What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2013 Official Dallas Cowboys Thread (1 Viewer)

The problem right now very simply is that we just re-did a bunch of deals that pushed more cap into future years on some questionable talent. In addition to that, both Spencer and Romo count for close to 26 million. They both have us by the short and curlies as far as re-doing their deals. I'm not a cap expert, but I know enough about basic economics and budgeting to know that we are playing a dangerous game.

Now also consider the new cap hits over the next couple of years with a low to flat cap increase. All while having some young players needing to be re-signed. Dez, Lee, Carter, Claiborne, Murray and Harris.

Is this sinking in to some of the more casual fans?
I kind of think everyone here realizes thatI also think everyone here agrees we should be working on the o-line, but it is simply not going to happen. Jerry said it himself, he thinks he can skimp there because Romo is mobile.I guess the good news is if the team is strapping itself for cash for the next several seasons, at leas we know they would probably not use the cash properly, so it is not a huge loss.
Please point me in the direction where Jerry said this.
really?ok give me a few

it was right around the time he wanted to make sure we all credit him if the cowboys win a super bowl
:wall: Wow.....thanks for the link....I might regret saying this but after reading Jerry's thoughts I'm starting to feel a little like Bankerguy and culdeus. How can an owner who won 3 Super Bowls with the one of the best offensive lines in the history of football now all of a sudden not realize the significance of at least having an average line?

 
The problem right now very simply is that we just re-did a bunch of deals that pushed more cap into future years on some questionable talent. In addition to that, both Spencer and Romo count for close to 26 million. They both have us by the short and curlies as far as re-doing their deals. I'm not a cap expert, but I know enough about basic economics and budgeting to know that we are playing a dangerous game.

Now also consider the new cap hits over the next couple of years with a low to flat cap increase. All while having some young players needing to be re-signed. Dez, Lee, Carter, Claiborne, Murray and Harris.

Is this sinking in to some of the more casual fans?
I kind of think everyone here realizes thatI also think everyone here agrees we should be working on the o-line, but it is simply not going to happen. Jerry said it himself, he thinks he can skimp there because Romo is mobile.I guess the good news is if the team is strapping itself for cash for the next several seasons, at leas we know they would probably not use the cash properly, so it is not a huge loss.
Please point me in the direction where Jerry said this.
really?ok give me a few

it was right around the time he wanted to make sure we all credit him if the cowboys win a super bowl
:wall: Wow.....thanks for the link....I might regret saying this but after reading Jerry's thoughts I'm starting to feel a little like Bankerguy and culdeus. How can an owner who won 3 Super Bowls with the one of the best offensive lines in the history of football now all of a sudden not realize the significance of at least having an average line?
Good, then hopefully you'll start to understand that not liking the direction of your fav team does not = not loving them.

We are a total mess right now.

 
The problem right now very simply is that we just re-did a bunch of deals that pushed more cap into future years on some questionable talent. In addition to that, both Spencer and Romo count for close to 26 million. They both have us by the short and curlies as far as re-doing their deals. I'm not a cap expert, but I know enough about basic economics and budgeting to know that we are playing a dangerous game.

Now also consider the new cap hits over the next couple of years with a low to flat cap increase. All while having some young players needing to be re-signed. Dez, Lee, Carter, Claiborne, Murray and Harris.

Is this sinking in to some of the more casual fans?
I kind of think everyone here realizes thatI also think everyone here agrees we should be working on the o-line, but it is simply not going to happen. Jerry said it himself, he thinks he can skimp there because Romo is mobile.I guess the good news is if the team is strapping itself for cash for the next several seasons, at leas we know they would probably not use the cash properly, so it is not a huge loss.
Please point me in the direction where Jerry said this.
really?ok give me a few

it was right around the time he wanted to make sure we all credit him if the cowboys win a super bowl
:wall: Wow.....thanks for the link....I might regret saying this but after reading Jerry's thoughts I'm starting to feel a little like Bankerguy and culdeus. How can an owner who won 3 Super Bowls with the one of the best offensive lines in the history of football now all of a sudden not realize the significance of at least having an average line?
he's not a football guy, never was. If he refuses to listen to football people we are doomed....

Want t be even more scared? Think of how Al Davis was the last few years. He could not surrender control and was making bad decisions and destroying that team. Now, look at where Al started. He was a illegitimate football genius. He built a dynasty, hell he built the league.

Now, look at where Jerry started in terms of football knowledge, and think where we will be if he falls as far as Al did.

Weep for the future.

 
The problem right now very simply is that we just re-did a bunch of deals that pushed more cap into future years on some questionable talent. In addition to that, both Spencer and Romo count for close to 26 million. They both have us by the short and curlies as far as re-doing their deals. I'm not a cap expert, but I know enough about basic economics and budgeting to know that we are playing a dangerous game.

