humpback, please stop. You're the turd floating in the pool here.
humpback, please stop. You're the turd floating in the pool here.![]()
We got a STALKA! Troll be gone. Clueless at best.
Darby looks pretty good to me in those clips, and PFF said he was the Bills 4th-best player this week I think.
AlsoDarby looks pretty good to me in those clips, and PFF said he was the Bills 4th-best player this week I think.
at that last bonus gif of Charles Clay.The ignore feature is a beautiful thing. Figured out where it's located. Problem fixed.You think he'll ever realize that not responding to every post is an option?
I don't think Tannehill will be getting rid of the ball nearly as quickly as Brady did.I worry about the Dolphins front four- This I believe is Miami's home opener. Landry lining up all over the place and in the slot, Going to need our DB's to do a better job on him than on Edelman. I hope because Tannehill isn't following the Brady script and shotgun throwing quick routes. We will be able to form a pass rush if thats not the case. Hoping he hasn't seen any of the blitzes we plan on sending because last week rushing 4-5 wasn't getting it done and Dareus and Kyle got no idea pressure on most occasions.
Anyone know if Miami is going to be without Albert? I assume Wake is playing.
I don't either but you'd think these teams would just tell their QB's to stand there and throw the ball after 2 seconds. Obviously not everyone can process the field like the greats but still. They only gave up 17 and 23 to the Redskins/Jags - granted I haven't seen them play yet this year, hopefully Roman can get Sammy off Grimes for alittle move him around.I don't think Tannehill will be getting rid of the ball nearly as quickly as Brady did.I worry about the Dolphins front four- This I believe is Miami's home opener. Landry lining up all over the place and in the slot, Going to need our DB's to do a better job on him than on Edelman. I hope because Tannehill isn't following the Brady script and shotgun throwing quick routes. We will be able to form a pass rush if thats not the case. Hoping he hasn't seen any of the blitzes we plan on sending because last week rushing 4-5 wasn't getting it done and Dareus and Kyle got no idea pressure on most occasions.
Anyone know if Miami is going to be without Albert? I assume Wake is playing.
Should be a good game, but Wake and Albert are both banged up and the Dolphins defense hasn't been able to stop anybody yet.
I prefer to think of this as "They gave up 23 to the Jags!"I don't either but you'd think these teams would just tell their QB's to stand there and throw the ball after 2 seconds. Obviously not everyone can process the field like the greats but still. They only gave up 17 and 23 to the Redskins/Jags - granted I haven't seen them play yet this year, hopefully Roman can get Sammy off Grimes for alittle move him around.I don't think Tannehill will be getting rid of the ball nearly as quickly as Brady did.I worry about the Dolphins front four- This I believe is Miami's home opener. Landry lining up all over the place and in the slot, Going to need our DB's to do a better job on him than on Edelman. I hope because Tannehill isn't following the Brady script and shotgun throwing quick routes. We will be able to form a pass rush if thats not the case. Hoping he hasn't seen any of the blitzes we plan on sending because last week rushing 4-5 wasn't getting it done and Dareus and Kyle got no idea pressure on most occasions.
Anyone know if Miami is going to be without Albert? I assume Wake is playing.
Should be a good game, but Wake and Albert are both banged up and the Dolphins defense hasn't been able to stop anybody yet.
I agree. It was evident that they needed to play press coverage and they never really adjusted. Brady just made quick throw after quick throw all day. The stats backed it up as Brady did about 25% better against their off coverage than their press coverage last week. Not every QB can read a defense so perfectly and make all of those quick throws accurately. Not even Brady can do it that well most of the time. He just had an amazing game.I have a lot of faith in this defense. Their flaw in week two was a pretty bad game plan but they were torched by a HOF QB having one of the best games of his life.
Where's the weakness in this D? I think they will show up in Miami and all year.
Agreed. Last week was an anomaly. Bad coaching on one side versus great QB play on the other.I have a lot of faith in this defense. Their flaw in week two was a pretty bad game plan but they were torched by a HOF QB having one of the best games of his life.
Where's the weakness in this D? I think they will show up in Miami and all year.
I agree that the Colts aren't that good, but in a game where: the Bills continually shot themselves in the foot with stupid penalties, played against one of the best QBs in NFL history playing one of his best games ever, against the defending Super Bowl champions, they had the ball with the potential to tie it up late in the game before eventually losing by 1 score.I mean, that was a terrible game on many fronts for the Bills with a ton of self-inflicted wounds against the best team in the league playing at their top level and the Bills lost by just 8 points.It looks like the Bills beat the Colts because the Colts are very bad, rather than the Bills being very good. But I think it's reasonable to expect that a team with a new QB and new coaches doesn't hit their stride until the middle of the season. Hopefully they're good enough to beat the bad and middling teams until then.
A win today would be huge.
