4 WR with tremendous value you can draft late (1 Viewer)

[Otis]

I don't think Bradford is a sleeper, but I like your Crayton pick. He'll have a lot of value when TO gets dinged. I think you'd have more credibility if you compared these WR's to pizza sizes though. Combining your FF and math skillz is $$$.

Can't spell Mario Soto without Otis. Haven't posted in the Shark Pool since January and you pick this thread, eh?

Are you sure you aren't my girlfriend, and I didn't leave the toilet seat up or something?

 

[Bob Sacamano]

On the flip side, if your WRs are questionable, the possible homerun hitters are better options, as you may need an unexpected boost at the position, someone who can possibly provide unexpected big numbers.Devery Henderson may steal Donte Stallworth's job in New Orleans, and with Joe Horn's health issues last year, that means some potential games in the WR1 role. That's opportunity.I like the Cotchery and Caldwell suggestions made earlier as well. David Givens isn't really under the radar, but like I mentioned with Bruce earlier, he's one of those value guys I'd give a bigger upside - at least for the first half of the season. Then trade him while he's producing before VY takes over at QB.

Solid Bob.Let me ask though...if you have topflight WRs in the 1st 3-4 spots then doesn't it give you the flexibility to go after guys with bigger upside. I have Holt/Mason as my 1-2 in a league and I am seriously thinking about sitting Mason in week1 against the Bucs and maybe playing Bobby Engram as DJax may not be back 100% and Burleson will be learning the offense...Engram may be a clutch security blanket for Hass back there.

Of course. Obviously you mix and match it. If you can claim a quality WR in the 4 spot, I'd draft nothing but guys with bigger upside after that, as guys in the 5 or 6 hole are likely to NEVER see your starting lineup. Go after possible trade bait without much worry.But if I go 3 deep at WR and plan to only draft 5 of them, I would be more likely to make certain 1 of those other 2 is of the Engram variety. He probably doesn't have to win any weeks for me. I just don't want him to post a goose egg on my bye weeks. I can afford to shoot for the stars with the other guy. On the other hand, if my early WRs are questionable, a guy who is a slam dunk for 5 points per week but has a lower ceiling doesn't do a lot for me. I want to generate possible point production from the position. I'd probably lean more heavily towards guys who can make up for their possible lack of performance, as I'm not likely to win anyway if I can't find one of the Galloways in the draft.

It's interesting and maybe deserves its own thread but on a 20 man roster I keep 2 Def/ST, 1TE, 1PK...usually 2 QBs, and then I mix and match about 14 RB/WR...this year I tried to back all my starting RB so I probably have 3 different teams and a back up on thsoe teams so I went with 8 WR. I picked about 4 of them by round 10-12 and then I took 4 more in most leagues in the 15th or later.

Like I posted before, you mix and match as necessary. It's all about getting a good balance of risk. You can't make every pick a swing for the fences, but you also can't draft so conservatively that you have no chance of getting a breakthrough player. If every late round pick is a WR3 on his team, odds are good he's not going to exceed expectations by a lot. Normally, I limit myself to one "likely contributor" and take chances on my other picks. But that might even need to change based on circumstances. Say you drafted Darrell Jackson as one of your expected 3 starters. Bobby Engram might warrant a late-round pick because he serves the dual purpose of likely contributor and insurance policy (WR handcuff, if you want to call it that). Now you have your safety net on bye the same week as a starter. So maybe you take a Marty Booker as well and load up on your other WR spots as high ceiling guys. If I drafted Marvin Harrison at WR1 and Andre Johnson at WR2, Johnson also sort of serves as one of those high ceiling guys. I might be tempted to offset him with a more conservative value pick at WR3 (Glenn, Kennison, Keyshawn) and then with two pretty steady WR already on board, load up on high-risk/high-reward guys in the WR4-6 slots.

