What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Age of a "Darius" (1 Viewer)

BustedKnuckles

Footballguy
Age of a "Darius"

Not just a "white guy" but a nice guy by all accounts, it would seem the mercurial S.S., Stuart Schwiegert is finally as out of favor with the front office as he has been with some Raider fans.

But the truth of the matter may be an entirely different story.

Rob Ryan's rock-n-roll Raiders have succeeded where Art Shell's regime (funny how Raiders refer to it in the dictatorial negative) had failed, by instilling a sense of unity amongst the "Infernal Machine".

And a machine they are.

Despite score saving tackles Schwiegert finishing the year with 107 tackles, 3rd behind Morrison and Howard, Stu remains a polarizing factor for many in the Raider Nation and with the signing of Donovin Darius it would seem to be a vindication toward one view over the other, but alas, the truth may be something infinitely better.

As a "Machine" the Raiders Defense may look to rely on the inter changeability of its spare parts.

And as any military logistic Officer will tell you, this can be crucial to the long term and overall field effectiveness of a given weapon system.

Simply put, adding Donovin Darius to a roster that already features Bowie, Bing, Stu, Huff, Ward Cooper and Frampton seems redundant.

And in fact, thats exactly what it is.

Look for Oakland to fight back against League corruption and the forces of zombie majority oppression by further blurring the line between Line Backer and Safety.

Oakland has been looking for a great Safety for many years now, through the draft and in Free Agency, but now seems to have settled on a strategy of more is more.

In its studies over the seasons trying to find "The" Safety, Oakland may have come to an epiphany.

Through reading the availability of good, if inexperienced ( hence inexpensive) raw talent, they seem to have determined a Defensive Secondary system that can provide coverage more effectively than Linebackers, while fielding 2 "Strong" Safeties willing an able to read and stuff the run, at the same time maximizing youthful athleticism and diminishing inexperience.

Employing such a system would no doubt be beneficial, but it turn, its inherent down side would be the undue wear and tear on Safeties who dare to step into Linebacker shoes.

But with the relative simplicity of said system, training and fielding replacements from an ample stock pile of "good" players could keep the Machine's productivity high through out the long season.

The obvious benefit, instead of relying on 1 or 2 exceptional athletes to play a majority of downs and hoping they don't get injured or show diminished skills as the year drags on, is also complimented by the amount of "good" rotational talent available for basically the price of 2 "great"players.

Desperate or genius, the reasons for this apparent shift are logical and show a fairly unconventional new twist on Defensive theory.

Something that apparently runs in the Ryan family.

:shrug:

 
I think I might agree with you, but this was painful to read so I have no idea. Why so many new paragraphs? :goodposting:

 
It really won't matter if Terdell Sands can't hold up against the run. They need another toad to provide him with competition and/or breathers. This is the only way they are going to take that next step to being an elite D. This team has many UTs, but Terdell is the only real toad DT. The LBs are not stout enough against the run if the DL cannot hold the line of attack. Against SD, Den, KC, this is a huge hole in this division.

The secondary may or may not be the best in the league, but it won't matter if teams continually just run it up and down the field.

 
corpcow said:
I think I might agree with you, but this was painful to read so I have no idea. Why so many new paragraphs? :popcorn:
I did`nt write it so i have no idea...did`nt really care how it was written either.
 
It really won't matter if Terdell Sands can't hold up against the run. They need another toad to provide him with competition and/or breathers. This is the only way they are going to take that next step to being an elite D. This team has many UTs, but Terdell is the only real toad DT. The LBs are not stout enough against the run if the DL cannot hold the line of attack. Against SD, Den, KC, this is a huge hole in this division.The secondary may or may not be the best in the league, but it won't matter if teams continually just run it up and down the field.
the D gave up 4.0 yds per carry. That number makes them the 11th best team against the rush. The Chargers, Chiefs, and Broncos all gave up more than that per carry. I know it might seem that the Raiders are weak against the run, but that is just not the case. Burgess is susceptible to giving up a big play because he gambles by running around the blockers. One more year of experience for Kirk Morrison, and Thomas Howard along with acquisition of Darius should improve the run D even more. Also it should be mentioned that teams feared the Raiders pass defense. why leave anything to chance when you could run or punt and let the raiders offense back on the field. :confused:
 
BustedKnuckles said:
corpcow said:
I think I might agree with you, but this was painful to read so I have no idea. Why so many new paragraphs? :rolleyes:
I did`nt write it so i have no idea...did`nt really care how it was written either.
Oh, where was it from?? :shrug: :confused:
 
BustedKnuckles said:
corpcow said:
I think I might agree with you, but this was painful to read so I have no idea. Why so many new paragraphs? :thumbup:
I did`nt write it so i have no idea...did`nt really care how it was written either.
Oh, where was it from?? :football: :football:
Google search returns nothing. I'd also be interested to see who wrote this and where it was from. The first paragraph pun is something out of the FFA playbook. Terrible.
 
I think I might agree with you, but this was painful to read so I have no idea. Why so many new paragraphs? :)
I did`nt write it so i have no idea...did`nt really care how it was written either.
Oh, where was it from?? :confused: :lmao:
Google search returns nothing. I'd also be interested to see who wrote this and where it was from. The first paragraph pun is something out of the FFA playbook. Terrible.
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseacti...logID=286981879here ya go

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top