YepLooked to me like he kicked it. He tried to get his stick on it but whiffed and the only thing he had left was his foot. He kicked it.
Looked to me like he kicked it. He tried to get his stick on it but whiffed and the only thing he had left was his foot. He kicked it.
Fortunately for you it is played at least every couple years. In a commercial or a montage intro for the playoffs. I always get to see it! Love it!Dickie Dunn said:I have to watch that clip every couple of years to remember Gretzky was playing for the Blues (and fumbled the puck right before Stevie Y's bomb).
And he distinctly turned his ankle at the end and kicked it in. There are many videos that shoe that.It was normal follow through of his left skate on a cross-over turning to the left to avoid slamming into the post.
"Count It"
On the Sportsnet/CBC broadcast Kevin Bieksa said Coleman did a great job of making it look like he accidentally kicked the puck in the net. Accidentally on purpose.It was normal follow through of his left skate on a cross-over turning to the left to avoid slamming into the post.
"Count It"
sliding? more like a triple Lindy.@hayyyshayyy: Kuemper goes sliding, Manson makes the save https://twitter.com/hayyyshayyy/status/1530364328234426368/video/1
1. You want a goalie kicked in the face?Kicking motion rule is dumb.
also had no clue Darren Helm was still in the league.
If the Bolts make the final I want the Avs.Blues made that more of a series than I thought they would. Pretty successful season… I was entertained for most of the winter. This is looking like Avs and Ning in the finals. That would be a good one.
took me a second to realize 2 wasn't the answer to 1.1. You want a goalie kicked in the face?
2. me too.
Coleman’s skate was nowhere near a goalie’s face.1. You want a goalie kicked in the face?
2. me too.
You said the rule is dumb. So if you allow any kicking, some goalie is going to get a skate in the face.Coleman’s skate was nowhere near a goalie’s face.
Be careful what you wish for. I would give the Lightning the edge due to Vasilevskiy being way better (IMO) than Kuemper, the latter of whom didn't overly impress me in this last series vs the Blues, but when the Avs get cranking on offense, it is like a tidal wave. If that is the finals, and I think it will be, it should be a great series.If the Bolts make the final I want the Avs.
Why not allow goals that pose no risk to player safety? Skate touches the ice, good goal regardless of any kicking motion. Which can look just like a normal hockey stop in some cases.You said the rule is dumb. So if you allow any kicking, some goalie is going to get a skate in the face.
Can’t wait for the reviews to try and determine if a skate blade is barely touching the ice or not. There’s no easy fix to this one unless you just allow kicking and move on which will be great until a goalie gets injured.Why not allow goals that pose no risk to player safety? Skate touches the ice, good goal regardless of any kicking motion. Which can look just like a normal hockey stop in some cases.
I will be pulling for the Maroon dynasty train to motor on.If the Bolts make the final I want the Avs.
I see a lot of Blues fans laying this on emotion. Should have just been “fired up”. The reality is that they are a poor team against a good forecheck. Colorado doesn’t need any help generating offense but when you add in that we are so bad at exiting our zone it’s a recipe for disaster. We missed Binningtons stick handling which helped neutralize it a bit but Colorado and Vegas have been killing us the past two years because they are fast and relentless and our defense melts against it. Parayko is really disappointing to me in this department especially. He was awful last night.The Blues earned their fate. Sports really baffle me sometimes, as I just don't get how a team can come out and lack such fire and energy for most of a home game with your season on the line. Avs were the better team tonight by a lot.
Avs vs Oilers should be fun. Avs might score 10 goals in one of those games.
Good points.I see a lot of Blues fans laying this on emotion. Should have just been “fired up”. The reality is that they are a poor team against a good forecheck. Colorado doesn’t need any help generating offense but when you add in that we are so bad at exiting our zone it’s a recipe for disaster. We missed Binningtons stick handling which helped neutralize it a bit but Colorado and Vegas have been killing us the past two years because they are fast and relentless and our defense melts against it. Parayko is really disappointing to me in this department especially. He was awful last night.
