Sparky Polastri
Footballguy
UGA and OSU are on a pretty similar tier talent wise. OSU is consistently "just better" than them, but they seem to struggle. This is historically true with OSU though, not just the last few years. We are stumbling very much into that subjective territory here where in some cases it mattered, others it didn't apparently. This is my main problem with the whole narrative. It's consistently inconsistent. You will offer up enough exceptions to the rule that then makes the rule really not all that sound to begin with.This whole time? Because you seem very invested in Michigan only being successful because of their cheating. What doesn't square for me with these theories are the blowout losses in playoff games or inexplicable losses in playoff games. Was that all part of their ruse/plan?Michigan was in a major funk going on 20 years of underwhelming. They magically start cheating and win three big ten titles in a row, go to the playoffs three times in a row and win a title, but absolutely no correlation.
There was very much a correlation. That's easy to establish. What hasn't been established is the causation that so many of you have claimed.
I was being cheeky.
Georgia was just better and dominate their other loses were a close one to MSU, when MSU ran no huddle for the first time and to TCU who they didn't scout because they didn't think TCU was going to make it after their Big 12 title game loss and TCU was told they might have their signs and had month to change signs. Plus throwing two pick sixes.
We have a rather obvious narrative in front of us that we are ignoring for the sake of scandal when it comes to their almost 25 years of sucktitude. BUT, like I said, we'll know this year if your theory holds water. They should be back down in that 5-6 win range if you're right. They should have been back down to that last year, but....