'gonzobill5 said:
Also, I'm not sure what you mean by colleges not preparing guys. After free agency and the draft every pro team could have either a competent starting quarterback, or a guy that they think will become a competent starting quarterback. I can't remember another year where that was true.
That's exactly my point, look how low our collective expectations are. If every NFL team
might be in a position to field a competent starter or even a guy with the potential to develop to the competenet level, then we consider that a rare year. Shouldn't the expectation be that many teams have quality QBs, every team has 1 or possibly even 2 competent QBs, and some teams even go into the season with three?
With 120 Div NCAA Div 1A schools graduating QBs almost every year, the overall pool (rookies and vets) of QB's for NFL teams to draw from in any given year should be north of 300 players. Yet every year, we see around half the league fail to find a guy they are comfortable with for the full season.
On the top of that list, Brees and Manning are proven. Teams would likely give their starting job to Alex Smith and Orton, and maybe Grossman. The rest of the list are backups and camp bodies.
QB is a specialist position, with in demand specialist skills, yet, as you point out, so few seem to be able to move into the range of competent.
I'm accepting of it, I'm just wondering if anyone has any views as to why the situation persists, at some point I'd think the QB factories in Texas, western PA, CA and elsewhere would crank out enough of these guys to level the supply demand imbalance a little more.