Biabreakable
Footballguy
1st round pick is no guarantee the player is going to be good.
I do think their first pick should be a lineman either side of the ball.
1st round pick is no guarantee the player is going to be good.
Of course that’s true. Regardless, has to be OL. I’d say they may wait for the 2nd but they already threw that one in the trash can chasing DL.1st round pick is no guarantee the player is going to be good.
I do think their first pick should be a lineman either side of the ball.
Its too bad they wasted the 2nd round pick. Would have been good if they had decided he wouldn't fit the defense before trading for him. I found out pretty quickly after the trade that Ngakoue was not a good run defender and likely not a guy you want to be paying a lot of money to for what should be a pass rush specialist type role in the defense. Just seems like they should have figured that out before trading for him. They watched his tape right?Of course that’s true. Regardless, has to be OL. I’d say they may wait for the 2nd but they already threw that one in the trash can chasing DL.
Yeah, I'm just probably going to be a consistent voice of reason on this. Are there other areas that need to be helped? Of course. I just think it is beyond debate at this point that you're better off fixing that thing that is getting your immobile QB hit 10-14 times a game. What we've seen re: the mediocrity on defense was because they are literally decimated and starting guys who don't belong as NFL starters. The continued mediocrity at OL was a virtually healthy unit. It needs improved personnel. They don't have 5 injured stars returning, unlike the D.They have need of a corner back too although that is likely what people do not want to hear. Right now they have pick 14. I would think they take BPA there, It looks like there are a couple highly mocked offensive linemen going in the top 10. Maybe the Vikings get lucky and one of them falls to their pick.
If they lose to the Saints, which they should, which is why maybe they won't, I think their draft position improves a bit. Which improves their odds of getting one of those two linemen.Yeah, I'm just probably going to be a consistent voice of reason on this. Are there other areas that need to be helped? Of course. I just think it is beyond debate at this point that you're better off fixing that thing that is getting your immobile QB hit 10-14 times a game. What we've seen re: the mediocrity on defense was because they are literally decimated and starting guys who don't belong as NFL starters. The continued mediocrity at OL was a virtually healthy unit. It needs improved personnel. They don't have 5 injured stars returning, unlike the D.
That said, we definitely need DL improved.
I think the only way I might be able to do it would be to move out of state. I’m not sure if even that would workPlease help me quit this team.
You know we can’t let you do that.Please help me quit this team.
I wasn’t surprised for the reasons you mentioned. Those who are disappointed probably saw yesterday as meteoric decline vs the prior weeks where we were similarly undermanned (which it was). Probably others who want to think there are promising young guys who may be able to step into Zim’s system. I’m somewhat in that camp... but clearly not the case.I'm surprised many are surprised with what happened yesterday.. The Vikings were playing 6th string LB's.
JMHO, the state of this team can't tolerate a 1st round pick standing on a sideline holding a clipboard for 1-2 years. Particularly with no 2nd round pick.Ok, I'm bored and week 17 is meaningless...
I will preface this by saying that I am a Kirk Cousins fan, but thinking about the draft, plenty of needs everywhere, but what if one of the QBs falls...Trask, Lance, and I really think Ehlinger will be a good NFL QB (but could maybe be had in the 2nd or 3rd - yes, would have to trade up into the 2nd). Would the Vikings be best served building the lines some more or taking the QB of the future if one is available?
I think they need to keep building the lines.Ok, I'm bored and week 17 is meaningless...
I will preface this by saying that I am a Kirk Cousins fan, but thinking about the draft, plenty of needs everywhere, but what if one of the QBs falls...Trask, Lance, and I really think Ehlinger will be a good NFL QB (but could maybe be had in the 2nd or 3rd - yes, would have to trade up into the 2nd). Would the Vikings be best served building the lines some more or taking the QB of the future if one is available?
I respect your opinion, but this team needs to stop building outside in. They never get to the 'in' part. The key to having an early round QB work out is putting him behind an above average line. They should not even consider putting a top rookie QB behind the existing line.... not that I think a rookie would even see the field this season. It's like building one castle after the next in a marsh.I am torn a little bit because getting a first round QB that could be the future of the franchise on a 5 year (1st rounder) deal would be ideal to help build around what is there already versus the build around the QB that we have. I do think that once his contract is done, that Kirk will have outplayed his contract - everyone see him as overpaid but think he is putting up numbers that would get any other QB a much higher deal. With the salary cap going down, it would probably be best to draft the QB - but they would have to be sure he is going to be a good one and that is where the trouble lies!
Some day, all of this will be yours.It's like building one castle after the next in a marsh.
