What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Aaron Hernandez (1 Viewer)

Neofight

Footballguy
Looking at the game between SD and NE this weekend the match up that most interests me is Tom Brady vs. the SD pass defense, and the same thing on the other side; Rivers - and his depleted WR core - against a susceptible NE pass defense. San Diego's offensive and defensive numbers have been examined in a few threads in the pool previously, but to me it is their 1st overall pass defense that is the most suspect. They just haven’t faced much quality competition to say that their defense is truly good against the pass. The best QB they’ve faced is a rookie who beat the secondary for a deep TD to another rookie playing in his first NFL game. This is not to say that their secondary is bad at all; Cason is solid and Jammer is decent. The safeties aren’t horrible. But they are very vulnerable in the middle of the defense, particularly against the pass. Here are the numbers for opposing TE’s this season:

Week Name Rec Yds TD LG1 T. Moeaki 3 21 1 162 M. Lewis 5 70 0 263 J. Carlson 5 61 1 374 J. Dray 1 24 0 245 Z. Miller 6 62 1 186 B. Bajema 3 34 0 18Avg 3.33 40 .5 20Enter Aaron Hernandez. This guy presents a match up nightmare for any defense, particularly one that has a soft belly in pass coverage. What is notable about Hernandez through his first 5 games is how in synch he has been with Brady and how much he is used in the middle of the field, both between the 20’s and on intermediate routes in the heart of the opposing defense. Since a modest 1 catch (on 2 targets) to start the season he has caught 21 balls (on 24 targets), for a total of 22 catches total on 26 targets (with two drops last week in overtime*). He has 5 catches of over 20 yards and 2 of 40 yards (leading TE’s) or more. His YPG average ranks behind only Gates and Miller. The only thing he has not done is get in the end zone; that will change this week as the Patriots call his number early and often against Kevin Burnett and Stephen Cooper.Of the numbers in the chart above, Moeaki, Carlson and Miller lead their respective teams in receiving yards for the game. Lewis was second behind Sims-Walker, while Dray had his only reception of the season and Bajema (who averaged 3 receptions his first five years in the NFL) had over half his yards on the season in that one game. Even bad/inexperienced TE’s have career days against this D.

On the flip side you have a young but talented Patriot defense that has taken its lumps this season. I personally think Rivers will get his this weekend against the Pats secondary, but that he won’t be able light it up like he would with his full complement of healthy starters.

In the end I think it will be a shootout and the Patriots will win something like 31-27. Most of those TD’s should come through the air and Hernandez will have at least one of them. Gronkowski might get one if they are down inside the 20, but I wouldn’t be surprised to see Hernandez put up numbers along the lines of 7 for 120 and 2 touches.

The New England two TE set against the largely untested Chargers pass D is a perfect storm. Things could get frenetic quickly in this game and then slow down a bit as attempts are made to take time off of the clock. Look for a TE lovefest early though. Gronkowski could be a sneaky play here if you have buy week or injury issues.

In summary:

• The San Diego pass defense is largely untested and somewhat over-hyped

• The LB’s don’t cover well

• 3 of the 5 passing TD’s given up by the Chargers D have gone to the TE position

• Aaron Hernandez is as indefensible as a first year TE can be

• Tom Brady is a Golden God (with nice hair)

• Philip Rivers is a Bronze God (bad hair)

• San Diego is still below .500

* Hernandez is anxious to make up for those two drops at the end of the last game

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Great, and I was ready to just plug Gates in if he's active...hmmmm.Good write-up.
Wow, interesting choice. Gates is near impossible to sit if he is healthy, but if he looks gimpy in warm ups maybe. If you can start Hernandez in the flex, definitely.
 
The only thing that makes me hesitant here is that Hernandez dropped not one, but a second pass that could have cost the patriots their game against the ravens last week. He dropped the first one, ok fine, rookie mistake. But, they made it a point to go to him again to give him another shot, and he dropped it again. Not saying it's going to be a factor in the future. However, Brady may look elsewhere for time being.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Excellent analysis. Am struggling with a Hernandez vs. Z Miller decision. I see Brady throwing for about twice as much as Campbell, but Brady's also got about twice as many options to throw to. Tough one.

 
Jersey Jammer said:
Excellent analysis. Am struggling with a Hernandez vs. Z Miller decision. I see Brady throwing for about twice as much as Campbell, but Brady's also got about twice as many options to throw to. Tough one.
I have the same decision to make. Im going with Hernandez, partly because some of the points the OP made and partly because I'm scared to start anyone in Oakland's passing game as long as Gradkowski isn't starting.
 
