GroveDiesel
Footballguy
Frankly, the Patriots could start the season with the worst group of pass catchers in the NFL.
Obviously.He killed that dude, didn't he?
Calling it.
He did it.
Jets and Raiders in the mix, but yes this group is terrible.Frankly, the Patriots could start the season with the worst group of pass catchers in the NFL.
lmao....awesome post!! That friggin started off my day perfect.how does adderal affect a violent nature?Seahawks should sign him.
That doesn't make any sense.No Hernandez, No Welker, injured Gronk...... Im avoiding Pats in all formats, they will be WAY overdrafted based on past performance.
Missing the joke, maybe I have to be a Hawks homer. Fill us in.lmao....awesome post!! That friggin started off my day perfect.how does adderal affect a violent nature?Seahawks should sign him.
I'll take Gronk. He might miss a few games, but if it's just him and Danny A catching passes from Brady, sign me up.No Hernandez, No Welker, injured Gronk...... Im avoiding Pats in all formats, they will be WAY overdrafted based on past performance.
Patriot players will be drafted higher than they should be. People will think you can just plug Amendola in for Welker and he is the new Welker. People think Brady will continue to be a top performer regardless of players available. They will assume Gronk will be ok.That doesn't make any sense.No Hernandez, No Welker, injured Gronk...... Im avoiding Pats in all formats, they will be WAY overdrafted based on past performance.
Amendola will be more productive in NE this year than Welker will be in DEN.Patriot players will be drafted higher than they should be. People will think you can just plug Amendola in for Welker and he is the new Welker. People think Brady will continue to be a top performer regardless of players available. They will assume Gronk will be ok.That doesn't make any sense.No Hernandez, No Welker, injured Gronk...... Im avoiding Pats in all formats, they will be WAY overdrafted based on past performance.
Hope that clarifies any confusion you had. If it does not feel free to PM me.
For the most part I agree with you--although for me personally--this string of news does make Ridley look more attractive to me. It almost guarantees that the Pats will have to make their running game a big part of their offense.Patriot players will be drafted higher than they should be. People will think you can just plug Amendola in for Welker and he is the new Welker. People think Brady will continue to be a top performer regardless of players available. They will assume Gronk will be ok.That doesn't make any sense.No Hernandez, No Welker, injured Gronk...... Im avoiding Pats in all formats, they will be WAY overdrafted based on past performance.
Hope that clarifies any confusion you had. If it does not feel free to PM me.
The Tebow media circus will now be the only circus in town......They don't really need to know any more than we do. This removes any distractions and keeps the media circus out of training camp.You have to think the Patriots were able to gather some info from the NFL/authorities before they released this guy. I can't imagine releasing this guy to see him play for another team this year. Just speculation on my part, but if the Pats know something, Hernandez isn't seeing the field this year.
Every NFL contract should from now on have " if you kill somebody - you don't get your money "I wonder if there's any verbiage in his contract which would allow them to recoup the signing bonus in this sort of situation.
Who knows if Kraft and Goodell had spoken at length about this and there was already an agreement in place for cap relief if the Pats cut him.Cap implications.
http://overthecap.com/patriots-release-aaron-hernandez-some-cap-related-thoughts/
From his first article on the matter, the Patriots would have had MUCH more cap flexibility by waiting for the legal proceedings to play out or for Goodell to suspend him. The outright release limits their options and narrows the cards that they can play to recoup the bonus money already paid.
Throughout his two articles he's basically saying they took a moral stance and that could hurt their cap. I'm not sure it was the right move, either, but the Pats (more than any other team) seem to have a culture of accountability and want to keep that culture in tact.