Ideally, that should be right. What is up with how bad this personnel dept is scouting OL? No pro bowlers so far this century other than a rookie Kalil? What exactly are they scouting for... kind and gentle souls?I agree with your sentiment but you don't necessarily need to draft interior linemen with first rounders. What they DO need to do is start drafting some guys with more lead in their pants.
I agree with you. They need to build the lines and with all the QBs available in this upcoming draft, they may be able to have a high quality lineman fall to them and be "forced" to make the correct decision.I respect your opinion, but this team needs to stop building outside in. They never get to the 'in' part. The key to having an early round QB work out is putting him behind an above average line. They should not even consider putting a top rookie QB behind the existing line.... not that I think a rookie would even see the field this season. It's like building one castle after the next in a marsh.
But I don't want it.Ideally, that should be right. What is up with how bad this personnel dept is scouting OL? No pro bowlers so far this century other than a rookie Kalil? What exactly are they scouting for... kind and gentle souls?
BTW- LOL on the curtains quote. It was exactly the movie scene I was thinking. I've been watching way too much Monty Python lately.
Wow, this post made me throw up in my mouth. I knew it was bad, but eeeeish.But I don't want it.
Its a fair question in regards to the scouting department. However there was a change on that front when Studwell stepped down in 2014 so you would only be looking at 2015 on for this current scouting department.
Here are the offensive linemen they have drafted since then.
1 2020 2 58 Ezra Cleveland T 22 2020 2020 0 0 0 0 12 8 Boise St. College Stats
2 2020 6 203 Blake Brandel T 23 0 0 0 Oregon St. College Stats
3 2020 7 253 Kyle Hinton G 22 0 0 0 Washburn
4 2019 1 18 Garrett Bradbury C 24 2019 2020 0 0 2 8 31 31 North Carolina St. College Stats
5 2019 4 114 Dru Samia G 22 2019 2020 0 0 0 0 14 4 Oklahoma College Stats
6 2019 6 193 Oli Udoh T 22 0 0 0 Elon
7 2018 2 62 Brian O'Neill T 22 2018 2020 0 0 3 15 45 41 Pittsburgh College Stats
8 2018 6 213 Colby Gossett G 23 2018 2018 0 0 0 1 5 4 Appalachian St. College Stats
9 2017 3 70 Pat Elflein C 23 2017 2020 0 0 3 21 49 48 Ohio St. College Stats
10 2017 5 180 Danny Isidora G 23 2017 2020 0 0 0 4 25 6 Miami (FL) College Stats
11 2016 4 121 Willie Beavers T 22 2016 2016 0 0 0 0 2 0 West. Michigan College Stats
12 2015 4 110 T.J. Clemmings T 23 2015 2018 0 0 2 17 41 32 Pittsburgh College Stats
13 2015 6 185 Tyrus Thompson T 23 0 0 0 Oklahoma College Stats
14 2015 7 228 Austin Shepherd T 23 2015 2015 0 0 0 1 14 0 Alabama College Stat
Some of these players are still too young to judge like Cleveland and to a certain extent Bradbury who is just completing his 2nd season.
The Beavers and Clemmings picks were disasters. Elflien wasn't good enough, but he was only a 3rd round pick.
I dunno there is a decent amount of draft capital invested here. A 1st two 2nd a 3rd, 3 fourth round picks.
The Vikings clearly are focusing on quickness and athleticism in their linemen. That is what Clemmings had going for him, converted defensive lineman. The scouting department is finding the players they are looking for. The coaches have to develop them.
I get your point though, that if they cant find any diamonds in the rough (they haven't since John Sullivan) then you need to use higher draft picks to make sure you get a player who can actually start.
The Vikings are a really bad team right now. Not sure if they are bad enough to lose this game against the Lions though. It would certainly help their draft position if they lost this game.
Zimmer must be a total PITA to work for.Looks like Kubiak is "retiring."
From what I see he taking some time to think about it. Nothings decided yet. Zimmers comments leave the door open for Kubiak to return if he wants to.Looks like Kubiak is "retiring."
Yeah, I'm not calling for Kubiak's head or anything. My impression is he needs to freshen it up, a lot. I've heard Leber, Ron Johnson and Bercich each make astute observations on his plain style of lining guys up and running 1990's Denver plays. Some of the observations make a lot of sense. Get to the line quicker so that Cousins can get a longer presnap view. Use motion to give defenders something else to account for and to help Cousins know what scheme they are in. I'm not saying he needs to become a trend setter or anything, but he needs to step into the 21st century at a minimum.From what I see he taking some time to think about it. Nothings decided yet. Zimmers comments leave the door open for Kubiak to return if he wants to.
I for one would like some consistency. Zimmer hasn't had the same OC for longer than a year and a half his whole time coaching the Vikings.
