offdee
Footballguy
I'm moving to the burbs and have a downtown condo that I will be keeping and renting as an investment property. Here's the situation...
- agreed upon rent of $1,375 provides me $65 per month of profit above my break even total
- parking is an additional $200 cost for renter (he will just be taking over my present parking spot I've been using, which I now no longer need)
I have the choice to:
(A) collect the $1,375 per month from renter for rent only and then he pays the other $200 on his own directly to parking company.
OR
(B) Renter pays me $1,575 per month for rent (with parking included) and then I pay parking company the $200 directly (so renter makes one total payment per month to me only). But not sure in this scenario if it now looks like I make $265 per month profit on rent and I get taxed harder?
Wondering if either A or B is more advantageous to me come tax time or if it doesn't matter either way and is all the same in the wash. Thanks guys.
- agreed upon rent of $1,375 provides me $65 per month of profit above my break even total
- parking is an additional $200 cost for renter (he will just be taking over my present parking spot I've been using, which I now no longer need)
I have the choice to:
(A) collect the $1,375 per month from renter for rent only and then he pays the other $200 on his own directly to parking company.
OR
(B) Renter pays me $1,575 per month for rent (with parking included) and then I pay parking company the $200 directly (so renter makes one total payment per month to me only). But not sure in this scenario if it now looks like I make $265 per month profit on rent and I get taxed harder?
Wondering if either A or B is more advantageous to me come tax time or if it doesn't matter either way and is all the same in the wash. Thanks guys.