Legally, they would be on very shaky grounds. Regardless of whatever happens subsequently, at the time of his release, AH was not guilty of anything. Presumption of innocence is not just a feel-good idea. In any other profession, if he is subsequently exonerated, he could sue for wrongful termination. The Patriots basically released him for reasons unrelated to job performance. (I'm not saying they did the wrong thing. I'm simply saying that from a legal standpoint they have no right to "recoup" any money.) It's fine that they cut him, but the Pats have got to eat the money on this. If they don't, collusion (with Goodell) will be inferred and that's a whole other legal mess.Who knows if Kraft and Goodell had spoken at length about this and there was already an agreement in place for cap relief if the Pats cut him.Cap implications.
http://overthecap.com/patriots-release-aaron-hernandez-some-cap-related-thoughts/
From his first article on the matter, the Patriots would have had MUCH more cap flexibility by waiting for the legal proceedings to play out or for Goodell to suspend him. The outright release limits their options and narrows the cards that they can play to recoup the bonus money already paid.
Throughout his two articles he's basically saying they took a moral stance and that could hurt their cap. I'm not sure it was the right move, either, but the Pats (more than any other team) seem to have a culture of accountability and want to keep that culture in tact.
AH has no ability to complain about anything. It is within the an NFL team's rights to cut a player at any time. How that roster maneuver then gets reported and worked out is between the league and the Patriots, not Hernandez. Teams do not have to give any explanation why they release a player. None. There is no such thing as wrongful termination. Hernandez could have saved a bus full of kids from drowning and the Pats could have cut him and he would have had no recourse.Legally, they would be on very shaky grounds. Regardless of whatever happens subsequently, at the time of his release, AH was not guilty of anything. Presumption of innocence is not just a feel-good idea. In any other profession, if he is subsequently exonerated, he could sue for wrongful termination. The Patriots basically released him for reasons unrelated to job performance. (I'm not saying they did the wrong thing. I'm simply saying that from a legal standpoint they have no right to "recoup" any money.) It's fine that they cut him, but the Pats have got to eat the money on this. If they don't, collusion (with Goodell) will be inferred and that's a whole other legal mess.Who knows if Kraft and Goodell had spoken at length about this and there was already an agreement in place for cap relief if the Pats cut him.Cap implications.
http://overthecap.com/patriots-release-aaron-hernandez-some-cap-related-thoughts/
From his first article on the matter, the Patriots would have had MUCH more cap flexibility by waiting for the legal proceedings to play out or for Goodell to suspend him. The outright release limits their options and narrows the cards that they can play to recoup the bonus money already paid.
Throughout his two articles he's basically saying they took a moral stance and that could hurt their cap. I'm not sure it was the right move, either, but the Pats (more than any other team) seem to have a culture of accountability and want to keep that culture in tact.
Ross Tucker@RossTuckerNFL1hCap implications.
http://overthecap.com/patriots-release-aaron-hernandez-some-cap-related-thoughts/
From his first article on the matter, the Patriots would have had MUCH more cap flexibility by waiting for the legal proceedings to play out or for Goodell to suspend him. The outright release limits their options and narrows the cards that they can play to recoup the bonus money already paid.
Throughout his two articles he's basically saying they took a moral stance and that could hurt their cap. I'm not sure it was the right move, either, but the Pats (more than any other team) seem to have a culture of accountability and want to keep that culture in tact.
You're correct about that - presumption of innocence in not just a feel good idea, buts its application is limited to a court of law.Legally, they would be on very shaky grounds. Regardless of whatever happens subsequently, at the time of his release, AH was not guilty of anything. Presumption of innocence is not just a feel-good idea. In any other profession, if he is subsequently exonerated, he could sue for wrongful termination. The Patriots basically released him for reasons unrelated to job performance. (I'm not saying they did the wrong thing. I'm simply saying that from a legal standpoint they have no right to "recoup" any money.) It's fine that they cut him, but the Pats have got to eat the money on this. If they don't, collusion (with Goodell) will be inferred and that's a whole other legal mess.Who knows if Kraft and Goodell had spoken at length about this and there was already an agreement in place for cap relief if the Pats cut him.Cap implications.
http://overthecap.com/patriots-release-aaron-hernandez-some-cap-related-thoughts/
From his first article on the matter, the Patriots would have had MUCH more cap flexibility by waiting for the legal proceedings to play out or for Goodell to suspend him. The outright release limits their options and narrows the cards that they can play to recoup the bonus money already paid.
