QB in the 1st.
Probably get Arizona's 3rd. It was a cop out on my part. ;)
And I'm not sure if Cannon from TCU can play tackle, but one of the Bills strengths in at guard (unless Wood moves to center permanently). If the Bills are faced with the decisions that are available after the trade down I would hope they look at Martez Wilson from Illinois. Even if we bring Poz back we still need another ILB badly next to him. I think Wilson can be a very good ILB in the NFL.
 
Andy, if this was to play out exactly how you mocked it, which players would be, in your opinion, the best available (after the first 2 rounds)? Which players do you think could move into the 2nd round that you had a hard time finding a home for?

 
Andy, if this was to play out exactly how you mocked it, which players would be, in your opinion, the best available (after the first 2 rounds)? Which players do you think could move into the 2nd round that you had a hard time finding a home for?
Here are some names I thought about:Brandon Burton, CB Utah Allen Bailey, DE MiamiRas-I Dowling, CB IndianaDaniel Thomas, RB K-StateGreg Jones, LB Michigan St.Shane Vereen, RB CalQuinton Carter, FS Oklahoma (it's a weak year for safeties, but several teams need one)Luke Stocker, TE TennesseeAndy Dalton, QB TCUDemarco Murray, RB Oklahoma (speed + nice hands = versatile)Christian Ballard, DE IowaKendrick Ellis, DT Hampton (some 3-4 team might overlook his character questions)James Carpenter, OL Alabama
 
San Diego - Quan Sturdivant, ILB North CarolinaSan Diego - from New York Jets - Kendall Hunter, RB Okla. St.No sure I like a RB in round2.
I'm assuming Sproles leaves.
He is gone, is this Kendall hunter guy a special teamer?
Interestingly, KFFL had the same idea that I did
Oklahoma State senior running back Kendall Hunter enters the 2011 NFL Draft as one of the top players at his position. While he has question marks about durability and size, Hunter brings a unique style of play to the pro game.In 2008, he rushed for 1,555 yards and 16 touchdowns. Last year, Hunter racked up 1,548 yards and another 16 scores. He caught 42 total passes in his two full seasons with the Cowboys.Strengths Elusiveness - excellent change-of-direction ability Production Versatility High-character person Very good vision Decisive Solid build despite his lack of height (199 pounds) Runs with a low center of gravityWeaknesses Height (5-foot-7 1/4) Limited upside Mediocre in pass protection Average speed (4.47-second 40) Not a big-play threat 2009 injury-plagued seasonHunter figures to be a late second-round draft choice in April. There is a lot of uncertainty at the moment as to which teams could be interested in him because of the CBA situation.Our best guess is that he could draw attention from the San Diego Chargers. They pick 18th and 29th in the second round, which puts them in prime position to take a shot at Hunter. Darren Sproles is expected to be an unrestricted free agent and probably won't return to the team.
 
Andy -

I love your mock - you put it out there, you defend it, it's all good.

However.....

Your arguement for the pack taking a DL in r1 is defensable, although I disagree. But a LB in R2? Really? With what the Pack has committed to a very young lb group already? Just don't see it.

Oline, Safety, DBack - but LB?

 
Andy - I love your mock - you put it out there, you defend it, it's all good.However.....Your arguement for the pack taking a DL in r1 is defensable, although I disagree. But a LB in R2? Really? With what the Pack has committed to a very young lb group already? Just don't see it. Oline, Safety, DBack - but LB?
I didn't like any of the dbacks or linemen left so it was more of a BPA pick. Moch on one side and Matthews on the other would be a passing down nightmare for most teams.Don't worry, Moch has the measurables that Al Davis loves so it's almost a lock he'll be a Raider.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top