Capella
Footballguy
Jamal Crawfordwho is the third guy on the call tonight?
Jamal Crawfordwho is the third guy on the call tonight?
Three-time Sixth Man of the Year Jamal Crawford?Jamal Crawfordwho is the third guy on the call tonight?
Just tuned in. Holy hell.Mike Tirico play by play? Oh Gawd....
Tirico is usually good, is he not at basketball?Just tuned in. Holy hell.Mike Tirico play by play? Oh Gawd....
He's awful on SNFTirico is usually good, is he not at basketball?Just tuned in. Holy hell.Mike Tirico play by play? Oh Gawd....
KD for sure pulled a Webber but the refs are cowards

great no call imoKD for sure pulled a Webber but the refs are cowards
What does this mean?KD for sure pulled a Webber but the refs are cowards![]()
Your "refs are cowards" line bores me.What does this mean?KD for sure pulled a Webber but the refs are cowards![]()
It's your pick in the nerd draft.Your "refs are cowards" line bores me.What does this mean?KD for sure pulled a Webber but the refs are cowards![]()
The no-TO technical rule is in place to prevent the clock from being stopped and causing an unnecessary delay of game. Since they never actually awarded the TO before time expired the penalty wasn't necessary, plus it would have been a terrible anti-climactic ending to a great game.
Sorry I don’t actually think these guys are cowards - I figured the hyperbole was obvious. If you’re gonna be serious though I wasn’t aware the enforcement of that rule was a subjective thing where the refs can pick and choose. I mean he obviously called a TO with plenty of time left.Your "refs are cowards" line bores me.What does this mean?KD for sure pulled a Webber but the refs are cowards![]()
The no-TO technical rule is in place to prevent the clock from being stopped and causing an unnecessary delay of game. Since they never actually awarded the TO before time expired the penalty wasn't necessary, plus it would have been a terrible anti-climactic ending to a great game.
hey hey hey lets not sell him short he also shot way too much and did not pass the ball to one of the best players on the planet of all time kd a bunch so he has that going for him at at least take that to the bank bromigoGreat game and win by Thunder. Some terrific D by Durant before he bit and left his feet.
Reed Sheppard is ***
Rockets are in big trouble long term if he's going to be a ball handler and they have any aspirations of being a title contender. Maybe he can become a spot shooter. PG he is not. Dude does nothing but dribble with absolutely zero penetration over and over and over again. Guy has picked his dribble up at half court countless times like he's scared. Small, weak, and didn't seem like he even belonged out there.
Lovebut the Rockets got to find another ball handler. FVV a massive loss.
Great game and win by Thunder. Some terrific D by Durant before he bit and left his feet.
Reed Sheppard is ***
Rockets are in big trouble long term if he's going to be a ball handler and they have any aspirations of being a title contender. Maybe he can become a spot shooter. PG he is not. Dude does nothing but dribble with absolutely zero penetration over and over and over again. Guy has picked his dribble up at half court countless times like he's scared. Small, weak, and didn't seem like he even belonged out there.
Lovebut the Rockets got to find another ball handler. FVV a massive loss.
I was telling my son before the game started that they would be a major contender if FVV didn't get hurt but I'm not sure how deep they can go without him.Great game and win by Thunder. Some terrific D by Durant before he bit and left his feet.
Reed Sheppard is ***
Rockets are in big trouble long term if he's going to be a ball handler and they have any aspirations of being a title contender. Maybe he can become a spot shooter. PG he is not. Dude does nothing but dribble with absolutely zero penetration over and over and over again. Guy has picked his dribble up at half court countless times like he's scared. Small, weak, and didn't seem like he even belonged out there.
Lovebut the Rockets got to find another ball handler. FVV a massive loss.

They made opening day bigger than any playoffs or finals game that espn ever broadcasted.Liking all the NBC tip-off and production so far. Way better than Stephen A and Wilbon yelling at each other.
I don’t even know who this is.It hurts my soul to see the Godfather in a Warriors uniform.
Al HorfordI don’t even know who this is.It hurts my soul to see the Godfather in a Warriors uniform.
Great game and win by Thunder. Some terrific D by Durant before he bit and left his feet.
Reed Sheppard is ***
Rockets are in big trouble long term if he's going to be a ball handler and they have any aspirations of being a title contender. Maybe he can become a spot shooter. PG he is not. Dude does nothing but dribble with absolutely zero penetration over and over and over again. Guy has picked his dribble up at half court countless times like he's scared. Small, weak, can't defend and didn't seem like he even belonged out there.
Lovebut the Rockets got to find another ball handler. FVV a massive loss.
He looks like Jimmer out there.Great game and win by Thunder. Some terrific D by Durant before he bit and left his feet.
Reed Sheppard is ***
Rockets are in big trouble long term if he's going to be a ball handler and they have any aspirations of being a title contender. Maybe he can become a spot shooter. PG he is not. Dude does nothing but dribble with absolutely zero penetration over and over and over again. Guy has picked his dribble up at half court countless times like he's scared. Small, weak, can't defend and didn't seem like he even belonged out there.
