Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
The majority of people that voted for luck are probably voting for RG3
I think that is simply because most people are missing that he is still an option in the poll.
Richardson should be # 3 in 2QB either way. That's what'll happen in ours most likely.
Or that they get the idea that as good as Richardson is as a prospect that in 2 QB leagues, you are dead in the water if you don't have quality starters and depth. If you have the 1.02 pick in a 2 QB league it is very likely that you have that pick because you were weak at QB and when a prospect like RG III is available for you at the 1.02 spot then you take him, even over a stud prospect like Richardson.
In a Start 2 QB League, Luck and RG III are the only picks that I would take before Richardson -- it is a rare NFL draft where there are two exceptional QB prospects like this year with these two players.
I am a little baffled by this poll as well. Voting should be very similar to the standard scoring poll, just with the exception that pass catching the pass catching Tight Ends should move up a few slots.If anyone who did not vote for Luck in the first poll and then voted for Luck in the TE Heavy Scoring poll, I would like to hear why you made a different selection.'mr roboto said:
It's like we tried to tell you in the 1.01 thread, people aren't familiar with that type of league so they're just clicking something so their other votes can count.
The fourth poll may be the one most susceptible to corrupt data, but I will take that over not having enough votes in later polls to create separation.
Pretty much.