Throughout his two articles he's basically saying they took a moral stance and that could hurt their cap. I'm not sure it was the right move, either, but the Pats (more than any other team) seem to have a culture of accountability and want to keep that culture in tact.
Agree with the first paragraph 100%. I'm right there with you.AH has no ability to complain about anything. It is within the an NFL team's rights to cut a player at any time. How that roster maneuver then gets reported and worked out is between the league and the Patriots, not Hernandez. Teams do not have to give any explanation why they release a player. None. There is no such thing as wrongful termination. Hernandez could have saved a bus full of kids from drowning and the Pats could have cut him and he would have had no recourse.Legally, they would be on very shaky grounds. Regardless of whatever happens subsequently, at the time of his release, AH was not guilty of anything. Presumption of innocence is not just a feel-good idea. In any other profession, if he is subsequently exonerated, he could sue for wrongful termination. The Patriots basically released him for reasons unrelated to job performance. (I'm not saying they did the wrong thing. I'm simply saying that from a legal standpoint they have no right to "recoup" any money.) It's fine that they cut him, but the Pats have got to eat the money on this. If they don't, collusion (with Goodell) will be inferred and that's a whole other legal mess.Who knows if Kraft and Goodell had spoken at length about this and there was already an agreement in place for cap relief if the Pats cut him.Cap implications.
http://overthecap.com/patriots-release-aaron-hernandez-some-cap-related-thoughts/
From his first article on the matter, the Patriots would have had MUCH more cap flexibility by waiting for the legal proceedings to play out or for Goodell to suspend him. The outright release limits their options and narrows the cards that they can play to recoup the bonus money already paid.
Throughout his two articles he's basically saying they took a moral stance and that could hurt their cap. I'm not sure it was the right move, either, but the Pats (more than any other team) seem to have a culture of accountability and want to keep that culture in tact.
If Kraft went to Goodell and said the Pats could not handle the P.R. hit in continuing to roster Hernandez until things played out more, Goodell could have told Kraft it was ok to release him and the league figure out how to get NE cap relief for the salary cap hit at a later date. I'm not saying that actually happened, but I suggest there was a decent chance there was some discussion about how to go about it.
Shark move is to get Vereen...Shark move is to grab Ballard two weeks ago....
"They bought their tickets. They knew what they were getting into. I say let 'em crash".No way does the NFL do something special to help the Pats cap-wise. That would be a total violation of the CBA. Especially since the new CBA actually punishes team when they have too many players get in trouble. The Pats drafted Hernandez despite knowing his character questions, reaped the rewards for a few years and must now pay the penalty.
The issue will be what the league will do, if anything, about signing bonus that was not paid out yet for Hernandez. Had they actually paid him the money already, I agree that the league would likely say tough noogies. However, since they spaced out his bonuses, I am not sure if they will allow them any cap relief for things that were set to be future payments.No way does the NFL do something special to help the Pats cap-wise. That would be a total violation of the CBA. Especially since the new CBA actually punishes team when they have too many players get in trouble. The Pats drafted Hernandez despite knowing his character questions, reaped the rewards for a few years and must now pay the penalty.
It stands to reason that Goodell would be supportive of having Hernandez off the Patriots roster and therefore would have worked something out with Kraft if he was willing to cut him quickly.AH has no ability to complain about anything. It is within the an NFL team's rights to cut a player at any time. How that roster maneuver then gets reported and worked out is between the league and the Patriots, not Hernandez. Teams do not have to give any explanation why they release a player. None. There is no such thing as wrongful termination. Hernandez could have saved a bus full of kids from drowning and the Pats could have cut him and he would have had no recourse.Legally, they would be on very shaky grounds. Regardless of whatever happens subsequently, at the time of his release, AH was not guilty of anything. Presumption of innocence is not just a feel-good idea. In any other profession, if he is subsequently exonerated, he could sue for wrongful termination. The Patriots basically released him for reasons unrelated to job performance. (I'm not saying they did the wrong thing. I'm simply saying that from a legal standpoint they have no right to "recoup" any money.) It's fine that they cut him, but the Pats have got to eat the money on this. If they don't, collusion (with Goodell) will be inferred and that's a whole other legal mess.Who knows if Kraft and Goodell had spoken at length about this and there was already an agreement in place for cap relief if the Pats cut him.Cap implications.
http://overthecap.com/patriots-release-aaron-hernandez-some-cap-related-thoughts/
From his first article on the matter, the Patriots would have had MUCH more cap flexibility by waiting for the legal proceedings to play out or for Goodell to suspend him. The outright release limits their options and narrows the cards that they can play to recoup the bonus money already paid.