Fantaholic said:
The only thing that makes me hesitant here is that Hernandez dropped not one, but a second pass that could have cost the patriots their game against the ravens last week. He dropped the first one, ok fine, rookie mistake. But, they made it a point to go to him again to give him another shot, and he dropped it again. Not saying it's going to be a factor in the future. However, Brady may look elsewhere for time being.
http://patsblog.projo.com/2010/10/patriots-not-dw.html
Patriots not dwelling on Hernandez drops1:45 PM Tue, Oct 19, 2010 | Permalink

By Brian MacPherson Email this author | Email this entry

Aaron Hernandez had two potentially key drops in overtime on Sunday against Baltimore, two drops on two first-down passes that eventually lead to two punts. The Patriots didn't drive for their game-winning field goal until their third possession.

But Hernandez, who caught four passes for 61 yards in regulation and took an end-around for an 18-yard gain, still has the confidence of the coaching staff.

"He's come in and done some really good things," Patriots play-caller Bill O'Brien said. "He's got a long way to go, just like any rookie. There's things we're trying to get him to improve on every week, whether it's in the running game or in the passing game. But he's obviously come in and, to this point, done pretty well for a rookie. It's what we thought when we drafted him. We thought we were getting an athletic guy that could run and had some toughness. He's got to continue to focus on the game, focus on the game plan, and he'll get better every week."
 
I've got AHernandez and AGates as well but going with AH - he's only getting better each week.

AG is certainly awesome but I can't take the chance that he's sitting on the sidelines.

 
Excellent write up, I am drinking your kool-aid. :rolleyes: This is the only thing I disagree with :

• Tom Brady is a Golden God (with nice hair)
Bieber wants his hair back!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Outstanding write up, Neo. I have the option to start either Hernandez on the road in SD or Tony Gonzalez at home v. the Bengals. Tony G. is 9th in TE scoring in my PPR league, but he is 4th in red zone scoring.

Tony G. is a good option as Matt Ryan looks for him around the endzone - He has 3 ytd td's , with 2 last week on just 3 catches. HEck, Ryan looks to connect with Tony G. almost twice as much as Brady does with Hernandez. Tony G. has 44 targets to Hernandez's 26. But the reception percentage is much higer in Hernandez favor, with Tony G. only catching 27 and Hernandez catching 22. Hernandez produces more yards on just a few less receptions (301 to 265), the only draw back is that he has not produced TD's.

Your analysis on the SD pass defense is compelling reason for Hernandez owners to give him the nod this weekend as he has a great opporutnity to reach the endzone.

Thanks for the contribution.

 
nice write-up. I was debating between starting Hernandez or Gaffney (TE counts as WR in my league). You've convinced me to go with Hernandez.

 
nice write-up. I was debating between starting Hernandez or Gaffney (TE counts as WR in my league). You've convinced me to go with Hernandez.
I have the same issue. I need to star 2 out of Hernandez, Gaffney and Celek. Gaffney gets a ton of targets and with Jackson out and Kolb in, Celek could have a huge day
 
I've got AHernandez and AGates as well but going with AH - he's only getting better each week.AG is certainly awesome but I can't take the chance that he's sitting on the sidelines.
In the same boat, but as of now, Miller is still in my line-up!OP - good stuff!
 
I have had Hernandez in all week over Gonzo, but have had my finger on the bench button since last night. I really don't like the stat line of 19 yards and 2 TDS from gonzo last week. I am not one to count on TDs for total production. I usually go to yardage and whatever TDS come is just bonus. That would mean I should start Hernandez, but he so far has zero percent chance of a TD based on 5 games.

still waffling back and forth but I would say your writeup has made me feel better with keeping my initial gut feeling in there with Hernandez

 
i have VD and hernandez. struggling to make a decision.
Hope that clears up soon.;)VD vs Carolina's D... I dunno. That is definitely a tough decision. You know that VD is target #1 (despite Crabtree's emergence) but Carolina's pass D is no slouch. My gut says to roll with Hernandez given his matchup, but Brady does have a bunch more viable receivers than Smith does.The good part about it is that there is no bad answer, at least pregame.
 