You know as far as scheme goes the Vikings Bears and Packers are all running mostly the same offnse now. The diference is more about who the players are and how they execute it.Yeah, I'm not calling for Kubiak's head or anything. My impression is he needs to freshen it up, a lot. I've heard Leber, Ron Johnson and Bercich each make astute observations on his plain style of lining guys up and running 1990's Denver plays. Some of the observations make a lot of sense. Get to the line quicker so that Cousins can get a longer presnap view. Use motion to give defenders something else to account for and to help Cousins know what scheme they are in. I'm not saying he needs to become a trend setter or anything, but he needs to step into the 21st century at a minimum.
Agree to disagree. Especially comparing Nagy's Chicago offense to anything Kubiak does. Nagy is anything but old school. Green Bay moves the pocket with roll outs constantly.You know as far as scheme goes the Vikings Bears and Packers are all running mostly the same offnse now. The diference is more about who the players are and how they execute it.
The Vikings were doing it first. Now the Bears and Packers are doing it. In the 21st century.
Dont believe the hype of these talking heads who just need something to talk about.
The fundamental aspects of the scheme are the same. The plays and schemes from the 90s that were successful then are still successful now.Agree to disagree. Especially comparing Nagy's Chicago offense to anything Kubiak does. Nagy is anything but old school. Green Bay moves the pocket with roll outs constantly.
Sadly, degrees of sucktitude is the only scale this unit has hierarchy for.There is a hierarchy of levels of suck here.
Probably an equal need as the Vikes should be getting Pierce back next year at DT (he opted out for Covid this year). That should helpI've been reading a lot about the Vikings needing an Edge rusher with their 1st round pick. If Hunter is healthy, I thought Wonnum played really well last year - no idea why he didn't play more!
I'm thinking DT is a much higher priority for them than a DE. Am I wrong about this?
The mock drafters have been mocking edge rusher to the Vikings for about 6 or more seasons in a row now. Because they have not drafted one high for a long time because they had Griffen and Hunter develop into good rushers for them.I've been reading a lot about the Vikings needing an Edge rusher with their 1st round pick. If Hunter is healthy, I thought Wonnum played really well last year - no idea why he didn't play more!
I'm thinking DT is a much higher priority for them than a DE. Am I wrong about this?
Is he going to play tackle or guard?Oh good. Mackensie Alexander is back.
The secondary is actually looking pretty good as far as depth and a mix of experience and youth. Assuming that Peterson can still play at a high level.Andy Dufresne said:Oh good. Mackensie Alexander is back.
I'm guessing Hughes is done with his neck issues. I didn't think Harrison Hand played poorly last year so he should be on the list as well. And now with the addition of Xavier Woods, the secondary is actually quite solid...now, about that O-Line...The secondary is actually looking pretty good as far as depth and a mix of experience and youth. Assuming that Peterson can still play at a high level.
Patrick Peterson
Cameron Dantzler
Jeff Gladney
Mike Hughes
Mackenzie Alexander
Chris Boyd
So Alexander is competing for the 4th CB position and he might be better than Hughes or Boyd. He knows Zimmers expectations already and has experience in the system which seems to help players perform better in it.
These guys...DALLAS (CBSDFW.COM) – Minnesota Vikings cornerback Jeff Gladney has turned himself in to the Dallas County Jail for an alleged felony assault involving his girlfriend.
A warrant was issued for the 24-year-old former Texas Christian University standout for a charge of third degree felony family violence assault. He posted a $10,000 bond after his arrest.
Gladney faces between two to 10 years in prison, if convicted, for an alleged incident that happened on April 2.
A 22-year-old woman, who said she was in a relationship with Gladney, told police she got into an altercation with the NFL player while in a vehicle heading to an apartment complex in southeast Dallas.
Sources told CBS 11 News that Gladney became upset over the woman’s text messages and demanded to see her phone. At one point, sources said the accuser threw her phone out of the window on Elam Road but that Gladney stopped to get it.
Records show he tried “… shoving [her] face toward her phone to try to use the phone’s Face ID to unlock,” and later, “… pulling [her] by her hair trying to hold her still in order to get the Face ID to work.”
Then accuser then said Gladney began to strike her “… with closed fists causing pain in the side of her ribs, in the stomach and the back, and hitting her open hand across the head.”
Then she told detectives the two returned to an apartment complex in Dallas, where she said Gladney “… began strangling [her] by the neck, which impeded her breathing for approximately five seconds,” and later “… grabbed [her] by her hair while the vehicle was still moving and dragged [her] across the ground.”
The woman said she was able to break free and get into a vehicle with unknown passengers. Detectives documented bruising on her head, ears and torso.
She also reported she had scratches on her face and neck and abrasions on her knees.