 

[massraider]

On the flip side, if your WRs are questionable, the possible homerun hitters are better options, as you may need an unexpected boost at the position, someone who can possibly provide unexpected big numbers.Devery Henderson may steal Donte Stallworth's job in New Orleans, and with Joe Horn's health issues last year, that means some potential games in the WR1 role. That's opportunity.I like the Cotchery and Caldwell suggestions made earlier as well. David Givens isn't really under the radar, but like I mentioned with Bruce earlier, he's one of those value guys I'd give a bigger upside - at least for the first half of the season. Then trade him while he's producing before VY takes over at QB.

Solid Bob.Let me ask though...if you have topflight WRs in the 1st 3-4 spots then doesn't it give you the flexibility to go after guys with bigger upside. I have Holt/Mason as my 1-2 in a league and I am seriously thinking about sitting Mason in week1 against the Bucs and maybe playing Bobby Engram as DJax may not be back 100% and Burleson will be learning the offense...Engram may be a clutch security blanket for Hass back there.

Of course. Obviously you mix and match it. If you can claim a quality WR in the 4 spot, I'd draft nothing but guys with bigger upside after that, as guys in the 5 or 6 hole are likely to NEVER see your starting lineup. Go after possible trade bait without much worry.But if I go 3 deep at WR and plan to only draft 5 of them, I would be more likely to make certain 1 of those other 2 is of the Engram variety. He probably doesn't have to win any weeks for me. I just don't want him to post a goose egg on my bye weeks. I can afford to shoot for the stars with the other guy. On the other hand, if my early WRs are questionable, a guy who is a slam dunk for 5 points per week but has a lower ceiling doesn't do a lot for me. I want to generate possible point production from the position. I'd probably lean more heavily towards guys who can make up for their possible lack of performance, as I'm not likely to win anyway if I can't find one of the Galloways in the draft.

It's interesting and maybe deserves its own thread but on a 20 man roster I keep 2 Def/ST, 1TE, 1PK...usually 2 QBs, and then I mix and match about 14 RB/WR...this year I tried to back all my starting RB so I probably have 3 different teams and a back up on thsoe teams so I went with 8 WR. I picked about 4 of them by round 10-12 and then I took 4 more in most leagues in the 15th or later.

Like I posted before, you mix and match as necessary. It's all about getting a good balance of risk. You can't make every pick a swing for the fences, but you also can't draft so conservatively that you have no chance of getting a breakthrough player. If every late round pick is a WR3 on his team, odds are good he's not going to exceed expectations by a lot. Normally, I limit myself to one "likely contributor" and take chances on my other picks. But that might even need to change based on circumstances. Say you drafted Darrell Jackson as one of your expected 3 starters. Bobby Engram might warrant a late-round pick because he serves the dual purpose of likely contributor and insurance policy (WR handcuff, if you want to call it that). Now you have your safety net on bye the same week as a starter. So maybe you take a Marty Booker as well and load up on your other WR spots as high ceiling guys. If I drafted Marvin Harrison at WR1 and Andre Johnson at WR2, Johnson also sort of serves as one of those high ceiling guys. I might be tempted to offset him with a more conservative value pick at WR3 (Glenn, Kennison, Keyshawn) and then with two pretty steady WR already on board, load up on high-risk/high-reward guys in the WR4-6 slots.