Throughout his two articles he's basically saying they took a moral stance and that could hurt their cap. I'm not sure it was the right move, either, but the Pats (more than any other team) seem to have a culture of accountability and want to keep that culture in tact.
If Kraft went to Goodell and said the Pats could not handle the P.R. hit in continuing to roster Hernandez until things played out more, Goodell could have told Kraft it was ok to release him and the league figure out how to get NE cap relief for the salary cap hit at a later date. I'm not saying that actually happened, but I suggest there was a decent chance there was some discussion about how to go about it.
He's one of three people who likely did kill someone and there's enough circumstantial evidence to convict him if no one else is ID'ed as the killer.My opinion with absolutely no proof: I think they have evidence he tampered/destroyed evidence. That makes him a P2 to my knowledge.
I doubt he actually killed someone though. I think he is protecting someone from his childhood and his loyalty is his downfall.
Why, because he used to catch passes from Tom Brady? Someone pulled the trigger and he's one of the 3 most likely suspects at this point.My opinion with absolutely no proof: I think they have evidence he tampered/destroyed evidence. That makes him a P2 to my knowledge.
I doubt he actually killed someone though. I think he is protecting someone from his childhood and his loyalty is his downfall.
Why, because he used to catch passes from Tom Brady? Someone pulled the trigger and he's one of the 3 most likely suspects at this point.My opinion with absolutely no proof: I think they have evidence he tampered/destroyed evidence. That makes him a P2 to my knowledge.
I doubt he actually killed someone though. I think he is protecting someone from his childhood and his loyalty is his downfall.
Because he had everything to lose. With all the NFL safeguards, I have to believe he would be conscious of the damages to himself, his family and everyone he loves.Why, because he used to catch passes from Tom Brady? Someone pulled the trigger and he's one of the 3 most likely suspects at this point.My opinion with absolutely no proof: I think they have evidence he tampered/destroyed evidence. That makes him a P2 to my knowledge.
I doubt he actually killed someone though. I think he is protecting someone from his childhood and his loyalty is his downfall.
Anarchy... no where where in any of your recent opinion posts do you come close to factual statements regarding cap implications. You're just saying random things of what they should do, none of which have a legal basis. Please stop.The issue will be what the league will do, if anything, about signing bonus that was not paid out yet for Hernandez. Had they actually paid him the money already, I agree that the league would likely say tough noogies. However, since they spaced out his bonuses, I am not sure if they will allow them any cap relief for things that were set to be future payments.No way does the NFL do something special to help the Pats cap-wise. That would be a total violation of the CBA. Especially since the new CBA actually punishes team when they have too many players get in trouble. The Pats drafted Hernandez despite knowing his character questions, reaped the rewards for a few years and must now pay the penalty.
Also, since most players are never attached to a murder investigation, there's nothing to say the league could not make a determination or request a vote on the matter based on special circumstances.
The rules are pretty straightforward... with only a few exceptions (like medical insurance), a dollar that you pay the player has to hit your salary cap at some point. If it was going to hit the cap for you in the future, then if you release him it hits immediately (or is split over 2 years if a post-June 1 release).The issue will be what the league will do, if anything, about signing bonus that was not paid out yet for Hernandez. Had they actually paid him the money already, I agree that the league would likely say tough noogies. However, since they spaced out his bonuses, I am not sure if they will allow them any cap relief for things that were set to be future payments.No way does the NFL do something special to help the Pats cap-wise. That would be a total violation of the CBA. Especially since the new CBA actually punishes team when they have too many players get in trouble. The Pats drafted Hernandez despite knowing his character questions, reaped the rewards for a few years and must now pay the penalty.