Now also consider the new cap hits over the next couple of years with a low to flat cap increase. All while having some young players needing to be re-signed. Dez, Lee, Carter, Claiborne, Murray and Harris.

Is this sinking in to some of the more casual fans?
I kind of think everyone here realizes thatI also think everyone here agrees we should be working on the o-line, but it is simply not going to happen. Jerry said it himself, he thinks he can skimp there because Romo is mobile.I guess the good news is if the team is strapping itself for cash for the next several seasons, at leas we know they would probably not use the cash properly, so it is not a huge loss.
Please point me in the direction where Jerry said this.
really?ok give me a few

it was right around the time he wanted to make sure we all credit him if the cowboys win a super bowl
:wall: Wow.....thanks for the link....I might regret saying this but after reading Jerry's thoughts I'm starting to feel a little like Bankerguy and culdeus. How can an owner who won 3 Super Bowls with the one of the best offensive lines in the history of football now all of a sudden not realize the significance of at least having an average line?
Good, then hopefully you'll start to understand that not liking the direction of your fav team does not = not loving them.

We are a total mess right now.
The problem is we are NOT a total mess.If this team sank to 2-14 for a few seasons and merchandise sales dwindled and interest started to wane that may startle Jerry into action.

But this team has some great players who work hard and want to win, and yes Romo is on that list. For every boneheaded mistake he makes that costs us a game he wins us 3.

I don't have an answer, Jerry needs to figure this out. He needs to learn football and fast

 
What owner says this....

it is insane

“I pretty much go with what I did the night I bought the team,” Jones said last week from the scouting combine in Indianapolis, looking very comfy in his $2 million team bus. “I said I was going to be the GM. … It would be a facade if someone else was sitting in my shoes and someone thought they were spending the money. It would be deception. … I would grant you the decisions that have been made over the years have not produced a Super Bowl, two Super Bowls or three Super Bowls that I would like to have been a part of. And the only thing I am going to do there is keep trying and then make sure I get the credit when we do get that one. Y’all are going to give it to me, aren’t you?”

:shrug:

 
I wish we could find a partner to trade Spencer. I'm not sure what the compensation would be. A 2nd and a 4th? This would free up 10 million for FA. I would then take a serious run at Jake Long and pray he can stay healthy. Move Tyron Smith back to RT where I think he is better, not that he isn't a capable LT. This also allows us to make Doug Free a June 1 cut and save additional cap.

Take Richardson, Cooper or a trade down for Datone Jones in the first.

Barrett Jones in the 2nd

Eric Reid in the 2nd

Tank Carradine in the 3rd

Leveon Bell/Marcus Lattimore 4th

Ryan Nassib in the 4th

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The problem right now very simply is that we just re-did a bunch of deals that pushed more cap into future years on some questionable talent. In addition to that, both Spencer and Romo count for close to 26 million. They both have us by the short and curlies as far as re-doing their deals. I'm not a cap expert, but I know enough about basic economics and budgeting to know that we are playing a dangerous game.

Now also consider the new cap hits over the next couple of years with a low to flat cap increase. All while having some young players needing to be re-signed. Dez, Lee, Carter, Claiborne, Murray and Harris.

Is this sinking in to some of the more casual fans?
I kind of think everyone here realizes thatI also think everyone here agrees we should be working on the o-line, but it is simply not going to happen. Jerry said it himself, he thinks he can skimp there because Romo is mobile.I guess the good news is if the team is strapping itself for cash for the next several seasons, at leas we know they would probably not use the cash properly, so it is not a huge loss.
Please point me in the direction where Jerry said this.
really?ok give me a few

it was right around the time he wanted to make sure we all credit him if the cowboys win a super bowl
:wall: Wow.....thanks for the link....I might regret saying this but after reading Jerry's thoughts I'm starting to feel a little like Bankerguy and culdeus. How can an owner who won 3 Super Bowls with the one of the best offensive lines in the history of football now all of a sudden not realize the significance of at least having an average line?
Good, then hopefully you'll start to understand that not liking the direction of your fav team does not = not loving them.

We are a total mess right now.
The problem is we are NOT a total mess.If this team sank to 2-14 for a few seasons and merchandise sales dwindled and interest started to wane that may startle Jerry into action.

But this team has some great players who work hard and want to win, and yes Romo is on that list. For every boneheaded mistake he makes that costs us a game he wins us 3.

