Capella
Footballguy
We can just agree to disagree. Caps are good for parity, but I don’t think a non-capped league sees a significant difference.Both good points. Perhaps I misread your "indisputable parity" as implying that the NHL doesn't have parity. However, that doesn't change my opinion that baseball does not have parity.
And you're right, I should have combined TSP. My mistake.
That still doesn't change my mind that a salary cap is a good thing. The ability of owners in large markets to drive revenue via local cable television contracts (not to mention owning networks (e.g., YES, SNY)) splits the league into have and have nots. Small market owners operating at a consistent loss (i.e., spending more on salaries than they take in at the gate/local TV, etc.) is not a sustainable business model.
I don’t really care either way in most instances, but I do think how the owners (and I guess the players agreed to it because what choice do they have) have suppressed the cap for this year and the next 2-3 is unfair to the players and even to the teams who couldn’t possibly plan for such an event. Lots of players are getting paid a lot less for the next few years because of this situation. And since it’s an escrow tie-in, the Coyotes playing in a 5k arena isn’t gonna help. It’s not right!