The Lions would look different if ATL, CIN, or MIA had taken the generational tackle. In hindsight, it looks like ATL made a mistake, although argument could be made for Miami since they traded back up to get Waddle, giving up a 2022 1st rounder.
Penei was such a perfect first pick for Holmes and Campbell. Tone setter.
The rocket scientist was a toxic jerk and a very ineffective leader, and that was Quinn's handpicked choice. But one thing silent Bob got right was locking up Decker & Ragnow + finding a pro bowl LG in the 3rd round (Jonah Jackson.) Hal Vaitai, on the whole, was a bad signing (overpay) but he's serviceable when healthy. I'll give him credit there, the roster cupboard was bare, but not at OL.
For most new GMs/HCs going into their first draft of a complete teardown and rebuild, probably the chalk play would be "OK, OL is no worse than mid, let's find some playmakers." NOPE - they went for 1) a generational talent to add to an already good position group, and 2) sending a clear message:
we're building an identity. It starts from the inside and then we'll work on the outside.
OT-DL-NT-DB on Day 1 and Day 2, 3 starters and a contributor. Wow. Huge need at WR (had just lost Golladay), "hey we'll get to that, these are foundational pieces for our identity."
Then on Day 3 it went from "gee nice draft, Detroit might have a good GM now" to absolutely crushing it. ARSB and the trade up to get Derrick Barnes with picks 112 and 113.
He's had two more good drafts since, but taking Sewell was probably the most important pick they've made in the last three years, even bigger than Hutch. He has gone from very good to probably no worse than 2nd or 3rd best RT in the league, and he's made huge strides as a leader. Got married, started a family, and matured into the most vocal leader on the offense. Dude is relentless in his pursuit to be the best OL in the game.