The secondary has been exposed in the short and long passing games against both New England and Pittsburgh (preseason, but against the starters). And the front four hasn't been able to generate sufficient pressure on their own without blitzing.I have a lot of faith in this defense. Their flaw in week two was a pretty bad game plan but they were torched by a HOF QB having one of the best games of his life.
Where's the weakness in this D? I think they will show up in Miami and all year.
I don't think they pressed against New England because they knew those receivers could still beat them off the line which would have exposed them to bigger gains down field.I agree. It was evident that they needed to play press coverage and they never really adjusted. Brady just made quick throw after quick throw all day. The stats backed it up as Brady did about 25% better against their off coverage than their press coverage last week. Not every QB can read a defense so perfectly and make all of those quick throws accurately. Not even Brady can do it that well most of the time. He just had an amazing game.I have a lot of faith in this defense. Their flaw in week two was a pretty bad game plan but they were torched by a HOF QB having one of the best games of his life.
Where's the weakness in this D? I think they will show up in Miami and all year.
On a per attempt basis, the Bills are actually ranked 10th against the pass. It's just that due to game situation/game plan, the first two teams totalled 108 passes against them in 2 weeks. That's ridiculous.
They're also 10th in QB rating against, 9th in completion percentage against and 11th in 1st down percentage.
Against the run they're only giving up 3.8 yards per carry and are 2nd in the league in yards per game.
disagreeThe secondary has been exposed in the short and long passing games against both New England and Pittsburgh (preseason, but against the starters). And the front four hasn't been able to generate sufficient pressure on their own without blitzing.I have a lot of faith in this defense. Their flaw in week two was a pretty bad game plan but they were torched by a HOF QB having one of the best games of his life.
Where's the weakness in this D? I think they will show up in Miami and all year.
Would most teams have these issues against New England, Indianapolis and Pittsburgh? Yes, but the Bills defense is supposed to be elite and I haven't really seen anything elite - yet.
I did too, but then again Trent Edwards never danced like a butterfly and stung like a bee.I said this about Trent Edwards so take it with a grain of salt, but I think we have our quarterback.
I was coming here to post this.Biggest concern is all the injuries. Sounds like Watkins may miss some time. Also sounds like they should maybe shutdown McCoy for a game or two.
What's awesome is that Harvin has been a stud and Karlos Williams has been a total beast. Karlos the first rookie RB to have a TD in his first 3 games since Robert Edwards in 1998.
BIll may be>>everyone in AFC that's not a dirty little cheater (Bills >>>> jets, fish.
I keed, I keed, I make joke for you).This is pretty much the first time since the Ted Marchibroda era when I've felt like we have a really good offensive coordinator. I get that it's easy for the OC to look good when the QB is playing well, but I like how the offense has been mixing it up and using players effectively. When my biggest quibble is with a third down run up the middle when the team is up eight touchdowns or whatever it was, you know things are going well.What I think is maybe most interesting of all, other than Tyrod's strong play, is that they blew out two of the supposed AFC contenders while getting virtually nothing from their two best offensive skill position players (McCoy and Watkins) in either game. There is enough talent in this offense to not only carry the load, but demolish teams even if McCoy and Watkins are hurt.
My worry at this point is that we're starting to get into the territory where teams are going to be able to gameplan against Tyrod. They usually say 3-4 games is the amount of film that defensive coaches need to breakdown a QB - and here we are. Let's see how the offense adjusts, because you know defenses are going to.
Agreed. Roman has done an excellent job mixing things up, keeping defenses off balance and playing to his players' strengths. Just a really nicely designed offense so far.This is pretty much the first time since the Ted Marchibroda era when I've felt like we have a really good offensive coordinator. I get that it's easy for the OC to look good when the QB is playing well, but I like how the offense has been mixing it up and using players effectively. When my biggest quibble is with a third down run up the middle when the team is up eight touchdowns or whatever it was, you know things are going well.What I think is maybe most interesting of all, other than Tyrod's strong play, is that they blew out two of the supposed AFC contenders while getting virtually nothing from their two best offensive skill position players (McCoy and Watkins) in either game. There is enough talent in this offense to not only carry the load, but demolish teams even if McCoy and Watkins are hurt.
My worry at this point is that we're starting to get into the territory where teams are going to be able to gameplan against Tyrod. They usually say 3-4 games is the amount of film that defensive coaches need to breakdown a QB - and here we are. Let's see how the offense adjusts, because you know defenses are going to.
For the time being, I feel good about the ability of our staff to out-coach and out-gameplan other teams.
I agree with you that the Bills could actually get better as the season goes along, although that probably won't show up on the scoreboard. All of our wins aren't going to cakewalks like they were against the Colts and Dolphins.Does anyone else think the Bills still have a lot of room to grow, while the Pats are inevitably going to cool off some?
I see these teams moving toward even by midseason.
