Tillmanisahero
Footballguy
I am wondering what you guys think of AJ Hawk and do you think he slips to #5? Mel Kiper has him at #3.
right on cueI haven't even seen him in the VICINITY of the ball so far today.
How about now?Hawk is a stud.....PERIOD!!RAPTUREWeapon of Mass Instruction Posted Today, 05:40 PM I haven't even seen him in the VICINITY of the ball so far today
1984-Carl Banks #3
1987-Cornelius Bennett #2
1990-Junior Seau #5
1994-Willie McGinest #4
1996-Kevin Hardy #2
1997-Peter Bouleware #4
2000-Lavar Arrington #2
There may have been like 2 or 3 other LB's taken in the top 5, but for the most part, LB's taken in the top 5 have been pretty good.
He's an OLB; may convert to ILB. Top 5 may depend on whether Vince Young goes pro.Not the best middle backer in the draft.
Historically, linebackers are hyped up predraft, but rarely go very early in the 1st round. 10-15 is usually when the top rated ones go. Middle linebackers especially are not taken early.
As a PAcker fan, I hope they don't take a linebacker at #5, they need more beef up front, and would love it if they nabbed Haloti Ngata out of Oregon (assuming he declares). He can become the Tim Bowens in Jim Bates system.
BustSome really bright guy who picked for the Pack in the mock draft a couple weeks ago picked Kiawanuka, which makes sense to me.
Wright is better.I do not want the Pack throwing a $10,000,000 signing bonus on a linebacker at #5. Ngota is the way to go. He is a house. I am just afraid he is going to go before # 5![]()
I agree somewhat. If Hawk and M Williams are both available with the #5, I think the Pack will go Williams.I hope he slips to the 5 spot. Either we get him or super mario....
Wright would be my # 2 option, but Ngata is my # 1. If he is gone, I would not complain if we got Wright. Grady Jackson is getting old, and we need a big time stuffer in the middle. Ngota is that guy, IMO, but Wright is not far behind. Looking foward to seeing him play vs. a high powered offense like USC. Wright reminds me alot of Daryl Gardner coming out of Baylor, there is no doubt the guy has elite skills, but he has a reputation for not working hard enough and taking plays off. The light went on for Gardner, maybe it will for Wright.People clamoring for Williams and Kiwinuka for the Pack don't have their priorities straight. If you can stuff the run on 1st and 2nd down, then you can bring in the KGB's (KBG is so misused, he has no business playing on run downs) to rush the passer on 3rd. Putting teams in 3rd and long goes a long way. We need to build the D through the middle: DT, MLB, and SS. Thats how you build a championship D. Look at the Pats - Seymour, Bruschi, and Harrison. Ngata would be a great start. Moving Barnett to the weakside and getting a MLB who stays true to his assignments would be the next step. I'd like to see the Pack target a MLB like Anthony Schlegel in round 3 or 4 (or if by some miraculous chance D'Qwell Jackson falls to us in round 2, then we need to take him).Wright is better.I do not want the Pack throwing a $10,000,000 signing bonus on a linebacker at #5. Ngota is the way to go. He is a house. I am just afraid he is going to go before # 5![]()
uhh...Lawrence Taylor? #2 overall...Not that this is relevant to anything, but can anyone think of a LB that was drafted top 5 that wasnt a bust?
Only 3 I can think of are Andruay Bruce, Lavar Arrington, and Kevin Hardy.
While Arrington and Hardy have both had their moments, I dont think either has come close to living up to the #2 pick in the draft.
uhhhhThat was before I was even born(82).uhh...Lawrence Taylor? #2 overall...Not that this is relevant to anything, but can anyone think of a LB that was drafted top 5 that wasnt a bust?
Only 3 I can think of are Andruay Bruce, Lavar Arrington, and Kevin Hardy.
While Arrington and Hardy have both had their moments, I dont think either has come close to living up to the #2 pick in the draft.
Yes, because if it happened prior to 1982, it obviously isn't relevant...uhhhhThat was before I was even born(82).uhh...Lawrence Taylor? #2 overall...Not that this is relevant to anything, but can anyone think of a LB that was drafted top 5 that wasnt a bust?
Only 3 I can think of are Andruay Bruce, Lavar Arrington, and Kevin Hardy.
While Arrington and Hardy have both had their moments, I dont think either has come close to living up to the #2 pick in the draft.
I was thinking maybe something a little more relevant.
The orig. poster is correct in that 24 year old draft tendacies don't hold up much relevance in 2006.I think the recent trend of LBs not being drafted high is much more germane to this discussion.Yes, because if it happened prior to 1982, it obviously isn't relevant...uhhhhThat was before I was even born(82).uhh...Lawrence Taylor? #2 overall...Not that this is relevant to anything, but can anyone think of a LB that was drafted top 5 that wasnt a bust?
Only 3 I can think of are Andruay Bruce, Lavar Arrington, and Kevin Hardy.
While Arrington and Hardy have both had their moments, I dont think either has come close to living up to the #2 pick in the draft.
