I would suggest otherwise. First it has not passed, though you state that it has. Second it does not kick in upon a finding of not guilty, not in any way, shape or form, though you suggest it has. In actuality the accused then becomes the accuser and has to sustain an equally high burden in a wholly separate action which, as a criminal action, would have to pass muster by the Prosecutor who would bring the charge . (Prosecutors rarely turn on crime victims, especially when it may be Prosecutorial error or ineffectiveness which lead to a not guilty verdict) That is not a difference of semantics or interpretation, but a massive difference. Lastly, the attorneys fees are not automatic, but rather still a matter of discretion to the judge, again a massive difference.
If you wanted to state that some Alabama legislators are proposing a law of no real import in changing the law since it only gathers and recodifies two existing laws, but that they are doing it for nefarious purposes, in your opinion, that purpose being to discourage women/victims from coming forward I would have had no issue and would likely have concurred. I might also have marveled at how they think that could rally their base or at a base which could thereby be rallied.
Your incaution took us down a rabbit hole yet again. Had it not been addressed any who read your post may have gone away with a massive misperception taking your inaccuracies as truth. Whether that is intentional or not I cannot say. I do note that I judge things as accident or intentional by whether they forward an agenda. Often folks plead accident. Almost always the accident seems to inure to their benefit or to the benefit of their agenda. That makes me skeptical, very much so.