I don't have an answer, Jerry needs to figure this out. He needs to learn football and fast
That's the thing bro, Romo doesn't win games; he participates, and hopes that he doesn't screw up. He's not a bad quarterback, buts he's just unlucky football player. He might be what you would call fool's gold. When the Giants went to Dallas? A complete flop. He had the best game of his career in Baltimore, they still didn't win. He didn't put up enough points on an NO defense, and even less against the Redskins with the season on the line. The hold, the lights... He's tough, but even that brilliant game in SF last year was won by the receiver, Romo just participated. How many Quarterbacks in recent history have put up the 'stats' that Tony Romo has relative to their peers and seen this little success? That's for Jimmy, Jerry.
 
'Jaruta said:
The problem right now very simply is that we just re-did a bunch of deals that pushed more cap into future years on some questionable talent. In addition to that, both Spencer and Romo count for close to 26 million. They both have us by the short and curlies as far as re-doing their deals. I'm not a cap expert, but I know enough about basic economics and budgeting to know that we are playing a dangerous game.

Now also consider the new cap hits over the next couple of years with a low to flat cap increase. All while having some young players needing to be re-signed. Dez, Lee, Carter, Claiborne, Murray and Harris.

Is this sinking in to some of the more casual fans?
I kind of think everyone here realizes thatI also think everyone here agrees we should be working on the o-line, but it is simply not going to happen. Jerry said it himself, he thinks he can skimp there because Romo is mobile.I guess the good news is if the team is strapping itself for cash for the next several seasons, at leas we know they would probably not use the cash properly, so it is not a huge loss.
Please point me in the direction where Jerry said this.
really?ok give me a few

it was right around the time he wanted to make sure we all credit him if the cowboys win a super bowl
:wall: Wow.....thanks for the link....I might regret saying this but after reading Jerry's thoughts I'm starting to feel a little like Bankerguy and culdeus. How can an owner who won 3 Super Bowls with the one of the best offensive lines in the history of football now all of a sudden not realize the significance of at least having an average line?
Good, then hopefully you'll start to understand that not liking the direction of your fav team does not = not loving them.

We are a total mess right now.
The problem is we are NOT a total mess.If this team sank to 2-14 for a few seasons and merchandise sales dwindled and interest started to wane that may startle Jerry into action.

But this team has some great players who work hard and want to win, and yes Romo is on that list. For every boneheaded mistake he makes that costs us a game he wins us 3.

I don't have an answer, Jerry needs to figure this out. He needs to learn football and fast
That's the thing bro, Romo doesn't win games; he participates, and hopes that he doesn't screw up. He's not a bad quarterback, buts he's just unlucky football player. He might be what you would call fool's gold. When the Giants went to Dallas? A complete flop. He had the best game of his career in Baltimore, they still didn't win. He didn't put up enough points on an NO defense, and even less against the Redskins with the season on the line. The hold, the lights... He's tough, but even that brilliant game in SF last year was won by the receiver, Romo just participated. How many Quarterbacks in recent history have put up the 'stats' that Tony Romo has relative to their peers and seen this little success? That's for Jimmy, Jerry.
Yea so um...... Just no.
 
'Jaruta said:
The problem right now very simply is that we just re-did a bunch of deals that pushed more cap into future years on some questionable talent. In addition to that, both Spencer and Romo count for close to 26 million. They both have us by the short and curlies as far as re-doing their deals. I'm not a cap expert, but I know enough about basic economics and budgeting to know that we are playing a dangerous game.

Now also consider the new cap hits over the next couple of years with a low to flat cap increase. All while having some young players needing to be re-signed. Dez, Lee, Carter, Claiborne, Murray and Harris.

Is this sinking in to some of the more casual fans?
I kind of think everyone here realizes thatI also think everyone here agrees we should be working on the o-line, but it is simply not going to happen. Jerry said it himself, he thinks he can skimp there because Romo is mobile.I guess the good news is if the team is strapping itself for cash for the next several seasons, at leas we know they would probably not use the cash properly, so it is not a huge loss.
Please point me in the direction where Jerry said this.
really?ok give me a few

it was right around the time he wanted to make sure we all credit him if the cowboys win a super bowl
:wall: Wow.....thanks for the link....I might regret saying this but after reading Jerry's thoughts I'm starting to feel a little like Bankerguy and culdeus. How can an owner who won 3 Super Bowls with the one of the best offensive lines in the history of football now all of a sudden not realize the significance of at least having an average line?
Good, then hopefully you'll start to understand that not liking the direction of your fav team does not = not loving them.

We are a total mess right now.
The problem is we are NOT a total mess.If this team sank to 2-14 for a few seasons and merchandise sales dwindled and interest started to wane that may startle Jerry into action.

But this team has some great players who work hard and want to win, and yes Romo is on that list. For every boneheaded mistake he makes that costs us a game he wins us 3.