Lovebut the Rockets got to find another ball handler. FVV a massive loss.
And then there is his defense.
i thought the link was going to be some analytics to show he was good or something literally in his defense instead it was a link showing that he stinks at defense so yeah there you have it take that to the bank bromigosGreat game and win by Thunder. Some terrific D by Durant before he bit and left his feet.
Reed Sheppard is ***
Rockets are in big trouble long term if he's going to be a ball handler and they have any aspirations of being a title contender. Maybe he can become a spot shooter. PG he is not. Dude does nothing but dribble with absolutely zero penetration over and over and over again. Guy has picked his dribble up at half court countless times like he's scared. Small, weak, can't defend and didn't seem like he even belonged out there.
Lovebut the Rockets got to find another ball handler. FVV a massive loss.
And then there is his defense.
It's not subjective based on the Athletic article about it: "The NBA’s 2025-26 Official Rules address that specific situation in Rule No. 12 — Fouls and Penalties. The rule reads: “Requests for a timeout in excess of the authorized number shall be granted, and a technical foul shall be assessed. Following the timeout and free-throw attempt, the ball will be awarded to the team which shot the free throw, and play shall resume with a throw-in nearest the spot where play was interrupted.”"Sorry I don’t actually think these guys are cowards - I figured the hyperbole was obvious. If you’re gonna be serious though I wasn’t aware the enforcement of that rule was a subjective thing where the refs can pick and choose. I mean he obviously called a TO with plenty of time left.Your "refs are cowards" line bores me.What does this mean?KD for sure pulled a Webber but the refs are cowards![]()
The no-TO technical rule is in place to prevent the clock from being stopped and causing an unnecessary delay of game. Since they never actually awarded the TO before time expired the penalty wasn't necessary, plus it would have been a terrible anti-climactic ending to a great game.
Yea that definitely should have been a tech and free throws. They just missed itIt's not subjective based on the Athletic article about it: "The NBA’s 2025-26 Official Rules address that specific situation in Rule No. 12 — Fouls and Penalties. The rule reads: “Requests for a timeout in excess of the authorized number shall be granted, and a technical foul shall be assessed. Following the timeout and free-throw attempt, the ball will be awarded to the team which shot the free throw, and play shall resume with a throw-in nearest the spot where play was interrupted.”"Sorry I don’t actually think these guys are cowards - I figured the hyperbole was obvious. If you’re gonna be serious though I wasn’t aware the enforcement of that rule was a subjective thing where the refs can pick and choose. I mean he obviously called a TO with plenty of time left.Your "refs are cowards" line bores me.What does this mean?KD for sure pulled a Webber but the refs are cowards![]()
The no-TO technical rule is in place to prevent the clock from being stopped and causing an unnecessary delay of game. Since they never actually awarded the TO before time expired the penalty wasn't necessary, plus it would have been a terrible anti-climactic ending to a great game.
The ref was looking right at him with a good angle. I think he chose not to call it instead of missing it. LInkYea that definitely should have been a tech and free throws. They just missed itIt's not subjective based on the Athletic article about it: "The NBA’s 2025-26 Official Rules address that specific situation in Rule No. 12 — Fouls and Penalties. The rule reads: “Requests for a timeout in excess of the authorized number shall be granted, and a technical foul shall be assessed. Following the timeout and free-throw attempt, the ball will be awarded to the team which shot the free throw, and play shall resume with a throw-in nearest the spot where play was interrupted.”"Sorry I don’t actually think these guys are cowards - I figured the hyperbole was obvious. If you’re gonna be serious though I wasn’t aware the enforcement of that rule was a subjective thing where the refs can pick and choose. I mean he obviously called a TO with plenty of time left.Your "refs are cowards" line bores me.What does this mean?KD for sure pulled a Webber but the refs are cowards![]()
The no-TO technical rule is in place to prevent the clock from being stopped and causing an unnecessary delay of game. Since they never actually awarded the TO before time expired the penalty wasn't necessary, plus it would have been a terrible anti-climactic ending to a great game.
Jabari also signaled for a timeoutThe ref was looking right at him with a good angle. I think he chose not to call it instead of missing it. LInkYea that definitely should have been a tech and free throws. They just missed itIt's not subjective based on the Athletic article about it: "The NBA’s 2025-26 Official Rules address that specific situation in Rule No. 12 — Fouls and Penalties. The rule reads: “Requests for a timeout in excess of the authorized number shall be granted, and a technical foul shall be assessed. Following the timeout and free-throw attempt, the ball will be awarded to the team which shot the free throw, and play shall resume with a throw-in nearest the spot where play was interrupted.”"Sorry I don’t actually think these guys are cowards - I figured the hyperbole was obvious. If you’re gonna be serious though I wasn’t aware the enforcement of that rule was a subjective thing where the refs can pick and choose. I mean he obviously called a TO with plenty of time left.Your "refs are cowards" line bores me.What does this mean?KD for sure pulled a Webber but the refs are cowards![]()
The no-TO technical rule is in place to prevent the clock from being stopped and causing an unnecessary delay of game. Since they never actually awarded the TO before time expired the penalty wasn't necessary, plus it would have been a terrible anti-climactic ending to a great game.