This is a good point. One of the things about WR's, is even the good ones have quiet weeks, moreso than a starting back. If you can carry 6 WR for example, and start 3, I want that WR4 to be a known quantity. 5 and 6? Go for broke.In a 12 team draft I am currently finishing up, large rosters, I have three solid WR's, and wound up with Burleson as my 4th. I reached a bit and took Williamson as my 5th. I like the potential payoff, and if the wheels fall off in Minny, it doesn't hurt me much. Bradford is still out there, and if I can get him as my WR6, I'll be stoked. Some of the names that have been mentioned:Isaac Bruce: I think dirt is getting thrown on his grave too soon. The man is a pro, and with Martz gone, the rumor I've read is that the Rams intend to use less 3WR sets. If that is the case, I think Kevin Curtis could be the Brandon Stokely of this years draft.Nate Burleson: Not crazy about the player, but love the opportunity. I'm a big believer in getting WR's from good teams, less ups and downs, and I think Hasselback will have good numbers this year. I have durability questions about Jackson, and don't think Stevens is good enough to be Matt's 2nd target. Cedric Wilson: Again, not sold on the player, but I think his situation may be favorable. I think Pitt passes more this year, and to assume he gets beat out by Holmes is not a slam dunk, IMO. Even if he does, he could see enough action in 3WR sets to make him worth a spot on the end of your bench. I could see him starting, and sliding to the slot in 3WR packages. I'm not crazy about him, but keeping an eye on him.Doug Gabriel: Eh, we'll see. In leagues that reward big plays, I like him as a WR5, but I think the real value on that offense will be Courtney, who I think'll be a great late pick as a backup TE. Actually, with people sniffing around Gabe, the real steal at WR for that team may be Curry. Injury-wise, I would be careful, obviously, but he might not even get drafted in most leagues.Chad Jackson: I like the opportunity, but there's no secret here, and with Branch being such a big story, I think his ADP will wind up being too high for my liking. Caldwell, OTOH, makes an interesting WR6. In all sincerity, tho, I'm staying away from this passing game all together. Well, aside from Brady.Samie Parker: I'm not going to be the guy to recommend ANY WR2 from KC till Gonzo is gone. Amani Toomer: I haven't really been in the position to acquire this guy, so I have been sleeping on him for sure, and at that ADP, I don't see how he doesn't surpass it, barring injury.And one possible guy: Jerry Porter. Classic boom or bust. We've seen too many players that have done an about-face, once their demands weren't met. There's a fine chance that Al give him the Marcus Allen treatment, but if Porter figures out he's not going anywhere, it wouldn't surprise me to see him starting on opening day.

 

[Ministry of Pain]

On the flip side, if your WRs are questionable, the possible homerun hitters are better options, as you may need an unexpected boost at the position, someone who can possibly provide unexpected big numbers.Devery Henderson may steal Donte Stallworth's job in New Orleans, and with Joe Horn's health issues last year, that means some potential games in the WR1 role. That's opportunity.I like the Cotchery and Caldwell suggestions made earlier as well. David Givens isn't really under the radar, but like I mentioned with Bruce earlier, he's one of those value guys I'd give a bigger upside - at least for the first half of the season. Then trade him while he's producing before VY takes over at QB.

Solid Bob.Let me ask though...if you have topflight WRs in the 1st 3-4 spots then doesn't it give you the flexibility to go after guys with bigger upside. I have Holt/Mason as my 1-2 in a league and I am seriously thinking about sitting Mason in week1 against the Bucs and maybe playing Bobby Engram as DJax may not be back 100% and Burleson will be learning the offense...Engram may be a clutch security blanket for Hass back there.

Of course. Obviously you mix and match it. If you can claim a quality WR in the 4 spot, I'd draft nothing but guys with bigger upside after that, as guys in the 5 or 6 hole are likely to NEVER see your starting lineup. Go after possible trade bait without much worry.But if I go 3 deep at WR and plan to only draft 5 of them, I would be more likely to make certain 1 of those other 2 is of the Engram variety. He probably doesn't have to win any weeks for me. I just don't want him to post a goose egg on my bye weeks. I can afford to shoot for the stars with the other guy. On the other hand, if my early WRs are questionable, a guy who is a slam dunk for 5 points per week but has a lower ceiling doesn't do a lot for me. I want to generate possible point production from the position. I'd probably lean more heavily towards guys who can make up for their possible lack of performance, as I'm not likely to win anyway if I can't find one of the Galloways in the draft.