I don't have an answer, Jerry needs to figure this out. He needs to learn football and fast
That's the thing bro, Romo doesn't win games; he participates, and hopes that he doesn't screw up. He's not a bad quarterback, buts he's just unlucky football player. He might be what you would call fool's gold. When the Giants went to Dallas? A complete flop. He had the best game of his career in Baltimore, they still didn't win. He didn't put up enough points on an NO defense, and even less against the Redskins with the season on the line. The hold, the lights... He's tough, but even that brilliant game in SF last year was won by the receiver, Romo just participated. How many Quarterbacks in recent history have put up the 'stats' that Tony Romo has relative to their peers and seen this little success? That's for Jimmy, Jerry.
Yea so um...... Just no.
:goodposting: they have no running game and no offensive line

any offense they have is attributable to Romo putting his life on the line and making things happen

Now if you want to say Romo cannot put a team on his shoulders and win a championship, I may agree. But he wins, and wins a lot.

 
Like I said... Fools gold. BTW, Rodgers Brady, flacco, and other qbs that have won games that count all come cheaper too. On the bright side, At least or not the guys paying:)

 
then you missed this brutal assessment:
The New York Giants are the best team in the NFC East. General manager Jerry Reese has had a very strong offseason, signing three likely starters in pass-catching tight end Brandon Myers, versatile defensive lineman Cullen Jenkins and former Cowboys linebacker Dan Connor. Reese also added a fourth receiver in Louis Murphy and brought back old friend Aaron Ross at corner.

I love what Chip Kelly and the Philadelphia Eagles have done, upgrading with defensive end Connor Barwin, cornerback Cary Williams and safety Kenny Phillips on defense, as well as tight end James Casey on offense. Kelly, as we've penned before, is the right coach at the right time for Philly.

Meanwhile, whether Robert Griffin III or Kirk Cousins is playing quarterback for the Washington Redskins, that team is better than Dallas.

If the Cowboys were in the NFC West, they'd be in fifth place, behind the conference's two most well-rounded squads in the Seattle Seahawks and San Francisco 49ers, as well as the St. Louis Rams (love the addition of Jake Long) and Arizona Cardinals (I told you they were going to sign Drew Stanton to play for Coach of the Year Bruce Arians).

Sean Payton is back; thus, so are the New Orleans Saints. The Atlanta Falcons are better than Dallas, obviously. So are the Green Bay Packers, Chicago Bears and -- now that they have Greg Jennings -- Minnesota Vikings.

So congrats, Dallas. You are lumped in with the Detroit Lions (who have work to do, as much as I loved the Reggie Bush signing), Carolina Panthers (who must significantly improve their defense, offensive line and receiving corps) and Tampa Bay Buccaneers (who aren't quite there yet, though of course we can reconsider their status if and when they land Darrelle Revis). You are behind St. Louis. Your owner has made your coach a dead man walking.
 
Found this...great info on our schedule.

Most times opened at home(out of 11):

1. Browns 10

2. Packers 8

2. Texans 8

2. Giants 8

2. Redskins 8

22. Lions 4

32. Cowboys 2

Most times closing out the season at home(out of 11):

1. Texans 9

2. Broncos 8

2. Chargers 8

4. Redskins 7

4. Eagles 7

18. Lions 5

30. Cowboys 3

Most home games combined(opener and finale)(out of 22):

1. Texans 17

2. Browns 16

3. Redskins 15

4. Patriots 14

4. Giants 14

25. Lions 9

32. Cowboys 5

Most times both opening and closing at home in the same season:

1. Texans 7

2. Redskins 6

3. Browns 5

4. Patriots 4

5. Packers 4

15. Lions 2

32. Cowboys 0(the only team not to have done this at least once since 2000)

Fewest times both opening and closing on the road in the same season:

1. Browns 0

2. Giants 0

3. Texans 1

3. Patriots 1

3. Packers 1

15. Lions 3

32. Cowboys 6

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Found this...great info on our schedule.Most times opened at home(out of 11): 1. Browns 10 2. Packers 8 2. Texans 8 2. Giants 8 2. Redskins 8 22. Lions 4 32. Cowboys 2 Most times closing out the season at home(out of 11): 1. Texans 9 2. Broncos 8 2. Chargers 8 4. Redskins 7 4. Eagles 7 18. Lions 5 30. Cowboys 3 Most home games combined(opener and finale)(out of 22): 1. Texans 17 2. Browns 16 3. Redskins 15 4. Patriots 14 4. Giants 14 25. Lions 9 32. Cowboys 5 Most times both opening and closing at home in the same season: 1. Texans 7 2. Redskins 6 3. Browns 5 4. Patriots 4 5. Packers 4 15. Lions 2 32. Cowboys 0(the only team not to have done this at least once since 2000) Fewest times both opening and closing on the road in the same season: 1. Browns 0 2. Giants 0 3. Texans 1 3. Patriots 1 3. Packers 1 15. Lions 3 32. Cowboys 6
Interesting.Here are two more stats:Most home games over those 11 seasons:1. Cowboys 88 (tied with 31 other teams)Fewest road games over those 11 seasons:1. Cowboys 88 (tied with 31 other teams)Just busting your chops a little bit. I think the lack of home openers/closers has probably affected the Cowboys more than other teams because Jones focuses on talent over mental toughness/character, and that mental toughness/character is what helps you open the season or close the season strong in a hostile environment.
 
I think the lack of home openers/closers has probably affected the Cowboys more than other teams because Jones focuses on talent over mental toughness/character, and that mental toughness/character is what helps you open the season or close the season strong in a hostile environment.
Garrett has made it a major priority to get character guys. I think I just read that there are only about 14 guys left on the team who were there when he took over from Wade. Jason seems to agree with you, dhockster.
 
Found this...great info on our schedule.Most times opened at home(out of 11): 1. Browns 10 2. Packers 8 2. Texans 8 2. Giants 8 2. Redskins 8 22. Lions 4 32. Cowboys 2 Most times closing out the season at home(out of 11): 1. Texans 9 2. Broncos 8 2. Chargers 8 4. Redskins 7 4. Eagles 7 18. Lions 5 30. Cowboys 3 Most home games combined(opener and finale)(out of 22): 1. Texans 17 2. Browns 16 3. Redskins 15 4. Patriots 14 4. Giants 14 25. Lions 9 32. Cowboys 5 Most times both opening and closing at home in the same season: 1. Texans 7 2. Redskins 6 3. Browns 5 4. Patriots 4 5. Packers 4 15. Lions 2 32. Cowboys 0(the only team not to have done this at least once since 2000) Fewest times both opening and closing on the road in the same season: 1. Browns 0 2. Giants 0 3. Texans 1 3. Patriots 1 3. Packers 1 15. Lions 3 32. Cowboys 6
notice the lions & cowboys on your list, must be because IIRC they always play at home the week before thanksgiving and thanksgiving of course
 
then you missed this brutal assessment:
The New York Giants are the best team in the NFC East. General manager Jerry Reese has had a very strong offseason, signing three likely starters in pass-catching tight end Brandon Myers, versatile defensive lineman Cullen Jenkins and former Cowboys linebacker Dan Connor. Reese also added a fourth receiver in Louis Murphy and brought back old friend Aaron Ross at corner.

I love what Chip Kelly and the Philadelphia Eagles have done, upgrading with defensive end Connor Barwin, cornerback Cary Williams and safety Kenny Phillips on defense, as well as tight end James Casey on offense. Kelly, as we've penned before, is the right coach at the right time for Philly.

Meanwhile, whether Robert Griffin III or Kirk Cousins is playing quarterback for the Washington Redskins, that team is better than Dallas.

If the Cowboys were in the NFC West, they'd be in fifth place, behind the conference's two most well-rounded squads in the Seattle Seahawks and San Francisco 49ers, as well as the St. Louis Rams (love the addition of Jake Long) and Arizona Cardinals (I told you they were going to sign Drew Stanton to play for Coach of the Year Bruce Arians).

Sean Payton is back; thus, so are the New Orleans Saints. The Atlanta Falcons are better than Dallas, obviously. So are the Green Bay Packers, Chicago Bears and -- now that they have Greg Jennings -- Minnesota Vikings.

So congrats, Dallas. You are lumped in with the Detroit Lions (who have work to do, as much as I loved the Reggie Bush signing), Carolina Panthers (who must significantly improve their defense, offensive line and receiving corps) and Tampa Bay Buccaneers (who aren't quite there yet, though of course we can reconsider their status if and when they land Darrelle Revis). You are behind St. Louis. Your owner has made your coach a dead man walking.
I can't stand opinion articles like that. This particular guy thinks the Drew Stanton signing was a good one, so he now thinks Arizona is somehow competitive. A downgrade at TE, a bust DT and a Dallas re-tread LB somehow add up to the best team in the NFC East. Jake Long will save the Rams? Maybe, but he's certainly a huge question mark after his last 2 seasons. Oof. Terrible, imo.I can't, however, argue with his assessment of Seattle and SF. They were good before and have made themselves better in the offseason. Even a blind chicken gets a grain of corn once in a while.

 
then you missed this brutal assessment:
The New York Giants are the best team in the NFC East. General manager Jerry Reese has had a very strong offseason, signing three likely starters in pass-catching tight end Brandon Myers, versatile defensive lineman Cullen Jenkins and former Cowboys linebacker Dan Connor. Reese also added a fourth receiver in Louis Murphy and brought back old friend Aaron Ross at corner.