You convinced me to bench Z.Miller for A.Hernandez.
After a good sleep I'm thinking my decision here is based on a classic case of "over-analyzing". Zach Miller has been the better performing TE all year.With that said, I'm still starting Hernandez. :confused:
 
You convinced me to bench Z.Miller for A.Hernandez.
After a good sleep I'm thinking my decision here is based on a classic case of "over-analyzing". Zach Miller has been the better performing TE all year.With that said, I'm still starting Hernandez. :thumbup:
Campbell is starting at QB, which has made it much easier to had Hernandez to my starting line-up than Z. Miller. Campbell is absolutely horrible!
 
I am not following the logic. This kid is getting about 5 - 6 targets a game for a team that is spreading the ball to everybody. He is a good option for someone who does not have a better TE, but I am not starting him over Gonzo, Witten, or Gates.

 
You convinced me to bench Z.Miller for A.Hernandez.
After a good sleep I'm thinking my decision here is based on a classic case of "over-analyzing". Zach Miller has been the better performing TE all year.With that said, I'm still starting Hernandez. :mellow:
Campbell is starting at QB, which has made it much easier to had Hernandez to my starting line-up than Z. Miller. Campbell is absolutely horrible!
You can spin the stats anyway you want. Here's one:Jason Campbell hit Zach Miller for 5 rec, 48 yds, 1 td in week 5...... vs San Diego.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You convinced me to bench Z.Miller for A.Hernandez.
After a good sleep I'm thinking my decision here is based on a classic case of "over-analyzing". Zach Miller has been the better performing TE all year.With that said, I'm still starting Hernandez. :mellow:
Campbell is starting at QB, which has made it much easier to had Hernandez to my starting line-up than Z. Miller. Campbell is absolutely horrible!
You can spin the stats anyway you want. Here's one:Jason Campbell hit Zach Miller for 5 rec, 48 yds, 1 td in week 5...... vs San Diego.
And who are the Pats playing today? San Diego :-)
 
3.33 40 .5 2: Wow, those are awful numbers vs TE's
Don't forget to factor in Dray's only career reception and Bajema's 3 matching his yearly average to date. The average isn't what we should be looking at here, I just threw it into excel for the heck of it. What we should be looking at is the match ups, because I'm fairly certain that is what Belichick is doing.This is a very bad match up for San Diego, for all of the reasons mentioned.
 
I am not following the logic. This kid is getting about 5 - 6 targets a game for a team that is spreading the ball to everybody. He is a good option for someone who does not have a better TE, but I am not starting him over Gonzo, Witten, or Gates.
It's a question of game planning the match ups. San Diego has the number 1 pass D (I think this is skewed based on playing mostly inferior QB's and offenses to date). Their DB's are good (I think Cason can be a stud in time), their safties OK, and their LB's just not good at defending the pass. I think given this, Brady's increasing comfort with Hernandez (despite those OT drops, which I think will be motivation for Hernandez) and the two TE set New England is running more and more of, well...Start him over Gates? Not if Gates is truly good to go. Over Gonzalez? Maybe. Over Witten? Yes, given his ups and downs and going against the Giants D.
 
I am drinking the koolaid. I lost Dallas Clark and have been holding Hernandez since week 2. Hopefully he blossoms today.

 
Looks like he did ok....in my case, starting him would have helped me, in some of the other cases it would have been a mistake. Oh well.

 
Hernandez had a ton of looks again today. Patriots didn't have a big offensive game because of Charger turnovers and a short field. Hernandez does most of his damage when he gets out in space, not in short yardage situations. I think he is due for a big game with multiple TDs very soon.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Gronkowski gets a TD
It looks like Gronkowski's going to stay the primary target in most of their goalline packages inside the 10. Hernandez looks like he's going to post good reception and yardage numbers the rest of the year, but if people are looking for TDs, I think you're only going to really see him get looks from 15-20 yards out in terms of the end zone.
 
Oof... mea culpa, fellas. I will check out the responses since the game took place and take my rightful lumps. I stand by my analysis but did not expect the Pats to line up Hernandez as much as they did to the outside. It seems they had him out wide and covered by a CB more often than running up the middle, where the San Diego D has been beaten consistently this year. Strange, but I am going to watch the game on NFL Replay to see if I can see what they were seeing. During the first viewing I have to admit I did not. Those quick hits to the sideline with a corner on Hernandez don't take advantage of his, well, advantages, for lack of a better term. But what do I know?

I will say, game planning the Chargers D aside, Belichick was too cute by half on the 4th down call at the end of the game. Pats are lucky to squeak this one out. But again, what the hell do I know?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top