It's interesting and maybe deserves its own thread but on a 20 man roster I keep 2 Def/ST, 1TE, 1PK...usually 2 QBs, and then I mix and match about 14 RB/WR...this year I tried to back all my starting RB so I probably have 3 different teams and a back up on thsoe teams so I went with 8 WR. I picked about 4 of them by round 10-12 and then I took 4 more in most leagues in the 15th or later.

Like I posted before, you mix and match as necessary. It's all about getting a good balance of risk. You can't make every pick a swing for the fences, but you also can't draft so conservatively that you have no chance of getting a breakthrough player. If every late round pick is a WR3 on his team, odds are good he's not going to exceed expectations by a lot. Normally, I limit myself to one "likely contributor" and take chances on my other picks. But that might even need to change based on circumstances. Say you drafted Darrell Jackson as one of your expected 3 starters. Bobby Engram might warrant a late-round pick because he serves the dual purpose of likely contributor and insurance policy (WR handcuff, if you want to call it that). Now you have your safety net on bye the same week as a starter. So maybe you take a Marty Booker as well and load up on your other WR spots as high ceiling guys. If I drafted Marvin Harrison at WR1 and Andre Johnson at WR2, Johnson also sort of serves as one of those high ceiling guys. I might be tempted to offset him with a more conservative value pick at WR3 (Glenn, Kennison, Keyshawn) and then with two pretty steady WR already on board, load up on high-risk/high-reward guys in the WR4-6 slots.

This is a good point. One of the things about WR's, is even the good ones have quiet weeks, moreso than a starting back. If you can carry 6 WR for example, and start 3, I want that WR4 to be a known quantity. 5 and 6? Go for broke.In a 12 team draft I am currently finishing up, large rosters, I have three solid WR's, and wound up with Burleson as my 4th. I reached a bit and took Williamson as my 5th. I like the potential payoff, and if the wheels fall off in Minny, it doesn't hurt me much. Bradford is still out there, and if I can get him as my WR6, I'll be stoked. Some of the names that have been mentioned:Isaac Bruce: I think dirt is getting thrown on his grave too soon. The man is a pro, and with Martz gone, the rumor I've read is that the Rams intend to use less 3WR sets. If that is the case, I think Kevin Curtis could be the Brandon Stokely of this years draft.Nate Burleson: Not crazy about the player, but love the opportunity. I'm a big believer in getting WR's from good teams, less ups and downs, and I think Hasselback will have good numbers this year. I have durability questions about Jackson, and don't think Stevens is good enough to be Matt's 2nd target. Cedric Wilson: Again, not sold on the player, but I think his situation may be favorable. I think Pitt passes more this year, and to assume he gets beat out by Holmes is not a slam dunk, IMO. Even if he does, he could see enough action in 3WR sets to make him worth a spot on the end of your bench. I could see him starting, and sliding to the slot in 3WR packages. I'm not crazy about him, but keeping an eye on him.Doug Gabriel: Eh, we'll see. In leagues that reward big plays, I like him as a WR5, but I think the real value on that offense will be Courtney, who I think'll be a great late pick as a backup TE. Actually, with people sniffing around Gabe, the real steal at WR for that team may be Curry. Injury-wise, I would be careful, obviously, but he might not even get drafted in most leagues.Chad Jackson: I like the opportunity, but there's no secret here, and with Branch being such a big story, I think his ADP will wind up being too high for my liking. Caldwell, OTOH, makes an interesting WR6. In all sincerity, tho, I'm staying away from this passing game all together. Well, aside from Brady.Samie Parker: I'm not going to be the guy to recommend ANY WR2 from KC till Gonzo is gone. Amani Toomer: I haven't really been in the position to acquire this guy, so I have been sleeping on him for sure, and at that ADP, I don't see how he doesn't surpass it, barring injury.And one possible guy: Jerry Porter. Classic boom or bust. We've seen too many players that have done an about-face, once their demands weren't met. There's a fine chance that Al give him the Marcus Allen treatment, but if Porter figures out he's not going anywhere, it wouldn't surprise me to see him starting on opening day.