I was thinking maybe something a little more relevant.![]()
Arrington hasn't even proven to be the best linebacker in the 2000 Draft Class.1984-Carl Banks #3
1987-Cornelius Bennett #2
1990-Junior Seau #5
1994-Willie McGinest #4
1996-Kevin Hardy #2
1997-Peter Bouleware #4
2000-Lavar Arrington #2
There may have been like 2 or 3 other LB's taken in the top 5, but for the most part, LB's taken in the top 5 have been pretty good.
First, the guy asked for any non-bust top 5 LBs, didn't give a time-frame, and ignored one of the best at the position of all time. Second, teams draft an LB that high exactly BECAUSE they are trying to find the next LT (I'm not talking about Tomlinson, in case you are confused). Finally, I guess the "original poster" doesn't think men landing on the moon are relevant to him, since it happened before he was born. For that matter, I hope he never gets the clap, since Penescillin was discovered in the 50s, and clearly isn't relevant either.The orig. poster is correct in that 24 year old draft tendacies don't hold up much relevance in 2006.I think the recent trend of LBs not being drafted high is much more germane to this discussion.Yes, because if it happened prior to 1982, it obviously isn't relevant...uhhhhThat was before I was even born(82).uhh...Lawrence Taylor? #2 overall...Not that this is relevant to anything, but can anyone think of a LB that was drafted top 5 that wasnt a bust?
Only 3 I can think of are Andruay Bruce, Lavar Arrington, and Kevin Hardy.
While Arrington and Hardy have both had their moments, I dont think either has come close to living up to the #2 pick in the draft.
I was thinking maybe something a little more relevant.![]()
Esp. when the last hyped LB to go Top 5 has been a high profile quasi-bust.
Hawk should easily be there for the Pack at #5.
And as another poster stated, if Vince Young come out it is a virtual certainty he will be there.
FWIW, the gbnreport's Dec 2 mock has Hawk going #7 to NO. (This is with Young coming out).
http://www.gbnreport.com/2006projection.html
Danny ClarkNot that this is relevant to anything, but can anyone think of a LB that was drafted top 5 that wasnt a bust?Only 3 I can think of are Andruay Bruce, Lavar Arrington, and Kevin Hardy.
While Arrington and Hardy have both had their moments, I dont think either has come close to living up to the #2 pick in the draft.
Arrington hasn't even proven to be the best linebacker in the 2000 Draft Class.1984-Carl Banks #3
1987-Cornelius Bennett #2
1990-Junior Seau #5
1994-Willie McGinest #4
1996-Kevin Hardy #2
1997-Peter Bouleware #4
2000-Lavar Arrington #2
There may have been like 2 or 3 other LB's taken in the top 5, but for the most part, LB's taken in the top 5 have been pretty good.
No. Try Brian Urlacher, Julian Peterson or Keith Bullock on for size.Danny ClarkNot that this is relevant to anything, but can anyone think of a LB that was drafted top 5 that wasnt a bust?Only 3 I can think of are Andruay Bruce, Lavar Arrington, and Kevin Hardy.
While Arrington and Hardy have both had their moments, I dont think either has come close to living up to the #2 pick in the draft.
Arrington hasn't even proven to be the best linebacker in the 2000 Draft Class.1984-Carl Banks #3
1987-Cornelius Bennett #2
1990-Junior Seau #5
1994-Willie McGinest #4
1996-Kevin Hardy #2
1997-Peter Bouleware #4
2000-Lavar Arrington #2
There may have been like 2 or 3 other LB's taken in the top 5, but for the most part, LB's taken in the top 5 have been pretty good.![]()
First, the guy asked for any non-bust top 5 LBs, didn't give a time-frame, and ignored one of the best at the position of all time. Second, teams draft an LB that high exactly BECAUSE they are trying to find the next LT (I'm not talking about Tomlinson, in case you are confused). Finally, I guess the "original poster" doesn't think men landing on the moon are relevant to him, since it happened before he was born. For that matter, I hope he never gets the clap, since Penescillin was discovered in the 50s, and clearly isn't relevant either.The orig. poster is correct in that 24 year old draft tendacies don't hold up much relevance in 2006.I think the recent trend of LBs not being drafted high is much more germane to this discussion.Yes, because if it happened prior to 1982, it obviously isn't relevant...uhhhhThat was before I was even born(82).uhh...Lawrence Taylor? #2 overall...Not that this is relevant to anything, but can anyone think of a LB that was drafted top 5 that wasnt a bust?
Only 3 I can think of are Andruay Bruce, Lavar Arrington, and Kevin Hardy.
While Arrington and Hardy have both had their moments, I dont think either has come close to living up to the #2 pick in the draft.
I was thinking maybe something a little more relevant.![]()
Esp. when the last hyped LB to go Top 5 has been a high profile quasi-bust.
Hawk should easily be there for the Pack at #5.
And as another poster stated, if Vince Young come out it is a virtual certainty he will be there.
FWIW, the gbnreport's Dec 2 mock has Hawk going #7 to NO. (This is with Young coming out).
http://www.gbnreport.com/2006projection.html