It also looked like Durant walked before giving up the ball to Sengun, thinking he had gotten the TO. Oh well, I was happy to get another OT period. But I would have been upset if I was an OKC fan.Jabari also signaled for a timeoutThe ref was looking right at him with a good angle. I think he chose not to call it instead of missing it. LInkYea that definitely should have been a tech and free throws. They just missed itIt's not subjective based on the Athletic article about it: "The NBA’s 2025-26 Official Rules address that specific situation in Rule No. 12 — Fouls and Penalties. The rule reads: “Requests for a timeout in excess of the authorized number shall be granted, and a technical foul shall be assessed. Following the timeout and free-throw attempt, the ball will be awarded to the team which shot the free throw, and play shall resume with a throw-in nearest the spot where play was interrupted.”"Sorry I don’t actually think these guys are cowards - I figured the hyperbole was obvious. If you’re gonna be serious though I wasn’t aware the enforcement of that rule was a subjective thing where the refs can pick and choose. I mean he obviously called a TO with plenty of time left.Your "refs are cowards" line bores me.What does this mean?KD for sure pulled a Webber but the refs are cowards![]()
The no-TO technical rule is in place to prevent the clock from being stopped and causing an unnecessary delay of game. Since they never actually awarded the TO before time expired the penalty wasn't necessary, plus it would have been a terrible anti-climactic ending to a great game.
Definitely no travel there. Kept his left foot as pivotIt also looked like Durant walked before giving up the ball to Sengun, thinking he had gotten the TO. Oh well, I was happy to get another OT period. But I would have been upset if I was an OKC fan.Jabari also signaled for a timeoutThe ref was looking right at him with a good angle. I think he chose not to call it instead of missing it. LInkYea that definitely should have been a tech and free throws. They just missed itIt's not subjective based on the Athletic article about it: "The NBA’s 2025-26 Official Rules address that specific situation in Rule No. 12 — Fouls and Penalties. The rule reads: “Requests for a timeout in excess of the authorized number shall be granted, and a technical foul shall be assessed. Following the timeout and free-throw attempt, the ball will be awarded to the team which shot the free throw, and play shall resume with a throw-in nearest the spot where play was interrupted.”"Sorry I don’t actually think these guys are cowards - I figured the hyperbole was obvious. If you’re gonna be serious though I wasn’t aware the enforcement of that rule was a subjective thing where the refs can pick and choose. I mean he obviously called a TO with plenty of time left.Your "refs are cowards" line bores me.What does this mean?KD for sure pulled a Webber but the refs are cowards![]()
The no-TO technical rule is in place to prevent the clock from being stopped and causing an unnecessary delay of game. Since they never actually awarded the TO before time expired the penalty wasn't necessary, plus it would have been a terrible anti-climactic ending to a great game.
right foot was the pivot. he took a step with itDefinitely no travel there. Kept his left foot as pivotIt also looked like Durant walked before giving up the ball to Sengun, thinking he had gotten the TO. Oh well, I was happy to get another OT period. But I would have been upset if I was an OKC fan.Jabari also signaled for a timeoutThe ref was looking right at him with a good angle. I think he chose not to call it instead of missing it. LInkYea that definitely should have been a tech and free throws. They just missed itIt's not subjective based on the Athletic article about it: "The NBA’s 2025-26 Official Rules address that specific situation in Rule No. 12 — Fouls and Penalties. The rule reads: “Requests for a timeout in excess of the authorized number shall be granted, and a technical foul shall be assessed. Following the timeout and free-throw attempt, the ball will be awarded to the team which shot the free throw, and play shall resume with a throw-in nearest the spot where play was interrupted.”"Sorry I don’t actually think these guys are cowards - I figured the hyperbole was obvious. If you’re gonna be serious though I wasn’t aware the enforcement of that rule was a subjective thing where the refs can pick and choose. I mean he obviously called a TO with plenty of time left.Your "refs are cowards" line bores me.What does this mean?KD for sure pulled a Webber but the refs are cowards![]()
The no-TO technical rule is in place to prevent the clock from being stopped and causing an unnecessary delay of game. Since they never actually awarded the TO before time expired the penalty wasn't necessary, plus it would have been a terrible anti-climactic ending to a great game.
Looks like you are right, but it was barely a step and more like a foot drag. That is never getting calledright foot was the pivot. he took a step with it
yeah, there's no advantage gainedLooks like you are right, but it was barely a step and more like a foot drag. That is never getting calledright foot was the pivot. he took a step with it
No, ESPN will still broadcast games.does this mean no more Mike Breen on NBA calls??