Great stuff from both Bob and Rider here.Bob shows a great way to plan out a WR1-WR6 roster format or if that is what you are going with. In 3WR start leagues you do need 4 solid guys you can count on...not as many flyer WR on your team.Good insight Rider into some of the later round players out there.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

On the flip side, if your WRs are questionable, the possible homerun hitters are better options, as you may need an unexpected boost at the position, someone who can possibly provide unexpected big numbers.Devery Henderson may steal Donte Stallworth's job in New Orleans, and with Joe Horn's health issues last year, that means some potential games in the WR1 role. That's opportunity.I like the Cotchery and Caldwell suggestions made earlier as well. David Givens isn't really under the radar, but like I mentioned with Bruce earlier, he's one of those value guys I'd give a bigger upside - at least for the first half of the season. Then trade him while he's producing before VY takes over at QB.

Solid Bob.Let me ask though...if you have topflight WRs in the 1st 3-4 spots then doesn't it give you the flexibility to go after guys with bigger upside. I have Holt/Mason as my 1-2 in a league and I am seriously thinking about sitting Mason in week1 against the Bucs and maybe playing Bobby Engram as DJax may not be back 100% and Burleson will be learning the offense...Engram may be a clutch security blanket for Hass back there.

Of course. Obviously you mix and match it. If you can claim a quality WR in the 4 spot, I'd draft nothing but guys with bigger upside after that, as guys in the 5 or 6 hole are likely to NEVER see your starting lineup. Go after possible trade bait without much worry.But if I go 3 deep at WR and plan to only draft 5 of them, I would be more likely to make certain 1 of those other 2 is of the Engram variety. He probably doesn't have to win any weeks for me. I just don't want him to post a goose egg on my bye weeks. I can afford to shoot for the stars with the other guy. On the other hand, if my early WRs are questionable, a guy who is a slam dunk for 5 points per week but has a lower ceiling doesn't do a lot for me. I want to generate possible point production from the position. I'd probably lean more heavily towards guys who can make up for their possible lack of performance, as I'm not likely to win anyway if I can't find one of the Galloways in the draft.

It's interesting and maybe deserves its own thread but on a 20 man roster I keep 2 Def/ST, 1TE, 1PK...usually 2 QBs, and then I mix and match about 14 RB/WR...this year I tried to back all my starting RB so I probably have 3 different teams and a back up on thsoe teams so I went with 8 WR. I picked about 4 of them by round 10-12 and then I took 4 more in most leagues in the 15th or later.

Like I posted before, you mix and match as necessary. It's all about getting a good balance of risk. You can't make every pick a swing for the fences, but you also can't draft so conservatively that you have no chance of getting a breakthrough player. If every late round pick is a WR3 on his team, odds are good he's not going to exceed expectations by a lot. Normally, I limit myself to one "likely contributor" and take chances on my other picks. But that might even need to change based on circumstances. Say you drafted Darrell Jackson as one of your expected 3 starters. Bobby Engram might warrant a late-round pick because he serves the dual purpose of likely contributor and insurance policy (WR handcuff, if you want to call it that). Now you have your safety net on bye the same week as a starter. So maybe you take a Marty Booker as well and load up on your other WR spots as high ceiling guys. If I drafted Marvin Harrison at WR1 and Andre Johnson at WR2, Johnson also sort of serves as one of those high ceiling guys. I might be tempted to offset him with a more conservative value pick at WR3 (Glenn, Kennison, Keyshawn) and then with two pretty steady WR already on board, load up on high-risk/high-reward guys in the WR4-6 slots.

This is a good point. One of the things about WR's, is even the good ones have quiet weeks, moreso than a starting back. If you can carry 6 WR for example, and start 3, I want that WR4 to be a known quantity. 5 and 6? Go for broke.

