Yes, but it's kinda of a lazy statement. I mean, we're talking about 4 drafts here right? "ALL OF THEM", at least to me, would be a more significant statement if it was more than 4. And at least one of the drafts they went back to back (and possibly in that draft you were one of the guys picking.. similar names).
Actually there were 7. I think 7 out of 7 seven says something about what the High Stakes community feels about the two. You're right though it is a small sample size and as mentioned before it could be 1 out 12 owners opinions that caused the shift but regardless its still 7 out of 7.
I don't think they were ever more than 3 or 4 picks apart. Don't you think it's at all possible that it just so happens in all 4 of those drafts someone who likes Julio more decided to draft a WR before the guy who liked AJ more was up?
Everything you said was true, yes, but I don't really find it all that interesting. Shall we go back and look at the start ups from last year and poke fun at some of the WRs that were taken before others?
Don't see how this is relevant to the topic at all, honestly. Reviewing past drafts is not a great tool for predicting future individual player performance.
The point is as relevant as how much someone paid to participate in a draft. I think it flew over your head anyway.And you are right, there are 7, but I only see a link to 5. Of the 5 drafts I can look at I see 1 pick, 2 pick, 3 pick, 1 pick differences, and in the other one Green bring drafted 1 spot ahead of Jones.