I love what Chip Kelly and the Philadelphia Eagles have done, upgrading with defensive end Connor Barwin, cornerback Cary Williams and safety Kenny Phillips on defense, as well as tight end James Casey on offense. Kelly, as we've penned before, is the right coach at the right time for Philly.

Meanwhile, whether Robert Griffin III or Kirk Cousins is playing quarterback for the Washington Redskins, that team is better than Dallas.

If the Cowboys were in the NFC West, they'd be in fifth place, behind the conference's two most well-rounded squads in the Seattle Seahawks and San Francisco 49ers, as well as the St. Louis Rams (love the addition of Jake Long) and Arizona Cardinals (I told you they were going to sign Drew Stanton to play for Coach of the Year Bruce Arians).

Sean Payton is back; thus, so are the New Orleans Saints. The Atlanta Falcons are better than Dallas, obviously. So are the Green Bay Packers, Chicago Bears and -- now that they have Greg Jennings -- Minnesota Vikings.

So congrats, Dallas. You are lumped in with the Detroit Lions (who have work to do, as much as I loved the Reggie Bush signing), Carolina Panthers (who must significantly improve their defense, offensive line and receiving corps) and Tampa Bay Buccaneers (who aren't quite there yet, though of course we can reconsider their status if and when they land Darrelle Revis). You are behind St. Louis. Your owner has made your coach a dead man walking.
I can't stand opinion articles like that. This particular guy thinks the Drew Stanton signing was a good one, so he now thinks Arizona is somehow competitive. A downgrade at TE, a bust DT and a Dallas re-tread LB somehow add up to the best team in the NFC East. Jake Long will save the Rams? Maybe, but he's certainly a huge question mark after his last 2 seasons. Oof. Terrible, imo.I can't, however, argue with his assessment of Seattle and SF. They were good before and have made themselves better in the offseason. Even a blind chicken gets a grain of corn once in a while.
Bottom line he's right. We'd finish last in the west.
 
I think the lack of home openers/closers has probably affected the Cowboys more than other teams because Jones focuses on talent over mental toughness/character, and that mental toughness/character is what helps you open the season or close the season strong in a hostile environment.
Garrett has made it a major priority to get character guys. I think I just read that there are only about 14 guys left on the team who were there when he took over from Wade. Jason seems to agree with you, dhockster.
Here's a quote from Garrett regarding character:http://espn.go.com/blog/dallas/cowboys

Garrett said he feels like this current group of players are his guys.

"Absolutely. That’s why this draft is so critical," Garrett said earlier this week from the NFL owners meetings in Phoenix. "You want to be able to continue to add to the culture we’ve developed the last couple years, and a lot of the culture has to do with who you are as a head coach, who your staff is and what they represent. But a lot of it has to do with the people you bring in, the players you bring in, and what they’re all about. We’ve tried to do a really good job of that. We feel good about how we’ve drafted, how we’ve kind of structured our football team, and the kinds of people we’re bringing in."

 
'Ridgelake said:
I think the lack of home openers/closers has probably affected the Cowboys more than other teams because Jones focuses on talent over mental toughness/character, and that mental toughness/character is what helps you open the season or close the season strong in a hostile environment.
Garrett has made it a major priority to get character guys. I think I just read that there are only about 14 guys left on the team who were there when he took over from Wade. Jason seems to agree with you, dhockster.
Here's a quote from Garrett regarding character:http://espn.go.com/blog/dallas/cowboys

Garrett said he feels like this current group of players are his guys.

"Absolutely. That’s why this draft is so critical," Garrett said earlier this week from the NFL owners meetings in Phoenix. "You want to be able to continue to add to the culture we’ve developed the last couple years, and a lot of the culture has to do with who you are as a head coach, who your staff is and what they represent. But a lot of it has to do with the people you bring in, the players you bring in, and what they’re all about. We’ve tried to do a really good job of that. We feel good about how we’ve drafted, how we’ve kind of structured our football team, and the kinds of people we’re bringing in."
Who do you think has final say on draft picks? Jones or Garrett?
 
'Ridgelake said:
I think the lack of home openers/closers has probably affected the Cowboys more than other teams because Jones focuses on talent over mental toughness/character, and that mental toughness/character is what helps you open the season or close the season strong in a hostile environment.
Garrett has made it a major priority to get character guys. I think I just read that there are only about 14 guys left on the team who were there when he took over from Wade. Jason seems to agree with you, dhockster.
Here's a quote from Garrett regarding character:http://espn.go.com/blog/dallas/cowboys

Garrett said he feels like this current group of players are his guys.