But don't make the mistake of thinking that known quantity at WR4 HAS to be the 4th WR you draft. You can draft a 4th and 5th WR who are boom or bust types of players, as long as you are comfortable there's going to be a 6th WR there who you can count on. Your 6th WR drafted can be your WR4.

 

[shuke]

I don't think Bradford is a sleeper, but I like your Crayton pick. He'll have a lot of value when TO gets dinged. I think you'd have more credibility if you compared these WR's to pizza sizes though. Combining your FF and math skillz is $$$.

 

[Charley]

Great info -- Just did a quick summary (very rough):

Proposed by MoP:

Gabriel, OAK -

McCareins, NYJ -

Engram, SEA -

Bradford, DET -

P. Crayton, DAL -

Proposed by EBF:

T. Taylor, MIN -

Chad Jackson, NE -

B. Berrian, CHI -

C. Rogers, DET -

Proposed by wannabee:

R. Caldwell, NE -

A. Toomer, NYG -

S. Parker, KC -

Greg Jennings, GB -

Proposed by GrandpaRox:

D. Boston, TB -

R. Caldwell, NE -

P. Crayton, DAL -

A. Davis, BUF -

Gabriel, OAK -

McCareins, NYJ -

C. Thorpe, KC -

A. Toomer, NYG -

Others mentioned (in no particular order):

J. Cotchery, NYJ -

T. Williamson, MIN -

M. Robinson, MIN -

Dante Hall, KC -

R. Curry, OAK -

Vincent Jackson, SD -

B. Lloyd, WAS -

Troy Brown, NE -

D. Henderson, NO -

A. Battle, SF -

A. Bryant, SF -

R. Ferguson, GB -

I. Bruce, STL -

K. Curtis, STL -

S. Parker, KC -

E. Parker, SD -

D. Givens, TEN -

Randle El, WAS -

Not mentioned:

Bryant Johnson, AZ -

Antonio Chatman, CIN -

M. Booker, MIA -

Cedric Wilson, PIT -

Reggie Williams, JAX -

Tim Carter, NYG -

Sinorice Moss, NYG -

Greg Lewis, PHI -

Eric Moulds, HOU -

M. Jenkins, ATL -

Mike Clayton, TB -

Mark Clayton, BAL -

Roddy White, ATL -

Peerless Price, BUF -

Wilford, JAX -

 

[sheetstainer]

while samie parkers numbers have been moderate, he is still firmly entrenched as the starter over crappy thorpe and hall. for that value alone, he is worthy bye week material with potential more upside. he'll never be a top ten or anything, but serviceable. i like marty booker this yr. even with all the options miami has. will be getting alot of single coverage i would imagine. the bears qb situation should be better, i think muhammad will eclipse last yrs numbers by a decent margin.

 

[Charley]

Just participated in a simultaneous draft (8 leagues with 8 teams each -- starters = 2 QB, 4 RB, 4 WR, 2 TE). Draftmasters, so no submission of starting lineup. Many of 64 owners from FBG.

Quick summary of where WRs were taken in 5 of the leagues (1st 48 picks were eliminated to focus on WRs outside of the top-15, stopped looking after pick 150):

ADP - Name - overall pick in 5 leagues - [FBG rank (DD) for WRs in ppr leagues] (note - ADP excludes highest and lowest pick)

45 - D. Driver - 54th overall pick, 44, 35, 63, 38 [WR 10] vs. WR 14 from ADP

49 - Roy Williams - 51st overall pick, 62, 49, 46, 44 [WR 17]

53 - P. Burress - 57, 49, 50, 65, 53 [WR 14]

56 - J. Walker - 70, 52, 52, 58, 58 [WR 19]

62 - Andre Johnson - 61, 85, 40, 72, 54 [WR 22]

65 - T.J. Houshmandzadeh - 65, 66, 63, 54, 73 [WR 20]

74 - D. Branch - 77, 74, 60, 79, 71 [WR 15] vs. WR 20 from ADP

77 - Joe Horn - 80, 73, 77, 94, 66 [WR 33]