Also, since most players are never attached to a murder investigation, there's nothing to say the league could not make a determination or request a vote on the matter based on special circumstances.
Some guys just don't understand the ramifications of their actions. There has already been 10 dudes suspended for substance abuse already this year. Is it that hard not to smoke dope or take codeine? You'd think not, but some guys do it anyway when millions of dollars are on the line.Because he had everything to lose. With all the NFL safeguards, I have to believe he would be conscious of the damages to himself, his family and everyone he loves.
Again, this is without knowing any of the evidence, just from what we heard in the news.
I don't get the Jets part.Jets and Raiders in the mix, but yes this group is terrible.Frankly, the Patriots could start the season with the worst group of pass catchers in the NFL.
It is applicable if the contract signed by the employer/employee includes a personal conduct clause exempting the employer from payment. Again, at the time of his release, AH was not guilty of anything. This is all that I am attempting to say (and saying very poorly, apparently). If the Patriots had waited for some sort of judgment, I would be in favor of them recouping some of the money tied up in this contract. They chose not to wait (bully for them) and now they have to eat the money. Period. They would be on very shaky legal grounds if they later attempt to wiggle out of some of their legal (contractual) obligations and responsibilities just because AH is convicted and/or suspended. The timing of this prevents them from ever recovering that money.You're correct about that - presumption of innocence in not just a feel good idea, buts its application is limited to a court of law.Legally, they would be on very shaky grounds. Regardless of whatever happens subsequently, at the time of his release, AH was not guilty of anything. Presumption of innocence is not just a feel-good idea. In any other profession, if he is subsequently exonerated, he could sue for wrongful termination. The Patriots basically released him for reasons unrelated to job performance. (I'm not saying they did the wrong thing. I'm simply saying that from a legal standpoint they have no right to "recoup" any money.) It's fine that they cut him, but the Pats have got to eat the money on this. If they don't, collusion (with Goodell) will be inferred and that's a whole other legal mess.Who knows if Kraft and Goodell had spoken at length about this and there was already an agreement in place for cap relief if the Pats cut him.Cap implications.
http://overthecap.com/patriots-release-aaron-hernandez-some-cap-related-thoughts/
From his first article on the matter, the Patriots would have had MUCH more cap flexibility by waiting for the legal proceedings to play out or for Goodell to suspend him. The outright release limits their options and narrows the cards that they can play to recoup the bonus money already paid.
Throughout his two articles he's basically saying they took a moral stance and that could hurt their cap. I'm not sure it was the right move, either, but the Pats (more than any other team) seem to have a culture of accountability and want to keep that culture in tact.
It has no application in the workplace.
Wrongful termination is not an option here - or in most cases where someone is terminated.
Shark move is to get Vereen...Shark move is to grab Ballard two weeks ago....
Shark move is to get Vereen...Shark move is to grab Ballard two weeks ago....
Didn't read a word you wrote but I love your avatar.It is applicable if the contract signed by the employer/employee includes a personal conduct clause exempting the employer from payment. Again, at the time of his release, AH was not guilty of anything. This is all that I am attempting to say (and saying very poorly, apparently). If the Patriots had waited for some sort of judgment, I would be in favor of them recouping some of the money tied up in this contract. They chose not to wait (bully for them) and now they have to eat the money. Period. They would be on very shaky legal grounds if they later attempt to wiggle out of some of their legal (contractual) obligations and responsibilities just because AH is convicted and/or suspended. The timing of this prevents them from ever recovering that money.You're correct about that - presumption of innocence in not just a feel good idea, buts its application is limited to a court of law.Legally, they would be on very shaky grounds. Regardless of whatever happens subsequently, at the time of his release, AH was not guilty of anything. Presumption of innocence is not just a feel-good idea. In any other profession, if he is subsequently exonerated, he could sue for wrongful termination. The Patriots basically released him for reasons unrelated to job performance. (I'm not saying they did the wrong thing. I'm simply saying that from a legal standpoint they have no right to "recoup" any money.) It's fine that they cut him, but the Pats have got to eat the money on this. If they don't, collusion (with Goodell) will be inferred and that's a whole other legal mess.Who knows if Kraft and Goodell had spoken at length about this and there was already an agreement in place for cap relief if the Pats cut him.Cap implications.