"Absolutely. That’s why this draft is so critical," Garrett said earlier this week from the NFL owners meetings in Phoenix. "You want to be able to continue to add to the culture we’ve developed the last couple years, and a lot of the culture has to do with who you are as a head coach, who your staff is and what they represent. But a lot of it has to do with the people you bring in, the players you bring in, and what they’re all about. We’ve tried to do a really good job of that. We feel good about how we’ve drafted, how we’ve kind of structured our football team, and the kinds of people we’re bringing in."
Who do you think has final say on draft picks? Jones or Garrett?
And why the hell bring in Rob Ryan only to dispatch him a couple seasons later.The answer is this is all window dressing. They have given zero indication there is any sort of plan in place. Every coach will say they think character is a critical component to success. Garrett doesn't own a monopoly on this idea, nor is there any string indication they are adding/subtracting players based on this.

 
Neither. Durant agreed to a 2 year deal, he can't actually sign with the Cowboys until one of the others restructures.http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/26/cowboys-agree-to-sign-justin-durant-someday/It's the Jerry Jones way of doing business.
Wow you should be a detective, NOT. :thumbdown: It's obvious he "agreed" verbally because he'll get the deal sooner rather than later. Otherwise why commit?Rumors have been rampant over the last few days about Romo and Spencer. One must be close for the Boysto give the verbal offer and get the verbal response. I suspect its ROMO, but fishing to see if others have any info.
 
Neither. Durant agreed to a 2 year deal, he can't actually sign with the Cowboys until one of the others restructures.http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/26/cowboys-agree-to-sign-justin-durant-someday/It's the Jerry Jones way of doing business.
Wow you should be a detective, NOT. :thumbdown: It's obvious he "agreed" verbally because he'll get the deal sooner rather than later. Otherwise why commit?Rumors have been rampant over the last few days about Romo and Spencer. One must be close for the Boysto give the verbal offer and get the verbal response. I suspect its ROMO, but fishing to see if others have any info.
Why ask the question if you don't want an answer? For what it's worth, the Pro Football Talk gave the impression thata restructure for Romo or Spencer is not imminent at this time. Which is why I gave you the link.As far as Durant committing before he can actually sign, I don't know why he would to that. It seems stupid to me, butthere are plenty of un-smart football players out there.I tried to be a help to you, because it seemed like you thought someone had actually restructured their deal. I apologize thatI didn't realize you were looking for inside information about what was going to happen in the future.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Apology accepted ;) Just as many rumors saying their will be a restructure soon. http://espn.go.com/blog/nfceastTrying to see if the Boys can actualy sign a few FA's that we desperately need that's all.
I will stop beating this dead horse after this point: The link you provided was not a rumor, it was speculation. Like you,Dan Graziano is speculating that a restructure must be close or Durant would not have agreed. He is not quoting any source thathe heard a restructure is close. He also, in another entry, says that Huff won't agree and wait for a restructure to get done (like Durant is doing).To me, at least, it appears the Cowboys still have some work to do on these re-structures.
 
Just to show my heart is in the right place, Big Dave, Dan Graziano is reporting the Cowboys have also reached an agreement with Will Allen. To clear spaceto sign both he and Durant, it could be another player cut, and not the restructuring of Romo or Spencer, that gets this done.http://espn.go.com/blog/nflnation/post/_/id/74776/another-conditional-signing-for-cowboys
Looks like you're right based on today's reports. :thumbup: Allen and Durant added due to restructuring of Orton and Armstrong cut. Didn't see that coming, but I like it. It means more $ when and if Spencer is restructured. Extra $ when Romo does his. Also on the radio was a rumor by Adam Schefter that Free was restructuring. Hopefully a big discount to save more $$$. Looks as if we're not going safety at #18. My desire would be OL and DL round 1 & 2.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just to show my heart is in the right place, Big Dave, Dan Graziano is reporting the Cowboys have also reached an agreement with Will Allen. To clear spaceto sign both he and Durant, it could be another player cut, and not the restructuring of Romo or Spencer, that gets this done.http://espn.go.com/blog/nflnation/post/_/id/74776/another-conditional-signing-for-cowboys
Looks like you're right based on today's reports. :thumbup: Allen and Durant added due to restructuring of Orton and Armstrong cut. Didn't see that coming, but I like it. It means more $ when and if Spencer is restructured. Extra $ when Romo does his. Also on the radio was a rumor by Adam Schefter that Free was restructuring. Hopefully a big discount to save more $$$. Looks as if we're not going safety at #18. My desire would be OL and DL round 1 & 2.
There does seem to be a lot of quality safety prospects in round 2. I would not be averse to taking one then. I have been pushing Vacarro some, but I'd rather see a big lug in round 1.
 