I look at it like the Bolts are playing with house money at this point so I think the most emphatic way to stamp that dynasty status would be to beat what is perceived as the best team in the league. Of course, I’ll be happy with whatever. Seeing McDavid in the final would also be amazing.Be careful what you wish for. I would give the Lightning the edge due to Vasilevskiy being way better (IMO) than Kuemper, the latter of whom didn't overly impress me in this last series vs the Blues, but when the Avs get cranking on offense, it is like a tidal wave. If that is the finals, and I think it will be, it should be a great series.
Tampa has the ability to play any team’s game and be better at it, and they have that same ability to score in waves. It would be a great series, so we’ll see what happens.Be careful what you wish for. I would give the Lightning the edge due to Vasilevskiy being way better (IMO) than Kuemper, the latter of whom didn't overly impress me in this last series vs the Blues, but when the Avs get cranking on offense, it is like a tidal wave. If that is the finals, and I think it will be, it should be a great series.
If the Lightning win it again, their dynasty status is set, regardless if it happens over Colorado over Edmonton, but I agree that it happening against the Avs would give this title a bit more sparkle.I look at it like the Bolts are playing with house money at this point so I think the most emphatic way to stamp that dynasty status would be to beat what is perceived as the best team in the league. Of course, I’ll be happy with whatever. Seeing McDavid in the final would also be amazing.
Yep, yep, about the Lightning's offense. The edge in goal is why I'd give them the edge, but the team still trying to get to the top of the mountain can sometimes have that little extra something that the team that has already been there doesn't.Tampa has the ability to play any team’s game and be better at it, and they have that same ability to score in waves. It would be a great series, so we’ll see what happens.
I felt this was Toronto in round 1. They definitely had more spurt in them for first 5.5 games but once Tampa won that game 6, then game 7 seemed like a formality. And now they haven’t looked back.Yep, yep, about the Lightning's offense. The edge in goal is why I'd give them the edge, but the team still trying to get to the top of the mountain can sometimes have that little extra something that the team that has already been there doesn't.
I don't recall ever seeing a G get two assists in a game.
I’m sure they’ve scouted both out. Somebody said no matter who it is they’ll travel Tuesday morning. This series will definitely be a rest vs rust trial.You would think Tampa would be licking their chops to play either of these teams Wednesday on less than 48 hours' rest. But on the flip side, the Lightning won't even know until about 11:00 Monday night where they will be traveling for that game.
They went thru this the last time around and that's how they landed on "distinct kicking motion" being the qualifier.Can’t wait for the reviews to try and determine if a skate blade is barely touching the ice or not. There’s no easy fix to this one unless you just allow kicking and move on which will be great until a goalie gets injured.
I’m sure they’ve scouted both out. Somebody said no matter who it is they’ll travel Tuesday morning. This series will definitely be a rest vs rust trial.
And a 2 minute minor.I don't recall ever seeing a G get two assists in a game.
Just that he’s not likely to play this seriesHave you heard anything on Point?
I think you guys get the win tomorrow. I think it will come down to goaltending. I know the Canes can't beat Tampa. They are a little bit better everywhere and a lot in goal and PP. I think Tampa is a lock for the finals but the Rangers would put up a better fight than the Canes IMO. Canes would lose game one at home and series over.AcerFC said:I think Gallant has to sit the Mika line until Rod the Bod throws the Stall line out first. Can’t keep doing the same ole thing and expect any differences.
Yea don’t want to crap on the Canes but I think the Bolts have them outflanked everywhere and would win in 5. Confident they’d beat the Rangers, but that goalie could steal some games.I think you guys get the win tomorrow. I think it will come down to goaltending. I know the Canes can't beat Tampa. They are a little bit better everywhere and a lot in goal and PP. I think Tampa is a lock for the finals but the Rangers would put up a better fight than the Canes IMO. Canes would lose game one at home and series over.