http://overthecap.com/patriots-release-aaron-hernandez-some-cap-related-thoughts/
From his first article on the matter, the Patriots would have had MUCH more cap flexibility by waiting for the legal proceedings to play out or for Goodell to suspend him. The outright release limits their options and narrows the cards that they can play to recoup the bonus money already paid.
Throughout his two articles he's basically saying they took a moral stance and that could hurt their cap. I'm not sure it was the right move, either, but the Pats (more than any other team) seem to have a culture of accountability and want to keep that culture in tact.
It has no application in the workplace.
Wrongful termination is not an option here - or in most cases where someone is terminated.
X 3Shark move is to get Vereen...Shark move is to grab Ballard two weeks ago....![]()
I still don't get this. Vereen takes over for Woodhead. I don't see him running the football more, and I don't see him becoming a WR. What am I missing? He's still a 75-100 carry back with 40-50 receptions.X 3Shark move is to get Vereen...Shark move is to grab Ballard two weeks ago....![]()
Unless I'm mistaken he's the highest profile active offensive player to be charged with a serious crime. For the FF community the the biggest criminal case I can remember.This is one of the craziest offseason stories that I can remember. Also crazy that it happened to a high profile player and not some random scrub.
I feel no sympathy for this guy. Sounds like a real idiot and a scumbag. You're sitting on a 40 million dollar contract and you can't stay out of trouble?
![]()
I don't think Goodell has any authority to do any such thing. Why should the Patriots get any benefit here when they drafted the guy knowing he had character issues? They only released him when it was clear he would no longer be an asset.Regardless of what the "supposed" cap hit is supposed to be, I doubt it plays out like that. New England has a tight window to win in with Brady. As much as they may want to do the right thing, NFL teams main goals are trying to win.
Without any evidence at all, I am stating that Roger Goodell and the Patriots have a gentleman's agreement to handle this as if he is released AFTER the conviction.
Rae Carruth disagreesUnless I'm mistaken he's the highest profile active offensive player to be charged with a serious crime. For the FF community the the biggest criminal case I can remember.This is one of the craziest offseason stories that I can remember. Also crazy that it happened to a high profile player and not some random scrub.
I feel no sympathy for this guy. Sounds like a real idiot and a scumbag. You're sitting on a 40 million dollar contract and you can't stay out of trouble?
![]()
Edit: Stay out of trouble? How about just not shooting people?
It's in the best interests of the NFL for him to be released so I think Goodell would be within his rights as commish to work out something that benefits the league.I don't think Goodell has any authority to do any such thing. Why should the Patriots get any benefit here when they drafted the guy knowing he had character issues? They only released him when it was clear he would no longer be an asset.Regardless of what the "supposed" cap hit is supposed to be, I doubt it plays out like that. New England has a tight window to win in with Brady. As much as they may want to do the right thing, NFL teams main goals are trying to win.
Without any evidence at all, I am stating that Roger Goodell and the Patriots have a gentleman's agreement to handle this as if he is released AFTER the conviction.
Like I said in another thread, it was reported early on that the Pats neglected to include a standard clause that allows teams to recover money in circumstances like this. If that's true, then it may not have even mattered when they released him.
Not a chance. The CBA is the CBA and the rules are the rules. The cap is the most important number for a franchise, you don't just allow modifications to it for random teams.Regardless of what the "supposed" cap hit is supposed to be, I doubt it plays out like that. New England has a tight window to win in with Brady. As much as they may want to do the right thing, NFL teams main goals are trying to win.
Without any evidence at all, I am stating that Roger Goodell and the Patriots have a gentleman's agreement to handle this as if he is released AFTER the conviction.