We have young safeties on the roster already. Allen is a good signing to bridge the gap. No safety in round one please.

Round 1- Best available OG.

Round 2- Best available DL.

Round 3- Best available OL.

Round 4 Best available RB. (I am not sold on any of the backups. Murray cant stay healthy)

Wouldn't hate seeing them draft a guy like Landry Jones or the guy from Arkansas to groom for the future.

 
We have young safeties on the roster already. Allen is a good signing to bridge the gap. No safety in round one please.Round 1- Best available OG.Round 2- Best available DL.Round 3- Best available OL. Round 4 Best available RB. (I am not sold on any of the backups. Murray cant stay healthy)Wouldn't hate seeing them draft a guy like Landry Jones or the guy from Arkansas to groom for the future.
At #18 if Warmack and Cooper are gone(hopefully not), then go DT if Richardson or Lotulelei are around. Anyone would be great at #18. IF they're all gone, lets see the Boys drop back to 23 or 25 with St. L or Minn. and pickup another third rounder we could desperately use. :thumbup:
 
We have young safeties on the roster already. Allen is a good signing to bridge the gap. No safety in round one please.Round 1- Best available OG.Round 2- Best available DL.Round 3- Best available OL. Round 4 Best available RB. (I am not sold on any of the backups. Murray cant stay healthy)Wouldn't hate seeing them draft a guy like Landry Jones or the guy from Arkansas to groom for the future.
At #18 if Warmack and Cooper are gone(hopefully not), then go DT if Richardson or Lotulelei are around. Anyone would be great at #18. IF they're all gone, lets see the Boys drop back to 23 or 25 with St. L or Minn. and pickup another third rounder we could desperately use. :thumbup:
:goodposting: Even with Lotulelei's recent heart issue I dont think there is any way possible he slips out of the top 10, maybe top 5.
 
We have young safeties on the roster already. Allen is a good signing to bridge the gap. No safety in round one please.

Round 1- Best available OG.

Round 2- Best available DL.

Round 3- Best available OL.

Round 4 Best available RB. (I am not sold on any of the backups. Murray cant stay healthy)

Wouldn't hate seeing them draft a guy like Landry Jones or the guy from Arkansas to groom for the future.
Who? I did a dance today when I heard Sensenbaugh was let go. We have had the worst safety play in the entire league since Woodson retired and Roy got fat.

 
I want Cooper as a Center in round 1. I think he translates to an elite center moreso then at G.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Like the Durant signing....could be our Sam, if he can beat out Albright.

Not sure I love the Allen signing.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just to show my heart is in the right place, Big Dave, Dan Graziano is reporting the Cowboys have also reached an agreement with Will Allen. To clear spaceto sign both he and Durant, it could be another player cut, and not the restructuring of Romo or Spencer, that gets this done.http://espn.go.com/blog/nflnation/post/_/id/74776/another-conditional-signing-for-cowboys
Looks like you're right based on today's reports. :thumbup: Allen and Durant added due to restructuring of Orton and Armstrong cut. Didn't see that coming, but I like it. It means more $ when and if Spencer is restructured. Extra $ when Romo does his. Also on the radio was a rumor by Adam Schefter that Free was restructuring. Hopefully a big discount to save more $$$. Looks as if we're not going safety at #18. My desire would be OL and DL round 1 & 2.
There does seem to be a lot of quality safety prospects in round 2. I would not be averse to taking one then. I have been pushing Vacarro some, but I'd rather see a big lug in round 1.
I'm not real jazzed about taking a S in the first round who runs a 4.68 and is not known as a ballhawk.
 
We have young safeties on the roster already. Allen is a good signing to bridge the gap. No safety in round one please.

Round 1- Best available OG.

Round 2- Best available DL.

Round 3- Best available OL.

Round 4 Best available RB. (I am not sold on any of the backups. Murray cant stay healthy)

Wouldn't hate seeing them draft a guy like Landry Jones or the guy from Arkansas to groom for the future.
Who? I did a dance today when I heard Sensenbaugh was let go. We have had the worst safety play in the entire league since Woodson retired and Roy got fat.
Sensabaugh sucked.Church was given a new contract even though he was hurt. I liked what I saw out of him.

Matt Johnson has talent and they obviously like him.

How will they know if these guys are good if they dont get to play.

 
Wouldnt mind seeing them bring in Rhonde Barber to help the team learn the Tampa defense. He is a free agent and would be fairly cheap. Maybe even keep him on after this season as an assistant.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top