75 - J. Galloway - 85, 55, 86, 60, 79 [WR 25]

83 - Rod Smith - 68, 86, 75, 93, 88 [WR 21]

85 - Eddie Kennison - 95, 71, 69, 90, 104 [WR 23]

86 - Lee Evans - 90, 92, 98, 66, 77 [WR 28]

99 - Matt Jones - 60, 103, 78, 118, 116 [WR 27]

99 - Reggie Brown - 89, 118, 89, 121, 84 [WR 31]

102 - M. Muhammad - 84, 101, 94, 116, 112 [WR 26] vs. WR 28 from ADP

103 - Drew Bennett - 69, 84, 112, 113, 120 [WR 40]

104 - L. Coles - 110, 109, 95, 109, 91 [WR 24] vs. WR 30 from ADP

108 - K. McCardell - 121, 96, 106, 85, 135 [WR 34]

111 - D. Stallworth - 116, 121, 99, 107, 111 [WR30]

112 - Koren Robinson - 93, 137, 109, 114, 113 [WR 32]

114 - Key. Johnson - 101, 113, 129, 88, 127 [WR 35]

116 - Terry Glenn - 123, 107, 102, 129, 117 [WR 29] vs. WR 35 from ADP

118 - N. Burleson - 126, 78, 104, 124, 137 [WR 53]

125 - Mike Clayton - 104, 130, 126, 126, 123 [WR 49]

128 - Joe Jurevicius - 129, 134, 120, 70, 136 [WR 37]

129 - Jerry Porter - 145, 128, [-], 111, 110 [WR 64]

132 - Isaac Bruce - 103, 133, 132, 130, 134 [WR 36] vs. WR 40 from ADP

137 - Antonio Bryant - 97, 150, 146, 132, 132 [WR 38]

140 - Kevin Curtis - 106, [-], [-], 122, 140 [WR 57]

148 - Eric Moulds - [-], 145, 149, 127, 149 [WR 47]

Others:

Br. Edwards - 132, [-], [-], 135, [-]

Mike Jenkins - 133, [-], [-], [-], [-]

Roddy White - 143, [-], [-], [-], 148

A. Lelie - 144, [-], [-], [-], [-]

Brandon Stokley - [-], 125, [-], [-], [-]

Bobby Engram - [-], 141, [-], [-], [-]

E. Wilford - [-], 138, [-], 141, [-]

A. Toomer - 113, 147, [-], [-], [-]

[-] = picked after 150

Note - Top 13 WRs not included above: S. Smith, Ch. Johnson, Owens, Holt, R. Moss, Fitzgerald, Harrison, Boldin, Chambers, H. Ward, R. Wayne, D. Jackson, S. Moss

From the above results, the "value" WRs that appear to be dropping fairly consistently, compared to current FBG's projections, are:

Driver

Burress

Branch

Muhammad

Coles

Glenn

Bruce

A. Bryant

Not enough time to examine WR's who had average ADP over 150.

 

[Colin Dowling]

Of your long list above, am I to presume that the 27 year old guy w/ two 1,000 yard seasons under his belt who has been looking good in camp and is behind only an aging Galloway and a hurt Clayton was NOT drafted? INteresting...

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Of your long list above, am I to presume that the 27 year old guy w/ two 1,000 yard seasons under his belt who has been looking good in camp and is behind only an aging Galloway and a hurt Clayton was NOT drafted? INteresting...

The 'roider?

 

[Colin Dowling]

Of your long list above, am I to presume that the 27 year old guy w/ two 1,000 yard seasons under his belt who has been looking good in camp and is behind only an aging Galloway and a hurt Clayton was NOT drafted? INteresting...

The 'roider who is cleared to playb?

Yes, him.

 

[Z-Dog]

I just picked him up in the 14th round of an Anarchy 16-team draft. I think he'll start by year's end, even if only b/c of injury.