Their defense is middling this year, and Tom Brady is playing at level even surprising for Tom Brady. He's going to come back to earth a bit.I agree with you that the Bills could actually get better as the season goes along, although that probably won't show up on the scoreboard. All of our wins aren't going to cakewalks like they were against the Colts and Dolphins.Does anyone else think the Bills still have a lot of room to grow, while the Pats are inevitably going to cool off some?
I see these teams moving toward even by midseason.
I've been waiting for New England to come back to earth since the mid-2000s.
I also definitely expect them to show some noticeable improvement as the season goes on. My concern, however, is injuries. A couple injuries at OL, DB, or even LB could really derail the season.I agree with you that the Bills could actually get better as the season goes along, although that probably won't show up on the scoreboard. All of our wins aren't going to cakewalks like they were against the Colts and Dolphins.Does anyone else think the Bills still have a lot of room to grow, while the Pats are inevitably going to cool off some?
I see these teams moving toward even by midseason.
The thing that scared me about the Patriots game was that the Bills got very little pressure on Brady. On paper the Bills D-Line should've crushed the Pats O-Line. And at the same time, their defense seemed to be getting great penetration.Their defense is middling this year, and Tom Brady is playing at level even surprising for Tom Brady. He's going to come back to earth a bit.I agree with you that the Bills could actually get better as the season goes along, although that probably won't show up on the scoreboard. All of our wins aren't going to cakewalks like they were against the Colts and Dolphins.Does anyone else think the Bills still have a lot of room to grow, while the Pats are inevitably going to cool off some?
I see these teams moving toward even by midseason.
I've been waiting for New England to come back to earth since the mid-2000s.
Not getting there in the 1.8 seconds he holds the ball ≠ losing badly in the trenches.ScottNorwood said:The thing that scared me about the Patriots game was that the Bills got very little pressure on Brady. On paper the Bills D-Line should've crushed the Pats O-Line. And at the same time, their defense seemed to be getting great penetration.flysack said:Their defense is middling this year, and Tom Brady is playing at level even surprising for Tom Brady. He's going to come back to earth a bit.IvanKaramazov said:I agree with you that the Bills could actually get better as the season goes along, although that probably won't show up on the scoreboard. All of our wins aren't going to cakewalks like they were against the Colts and Dolphins.flysack said:Does anyone else think the Bills still have a lot of room to grow, while the Pats are inevitably going to cool off some?
I see these teams moving toward even by midseason.
I've been waiting for New England to come back to earth since the mid-2000s.
It might have been a different story in the second half. My stream of the game cut out, and I was so disgusted that I didn't look for another one. But the Bills definitely lost badly in the trenches during the first half of the New England game.
The jury's out on most honestly. Clay seemed like a big all-in gamble w/out a proven qb but obviously Tmobile actually being good could erase that concern and then some. Happy to apparently be wrong about the FSU kids & Incognito; Darby is already playing better than McKelvin ever did. I liked the Harvin signing a lot.The Bills took some heat for quite a few moves they made this offseason. Jury still out on LeSean McCoy, but I have to think people are pretty happy with these:
G Richie Incognito - graded as #1 guard overall in the league by PFF through week 3.
CB Ronald Darby - playing great despite a rough preseason
RB Karlos Williams - leading the league in yards per carry?
QB Tyrod Taylor - looks like the best QB they've had in a long time\
WR Percy Harvin - coming up huge while Watkins is off to a slow stat
LB situation - traded Alonso, but sure doesn't seem like they miss him
DE Jerry Hughes - huge that they were able to keep him in free agency.
TE Charles Clay - wasn't cheap, but he showed what he's capable of on that opening drive against the Dolphins. best TE they've had in forever.
Not just fantasy but real D is more fluid than most think which was why I wasn't super optimistic about the season in general...we were banking on zero drop-off from last yr which I thought was dangerous to do...There's a lot of luck in injuries, redzone TD %, and takeaways. But as long as they're realtively healthy it has to be projected as a top 5 D; I have no idea why that wouldn't be a consensus.How about on the D side of the ball?
Given their moves, Bills were one of the consensus top fantasy Ds coming into the year (along with SEA, HOU, STL, and NYJ). Fantasy D performance is fluid both YoY and WoW and playing the game for real is much different than playing on paper or in preseason (for proof see HOU). But nothing so far this year has made me think the Bills can't easily be Top 5. Bills have held opponents to 14 points, except for NE (which you would know is a hard test for any D).
Yet rankings I've seen -- on this site and elsewhere -- seem to discount the Bills in the Top 10 or just below, among Ds like GB, CIN, CAR, DEN (though that one is justified).
What do you guys see as the outlook for the BUF D going forward, both fantasy and NFL-wise? Are they living up to your expectations? Do you think they will continue to improve like the O over the course of the season?